[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Diversity but Not Overall Abundance of Moths and Butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Decreases around Two Arctic Polluters
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Leaf Trichomes in Different Species of Cucurbitaceae on Attachment Ability of the Melon Ladybird Beetle Chnootriba elaterii
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/insects13121121
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Distribution of Three Bumblebee Pathogens from the Czech Republic

by
Alena Votavová
1,*,
Oldřich Trněný
1,
Jana Staveníková
1,
Magdaléna Dybová
1,
Jan Brus
2 and
Olga Komzáková
1
1
Agricultural Research Ltd., Troubsko, Zahradní 1, 664 41 Troubsko, Czech Republic
2
Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 17. Listopadu 50, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(12), 1121; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121121
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 5 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Behavior and Pathology)
Browse Figures
Figure 1
<p>Sampling locations and the ratio of <span class="html-italic">Crithidia bombi</span> infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Sampling locations and the ratio of <span class="html-italic">Apicystis bombi</span> infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Sampling locations and the ratio of <span class="html-italic">Nosema bombi</span> infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Percentage of individual PCR-positive <span class="html-italic">B. terrestris/lucorum</span> specimens individually and simultaneously infected with pathogens the <span class="html-italic">C. bombi</span>, <span class="html-italic">A. bombi</span> and <span class="html-italic">N. bombi,</span> especially for workers and males.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Presence of pathogens in <span class="html-italic">B. terrestris/lucorum</span> in various categories of landscape type independent of caste.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Percentage of individual PCR-positive <span class="html-italic">B. lapidarius</span> specimens individually and simultaneously infected with the pathogens <span class="html-italic">C. bombi</span>, <span class="html-italic">A. bombi</span> and <span class="html-italic">N. bombi</span> for workers.</p> ">
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In recent decades, there has been a significant global decline in pollinators. In addition to the honey bee, it is bumblebees that contribute significantly to the pollination of many wild and farm plants. Many factors, such as habitat loss, climate change, pesticides and pathogens, are contributing to the decline of bumblebee populations. The main parasites of bumblebees include Crithidia bombi, Apicystis bombi and Nosema bombi. In our study, we aimed to obtain the first knowledge of their occurrence in the Czech Republic in the two most abundant bumblebee species (buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris and red-tailed bumblebee Bombus lapidarius). More than half of the captured buff-tailed bumblebee individuals were infected by C. bombi, less than a quarter of N. bombi individuals and the least by A. bombi. Red-tailed bumblebee individuals were infected less frequently. Surprisingly, more individuals were infected with all three parasite species than with only the combination of N. bombi and A. bombi. Parasite infection is also influenced by the environment. More individuals were infected with C. bombi in urban and forested landscapes than in grasslands and agricultural landscapes. In turn, a higher incidence of N. bombi was found around greenhouses where commercially produced bumblebees were used.

Abstract

Bumblebees are significant pollinators for both wild plants and economically important crops. Due to the worldwide decrease in pollinators, it is crucial to monitor the prevalence and distribution of bumblebee pathogens. Field-caught bumblebee workers and males were examined for the presence of three pathogens during the summer months of the years 2015–2020 (Bombus terrestris/lucorum) and 2015–2017 (Bombus lapidarius). The greatest prevalence was in the case of Crithidia bombi, where significantly more workers (57%) of B. terrestris/lucorum were infected than males (41%). Infection was also confirmed in 37% of B. lapidarius workers. The average prevalence was very similar in the case of Nosema bombi in workers (25%) and males (22%) of B. terrestris/lucorum. In the case of B. lapidarius, 17% of the workers were infected. The lowest number of infected individuals was for Apicystis bombi and the prevalence of infection was significantly higher for males (22%) than workers (8%) of B. terrestris/lucorum. Only 3% of workers and 4% of males of B. terrestris/lucorum were simultaneously infected with three types of pathogens, but no worker was infected with only a combination of N. bombi and A. bombi. The greatest prevalence of C. bombi was found in urban or woodland areas.

1. Introduction

Bumblebees are important pollinators of many wild plants and agricultural crops [1,2]. This makes evidence of the decrease or elimination of pollinators in many countries worldwide alarming. In Europe, over 20% of bumblebees are at risk of extinction, and populations are declining in nearly 50% of species [3]. The primary determining causes of their worldwide decline include climate change, habitat loss, pesticides and pathogens [4,5,6]. Apart from viruses, the most common bumblebee pathogens influencing their population dynamics, behaviour and ecology are Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi and Apicystis bombi.
The intestinal trypanosome C. bombi is one of the most common pathogens in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Vertical transmission takes place either via infected nest material or infected nestmates [7,8]. Horizontal transmission presumably takes place via blossoms infected with faeces [9]. C. bombi infections can cause changes in bumblebee behaviour, as well as problems distinguishing between blossoms with nectar and empty flowers, diminishing their ability to forage for food [10]. It can also reduce the survival of bumblebee queens during hibernation [11] and their ability to successfully establish a nest [12]. The microsporidian N. bombi is the second most common bumblebee pathogen. Transmission usually takes place by ingestion of spores from infected food, but the infection can also be transmitted during mating [13]. N. bombi infections negatively influence nest size and the lifespan of queens, workers and drones [14,15,16]. A significant role in the prevalence of this illness is played by climatic conditions and host genotype [17,18,19]. N. bombi is considered to be a significant pathogen in the context of worldwide bumblebee decline, whose prevalence is also influenced by the reported spillovers across host species and between commercial and natural bumblebee populations [20,21]. The sporozoan A. bombi is a neogregarinid pathogen of bumblebees and honeybees. Transmission takes place by ingestion of oocysts, i.e., the oral-faecal route of transmission, just as with the previous pathogens. Sporozoites subsequently develop in the gut and are then deposited in the fat body. Infected queens have a reduced fat body, which also diminishes their ability to survive hibernation [22,23]. Workers are also negatively influenced by fat body reductions, as this is the place where a number of biochemical reactions take place, which are important for immunity and metabolism [24]. Recently it has been considered a serious cause of bumblebee decline in South America, where it was apparently introduced together with commercially bred bumblebees [25].
The prevalence of these three pathogens has already been monitored in various bumblebee species in a number of countries [26,27,28,29,30,31,32], but no data on the incidence of these pathogens in the Czech Republic has been published. Here, we provide an assessment of the health condition of the bumblebee population and findings on the prevalence of pathogens in Bombus terrestris/lucorum and Bombus lapidarius in the Czech Republic.

2. Materials and Methods

The collection of B. terrestris/lucorum species individuals (workers and males) took place between the years 2015–2020, and individuals of B. lapidarius (workers and males) in the years 2015–2017, each time in July and August. Specimens were preserved in 96% ethanol and stored at a temperature of −20 °C.
For testing, we used DNA isolated from the entire internal contents of the abdomen of the studied individuals using the commercial kit DNasy Blood & Tissue Kit® QIAGEN (Hilden, Germany). Parasitic DNA was detected using a PCR diagnostic method with primers amplifying part 18S of rDNA specific for the studied parasites. To detect the C. bombi pathogen, we used primers Crith-F/R (623 bp amlicon) according to Schmid-Hempel & Tognazzo (2010) [33], for the detection of A. bombi we used ApBF1/ApUR2 (258 bp amplicon) according to Meeus et al. (2010) [34] and for the detection of N. bombi we used Nbombi-SSU-Jfl/Jrl (323 bp amplicon) according to Klee et al. (2006) [35]. Reactions were carried out on the final reaction volume of 25 µL and contained 1 µL of template DNA, 12.5 µL 2 × PPP Master Mix (Top-Bio, Vestec, Czech Republic), 1 µL of each of the primers (10 µM) and ultrapure water were added to the final volume of the reaction. Reactions were carried out using the Thermal Cycler TC-512 device (Techne, Duxford Cambrige, UK) under the following conditions: 95 °C 4 min; 28 × (94 °C 20 s; 50 °C 20 s; 68 °C 35 s); 72 °C 5 min.
The PCR reaction included a positive and negative control. For the positive control, we used the DNA of the infected individual from which the product was PCR sequenced using the LIGHTRUN service (GATC Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany), the acquired sequence was then compared using the BLAST algorithm with the sequence of the corresponding pathogen in the public NCBI database, and it was confirmed that the sequence belonged to the given pathogen. Quality control of isolated DNA and results of the PCR reaction were analysed using horizontal electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel with Midori Green® (NIPPON Genetics EUROPE, Düren, Germany). On the Tvrdonice locality, there are greenhouses with commercially produced bumblebees.
Maps of sampling locations were produced using ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2 (Redlands, CA, USA) [36]. Landscape type was determined with the help of the ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2 [36] using the CORINE Land Cover 2018 [37] map based on the geographic coordinates recorded during capture. Individual types were merged into four categories: urban (urban development, areas of urban greenery, sports and recreational spaces, industrial or commercial zones), agricultural landscape (orchards, vineyards, arable land, agricultural areas with natural vegetation), meadowland (meadows, pastures) and woodland (deciduous, coniferous and mixed forest).
The dependency between pathogen infection and caste/landscape type was tested using Pearson’s Chi-square test using R v. 4.2.1.

3. Results

3.1. Bombus terrestris/lucorum

A total of 540 individual specimens of B. terrestris/lucorum were collected from 126 locations (Table S1). Of these, an infection by the pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi or N. bombi was detected in 396 workers and 144 males (Table 1).
Year-on-year, C. bombi infection (Figure 1) was between 49–70% for workers and 29–53% for males (due to the low number of males, the years 2015–2017 were not evaluated). On average (years 2015–2020), C. bombi infections were confirmed in 57% of workers and 41% of males. There is a statistically significant difference between male and worker infection rates (p < 0.001).
A difference between infected males and workers (p < 0.001) was also found for A. bombi infections (years 2015–2020), where 8% of workers and 22% of males were infected on average. Year-on-year, the recorded infection prevalence (Figure 2) was between 3–17% in workers and 9–42% in males (due to the low number of males, the years 2015–2017 were not evaluated).
Infections with the N. bombi pathogen (Figure 3) were confirmed in an average of 25% of workers and 22% of males. Year-on-year, recorded infections were between 9–48% in workers and 21–24% in males (due to the low number of males, the years 2015–2017 were not evaluated). Unlike with C. bombi and A. bombi, in the case of N. bombi, no difference between castes was discovered (p-value 0.32; years 2015–2020). Only in 2018 was the infection rate significantly higher for males than for workers (p < 0.05).
In 13 workers and six males of B. terrestris/lucorum, infection by all three types of pathogens was discovered. For infections by two types of pathogens, the highest incidence was in the CV (C. bombi and N. bombi) group (in 61 workers and in 10 males). Conversely, no joint infection was found in workers in the AV (A. bombi and N. bombi) group (Figure 4).
Landscape type and pathogen infection differ significantly for only C. bombi (p-value 0.013); for A. bombi and N. bombi they are not significantly different, with p-values of 0.67 and 0.27, respectively (Figure 5). Contingency table residuals suggest there are more C. bombi infections in urban and woodland environments in contrast to agricultural and meadowland types.
In 2017, sampling was carried out in the locality of Tvrdonice, which contained greenhouses utilising commercially sold bumblebees. Individuals caught at this location were significantly more likely to be infected with the N. bombi pathogen (p-value 0.008) compared to the other assessed locations. No difference in infection rate was proven for the other pathogens. Even when comparing locations from other years, where over 10 individuals were captured, the incidence of N. bombi at the Tvrdonice location was the highest (Figure S1).

3.2. Bombus lapidarius

A total of 88 individuals of B. lapidarius were collected from 17 locations (Table S2). Of these, 81 were workers, and seven were males (Table 2). In B. lapidarius workers, an average of 38% of individuals were infected with C. bombi, 4% with A. bombi and 12% were N. bombi. The year-on-year prevalence of worker infections was 31–50% for C. bombi, 3–6% for A. bombi and 3–38% for N. bombi. For males, there was only a low number of collected individuals in 2016. Of the seven individuals collected, C. bombi infection was confirmed in three individuals, A. bombi in 1 individual and N. bombi also in one individual.
Joint infection with all three types of pathogens was only recorded in three males. In five workers and one male, joint infection with C. bombi and N. bombi was shown (Figure 6).
We did not plot the presence of pathogens by landscape type due to low to no samplings in most landscape types.

3.3. Comparison of B. terrestris/lucorum and B. lapidarius

A chi-square test confirmed the significantly lower prevalence of C. bombi (p < 0.001) and N. bombi (p-value 0.013) for workers of B. lapidarius in comparison with B. terrestris/lucorum workers.

4. Discussion

Our study is the first to look at the incidence and prevalence of three types of pathogens in B. terrestris/lucorum and B. lapidarius in the territory of the Czech Republic. A total of 132 locations were visited during mapping.
The highest percentage of average infections out of the three monitored pathogens was recorded for C. bombi, in both B. terrestris/lucorum workers (57%) as well as B. lapidarius workers (37%). Earlier findings show that the prevalence of C. bombi changes during the season. While in June, it reaches relatively low values (15%, or 19% for B. lapidarius), in July in B. terrestris, it can rise as high as 78% (or 65% in B. lapidarius). In August, the prevalence then gradually falls to 58% (or 63% in B. lapidarius) [27]. These results also match our findings, which for B. terrestris/lucorum correspond more to the August prevalence. In the case of B. lapidarius, a third of all samples were collected at the start of July, in other words, at the beginning of the culmination of C. bombi prevalence in the bumblebee population. For B. terrestris/lucorum males, the average prevalence of C. bombi was lower (41%) than in workers, which corresponds with the findings of Shykoff and Schmid-Hempel (1991) [26], who explain the difference by the higher likelihood of infection within the nest. While males tend to leave the nest within 4 days of hatching, workers spend much more time in the nest, and the risk of infection is, therefore, higher. Apart from this, workers visit more blossoms over their lifetime, which also increases their risk of infection from infected blossoms [9].
The recorded infections of A. bombi in B. terrestris/lucorum was around 3–42%, with a significantly higher infection rate in males (22%) than in workers (8%). The different prevalence between castes in B. terrestris/lucorum was also observed in the south of Spain [30]. For B. lapidarius workers, 4% of the collected individuals were infected.
A significant role in the prevalence of N. bombi is played by climatic conditions and host genotype [17,18,19]. N. bombi infections in B. terrestris/lucorum fluctuated year-on-year between 9–48%, which is consistent with the observations of Manlik et al. (2017) [17]. Previous studies report a higher prevalence and abundance of N. bombi in males than in workers [26,38,39]. Nevertheless, in our study, the average prevalence of N. bombi did not differ between castes and was conversely very similar in both males (22%) and workers (25%) of B. terrestris/lucorum. A significant difference between castes was only found in 2018, where 9% of workers were infected alongside 21% of males. In B. lapidarius workers, the percentage of infections was between 3–38%, year-on-year. On average, they were less often infected (17%) than workers of B. terrestris/lucorum.
As has been previously mentioned, N. bombi is considered to be a significant pathogen in the context of the worldwide bumblebee decline, whose prevalence is also influenced by the reported spillovers across host species and between commercial and natural bumblebee populations [20,21]. In 2017, we, therefore, collected 37 samples of B. terrestris/lucorum in the Tvrdonice location, the site of greenhouses with commercially produced bumblebees. At this location, we recorded a significantly higher incidence of N. bombi (62%) than at the other locations (25%) that year. Even when comparing 10 locations from subsequent years, where over 10 individuals were captured, the incidence of N. bombi at the Tvrdonice location was the highest. The prevalence of C. bombi also increased; however, the increase was not significant. In the case of A. bombi, the detection was low at that location and did not differ from the other locations. It is interesting that Graystock et al. (2014) [28] in England conversely found a higher prevalence of C. bombi and A. bombi in the vicinity of greenhouses, while detection of N. bombi was very low (less than 1%). They also, however, had a low detection rate of N. bombi at locations far from greenhouses.
Our results also confirm that, in a small percentage of cases, bumblebees can be simultaneously infected with multiple types of pathogens, which is in line with the findings of Graystock et al. (2014) [28]. The highest number of simultaneous infections (15%) was found in B. terrestris/lucorum workers, which is also the case of the CV (C. bombi and N. bombi) combination. The CA (C. bombi and A. bombi) combination then infected 3% of workers and 6% of males. Conversely, the AV (A. bombi and N. bombi) combination was not discovered in any B. terrestris/lucorum workers, nor in any individual specimen of B. lapidarius and was only found in 2 males of B. terrestris/lucorum. What is interesting is that despite no detection of simultaneous infection in the AV group of pathogens, 3% of workers and 4% of males of B. terrestris/lucorum were infected with all three pathogen types (CAV). The likelihood of detecting the simultaneous infection by two pathogens should, however, be many times higher than the likelihood of detecting three pathogens in a single individual. As we know, mixed infections may change the impact of individual pathogens on disease symptoms [40]. For example, Graystock et al. (2015) [23] found that Deformed wing virus infections in bumblebees could mitigate the sub-lethal effect (degreased sugar sensitivity, intermediate lipid:body mass ratio) of A. bombi. Viruses were not included in our study, but the question remains whether or not the CAV combination may perhaps be ultimately less lethal than the AV combination on its own. Nevertheless, this hypothesis requires further research.
Habitat type may have a non-negligible effect on pathogen prevalence. Bee density, differences in the type and number of available flowers or exposure to environmental stressors may be driving factors. A recent study carried out on the honeybee in the Czech Republic found an increased number of individuals infected with Crithidia mellificae in urban landscapes over agricultural ecosystems [41]. In our study, for B. terrestris/lucorum we also found a significantly higher difference in the prevalence of C. bombi in urban landscapes in comparison with meadowlands and field vegetation, which is in line with previous findings [5,42]. A higher population density and environmental stress may be good explanations for the difference. Nevertheless, in our study, we also found a higher prevalence of C. bombi infections in woodland habitats. The individuals in our study were almost exclusively captured on flowers. While it was relatively difficult to find flowering vegetation allowing for specimen capture in forests and towns during the late summer months, collection in field vegetation was also largely carried out in wide clover fields and flowering meadows, which provided sufficient food even late in summer and the number of individuals at these locations tended to be relatively high. Sufficient food may reduce the number of visits made by different individuals to each blossom, which can lead to a reduction in horizontal transmission via infected blossoms and mitigate food scarcity stress, in contrast to the limited food sources in forests and towns, where a larger number of individuals are competing for a single food source. Without a doubt, the factors influencing pathogen prevalence are much more complex and require further research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13121121/s1, Table S1: List of samplings of B. terrestris/lucorum; Figure S1: Prevalence in locations with more samplings than 10; Table S2: List of samplings of B. lapidarius.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V. and O.T.; methodology, A.V., O.T. and O.K.; formal analysis, M.D., A.V. and J.S.; data curation, O.T., A.V. and M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.; writing—review and editing, A.V., O.T., J.S. and M.D.; visualisation, J.S., M.D., A.V. and J.B.; funding acquisition, A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the institutional support MZE-RO1722.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all technician for laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Potts, S.G.; Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.; Ngo, H.T.; Aizen, M.A.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Breeze, T.D.; Dicks, L.V.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Hill, R.; Steele, J.; et al. Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 2016, 540, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Velthuis, H.H.W.; van Doorn, A. A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie 2006, 37, 421–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Nieto, A.; Roberts, S.P.M.; Kemp, J.; Rasmont, P.; Kuhlmann, M.; Criado, M.G.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Bogusch, P.; Dathe, H.H.; De la Rúa, P.; et al. European Red List of Bees; Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014; pp. 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  4. Williams, P.H.; Osborne, J.L. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 2009, 40, 367–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Goulson, D.; Whitehorn, P.; Fowley, M. Influence of urbanisation on the prevalence of protozoan parasites of bumblebees. Ecol. Entomol. 2012, 37, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cameron, S.A.; Sadd, B.M. Global trends in bumble bee health. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Schmid-Hempel, P.; Schmid-Hempel, R. Transmission of a pathogen in Bombus terrestris, with a note on division of labour in social insects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1993, 33, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Otterstatter, M.C.; Thomson, J.D. Contact networks and transmission of an intestinal pathogen in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies. Oecologia 2007, 154, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Durrer, S.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Shared use of flowers leads to horizontal pathogen transmission. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1994, 258, 299–302. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gegear, R.J.; Otterstatter, M.C.; Thomson, J.D. Bumble-bee foragers infected by a gut parasite have an impaired ability to utilize floral information. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2006, 273, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fauser, A.; Sandrock, C.; Neumann, P.; Sadd, B. Neonicotinoids override a parasite exposure impact on hibernation success of a key bumblebee pollinator. Ecol. Entomol. 2017, 42, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Brown, M.J.F.; Schmid-Hempel, R.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Strong context-dependent virulence in a host-parasite system: Reconciling genetic evidence with theory. J. Anim. Ecol. 2003, 72, 994–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rutrecht, S.T.; Brown, M.J.F. Within colony dynamics of Nosema bombi infections: Disease establishment, epidemiology and potential vertical transmission. Apidologie 2008, 39, 504–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Otti, O.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Nosema bombi: A pollinator parasite with detrimental fitness effects. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2007, 96, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Otti, O.; Schmid-Hempel, P. A field experiment on the effect of Nosema bombi in colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Ecol. Entomol. 2008, 33, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Der Steen, J.J. Infection and transmission of Nosema bombi in Bombus terrestris colonies and its effect on hibernation, mating and colony founding. Apidologie 2008, 39, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manlik, O.; Schmid-Hempel, R.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Parasite infection of specific host genotypes relates to changes in prevalence in two natural populations of bumblebees. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 56, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McNeil, D.J.; McCormick, E.; Heimann, A.C.; Kammerer, M.; Douglas, M.R.; Goslee, S.C.; Grozinger, C.M.; Hines, H.M. Bumble bees in landscapes with abundant floral resources have lower pathogen loads. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Manlik, O.; Mundra, S.; Schmid-Hempel, R.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Impact of climate change on parasite infection of an important pollinator depends on host genotypes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Brown, M.J.F. Microsporidia: An emerging threat to bumblebees? Trends Parasitol. 2017, 33, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Colla, S.R.; Otterstatter, M.C.; Gegear, R.J.; Thomson, J.D. Plight of the bumble bee: Pathogen spillover from commercial to wild populations. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 129, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jones, C.M.; Brown, M.J.F.; Ings, T. Parasites and genetic diversity in an invasive bumblebee. J. Anim. Ecol. 2014, 83, 1428–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Graystock, P.; Meeus, I.; Smagghe, G.; Goulson, D.; Hughes, W.O.H. The effects of single and mixed infections of Apicystis bombi and deformed wing virus in Bombus terrestris. Parasitology 2015, 143, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arese, E.L.; Soulages, J.L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Aizen, M.A.; Smith-Ramírez, C.; Morales, C.L.; Vieli, L.; Sáez, A.; Barahona-Segovia, R.M.; Arbetman, M.P.; Montalva, J.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Inouye, D.W.; et al. Coordinated species importation policies are needed to reduce serious invasions globally: The case of alien bumblebees in South America. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 56, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shykoff, J.A.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Incidence and effects of four parasites in natural populations of bumble bees in Switzerland. Apidologie 1991, 22, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Popp, M.; Erler, S.; Lattorff, H.M. Seasonal variability of prevalence and occurrence of multiple infections shape the population structure of Crithidia bombi, an intestinal parasite of bumblebees (Bombus spp.). MicrobiologyOpen 2012, 4, 362–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Graystock, P.; Goulson, D.; Hughes, W.O. The relationship between managed bees and the prevalence of parasites in bumblebees. PeerJ 2014, 2, e522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gallot-Lavallée, M.; Schmid-Hempel, R.; Vandame, R.; Vergara, C.H.; Schmid-Hempel, P. Large scale patterns of abundance and distribution of parasites in Mexican bumblebees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016, 133, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jabal-Uriel, C.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Ornosa, C.; Higes, M.; Berriatua, E.; de la Rua, P. Short communication: First data on the prevalence and distribution of pathogens in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris and Bombus pascuorum) from Spain. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 15, e05SC01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Parsche, S.; Lattorff, M.H.G. The relative contributions of host density and genetic diversity on prevalence of a multi-host parasite in bumblebees. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 125, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ocepek, M.P.; Toplak, I.; Zajc, U.; Bevk, D. The pathogens spillover and incidence correlation in bumblebees and honeybees in Slovenia. Pathogens 2021, 10, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schmid-Hempel, R.; Tognazzo, M. Molecular divergence defines two distinct lineages of Crithidia bombi (Trypanosomatidae), parasites of bumblebees. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2010, 57, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Meeus, I.; de Graaf, D.C.; Jans, K.; Smagghe, G. Multiplex PCR detection of slowly-evolving trypanosomatids and neogregarines in bumblebees using broad-range primers. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Klee, J.; Tay, W.T.; Paxton, R.J. Specific and sensitive detection of Nosema bombi (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) in bumble bees (Bombus spp.; Hymenoptera: Apidae) by PCR of partial rRNA gene sequences. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2006, 91, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. ArcGIS Pro. Available online: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview (accessed on 8 July 2022).
  37. Copernicus. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc2018 (accessed on 24 August 2022).
  38. Gillespie, S. Factors affecting parasite prevalence among wild bumblebees. Ecol. Entomol. 2010, 35, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huth-Schwarz, A.; Settele, J.; Moritz, R.F.; Kraus, F.B. Factors influencing Nosema bombi infections in natural populations of Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2012, 110, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alizon, S.; de Roode, J.C.; Michalakis, Y. Multiple infections and the evolution of virulence. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mráz, P.; Hýbl, M.; Kopecký, M.; Bohatá, A.; Hoštičková, I.; Šipoš, J.; Vočadlová, K.; Čurn, V. Screening of honey bee pathogens in the Czech Republic and their prevalence in various habitats. Insects 2021, 12, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Theodorou, P.; Radzevičiūtė, R.; Settele, J.; Schweiger, O.; Murray, T.; Paxton, R. Pollination services enhanced with urbanization despite increasing pollinator parasitism. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 283, 20160561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 01121 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling locations and the ratio of Crithidia bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Figure 1. Sampling locations and the ratio of Crithidia bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Insects 13 01121 g001
Insects 13 01121 g002 550
Figure 2. Sampling locations and the ratio of Apicystis bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Figure 2. Sampling locations and the ratio of Apicystis bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Insects 13 01121 g002
Insects 13 01121 g003 550
Figure 3. Sampling locations and the ratio of Nosema bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Figure 3. Sampling locations and the ratio of Nosema bombi infection to uninfected bumblebees in the Czech Republic. The circles reflect the number of samples in sampling locations.
Insects 13 01121 g003
Insects 13 01121 g004 550
Figure 4. Percentage of individual PCR-positive B. terrestris/lucorum specimens individually and simultaneously infected with pathogens the C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi, especially for workers and males.
Figure 4. Percentage of individual PCR-positive B. terrestris/lucorum specimens individually and simultaneously infected with pathogens the C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi, especially for workers and males.
Insects 13 01121 g004
Insects 13 01121 g005 550
Figure 5. Presence of pathogens in B. terrestris/lucorum in various categories of landscape type independent of caste.
Figure 5. Presence of pathogens in B. terrestris/lucorum in various categories of landscape type independent of caste.
Insects 13 01121 g005
Insects 13 01121 g006 550
Figure 6. Percentage of individual PCR-positive B. lapidarius specimens individually and simultaneously infected with the pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi for workers.
Figure 6. Percentage of individual PCR-positive B. lapidarius specimens individually and simultaneously infected with the pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi for workers.
Insects 13 01121 g006
Table
Table 1. Results of laboratory test, obtained by PCR detection for species B. terrestris/lucorum for pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi. W workers, M males, * low number of samples; - not evaluated.
Table 1. Results of laboratory test, obtained by PCR detection for species B. terrestris/lucorum for pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi. W workers, M males, * low number of samples; - not evaluated.
Bombus terrestris/lucorum Crithidia bombiApicystis bombiNosema bombi
YearNumber of LocationsWorkersMalesW%M%W%M%W%M%
201526103772701*880*26250*
2016664541644*11170*23362*
2017361230491*231*29480*
201818683835512053913164269821
20193261553151162923597111120
20204139372359154125514821924
Mean 57 41 8 22 25 22
Total126396144232 56 34 27 99 31
Table
Table 2. Results of laboratory tests, obtained by PCR detection on the species B. terrestris/lucorum for pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi. W workers, M males. * low number of samples; - not evaluated.
Table 2. Results of laboratory tests, obtained by PCR detection on the species B. terrestris/lucorum for pathogens C. bombi, A. bombi and N. bombi. W workers, M males. * low number of samples; - not evaluated.
Bombus lapidarius Crithidia bombiApicystis bombiNosema bombi
YearNumber of LocationsWorkersMalesW%M%W%M%W%M%
2015103401750--13--13--
201663179293*131*3101*
20172160531--16--638--
Mean 37 4 17
Total1781731 3 3 1 10 1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Votavová, A.; Trněný, O.; Staveníková, J.; Dybová, M.; Brus, J.; Komzáková, O. Prevalence and Distribution of Three Bumblebee Pathogens from the Czech Republic. Insects 2022, 13, 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121121

AMA Style

Votavová A, Trněný O, Staveníková J, Dybová M, Brus J, Komzáková O. Prevalence and Distribution of Three Bumblebee Pathogens from the Czech Republic. Insects. 2022; 13(12):1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Votavová, Alena, Oldřich Trněný, Jana Staveníková, Magdaléna Dybová, Jan Brus, and Olga Komzáková. 2022. "Prevalence and Distribution of Three Bumblebee Pathogens from the Czech Republic" Insects 13, no. 12: 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121121

APA Style

Votavová, A., Trněný, O., Staveníková, J., Dybová, M., Brus, J., & Komzáková, O. (2022). Prevalence and Distribution of Three Bumblebee Pathogens from the Czech Republic. Insects, 13(12), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop