Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures
<p>Interaction between wind and fire.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Point of ignition and the cross-section of the empirical ridge shape.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Empirical fires which burn across the lee slope. (<b>a</b>) No wind, right-side ignition; (<b>b</b>) 4 m s<sup>−1</sup> wind, right side ignition; (<b>c</b>) 4 m s<sup>−l</sup> wind, left side ignition; (<b>d</b>) 4 m s<sup>−l</sup> wind, central ignition [<a href="#B30-fire-04-00027" class="html-bibr">30</a>].</p> "> Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) A flank fire produced by alteration in the direction of wind. (<b>b</b>) Different sides of the fire in terms of head, rear and flank.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>A summary of heat transfer processes in the heating up a wall.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Experimental equipment. (<b>b</b>) wind flow [<a href="#B60-fire-04-00027" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B61-fire-04-00027" class="html-bibr">61</a>].</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Smoke distribution in cross-wind direction for different wind speed [<a href="#B83-fire-04-00027" class="html-bibr">83</a>] ((<b>a</b>) v = 0, (<b>b</b>) v = 1 (m/s), (<b>c</b>) v = 2.5 (m/s)).</p> "> Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mechanism of fire spread in a building by the external windows and stairs, (<b>b</b>) The Coanda effect.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>Schematic view of structure in the experimental analysis.</p> "> Figure 10
<p>Installation of wind-control devices (WCD). (<b>a</b>) Small WCD located in window, (<b>b</b>) Large WCD located in window, (<b>c</b>) Water spray into window.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Fire–Wind Interaction
2.1. Fanning Effects of Wind
2.2. Effects of Wind Direction and Slope Angle on Fire
2.3. Fire Modelling and Wind Interaction
3. Fire–Wind Interaction and Structures
3.1. Effect of Wind Transition from Wildland to WUI
3.2. Effect of Wind–Fire Interaction on Urban Buildings
3.2.1. Fire–Wind Interaction Effects on Low-Rise Building
3.2.2. Fire–Wind Interaction Effects on High-Rise Buildings
- In all structural tests, the WCDs decreased the temperatures in the stairwell and the corridor.
- The streams of water suppressed the fires, leading to decreases of over 50% in the stairwell and corridor temperature.
- When positive pressure ventilation fans are used along with WCDs, fans can maintain clear and reasonable conditions in the stairwell. The main reason for the successful usage of positive pressure ventilation fans was to reduce the wind-driven fire conditions through door control or other techniques.
4. Conclusions and Future Challenges
- The behaviours of airflow are of primary importance in determining fire progression on the rate of thermal release associated with buildings.
- At a WUI, both structural and wildland fuels are combined. Simulations of this regime must consider the coupling effects between structural and wildland fuels.
- Ventilation operation mitigates the hazards of wind-driven fires. The effectiveness of this operation was found to decline with increasing wind speed.
- Using wind-control devices (WCDs) is suggested to maintain safe conditions for firefighters. In all tests, the use of WCDs decreased observed temperatures.
- As positive pressure ventilation is applied along with WCDs, fans are able to maintain acceptable conditions (as the fan was turned on, it takes time for the fire to obtain its rate of peak burning, and the stream of gases was forced away from the entrance).
- Using sprinklers dramatically reduces the thermal fluxes and temperature.
5. Future Directions
- An accurate analysis of fire behaviour in compartments of low and high-rise structures in wind environments are required to find efficient methods to assess compartment fire smoke control and travel.
- The other side of the coupled interaction of wind and fire is the enhancement of the wind downstream of a fire source. Investigation of the impact of fire on wind is not adequately conducted and needs further exploration.
- Although there are some studies on wildland–urban interface fires, little effort has been allocated to serious analysis of the physical aspects of wildland–urban interface fire propagation. In addition, it is hoped that further simulation endeavours might produce better cooperation and communication between fire safety specialists and WUI scientists.
- More research around real size structures is needed to fully comprehend the capability of firefighters to work with the proposed tactics, and to assess the interaction of these tactics with structure ventilation methods (both natural and positive pressure ventilation).
- Further investigation is required to analyse the critical wind velocity at the stairways and doorways of high-rise buildings.
- Improvement of new techniques for smoke exhaust devices including exact impact of external aerodynamic elements on smoke ventilators (considering a wide range of wind speeds and angles) is needed.
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fire and Rescue NSW. Annual Report; Fire and Rescue NSW: Sydney, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Haynes, K.; Handmer, J.; McAneney, J.; Tibbits, A.; Coates, L. Australian bushfire fatalities 1900–2008: Exploring trends in relation to the ‘Prepare, stay and defend or leave early’ policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010, 13, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guardian, T. Unprecedented’ Globally: More than 20% of Australia’s Forests Burnt in Bushfires. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/feb/25/unprecedented-globally-more-than-20-of-australias-forests-burnt-in-bushfires#maincontent (accessed on 24 February 2020).
- Mail, B.D. It was A Line of Fire Coming at Us: South West Firefighters Return Home. Available online: https://www.busseltonmail.com.au/story/6620313/it-was-a-line-of-fire-coming-at-us-firefighters-return-home/ (accessed on 7 February 2020).
- Siness, C. Australia is Promising $2 Billion for the Fires. I Estimate Recovery Will Cost $100 Billion. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/10/perspectives/australia-fires-cost/index.html (accessed on 10 January 2020).
- Hu, L.; Wu, L.; Liu, S. Flame length elongation behavior of medium hydrocarbon pool fires in cross air flow. Fuel 2013, 111, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Liu, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, D. A wind tunnel experimental study on burning rate enhancement behavior of gasoline pool fires by cross air flow. Combust. Flame 2011, 158, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Gao, Z.; Ji, J.; Li, K.; Sun, J. Wind effects on flame projection probability from a compartment with opposing openings. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 91, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eftekharian, E.; Ghodrat, M.; Ong, R.H.; He, Y.; Kwok, K.C.S. CFD Investigation of Cross-Flow Effects on Fire-Wind Enhancement. In Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 10–13 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Welker, J.R.; Sliepcevich, C.M. Bending of wind-blown flames from liquid pools. Fire Technol. 1966, 2, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, W.; Miller, C.H.; Gollner, M.J. Local flame attachment and heat fluxes in wind-driven line fires. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 3253–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Welker, J.R.; Sliepcevich, C.M. Burning rates and heat transfer from wind-blown flames. Fire Technol. 1966, 2, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, J.; Fleck, B.; Kostiuk, L. Effects of transverse air flow on burning rates of rectangular methanol pool fires. Combust. Flame 2006, 146, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Kuang, C.; Zhong, X.; Ren, F.; Zhang, X.; Ding, H. An experimental study on burning rate and flame tilt of optical-thin heptane pool fires in cross flows. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2017, 36, 3089–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghaderi, M.; Ghodrat, M.; Sharples, J. LES Simulation of Wind-Driven Wildfire Interaction with Idealized Structures in the Wildland-Urban Interface. Atmosphere 2020, 12, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oka, Y.; Kurioka, H.; Satoh, H.; Sugawa, O. Modelling of Unconfined Flame Tilt In Cross-Winds. Fire Saf. Sci. 2000, 6, 1101–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weise, D.R.; Biging, G.S. Effects of wind velocity and slope on flame properties. Can. J. For. Res. 1996, 26, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, R.M. An effective wind speed for models of fire spread. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2002, 11, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Liu, N.; Yin, P.; Yuan, X.; Jiang, J. Fire Whirl due to Interaction between Line Fire and Cross Wind. Fire Saf. Sci. 2014, 11, 1420–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshihara, N.; Ito, A.; Torikai, H. Flame characteristics of small-scale pool fires under low gravity environments. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2013, 34, 2599–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L. A review of physics and correlations of pool fire behaviour in wind and future challenges. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 91, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, J.B. An Investigation of the Effect of Controlled Wind on the Rate of Fire Spread. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada, 1969. [Google Scholar]
- Sheshukov, M.A. Effect of the steepness of the slope on the propagation rate of fire. Lesn. Khozyaystvo 1970, 1, 50–54. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wagner, C.E. Effect of slope on fire spread rate. Can. For. Serv. Bimon. Res. Notes 1970, 33, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Weise, D.R.; Biging, G.S. Effects of Wind Velocity and Slope on Fire Behavior. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Boston, MA, USA, 13–17 June 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Linn, R.; Winterkamp, J.; Edminster, C.; Colman, J.J.; Smith, W.S. Coupled influences of topography and wind on wildland fire behaviour. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2007, 16, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharples, J.J. Review of formal methodologies for wind-slope correction of wildfire rate of spread. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weise, D.R.; Biging, G.S. A qualitative comparison of fire spread models incorporating wind and slope effects. For. Sci. 1997, 43, 170–180. [Google Scholar]
- Sharples, J.J.; McRae, R.H.D.; Weber, R.O. Wind characteristics over complex terrain with implications for bushfire risk management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25, 1099–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharples, J.J.; Viegas, D.X.; Rossa, C.G.; Mcrae, R.H.D. Small-Scale Observations of Atypical Fire Spread Caused by the Interaction of Wind, Terrain, and Fire. In Proceedings of the VI International Conference on Forest Fire Research D, 15–18 November 2010, Coimbra, Portugal; Viegas, D.X., Ed.; ADAI: Coimbra, Portugal, 2010; p. 363. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, L.; Zhou, L.; Jia, X.; Li, X. Influence of Wind Direction on Fire Spread on the Exposed XPS insulation Wall. IOP Conf. Series Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 526, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Quill, R.; Sharples, J.J.; Wagenbrenner, N.S.; Sidhu, L.A.; Forthofer, J.M. Modeling Wind Direction Distributions Using a Diagnostic Model in the Context of Probabilistic Fire Spread Prediction. Front. Mech. Eng. 2019, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Węgrzyński, W.; Lipecki, T.; Krajewski, G. Wind and Fire Coupled Modelling—Part II: Good Practice Guidelines. Fire Technol. 2018, 54, 1443–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieringa, J. Updating the Davenport roughness classification. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1992, 41, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mell, W.E.; Manzello, S.L.; Maranghides, A.; Butry, D.; Rehm, R.G. The wildland-urban interface fire problem-current approaches and research needs. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehm, R.G.; Mell, W. (Ruddy) A simple model for wind effects of burning structures and topography on wildland–urban interface surface-fire propagation. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murphy, K.; Rich, T.; Sexton, T. An Assessment of Fuel Treatment Effects on Fire Behavior, Suppression Effectiveness, Structure Ignition on the Angora Fire. In USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Report R5-TP-025; United State Department of Agriculture: Vallejo, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Rehm, R.G. The effects of winds from burning structures on ground-fire propagation at the wildland–urban interface. Combust. Theory Model. 2008, 12, 477–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, H.; Chulahwat, A. Unraveling the Complexity of Wildland Urban Interface Fires. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maluk, C.; Woodrowc, M.; Toreroa, J.L. The potential of integrating fire safety in modern building design. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 88, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Kiviniemi, A.; Jones, S.W. A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Saf. Sci. 2017, 97, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Song, W.; Lv, W. Modeling pedestrian evacuation with guiders based on a multi-grid model. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanachawengsakul, T.; Mishima, N.; Fuchikami, T. A Simulation Study on Fire Evacuation Routes in Primary Stage for a Historic Canal Residential Area. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 216, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mikkola, E. Forest fire impacts on buildings. For. Fires 2008 2008, 119, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Noble, I.R.; Bary, G.A.V.; Gill, A.M. McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Aust. J. Ecol. 1980, 5, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, P.; Goodrick, S.L.; Hussaini, M.Y.; Linn, R.R. Coherent vortical structures in numerical simulations of buoyant plumes from wildland fires. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2005, 14, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coen, J.L. Simulation of the Big Elk Fire using coupled atmosphere-fire modeling. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2005, 14, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramsay, G.C.; McArthur, N.A.; Dowling, V.P. Preliminary results from an examination of house survival in the 16 February 1983 Bushfires in Australia. Fire Mater. 1987, 11, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baalisampang, T.; Abbassi, R.; Garaniya, V.; Khan, F.; Dadashzadeh, M. Fire impact assessment in FLNG processing facilities using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Fire Saf. J. 2017, 92, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGrattan, K.; Klein, B.; Hostikka, S.; Floy, J. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5)-User’s Guide. NIST Spec. Publ. 2009, 1019, 1–186. [Google Scholar]
- McGrattan, K.; Hostikka, S.; Floy, J.; Baum, H.; Rehm, R.; Mell, W.; McDermott, M. Fire Dynamic Simulator (Version 5) Technical Reference Guide. NIST Spec. Publ. 2008, 1008, 1–86. [Google Scholar]
- He, Y.; Kwok, K.C.S.; Douglas, G.; Razali, I.M. Numerical Investigation of Bushfire-Wind Interaction and its Impact on Build-ing Structure. Fire Saf. Sci. 2011, 10, 1449–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, C.; Gerhardt, H.J. Windkrfifte auf Flachen und Wenig Geneigten Dachflfichen. In Proceedings of the Dokumenta-tion zum 2. Kolloquium uber Industriaerodynamik, Aachen, Germany, 12–13 December 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Kramer, C.; Gerhardt, H.J. Wind pressures on roofs of very low and very large industrial buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1991, 38, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, C.; Gerhardt, H.J. Wind effects on heat and smoke control of industrial buildings in case of a fire. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1990, 36, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, N.; Ekholm, M. Variation in Results Due to User Effects in a Simulation with FDS. Fire Technol. 2017, 54, 97–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Available online: https://www.highrisefirefighting.co.uk/wind.html (accessed on 28 February 2020).
- ABCB. Building Code of Australia; Australian Building Codes Board: Canberra, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Onga, R.H.; Patrunob, L.; Yeod, D.; Hee, Y.; Kwok, K.C.S. Numerical simulation of wind-induced mean and peak pressures around a low-rise structure. Eng. Struct. 2020, 214, 110583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.F.; Chen, S.Y.; Chow, W.K. Wind Effects on the Smoke Spread of High-Rise Buildings. In Proceedings of the 2014 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Material Research (ACEM14), Busan, Korea, 24–28 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Šulc, S.; Šmilauer, V.; Wald, F. Coupled Simulation for Fire-Exposed Structures using CFD and Thermo-Mechanical Models. Acta Polytech. CTU Proc. 2017, 13, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Šulc, S.; Šmilauer, V.; Patzák, B.; Cábová, K.; Wald, F. Linked simulation for fire-exposed elements using CFD and ther-mo-mechanical models. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2019, 131, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. In Pitts WM (1991) Wind effects on fires; Franke, J. (Ed.) COST Office Brussels 5: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2017; Volume 17, pp. 83–134. [Google Scholar]
- Barsim, M.M.; Bassily, M.A.; El-Batsh, H.M.; Sherif, M.M. Numerical simulation of an experimental atrium fires in com-bined natural and forced ventilation by CFD. Int. J. Vent. 2020, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Assunta, A.; Nicola, B.; Marilena, M.; Giuseppe, R. Parametric analysis of input data on the CFD fire simulation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1224, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dana, X.; Wen-lei, Z. The Effect of Natural Wind to the Atrium Building Smoke Migration. Phys. Eng. 2011, 11, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Madrzykowski, D.; Walton, W.D. Cook County Administration Building Fire, In 69 West Washington, Chicago, Illinois, 17 October 2003: Heat Release Rate Experiments and FDS Simulations; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Cao, B.; Yang, L. Effects of ventilation state of vertical shaft on fire tilt direction and smoke migration behaviours in a multi-storey building. Indoor Built Environ. 2018, 18, 790–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandola, B.S. Effects of atmospheric wind on flows through natural convection roof vents. Fire Technol. 1990, 26, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchant, E.W. Effect of wind on smoke movement and smoke control systems. Fire Saf. 1984, 7, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandola, B.S. Wind effects on buildings with varying leakage characteristics—wind-tunnel investigation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1978, 3, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hostikka, S.; Mangs, J.; Mikkola, E. Comparison of Two and Three Dimensional Simulations of Fires at Wildland Urban Inter-face. In Proceedings of the 9th IAFSS Symposium, Karlsruhe, Germany, 21–26 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
- McDermott, R.; McGrattan, K.; Hostikkal, S. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): Technical Reference Guide. NIST SP 1018-5. NIST Spec. Publ. 2007, 1018, 1–186. [Google Scholar]
- Akovchuk, R.Y.; Kuzyk, A.; Skorobagatko, T.; Yemelyanenko, S.; Borys, O.; Obrostan, O. Computer simulation of fire test parameters facad heat insulating system for spread in fire spread in fire dynamics simulator (FDS). Ser. Geol. Tech. Sci. 2020, 4, 35–44. [Google Scholar]
- Mirahadi, F.; Mc Cabe, B.; Shahi, A. IFC-centric performance-based evaluation of building evacuations using fire dynamics simulation and agent-based modeling. Autom. Constr. 2019, 101, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Than, C.F. Smoke venting by gravity roof ventilators under windy conditions. J. Fire Prot. Eng. 1992, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pettit, T.A.; Washenitz, F.; Cortez, K. Three Firefighters Die in a 10-Story High-Rise Apartment Building–New York. NIOSH Firefighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- NIOSH F2001-33. High-Rise Apartment Fire Claims the Life of One Career Firefighter (Captain) and Injures Another Career Firefighter (Captain)–Texas; NIOSH Firefighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program: Morgantown, WV, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- John, N. Extreme Wind Driven Fireproof Multiple Dwelling Fires; With New York Firefighters (WNYF): New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Kerber, S. Evaluation of the Ability of Fire Dynamic Simulator to Simulate Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Laboratory and Practical Scenarios; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kerber, S.; Walton, W.D. Full Scale Evaluation of Positive Pressure Ventilation in a Firefighter Training Building; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Kerber, S.; Madrzykowski, D.; Stroup, D. Evaluating Positive Pressure Ventilation in Large Structures: High-Rise Pressure Experiments; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, N.; Chow, W.K. Wind Effect on Spread of Fire and Smoke. In Proceedings of the 2012 World Congress on Advances in Civil, Environmental, and Materials Research (ACEM’ 12), Seoul, Korea, 26–30 August 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Jo, J.; Lim, J.; Song, S.; Yeo, M.; Kim, K. Characteristics of pressure distribution and solution to the problems caused by stack effect in high-rise residential buildings. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madrzykowski, D.; Kerber, S.; Kumar, S.; Panindre, P. Wind, fire and high-rises: Firefighters and engineers conduct research to combat a lethal threat. Mag. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 2010, 132, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
- Lambert, B.; Merci, K. Experimental study on the use of positive pressure ventilation for fire service interventions in buildings with staircases. Fire Technol. 2014, 50, 1517–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wener, R.; Panindre, P.; Kumar, S.; Feygina, I.; Smith, E.; Dalton, J.; Seal, U. Assessment of web-based interactive game system methodology for dissemination and diffusion to improve firefighter safety and wellness. Fire Saf. J. 2015, 72, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerber, S.I.; Madrzykowski, D. Fire Fighting Tactics under Wind Driven Fire Conditions: 7-Story Building Experiments. In NIST Technical Note 1629; Building and Fire Research Laboratory: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Panindre, P.; Mousavi, S.; Kumar, S. Positive Pressure Ventilation for fighting wind-driven high-rise fires: Simulation-based analysis and optimization. Fire Saf. J. 2017, 87, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- F99-01, NIOSH. Three Firefighters Die in a 10-Story High-Rise Apartment Building—New York. NIOSH Firefighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1999. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face9901.html (accessed on 8 January 2020).
- Hall, J., Jr. High-Rise Building Fires; National Fire Protection Association: Quincy, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Exp. | Descriptions | Heat Release Rate (MW) | Temperature of Hall Thermocouple Array (°C) | Max Heat Flux (kW/m2) | CO2 (% Volume) from the Lower Living Room Sampling Location |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | There is not any external wind to the building. Once the fire within the building was identified to be fully improved, the fire was suppressed by safety sprinklers located in the building. The outcomes are associated with the time interval of begin suppression and window venting. | 1.5–14 | 300–1200 | 30–90 | 5–18 |
2 | 2 WCD were applied (the outcomes are associated with the time interval of WCD off and WCD on) | 15–2 | 800–350 | 100–20 | 16–11 |
3 | 2 WCD and a tiny water spray were applied (the outcomes are associated with the time interval of Sprinkler on and WCD on) | 20–1.5 | 800–300 | 140–50 | 17–6 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ghodrat, M.; Shakeriaski, F.; Nelson, D.J.; Simeoni, A. Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures. Fire 2021, 4, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4020027
Ghodrat M, Shakeriaski F, Nelson DJ, Simeoni A. Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures. Fire. 2021; 4(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4020027
Chicago/Turabian StyleGhodrat, Maryam, Farshad Shakeriaski, David James Nelson, and Albert Simeoni. 2021. "Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures" Fire 4, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4020027
APA StyleGhodrat, M., Shakeriaski, F., Nelson, D. J., & Simeoni, A. (2021). Existing Improvements in Simulation of Fire–Wind Interaction and Its Effects on Structures. Fire, 4(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4020027