Separation and Extraction of Compound-Fault Signal Based on Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
<p>The model of the NMF algorithm.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Example of Sine-bell window: (<b>a</b>) time-domain waveform; (<b>b</b>) the spectrum.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>The flowchart of the proposed method.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>The simulated signal: (<b>a</b>) time-domain waveform; (<b>b</b>) the envelope spectrum.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Time–frequency distribution of the simulated signal.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Envelope spectra of separated signal: (<b>a</b>) the signal <b><span class="html-italic">s</span><sub>1</sub></b>; (<b>b</b>) the signal <b><span class="html-italic">s</span><sub>2</sub></b>.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>The experimental platform and fault bearing of simulation experiment: (<b>a</b>) experiment platform; (<b>b</b>) fault bearing.</p> "> Figure 8
<p>The signal of compound faults at 1300 rpm: (<b>a</b>) time-domain waveform; (<b>b</b>) the envelope spectrum.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>Time–frequency distribution of the collected signal at 1300 rpm.</p> "> Figure 10
<p>Envelope spectra of separated signals with the proposed method at 1300 rpm: (<b>a</b>) Envelope spectrum of outer-race fault; (<b>b</b>) envelope spectrum of roller fault.</p> "> Figure 11
<p>The signal of compound faults at 900 rpm: (<b>a</b>) time-domain waveform; (<b>b</b>) the envelope spectrum.</p> "> Figure 12
<p>Time–frequency distribution of the collected signal at 900 rpm.</p> "> Figure 13
<p>Envelope spectra of separated signals with the proposed method at 900 rpm: (<b>a</b>) Envelope spectrum of outer-race fault; (<b>b</b>) envelope spectrum of roller fault.</p> "> Figure 14
<p>Envelope spectra of separated signals with the β-divergence method: (<b>a</b>) Envelope spectrum of <span class="html-italic">f</span><sub>1</sub>; (<b>b</b>) envelope spectrums of <span class="html-italic">f</span><sub>2</sub>.</p> "> Figure 15
<p>Envelope spectra of separated signals with the KL-divergence method: (<b>a</b>) Envelope spectrum of <span class="html-italic">f</span><sub>1</sub>; (<b>b</b>) envelope spectrums of <span class="html-italic">f</span><sub>2</sub>.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Principle of Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
3. Basic Principle
3.1. Parameter Selection of Short Time Fourier Transform
3.2. Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
Algorithm 1 Multi-constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization |
Step 1. Initialize non-negative matrices W and H randomly |
Step 2. Calculate the initial value of the objective function according to Equation (9) |
Step 3. Solve and update the matrices W and H alternately and iteratively based on Equation (10) |
Step 4. If the objective function (Equation (9)) converges, the iteration process is stopped, and the matrices W and H are output; otherwise, steps (2) and (3) are performed once again |
3.3. Construction of Parameter WK
4. Signal Separation Method Based on Multi-Constraint NMF
Algorithm 2: Signal Separation Method Based on Multi-constraint NMF |
Step 1. The algorithm of the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is performed to obtain a feature matrix with local information. |
Step 2. Take the square value of the feature matrix, and the multi-constraint NMF algorithm is used to reduce the dimension, and obtain the base matrix W and the coefficient matrix H. |
Step 3. The matrix W and H are recombined in subspace, and the recombined signals with feature components in the time domain are obtained by the inverse short-time Fourier transform (ISTFT). |
Step 4. Calculate the WK values of the recombined signals |
Step 5. The separation signals with high WK values are selected for envelope spectrum analysis to extract the fault features of bearings. |
5. Verification with Simulation and Experiment
5.1. Algorithm Simulation and Performance Analysis
5.2. Experimental Verification and Discussion
5.3. Comparison with Traditional Method
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, Y.; Kang, D.; He, G.; Jiao, X. Non-stationary vibration feature extraction method based on sparse decomposition and order tracking for gearbox fault diagnosis. Measurement 2018, 124, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Qi, C.; Yun, Z.X.; Wang, H.Y. An improved tracking method of bearing characteristic frequencies in the time-frequency representation of vibration signal. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2024, 35, 066118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.S.; Song, L.Y.; Cui, L.L.; Wang, H.Q. A three-dimensional geometric features-based SCA algorithm for compound faults diagnosis. Measurement 2019, 134, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.Q.; Wang, M.Y.; Li, J.L.; Song, L.Y.; Hao, Y.S. A Novel Signal Separation Method Based on Improved Sparse Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Entropy 2019, 21, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pan, H.; Yu, Y.; Xin, L. Symplectic geometry mode decomposition and its application to rotating machinery compound fault diagnosis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 114, 189–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, L.Y.; Wang, H.Q.; Chen, P. Step-by-step Fuzzy Diagnosis Method for Equipment Based on Symptom Extraction and Trivalent Logic Fuzzy Diagnosis Theory. IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 26, 3467–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Yi, C.; Tsui, K.L.; Lin, J.H. Sparsity guided empirical wavelet transform for fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 101, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.P.; Zhai, H.Y.; Gao, Y. New energy electric vehicle battery health state prediction based on vibration signal characterization and clustering. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alimardani, R.; Rahideh, A.; Hedayati, K.S. Mixed eccentricity fault detection for induction motors based on time synchronous averaging of vibration signals. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 71, 3173–3181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Yan, P.; Zhou, H.; Huang, Q.; Pei, J.; Yang, Y. Detection and recovery of anomalous vibration signal of rotating machinery based on LOF-MSAMP. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2024, 35, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Wang, H.Q.; Song, L.Y.; Wang, P.X. An adaptive data fusion strategy for fault diagnosis based on the convolutional neural network. Measurement 2020, 165, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łuczak, D. Machine Fault Diagnosis through Vibration Analysis: Continuous Wavelet Transform with Complex Morlet Wavelet and Time–Frequency RGB Image Recognition via Convolutional Neural Network. Electronics 2024, 13, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.Q.; Li, S.; Song, L.Y.; Cui, L.L. A novel convolutional neural network based fault recognition method via image fusion of multi-vibration-signals. Comput. Ind. 2019, 105, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.G.; Tian, W.K.; Zhang, K.; Ma, C.Y. Application of an enhanced fast kurtogram based on empirical wavelet transform for bearing fault diagnosis. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2019, 30, 035001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.S.; Song, L.Y.; Wang, M.Y.; Cui, L.L.; Wang, H.Q. Underdetermined Source Separation of Bearing Faults Based on Optimized Intrinsic Characteristic-Scale Decomposition and Local Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 11427–11435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, R. Soft Orthogonal Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparse Representation: Static and Dynamic. Neurocomputing 2018, 25, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.S.; Fu, W.H. A single-channel blind source separation algorithm based on improved wavelet packet and variational mode decomposition. Telecommun. Syst. 2024, 86, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łuczak, D.; Brock, S.; Siembab, K. Cloud Based Fault Diagnosis by Convolutional Neural Network as Time–Frequency RGB Image Recognition of Industrial Machine Vibration with Internet of Things Connectivity. Sensors 2023, 23, 3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeong, D.; Choi, E.; Ahn, H.; Martinezmartin, E.; Park, E.; Pobil, A.P.D. Multi-modal authentication model for occluded faces in a challenging environment. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.J.; Xie, M.Z. Graph regularized non-negative matrix factorization with prior knowledge consistency constraint for drug-target interactions prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2022, 23, 564–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, G.; Luo, G.G.; Zhang, W. Underdetermined Blind Source Separation with Variational Mode Decomposition for Compound Roller Bearing Fault Signals. Sensors 2016, 16, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, X.; Wu, F.; Yu, H. Mixed pixel decomposition of mineral spectrum based on EMD-ICA method. Opt. Spectrosc. 2015, 119, 893–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.H.; Wang, Z.; Guo, L.; Liu, W.J.; Sun, S.M. Meta Path-Aware Recommendation Method Based on Non-Negative Matrix Factorization in LBSN. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2022, 19, 4284–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.L.; Fan, X.Z.; Lu, X.Y. Modified fuzzy clustering algorithm based on non-negative matrix factorization locally constrained. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2023, 14, 11373–11383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ke, Y.F.; Ma, C.F.; Jia, Z.G. Quasi Non-Negative Quaternion Matrix Factorization with Application to Color Face Recognition. J. Sci. Comput. 2023, 95, 38–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Liang, J.C.; Liu, J.M.; Shen, W.L.; Xu, Z.B.; Yao, Z.J. Entropy regularized fuzzy nonnegative matrix factorization for data clustering. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2024, 15, 459–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.F.; Chen, J.X.; Lu, W.P.; Liu, Z.H. Weighted non-negative matrix factorization based on adaptive robust local sparse graph. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2023, 82, 46313–46330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, H.Y.; Ma, F.S.; Guo, J.; Li, S.W.; Deng, G.S. Source and pattern identification of ground deformation based on non-negative matrix factorization: A case study. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2023, 82, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, P.; Qu, X.L.; Tan, L. Robust Ensemble Manifold Projective Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Image Representation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 217781–217790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saha, S.; Imtiaz, H. Privacy-Preserving Non-Negative Matrix Factorization with Outliers. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 2024, 18, 64–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.F.; Zhang, R.S.; Yao, Y.B. Link prediction using deep autoencoder-like non-negative matrix factorization with L21-norm. Appl. Intell. 2024, 54, 4095–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marta, P.; Ragnhild, L.; Asger, H. Model selection and robust inference of mutational signatures using Negative Binomial non-negative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinform. 2023, 24, 187–211. [Google Scholar]
- Tu, K.; Zhou, W.H.; Kong, S.B. Integrating Multi-omics Data for Alzheimer’s Disease to Explore Its Biomarkers Via the Hypergraph-Regularized Joint Deep Semi-Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Algorithm. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2024, 74, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nasrin, A.; Kazi, L.K.; Gopinath, C.; Raviteja, V. Improved Protein Decoy Selection via Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2022, 19, 1670–1682. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D.D.; Seung, H.S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 1999, 401, 788–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owens, F.J.; Murphy, M.S. A Short-time Fourier Transform. Adv. Top. Signal Process. 1988, 14, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kompass, R. A generalized divergence measure for non-negative matrix factorization. Neural Comput. 2007, 19, 780–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WK | 6.52 | 3.78 | 2.74 | 9.08 | 2.96 | 31.74 | 3.96 | 22.28 | 2.89 | 6.54 |
Inner Diameter | External Diameter | Roller Diameter | Width | Number of Rollers |
---|---|---|---|---|
20 mm | 47 mm | 6.5 mm | 14 mm | 10 |
Fault Types | Outer Race | Roller | Cage |
---|---|---|---|
Characteristic frequencies at 1300 rpm | 86 Hz | 101 Hz | 8 Hz |
Characteristic frequencies at 900 rpm | 60 Hz | 74 Hz | 6 Hz |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WK | 0.51 | 88.72 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 211.52 | 0.83 | 0.63 | 2.79 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WK | 0.92 | 25.63 | 440.55 | 68.62 | 0.68 | 8.57 | 223.02 | 10.19 | 59.82 | 1.53 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, M.; Zhang, W.; Shao, M.; Wang, G. Separation and Extraction of Compound-Fault Signal Based on Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Entropy 2024, 26, 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070583
Wang M, Zhang W, Shao M, Wang G. Separation and Extraction of Compound-Fault Signal Based on Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Entropy. 2024; 26(7):583. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070583
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Mengyang, Wenbao Zhang, Mingzhen Shao, and Guang Wang. 2024. "Separation and Extraction of Compound-Fault Signal Based on Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization" Entropy 26, no. 7: 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070583
APA StyleWang, M., Zhang, W., Shao, M., & Wang, G. (2024). Separation and Extraction of Compound-Fault Signal Based on Multi-Constraint Non-Negative Matrix Factorization. Entropy, 26(7), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/e26070583