Tricoma (Tricoma) disparseta sp. nov. (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae), a New Free-Living Marine Nematode from a Seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, with a New Record of T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914) †
<p>A map depicting the locations where samples were collected.</p> "> Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov. Holotype male (MNB001). (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the male body, lateral view; (<b>B</b>) head region, left side; (<b>C</b>) head region, ventral view (Paratype MNB006); (<b>D</b>) head region, right side (Paratype MNB005); (<b>E</b>) spicules and tail region, right side (Paratype MNB005); (<b>F</b>) a posterior region showing sightly laterally inserted subventral setae (arrow). Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>–<b>E</b>); 20 µm in (<b>F</b>).</p> "> Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov. Allotype female (MNB007). (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the male body, lateral view; (<b>B</b>) head region, right side; (<b>C</b>) head region, right side (Paratype MNB008); (<b>D</b>) reproductive systems; (<b>E</b>) tail region, right side. Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>); 20 µm in (<b>D</b>,<b>E</b>).</p> "> Figure 4
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov. SEM photomicrographs, male. (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the body, lateral view; (<b>B</b>) anterior region showing laterally inserted subventral setae (white arrow); (<b>C</b>) head showing the amphideal fovea, with a white arrow indicating the amphideal pore, dorsal view; (<b>D</b>) head region, anterior view; (<b>E</b>) cephalic setae enclosed by a thin membrane; (<b>F</b>) the distal end of cephalic setae, split and enclosed by a thin membrane. Scale bars: 100 µm in (<b>A</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>); 5 µm in (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>); 500 nm in (<b>F</b>).</p> "> Figure 5
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov. SEM photomicrographs, male. (<b>A</b>) Cuticular layer showing the height difference between the dorsal and ventral peduncles; (<b>B</b>) subdorsal setae; (<b>C</b>) subventral setae appearing with curved tip; (<b>D</b>) spicules region, lateral view; (<b>E</b>) spicules region, anterior view; (<b>F</b>) terminal ring. Scale bars: 10 µm in (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>); 5 µm in (<b>B</b>,<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>).</p> "> Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov., DIC photomicrographs, holotype male (MNB001). (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the body; (<b>B</b>) anterior region; (<b>C</b>) amphideal fovea; (<b>D</b>) posterior region; (<b>E</b>) head region, ventral view (paratype MNB006); (<b>F</b>) somatic setae; (<b>G</b>) spicules and gubernaculum of the specimen treated with lactic acid, which was additionally used to increase transparency for the observation of internal reproductive organs, and showing spicules capitulum (arrow) and hooked gubernaculum (white arrow) (paratype MNB003); (<b>H</b>) terminal ring showing phasmata (paratype MNB004). Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>–<b>H</b>).</p> "> Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov., DIC photomicrographs, allotype female (MNB007). (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the body; (<b>B</b>) head region; (<b>C</b>) amphideal fovea showing anterior margin (arrow); (<b>D</b>) reproductive system showing naked vulva (arrow), left side; (<b>E</b>) posterior region; (<b>F</b>) entire view of the body showing somatic setae (paratype MNB008). Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>,<b>F</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>–<b>E</b>).</p> "> Figure 8
<p>Pictorial key to the species group with 50 to 64 main rings in the subgenus <span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>. Sources of the figures: (<b>A</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>B</b>) Decraemer (1979); (<b>C</b>) Freudenhammer (1975); (<b>D</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>E</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>F</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>G</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>H</b>) Decraemer (1978); (<b>I</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span>. (<span class="html-italic">T</span>.) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov.; (<b>K</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>L</b>) Decraemer (1978); (<b>M</b>) Decraemer (1983); (<b>N</b>) Blome (1982); (<b>O</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>P</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>Q</b>) Blome (1982); (<b>R</b>) Chitwood (1951); (<b>S</b>) Decraemer (1986); (<b>T</b>) Decraemer (1979); (<b>U</b>) Lee, Lee and Rho (2023).</p> "> Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Pictorial key to the species group with 50 to 64 main rings in the subgenus <span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>. Sources of the figures: (<b>A</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>B</b>) Decraemer (1979); (<b>C</b>) Freudenhammer (1975); (<b>D</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>E</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>F</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>G</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>H</b>) Decraemer (1978); (<b>I</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>J</b>) <span class="html-italic">T</span>. (<span class="html-italic">T</span>.) <span class="html-italic">disparseta</span> sp. nov.; (<b>K</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>L</b>) Decraemer (1978); (<b>M</b>) Decraemer (1983); (<b>N</b>) Blome (1982); (<b>O</b>) Decraemer (1987); (<b>P</b>) Timm (1970); (<b>Q</b>) Blome (1982); (<b>R</b>) Chitwood (1951); (<b>S</b>) Decraemer (1986); (<b>T</b>) Decraemer (1979); (<b>U</b>) Lee, Lee and Rho (2023).</p> "> Figure 9
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">longirostris</span> (Southern, 1914), newly discovered in this study, male (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>). (<b>A</b>) Entire view of the male body, lateral view; (<b>B</b>) head region, lateral view; (<b>C</b>) spicules and gubernaculum; (<b>D</b>) spicule and tail region. <span class="html-italic">T.</span> (<span class="html-italic">T.</span>) <span class="html-italic">longirostris</span> (Southern, 1914) from the original description, male (<b>E</b>–<b>G</b>). (<b>E</b>) head, dorsal view; (<b>F</b>) spicules and gubernaculum; (<b>G</b>) tail region (after Southern, 1914). <span class="html-italic">T.</span> (<span class="html-italic">T.</span>) <span class="html-italic">glutinosa</span> Steiner, 1916, male (<b>H</b>). (<b>H</b>) Anterior end (after Steiner, 1916). <span class="html-italic">T.</span> (<span class="html-italic">T.</span>) <span class="html-italic">septentrionalis</span> Timm, 1978, male (<b>I</b>,<b>J</b>). (<b>I</b>) Head region; (<b>J</b>) specular apparatus (after Timm, 1978). <span class="html-italic">T.</span> (<span class="html-italic">T.</span>) <span class="html-italic">longirostris</span> (Southern, 1914), male (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>). (<b>K</b>) Head, surface view; (<b>L</b>) copulatory apparatus and tail (after Decraemer, 1983). Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>); 30 µm in (<b>L</b>); 15 µm in (<b>K</b>); 12 µm in (<b>I</b>,<b>J</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>–<b>D</b>).</p> "> Figure 10
<p><span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span> (<span class="html-italic">Tricoma</span>) <span class="html-italic">longirostris</span> (Southern, 1914), DIC photomicrographs, male. (<b>A</b>) Entire body view; (<b>B</b>) head region; (<b>C</b>) cephalic setae; (<b>D</b>) amphideal fovea; (<b>E</b>) spicules and gubernaculum showing a knobbed apophysis (arrow); (<b>F</b>) common forms of somatic setae; (<b>G</b>) tail region. Scale bars: 50 µm in (<b>A</b>); 10 µm in (<b>B</b>–<b>G</b>).</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Field Sampling and Sample Processing
2.2. Laboratory Processing and Microscopic Analysis
2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
Subdorsal | Left side: | 5,10,17,23,31,41,47,53,58 | = 9 |
Right side: | 6,10,15,19,23,33,39,46,53,59 | = 10 | |
Subventral | Left side: | 3,5,8,12,14,17,20,23,27,31,34,38,42,45,47,53,55 | = 17 |
Right side: | 3,5,8,11,14,16,20,23,26,29,32,36,39,42,45,47,52,55 | = 18 |
Subdorsal | Left side: | 5(4),9(10),17,24(22,23),32(31),41(39),48(45,46,47),52(51,53),58(57) | = 9 |
Right side: | 5,9(10),18(17),23(25),31(30),39(38),48(46),53(51,52),58(57) | = 9 | |
Subventral | Left side: | 3,5,8(7),11(9),13(12),16(14),18(17,19),21(20,22),24(23,25,26),28(27),32(30,31),36(33,34,35),40(38,39),43(41,42),46(45),48,53(52),55(54) | = 18(16,17) |
Right side: | 3,5,8(7),11,14(13),17(16),20(19),24(22,23),27(26,28),32(29,30),35(34),39(37,38),42(41),45(44),48,53(52),55 | = 17(14,16) |
Subdorsal | Left side: | 6,11,18,23,32,42,47,53,59 | = 9 |
Right side: | 6,11,18,24,32,40,47,53,59 | = 9 | |
Subventral | Left side: | 4,5,8,10,12,15,19,22,25,29,33,37,41,45,49,52,55 | = 17 |
Right side: | 4,5,7,10,13,15,18,22,25,29,33,37,41,44,48,51,55 | = 17 |
Subdorsal | Left side: | 7(6),11,17(18),24(23),32,40(42),47(48),53,59(58) | = 9 |
Right side: | 6,11,18(19),23(24,26),32(33),40,48(47),54(53),59(58) | = 9 | |
Subventral | Left side: | 4(3),5,8,11(12),14(15),16,19(20),22(23),25(26,27),29(30,31),33(34,35),37(38,39),41(42),44(45),49(48),55(51,53),57(56) | = 17(16) |
Right side: | 4(3),5,7(8),9(10,11),12(13),14(15),16(18),20(21),22,25(24),29(28),34(33),38(37),42(41),45,49(48),52(51),57(56) | = 18(16,17) |
Subdorsal | Left side: | 7,14,20,28,40,50,57,67 | = 8 |
Right side: | 7,15,21,28,38,51,59,70 | = 8 | |
Subventral | Left side: | 4,7,12,17,22,29,36,43,49,54,62,68,72 | = 13 |
Right side: | 5,7,11,16,19,24,30,36,43,48,54,61,68,71 | = 14 |
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Danovaro, R.; Snelgrove, P.V.; Tyler, P. Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dell’Anno, A.; Carugati, L.; Corinaldesi, C.; Riccioni, G.; Danovaro, R. Unveiling the biodiversity of deep-sea nematodes through metabarcoding: Are we ready to bypass the classical taxonomy? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armenteros, M.; Quintanar-Retama, O.; Gracia, A. Depth-related patterns and regional diversity of free-living nematodes in the deep-sea Southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1023996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trebukhova, Y.A.; Miljutin, D.; Pavlyuk, O.; Mar’yash, A.; Brenke, N. Changes in deep-sea metazoan meiobenthic communities and nematode assemblages along a depth gradient (North-western Sea of Japan, Pacific). Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 86, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dos Santos, G.A.; Silva, A.C.; Esteves, A.M.; Ribeiro-Ferreira, V.P.; Neres, P.F.; Valdes, Y.; Ingels, J. Testing bathymetric and regional patterns in the southwest Atlantic deep sea using infaunal diversity, structure, and function. Diversity 2020, 12, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udalov, A.; Azovsky, A.; Mokievsky, V. Depth-related pattern in nematode size: What does the depth itself really mean? Prog. Oceanogr. 2005, 67, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danovaro, R.; Gambi, C. Cosmopolitism, rareness and endemism in deep-sea marine nematodes. Eur. Zool. J. 2022, 89, 653–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezerra, T.N.; Pape, E.; Hauquier, F.; Vanreusel, A. Description and distribution of Erebussau nom. nov. pro Erebus Bussau, 1993 nec Erebus Latreille, 1810 with description of a new species, and of Odetenema gesarae gen. nov., sp. nov.(Nematoda: Desmoscolecida) from nodule-bearing abyssal sediments in the Pacific. Zootaxa 2021, 4903, 542–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.J.; Lee, H.; Rho, H.S. Six species of Tricoma (Nematoda, Desmoscolecida, Desmoscolecidae) from the East Sea, Korea, with a bibliographic catalog and geographic information. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 2023, 41, 570–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decraemer, W.; Rho, H.S. Order Desmoscolecida. In Handbook of Zoology: Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera, Vol. 2: Nematoda; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 351–372. [Google Scholar]
- Rogers, A. The biology of seamounts. In Advances in Marine Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994; Volume 30, pp. 305–350. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, M.R.; Rowden, A.A.; Schlacher, T.; Williams, A.; Consalvey, M.; Stocks, K.I.; Rogers, A.D.; O’Hara, T.D.; White, M.; Shank, T.M. The ecology of seamounts: Structure, function, and human impacts. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2010, 2, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piepenburg, D.; Müller, B. Distribution of epibenthic communities on the Great Meteor Seamount (North-east Atlantic) mirrors pelagic processes. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res. 2004, 51, 55–70. [Google Scholar]
- White, M.; Bashmachnikov, I.; Arístegui, J.; Martins, A. Physical Processes and Seamount Productivity; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2007; pp. 65–84. [Google Scholar]
- Zeppilli, D.; Bongiorni, L.; Cattaneo, A.; Danovaro, R.; Santos, R.S. Meiofauna assemblages of the Condor Seamount (North-East Atlantic Ocean) and adjacent deep-sea sediments. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 98, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowden, A.A.; Schlacher, T.A.; Williams, A.; Clark, M.R.; Stewart, R.; Althaus, F.; Bowden, D.A.; Consalvey, M.; Robinson, W.; Dowdney, J. A test of the seamount oasis hypothesis: Seamounts support higher epibenthic megafaunal biomass than adjacent slopes. Mar. Ecol. 2010, 31, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decraemer, W. Morphological and taxonomic study of the genus Tricoma Cobb (Nematoda: Desmoscolecida), with the description of new species from the Great Barrier Reef of Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 1978, 26, 1–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decraemer, W. Desmoscolecids from sublittoral finesand of Pierre Noire (West Channel) (Nematoda, Desmoscolecida). Bull. Muséum Natl. D’histoire Nat. 1979, 1, 299–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decraemer, W. Morphology of Tricoma absidata lizardiensis subsp. nov.(Nematoda, Desmoscolecida) with a note on its ontogeny. Biol. Jaarb. Dodonaea 1979, 46, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
- Decraemer, W. Tricominae (Nematoda-Desmoscolecida) from the northern part of Moçambique Channel, with five new species and one new genus. Bull. L’institut R. Sci. Nat. Belg. Biol. 1983, 55, 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Decraemer, W. Tricominae (Nematoda: Desmoscolecida) from Laing Island, Papua New Guinea, with Descriptions of New Species. Invertebr. Syst. 1987, 1, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decraemer, W. Descriptions of two new species of Tricoma (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae) and comments on the taxonomic status of T.(T.) tertia Blome, 1982 and T.(T.) brevirostris (Southern, 1914) Steiner, 1916. Russ. J. Nematol. 1996, 4, 107–114. [Google Scholar]
- Decraemer, W.; Tchesunov, A.V. Some Desmoscolecids from the White Sea. Russ. J. Nematol. 1996, 4, 15–130. [Google Scholar]
- Soetaert, K.; Decraemer, W. Eight new Tricoma species (Nematoda, Desmoscolecidae) from a deep-sea transect off Calvi (Corsica, Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 1989, 183, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timm, R.W. A revision of the nematode order Desmoscolecida Filipjev, 1929. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 1970, 93, 1–115. [Google Scholar]
- Timm, R.W. Marine nematodes of the order Desmoscolecida from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Biol. Antarct. Seas 1978, 26, 225–236. [Google Scholar]
- Freudenhammer, I. Desmoscolecida aus der Iberischen Tiefsee, zugleich eine Revision dieser Nematoden-ordnung. Meteor Forschungsergebnisse Reihe D Biol. 1975, 20, 1–65. [Google Scholar]
- Southern, R. Clare Island Survey. Nemathelmia, Kinorhyncha and Chaetognatha. In Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, Ireland, 30 December 1914; pp. 1–80. [Google Scholar]
- Steiner, G. Neue und wenig bekannte nematoden von der Westküste Afrikas I. Zool. Anz. 1916, 47, 337–351. [Google Scholar]
- Ansari, K.; Lyla, P.; Ajmal Khan, S. New distributional records of free-living marine nematodes from Indian waters I. Chromadorids. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2015, 44, 756–765. [Google Scholar]
Stations | Date | Latitude (DMS) | Longitude (DMS) | Depth(m) | Remarks | Specimens | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St.1 | BKC90103 | 1 September 2023 | 15°38′15.16″ S | 151°59′50.35″ E | 1425.52 | Starfish habitat | HSV0114 |
St.2 | BKC80403 | 6 September 2023 | 17°02′47.346″ S | 149°52′50.484″ E | 1366.6 | Starfish habitat | HSV0113_#4, HSV0113_#5, HSV0113_#6, HSV0113_#7, HSV0113_#9, HSV0113_#10 |
St.3 | BKC80502 | 7 September 2023 | 17°05′45.41″ S | 149°55′07.67″ E | 1510.1 | Sponge | HSV0113_#1, HSV0113_#2, HSV0113_#3, HSV0113_#8 |
Males | Females | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Holotype | Paratypes (n = 4) Mean ± sd (Range) | Allotype | Paratypes (n = 3) Mean ± sd (Range) | |
Total body length | 571 | 562 ± 31.5 (527–613) | 543 | 536 ± 35 (490–575) |
Number of body rings | v:60 d:61 | 60 ± 0.6 (59–61) | v:60 d:61 | 61 ± 0.8 (60–62) |
a | 19 | 16.8 ± 1.0 (15.4–17.8) | 16 | 14.6 ± 2.5 (11.7–17.8) |
b | 6 | 5.9 ± 0.2 (5.7–6.3) | 6 | 6.5 ± 2.5 (6.3–6.7) |
c | 6 | 6.1 ± 0.2 (6.0–6.5) | 7 | 6.9 ± 0.3 (6.5–7.3) |
Head length | 16 | 16.5 ± 1.1 (14.7–17.8) | 16 | 15.5 ± 0.8 (14.6–16.6) |
Head diameter at the level of cephalic setae | 21 | 20.1 ± 0.8 (19.1–21.2) | 19 | 20.4 ± 1.1 (18.9–21.4) |
Body diameter at the level of cardia | 24 | 26.6 ± 1.4 (25.3–28.9) | 28 | 26.6 ± 1.2 (24.9–27.8) |
Maximum body diameter | 30 | 33.5 ± 1.4 (31.1–34.7) | 35 | 37.6 ± 5.0 (30.5–41.8) |
Cephalic setae length | 25 | 24.1 ± 2.2 (22.4–27.8) | 22 | 23.4 ± 1.1 (22.3–24.8) |
Amphideal fovea length | 25 | 25.5 ± 1.6 (22.9–27) | 27 | 25.2 ± 2.5 (21.7–27) |
Ocelli diameter | 8 | 6.1 ± 1.2 (4.5–7.6) | 10 | 5.7 ± 1.4 (3.7–6.8) |
Ocelli length | 11 | 7.8 ± 3.2 (4.7–13.1) | 14 | 6.1 ± 2.2 (4.4–9.2) |
Anterior end to ocelli | 123 | 127.8 ± 25.3 (107.6–171.2) | 119 | 141.6 ± 26.2 (106.9–170.3) |
Esophagus length | 95 | 94.9 ± 1.6 (92.7–97) | 92 | 82.6 ± 6.7 (73.3–88.3) |
Number of subventral setae (left) | 17 | 17 ± 0.8 (16–18) | 17 | 17 ± 0.5 (16–17) |
Number of subventral setae (right) | 18 | 16 ± 1.2(14–17) | 17 | 17 ± 0.8 (16–18) |
Length of the longest subventral setae | 32 | 33.9 ± 2.6 (29.7–36.4) | 35 | 34.1 ± 2.8 (30.7–37.6) |
Length of the shortest subventral setae | 17 | 16.8 ± 1.0 (15.3–18.1) | 16 | 20.1 ± 3.5 (15.2–23.1) |
Number of subdorsal setae (left) | 9 | 9 ± 0 (9–9) | 9 | 9 ± 0 (9–9) |
Number of subdorsal setae (right) | 10 | 9 ± 0 (9–9) | 9 | 9 ± 0 (9–9) |
Length of the longest subdorsal setae | 20 | 19.4 ± 1.2 (17.6–20.9) | 19 | 19.6 ± 2.0 (17.5–22.3) |
Length of the shortest subdorsal setae | 17 | 14.1 ± 1.1(12.7–15.5) | 12 | 14.2 ± 1.7 (12.7–16.6) |
Spicule length | 31 | 29.9 ± 1.4 (28.5–32.2) | - | - |
Gubernaculum length | 18 | 17 ± 1.2(15.6–18.5) | - | - |
Anterior end to vulva | - | - | 305 | 309.2 ± 10.8 (300.9–324.5) |
Body diameter at the level of the vulva | - | - | 32 | 31.6 ± 4.3 (26.9–37.3) |
V(%) | - | - | 56 | 57.9 ± 2.6 (55.7–61.4) |
Anal body diameter | 25 | 26.5 ± 1.6 (24.4–28.8) | 23 | 25.8 ± 0.6 (24.9–26.4) |
Tail length | 96 | 91.8 ± 2.3 (88.6–95) | 82 | 78.1 ± 5.2 (71.3–83.9) |
Number of tail’s body ring | 10 | 9.8 ± 0.4 (9–10) | 9 | 8.7 ± 0.5 (8–9) |
Terminal ring length | 23 | 24.9 ± 1.6 (22.9–26.6) | 26 | 25 ± 0.8 (23.9–25.7) |
Desmos covering the terminal ring | 7 | 7.3 ± 0.6 (6.5–7.9) | 9 | 8.8 ± 0.7 (8–9.5) |
Phasmata | 2.5 | 2.6 ± 0.2 (2.5–2.9) | 2.7 | 2.6 ± 0.1 (2.5–2.8) |
Species | Characters | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Males | Females | Head Diameter | Head Length | Cephalic Setae Length | Spicules Length | Gubernaculum Length | Vulva (Ring) | Number of Tail Ring (Males) | Number of Tail Ring (Females) | |||||
Body Length | Body Rings | Setae Pattern (sd/sv) | Body Length | Body Rings | Setae Pattern (sd/sv) | |||||||||
T. (T.) absidata Timm, 1970 | 485–520 | 57–60 | 11,12/19,19 | 510–550 | 59–60 | 11,12/17,19 | 22 | 16 | 18–19 | 42–45 | - | 27 | 9–10 | 9–10 |
T. (T.) absidata lizardiensis Decraemer, 1979 | 525–710 | 55–57 | 13,13/17,19 | 540–710 | 56–60 | 13,13/21,23 | 25–29 | 16–21 | 21–27 | 42–48 | 24–28 | 24–27 | 9 | 8 |
T. (T.) atlantica Freudenhammer, 1975 | 450 | 58 | 7,7/11,11 | 490 | 50 | - | 18–20 | 20–22 | 20–22 | 26 | - | 28–29 | 9 | 9 |
T. (T.) bipapillata Decraemer, 1987 | 185–205 | 48–55 | 9/14–15 | - | - | - | 11–12 | 8–9 | 10–11 | 25–32 | 12–13 | - | 7–9 | - |
T. (T.) capitata Decraemer, 1987 | 225 | 55–56 | 9/12–13 | 215–260 | 53–57 | 9/11–14 | 11–14 | 9.5–11 | 11–14 | 52 | 12 | 34–35 | 9 | 6–8 |
T. (T.) coralicolla Decraemer, 1987 | 185 | 56–57 | 9/12 | 220 | 58 | 9/11 | 11–13 | 11 | 12–14 | 14 | 10 | 33 | 8 | 8 |
T. (T.) denticulata Timm, 1970 | 645–800 | 63–64 | 10/15–17 | 760 | 65–66 | - | 32–39 | 19–26 | 20–22 | 96–104 | 50–56 | 43 | 11–12 | 9 |
T. (T.) dimorpha Decraemer, 1978 | 305–600 | 52–65 | 12–13/16–17 | 400 | 62–67 | 13/17 | 15–20 | 11–16 | 15–21 | 16–27 | 16–19 | 27–29 | 10–12 | 12–13 |
T. (T.) dimorpha papuensis Decraemer, 1987 | 175–210 | 48–55 | 9/10–11 | 180–265 | 48–56 | 8–13/11–15 | 9.5–12 | 8–11 | 9–12 | 14–17 | 8.5–10.5 | 26–33 | 8–11 | 5–10 |
T. (T.) disparseta sp. nov. | 527–613 | 59–61 | 9–10/14–18 | 490–575 | 60–62 | 9/16–18 | 19–22 | 15–18 | 22–28 | 29–32 | 16–19 | 38–40 | 9–10 | 8–9 |
T. (T.) fisheri Timm, 1970 | 300–390 | 56–61 | 8–9/10–17 | 275–425 | 56–61 | 8–11/13–16 | 16–20 | 10–14 | 13–17 | 25–38 | 13–29 | 31–33 | 8–9 | 7–8 |
T. (T.) goldeni Decraemer, 1978 | 310–320 | 55–59 | 12/15–16 | - | - | - | 14 | 11 | 12–13 | 21–22 | 13 | - | 11–12 | - |
T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914) | 250–900 | 63–78 | 8–9/12–15 | 700–1000 | - | - | 15–36 | 12–31 | 21–32 | 19–35 | 14–16 | - | 10–12 | - |
T. (T.) oblita Blome, 1982 | 477–506 | 60–63 | 8–9/15–16 | 513 | 63 | 10/18 | 25–27 | - | 21–22 | 27 | 11–13 | 37–38 | 9–10 | - |
T. (T.) paratimmi Decraemer, 1987 | 385–420 | 61 | 11–12/16–17 | 390–450 | 53–56 | 8–13/15–17 | 13–14 | 20–22 | 11–16 | 28–30 | 17–20 | 27–29 | 9 | 5–6 |
T. (T.) perparvula Timm, 1970 | 275 | 61–62 | 7,9/13,13 | - | - | - | 14 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 9 | - | 9 | - |
T. (T.) secunda Blome, 1982 | 328 | 56–57 | 9,9/10, 13 | - | - | - | 18 | - | 16 | 22 | 8 | - | 9 | - |
T. (T.) spinosoides Chitwood, 1951 | 400 | 61 | 10/17 | 380 | - | 10/14 | - | - | - | 26 | 13 | 26 | - | 12 |
T. (T.) spuria Inglis, 1967 | 710 | 62 | 11/21 | 735 | 62 | 10–11/18–19 | 27–28 | 18–21 | 29 | 46 | 31 | 33 | 10 | 9 |
T. (T.) steineri de Man, 1922 | 310–408 | 63–55 | 11–13/13–16 | 310–460 | 63–64 | 12/15–16 | 13–15 | 12–13 | 12–17 | 24–27 | 17 | 28–30 | 12 | 11 |
T. (T.) ulleungensis Lee, Lee & Rho, 2023 | 409–415 | 54–55 | 6–7/10–12 | 462–567 | 55–57 | 6–7/9–10 | 24–26 | 14–16 | 19–22 | 22–24 | 11–13 | 31 | 8–9 | 8–9 |
Characters | Southern (1914) | Steiner (1916) | Timm (1978) | Decraemer (1983) | Ansari et al. (2015) | This Study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Specimens | 2 males | 1 male | 4 males | 2 males | 16 males, 19 females | 1 male |
Body length in male | 650 | 250 | 780–847 | 300–420 | 600–900 | 808 |
Body length in female | - | - | - | - | 700–1000 | - |
Number of body ring | 70 | 77 | 71–77 | 63–72 | 70–78 | 78 |
Width of body | 39 | 14 | 32–39 | 19–21 | 44–57 | 30 |
Length of head | 31 | - | 25 | 12–16 | - | 26 |
Width of head | 32 | - | 27 | 15–19 | - | 28 |
Cephalic seta | - | - | 28–32 | 17–21 | 21–23 | 23 |
Esophagus ring | - | - | - | 11 | - | 10 |
Spicule length | - | - | 30 | 32–35 | 19–23 | 28 |
Length of gubernaculum | - | - | - | 14–15 | - | 16 |
Number of tail rings | - | 10 | 10–11 | 11–12 | - | 12 |
Tail length | - | 43 | 112–119 | 60–84 | - | 125 |
Somatic setae pattern (subdorsal/subventral) | - | - | 8–9/12–15 | 9/12–13 | - | 8,8/13,14 |
Length of the terminal ring | - | - | 22–58 | 16–23 | - | 38 |
Locality | Clew bay, Atlantic coast of Ireland, 24 fms, bottom of sand and shells | Prampram, Gold coast, the west coast of Africa, 9 m | McMurdo sound, Antarctica, Hut point, 4457 m, Scott Base, 540 m | Mozambique Channel | Bay of Bengal continental shelf, southeast coast of India, 30–176 m, sandy silt sediment | Northeastern of Guam, Pacific Ocean, 1425.52 m, sediment |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, H.J.; Lee, H.; Kihm, J.-H.; Rho, H.S. Tricoma (Tricoma) disparseta sp. nov. (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae), a New Free-Living Marine Nematode from a Seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, with a New Record of T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914). Diversity 2024, 16, 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100648
Lee HJ, Lee H, Kihm J-H, Rho HS. Tricoma (Tricoma) disparseta sp. nov. (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae), a New Free-Living Marine Nematode from a Seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, with a New Record of T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914). Diversity. 2024; 16(10):648. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100648
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Hyo Jin, Heegab Lee, Ji-Hoon Kihm, and Hyun Soo Rho. 2024. "Tricoma (Tricoma) disparseta sp. nov. (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae), a New Free-Living Marine Nematode from a Seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, with a New Record of T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914)" Diversity 16, no. 10: 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100648
APA StyleLee, H. J., Lee, H., Kihm, J.-H., & Rho, H. S. (2024). Tricoma (Tricoma) disparseta sp. nov. (Nematoda: Desmoscolecidae), a New Free-Living Marine Nematode from a Seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, with a New Record of T. (T.) longirostris (Southern, 1914). Diversity, 16(10), 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16100648