An IoT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Elderly Adults through a Wearable Device and Mobile Application
<p>System architecture of Abuelómetro.</p> "> Figure 2
<p>Hexiwear biometric bracelets.</p> "> Figure 3
<p>Services available in the cloud and accessible through the middleware. <span class="html-italic">Upload photos</span>: Caregiver-type users can share photos with family-type users. <span class="html-italic">Upload user information by caregiver</span>: This service allows uploading and updating information related to caregiver-type users. <span class="html-italic">Add medical data</span>: The service allows caregiver-type users to create new classifications to personalize the medical data of the elderly at their care. <span class="html-italic">Upload user information by family member</span>: This service allows uploading and updating information related to family-type users. <span class="html-italic">Consult family chat</span>: Caregiver-type users can access the conversation history with the relatives of the elderly at their care. <span class="html-italic">Update information of the elderly</span>: This service allows uploading and updating personal information of the elderly. <span class="html-italic">Upload medical information of the elderly</span>: The functionality of this service is to allow caregiver-type users to upload medical data of the elderly who are in their care.</p> "> Figure 4
<p>Login screen of Abuelómetro.</p> "> Figure 5
<p>Medical record.</p> "> Figure 6
<p>Chat to communicate with family.</p> "> Figure 7
<p>Real-time readings of the device’s sensors.</p> "> Figure 8
<p>Clinical history of the elderly.</p> "> Figure 9
<p>Alerts with color codes according the sensed data by the bracelet.</p> "> Figure 10
<p>Average SUS scores.</p> ">
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Works
2.1. Mobile Monitoring to Predict Medical Conditions
2.2. LifeShirt
2.3. Vita-Data
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Initial Understanding
- Many older adults, with few caregivers to care for them;
- Little communication between the caregiver and the family;
- Health monitoring is registered mainly on paper;
- Very low involvement of the family members in the care of the elderly.
3.2. Envisioned System
3.2.1. Medical Record
3.2.2. Communication with Family
3.2.3. Remote Monitoring
3.2.4. Medical History
3.2.5. Alert Notifications
3.3. System Architecture
3.3.1. Wearable IoT device
3.3.2. WolkAbout API
3.3.3. Middleware
3.3.4. Mobile Application
3.4. Development
3.5. Evaluation
Process
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Development
4.1.1. Medical Record
4.1.2. Communication with Family
4.1.3. Remote Monitoring
4.1.4. Medical History
4.1.5. Alert Notifications
4.2. Usability
- In the odd items, subtract one from the position marked by the user.
- For even items, subtract the position marked from five.
- Add up these new values from responses and multiply that total by 2.5.
- Then we obtain a general value of usability on a scale of 0 (null usability) to 100 (excellent usability). It is not a percentage.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- I think that I would like to use this system frequently.
- I found the system unnecessarily complex.
- I thought the system was easy to use.
- I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system.
- I found the various functions in this system were well integrated.
- I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system.
- I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.
- I found the system very cumbersome to use.
- I felt very confident using the system.
- I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.
References
- Everlet, A.; Pastor, J. Introducción al Internet de las Cosas: Construyendo un proyecto de IoT; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos: Madrid, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- A Simple Explanation of “The Internet of Things”. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2014/05/13/simple-explanation-internet-things-that-anyone-can-understand/#13be50241d09 (accessed on 13 May 2014).
- Conti, M.; Dehghantanha, A.; Franke, K.; Watson, S. Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 78, 544–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, T.; Chen, N.; Li, K.; Atiquzzaman, M.; Zhao, W. How Can Heterogeneous Internet of Things Build our Future: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 2011–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juniper, R. IoT-The Internet of Transformation 2018; Juniper Research: Hampshire, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- In Less Than Two Years, a Smartphone Could Be Your Only Computer. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2015/02/smartphone-only-computer/ (accessed on 2 October 2015).
- Eysenbach, G. What is e-health? J. Med. Internet Res. 2001, 3, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borja-Lopez, J.; Santana-Mancilla, P.C.; Batista-Delgado, F.; Ruiz-Ramirez, I.; Urzua-Alvarez, M. Reh-arcade: Juego serio como apoyo a las terapias de rehabilitación de codo. In Proceedings of the Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2014), Oaxaca, Mexico, 5 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lun, R.; Gordon, C.; Zhao, W. The design and implementation of a Kinect-based framework for selective human activity tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Budapest, Hungary, 9–12 October 2016; pp. 002890–002895. [Google Scholar]
- Santana-Mancilla, P.; Anido-Rifón, L. The Technology Acceptance of a TV Platform for the Elderly Living Alone or in Public Nursing Homes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bansal, S.; Chowell, G.; Simonsen, L.; Vespignani, A.; Viboud, C. Big Data for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Modeling. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pasluosta, C.F.; Gassner, H.; Winkler, J.; Klucken, J.; Eskofier, B.M. An Emerging Era in the Management of Parkinson’s Disease: Wearable Technologies and the Internet of Things. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2015, 19, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Horgas, A.; Abowd, G. The Impact of Technology on Living Environments for Older Adults. In Technology for Adaptive Aging; Pew, R., Van Hemmel, S., Eds.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Liaqat, D. Using Mobile Sensing to Predict Episodes of Medical Conditions; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 7–8. [Google Scholar]
- Terry, M. Wearable Health Monitors: Real-Time, Patient-Friendly Data Collection. Telemed. E-Health 2010, 16, 134–138. [Google Scholar]
- Kent, L.; O’Neill, B.; Davison, G.; Nevill, A.; Stuart Elborn, J.; Bradley, J.M. Validity and reliability of cardiorespiratory measurements recorded by the LifeShirt during exercise tests. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2009, 167, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gutierrez, A. Estudiantes diseñan pulsera-monitor de uso médico. Conacyt. Prensa 2017. [Google Scholar]
- McCracken, G. The Long Interview; Sage Publication Inc.: Newcastle, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Hexiwear IoT and Wearables Development Platform 2018. Available online: http://www.hexiwear.com (accessed on 6 May 2019).
- WolkAbout IoT Platform API 2018. Available online: https://restapi.wolkabout.com/ (accessed on 6 May 2019).
- Papazoglou, M.P. Service-oriented computing: Concepts, characteristics and directions. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, Rome, Italy, 12 December 2003; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
- Chaniotis, I.K.; Kyriakou, K.-I.D.; Tselikas, N.D. Is Node.js a viable option for building modern web applications? A performance evaluation study. Computing 2015, 97, 1023–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilkov, S.; Vinoski, S. Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs. IEEE Internet Comput. 2010, 14, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, S.M.; Xia, X.L.; Le, J.J. A Real-Time Web Application Solution Based on Node.js and WebSocket. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 816–817, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bangare, S.L.; Gupta, S.; Dalal, M.; Inamdar, A. Using Node.Js to Build High Speed and Scalable Backend Database Server. Int. J. Res. Advent Technol. 2016, 4, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
- Azevedo, J.; Pereira, R.L.; Chainho, P. An API proposal for integrating sensor data into web apps and WebRTC. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on All-Web Real-Time Systems-AWeS ’15, Bordeaux, France, 21 April 2015; ACM Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Avancha, S.; Baxi, A.; Kotz, D. Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare. ACM Comput. Surv. 2012, 45, 1–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooke, J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry; Jordan, P.W., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1996; ISBN 978-0-7484-0314-1. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen, J. Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users; Nielsen Norman Group: Fremont, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Sauro, J. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS); MeasuringU: Denver, CO, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
User | Gender | Age |
---|---|---|
1 | Female | 34 |
2 | Female | 32 |
3 | Female | 55 |
4 | Female | 28 |
5 | Male | 33 |
User | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | SUS Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 95.0 |
2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 75.0 |
3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 67.5 |
4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 82.5 |
5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 95.0 |
Average SUS score | 83.0 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Durán-Vega, L.A.; Santana-Mancilla, P.C.; Buenrostro-Mariscal, R.; Contreras-Castillo, J.; Anido-Rifón, L.E.; García-Ruiz, M.A.; Montesinos-López, O.A.; Estrada-González, F. An IoT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Elderly Adults through a Wearable Device and Mobile Application. Geriatrics 2019, 4, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4020034
Durán-Vega LA, Santana-Mancilla PC, Buenrostro-Mariscal R, Contreras-Castillo J, Anido-Rifón LE, García-Ruiz MA, Montesinos-López OA, Estrada-González F. An IoT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Elderly Adults through a Wearable Device and Mobile Application. Geriatrics. 2019; 4(2):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4020034
Chicago/Turabian StyleDurán-Vega, Luis A., Pedro C. Santana-Mancilla, Raymundo Buenrostro-Mariscal, Juan Contreras-Castillo, Luis E. Anido-Rifón, Miguel A. García-Ruiz, Osval A. Montesinos-López, and Fermín Estrada-González. 2019. "An IoT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Elderly Adults through a Wearable Device and Mobile Application" Geriatrics 4, no. 2: 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4020034
APA StyleDurán-Vega, L. A., Santana-Mancilla, P. C., Buenrostro-Mariscal, R., Contreras-Castillo, J., Anido-Rifón, L. E., García-Ruiz, M. A., Montesinos-López, O. A., & Estrada-González, F. (2019). An IoT System for Remote Health Monitoring in Elderly Adults through a Wearable Device and Mobile Application. Geriatrics, 4(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics4020034