[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Article in Journal
Relevant Indicators of Consciousness after Waterbath Stunning in Turkeys and Stunning Efficiency in Commercial Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Adiposity on Exercise Performance in Horses
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine in Sport and Companion Animals: Electrotherapy
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/ani13040667
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: Laser Therapy

by
Darryl L. Millis
1,* and
Anna Bergh
2
1
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
2
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(4), 667; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040667
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Veterinary Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine)
Browse Figure
Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram of the stages of the selection process used for identification of studies eligible for final analysis.</p> ">
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Light therapy, or photobiomodulation, is a collective name for methods where tissue is irradiated with different types of light, with the aim of stimulating healing. The group includes methods such as laser, Light Emitting Diode (LED) light, ultra and infrared light, and tanning beds. In animals, the main indications for light treatment are musculoskeletal injuries, neurological diseases, wounds, and pain. Despite being frequently used, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment protocols for light therapy nor its clinical efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the documented clinical effects of light therapy, with a focus on laser and LED light, in horses, dogs, and cats. The undertaken systematic literature review found gaps in the scientific documentation. Conflicting study results and unclear application for clinical use are explained by the wide variety of treatment parameters used in the analyzed studies, such as wavelength, laser class, dose, and effect, as well as the frequency and duration of treatment. Some beneficial effects have been reported during treatment with light therapy; however, the published studies also have limited scientific quality regarding these therapies, with a high or moderate risk of bias.

Abstract

Light therapy, or photobiomodulation, is a collective name for methods where tissue is irradiated with different types of light, with the aim of stimulating healing. Despite being frequently used, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment protocols for light therapy, nor its clinical efficacy. A systematic literature review was conducted, searching the relevant literature regarding light therapy in three databases, published between 1980–2020. The risk of bias in each article was evaluated. Forty-five articles met the inclusion criteria; 24 articles were regarding dogs, 1 was regarding cats, and the rest were regarding horses. The indications for treatment were musculoskeletal and neurologic conditions, skin disease and wounds, and pain. The literature review showed conflicting study results and unclear application for clinical use. This can be explained by the wide variety of treatment parameters used in the searched studies, such as wavelength, laser class, dose, and effect, as well as the frequency and duration of treatment. Although some beneficial effects were reported for light therapy, the studies also had limited scientific quality regarding these therapies, with a high or moderate risk of bias.

1. Introduction

Light therapy, or photobiomodulation, is a collective name for methods where tissue is irradiated with different types of light, with the aim of stimulating healing. The group includes methods such as laser, Light Emitting Diode (LED) light, ultra and infrared light, and tanning beds. In humans, light therapy has been used for decades to treat various conditions such as depression, skin disease and wounds, and pain, as well as to promote the healing of musculoskeletal tissues [1]. In animals, the main indications are musculoskeletal injuries, neurological diseases, wounds, and pain [2].
Different light sources have different properties. For example, the light emitting from a laser is monochromatic, is collimated, and is of one wavelength. This is in contrast to ordinary light, with many different noncollimated wavelengths. One difference between laser light and LED light is that laser light waves are coherent, with the wavelengths in phase in space and time.
The mechanism behind light therapy is not clearly understood. Light particles, called photons, are transmitted to tissues. One hypothesis for light’s mechanism of action is that photons are absorbed by cell mitochondrial chromophores, which leads to a photodissociation of inhibitory nitric oxide from cytochrome C oxidase. This is followed by the enhancement of electron transport, enzyme activity, and ATP production, parameters concerned with cell proliferation and tissue repair [3].
In practice, many different types of light-emitting sources and protocols are used, with different settings of wavelength, irradiated area, intensity, and treatment time. Most commonly, does are below 50 J/cm2 [3]. Increasingly, higher power class IV lasers are used in small animal practice, with up to 15 watts/cm2 continuous laser and pulsed lasers with up to 270 watts/cm2 peak power being used. Further adding confusion to any discussion of therapeutic lasers are terms such as the type of laser (CO2, HeNe, GaAs, and GaAlAs), the use of either single or multiple wavelengths, and cluster probes which use several different photon emitting devices in a single unit. Despite being frequently used in animals, there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment protocols nor its clinical efficacy for the treatment of various conditions. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the documented clinical effects of light therapy, with a focus on laser and LED light, in horses, dogs, and cats.

2. Materials and Methods

The overall outline of this systematic review adhered to the Cochrane guidelines regarding how to perform a systematic review [4], as adapted by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) in its methodological handbook [5].

2.1. Review Topic/Research Question

To assess the evidence for the clinical efficacy of laser and LED therapy used in horses, dogs, and cats.

2.2. Search Strategy

Professional librarians searched the literature in the databases Web of Science Core Collection, CABI, and PubMed (1980–2020) in August 2020. The keywords were terms relevant to dog OR cat OR horse, AND veterinary medicine OR veterinarian, AND therapy * OR treatment *. These keywords were combined with terms related to light therapies, i.e., laser therapy, therapeutic laser, cold laser, low-level laser or photobiomodulation, and light emitting diode.

2.3. General Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The included studies were to be original research, which was published in a peer-reviewed journal between years 1980–2020. Primarily observational studies that would have only one method studied per treatment group were included. Experimental studies could also be included when the study mimicked a clinical situation. The subject species were to be either canine, feline, or equine.
Textbook chapters, conference proceedings, abstracts, opinion notes, review articles, and case reports (subject number < 5) were excluded. Mechanism of action experimental studies were also excluded, along with studies that used multiple treatments simultaneously per intervention group.

2.4. Study Selection and Categorisation

All screening was performed based on journal title, publication title, or abstract. Citations identified were imported into Endnote (X9.3.3, 2018) and duplicates were removed. A single author (DM) applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to all publications.
In the screening phase, articles of possible relevance for the review, and articles describing one type of intervention in cats, dogs, or horses were selected for full text reading. A therapeutic intervention was defined as an intervention intended to reduce the signs, severity, or duration of a clinical condition. After the first stage of screening, articles deemed potentially relevant were accessed. For each study, the following key descriptive items were tabulated using templates modified after SBU [5]: first author, year of publication, study design, study population, intervention, and type of control, outcome, and relevance (external validity).
Assessment of the risk of bias (scientific quality) of each article was performed in accordance with the Cochrane [4] and SBU [5] guidelines. The assessment was based on the following items: study design, statistical power, deviation from planned therapy, loss to follow-up, type of outcome assessment, and relevance. In the assessment of observational studies, risk of confounding was also included. The writing of the paper has been conducted following the PRISMA 2022 checklist and the study has not been registered in PROSPERO since it is not for human health.

3. Results

A total of 2581 abstracts were identified from the three electronic databases (Figure 1). Duplicates were removed and the abstracts were re-evaluated using the inclusion criteria. A total of 125 publications were studied in detail. Regarding laser treatment of the musculoskeletal system, 50 studies were identified, of which 28 were dog studies, 22 were on horses, and none were cat studies. Thirteen of these met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the effects of laser on skin and wound healing, 44 abstracts were identified, of which 32 were dog studies, 12 were studies of horses, and none were regarding cats. Nineteen of these met the inclusion criteria. In the treatment of pain with laser, three studies were regarding dogs, one was regarding cats, and six studies were on horses. Seven of these were included. Of 20 dog studies regarding laser treatment for various neurological conditions, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. A horse study was identified; however, it did not meet the inclusion criteria. The studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were case reports, review articles, method articles, or had phototherapy as part of a combination of treatments, which made the evaluation of phototherapy as a single treatment impossible.

3.1. Study Quality

In general, the quality of the studies was low. In many cases, details regarding laser application were missing or inadequate, controls groups were not included, or other interventions were administered along with laser therapy.

3.2. General Clinical Indications

Photobiomodulation is used in a variety of applications in veterinary medicine, including musculoskeletal conditions, skin and wound healing, neurological conditions, pain, and a variety of other indications.

3.3. Musculoskeletal Conditions

Intervention, Control and Clinical Effects

Of the 13 articles on musculoskeletal conditions, 8 had a low risk of bias, 3 a moderate, and 2 a high (Table 1). Of the six studies which evaluated laser for musculoskeletal conditions in dogs, four were randomized, controlled trials (RCT), and three of these showed possible benefits. A study of laser for elbow arthritis indicated improvement in subjective parameters and reduction in the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, evaluated by the dog owner [6]. The laser dose was based on body weight. Three studies evaluated the use of laser treatment in dogs that underwent a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) for cranial cruciate ligament injury. A preoperative treatment was mildly effective in improving post-operative weight bearing, evaluated by force platform measurement [7]. A larger RCT study indicated improvement in lameness via a subjective scoring system; however, no objective methods were used [8]. A study of dogs treated for eight weeks after TPLO used a combination of subjective and objective measures. The study found no significant differences between the treated and placebo groups, with better results observed for the placebo group than the treated dogs at several time points [9].
A research study on osteogenesis reported positive effects of laser treatment on bone formation and healing time of the osteotomy [10]. Interestingly, the TPLO studies also evaluated bone healing, and none of them showed a positive effect. An uncontrolled study of laser treatment for osteomyelitis, after unsuccessful treatment with antibiotics, indicated a positive result in most dogs; however, long-term follow-up was not performed [11].
Seven of the horse studies were RCT. Two studies evaluated carbon dioxide laser for acute traumatic arthritis of the fetlock joint. One study, without an untreated control group, compared betamethasone and hyaluronan with carbon dioxide laser for acute traumatic arthritis, with a more favorable recovery in the laser-treated group [12]. A smaller study, which evaluated laser treatment compared to a control group, showed no differences in subjective lameness assessment, objective movement analysis with accelerometry, and analysis of inflammatory markers in the synovial fluid [13].
Other equine studies largely evaluated the effect of laser on tendon or ligament injuries. A clinical study of horses with ligament or tendon injuries indicated improved edema, lameness, and lesion size; however, no differences in healing were detected with objective ultrasound evaluations [14]. A retrospective study of a large number of horses with superficial digital flexor tendon injuries showed no advantage of laser treatment compared to conservative treatment [15].
Other studies evaluated the penetration ability or thermal effects of lasers on equine tissue. An experimental study of carbon dioxide laser showed increased skin perfusion and temperature in treated horses, with the biggest changes occurring in horses with clipped hair [16]. However, there were no temperature or perfusion differences in deeper tissues. Another study of laser application also showed increased skin temperature, which was assessed with a thermal imager [17]. A study of near-infrared lasers on cadaveric superficial digital flexor tendons indicated poor light penetration into the tissue [18].

3.4. Skin and Wound Healing

Intervention, Control and Clinical Effects

Of the 19 articles on skin and wounds, 11 had a low risk, 6 had a moderate, and 2 had a high risk of bias (Table 2). Of the 10 dog studies, one randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed potential benefit in wound healing properties. Most of the studies evaluated wound healing or absorbance of laser energy in the tissue. Three well-controlled blinded studies showed no effect of laser treatment on wound healing in surgically-created sutured or open wounds [19,20,21], while one study showed a slightly faster healing time with improved scarring after laser treatment [22]. One study on infected wounds showed no effect of laser treatment [23], while another that used blue light showed improvement of pyoderma in dogs [24]. A study of pedal pruritus due to atopy showed no effect of laser treatment [25].
Studies of laser penetration indicated that if the laser head has contact with the skin, there is better light penetration than when applied without contact [26]. Other aspects that improved light penetration in tissues were clipped hair, and lighter skin color [27]. Most laser energy was found to be absorbed by the superficial tissues. Other studies included the use of lasers to treat aural hematomas [28] and alopecia [29]; these studies indicated a positive effect; however, the design of the studies used subjective outcome measures or had inadequate controls, which left interpretation of the results questionable.
All eight of the horse studies were RCT, with most studies being either tissue penetration of laser light or wound healing, and with two wound healing studies showing no effect and two showing some positive effects. Two well-controlled studies showed no effect of laser on wound healing [30,31], while two indicated an improvement in wound healing of tissue in the pharynx [32] and granulation tissue on the extremities compared with bandages or basic liniments [33]. One study suggested that a very high doses of laser energy may damage tissues [34] (Bergh A, 2007). Three studies evaluated laser penetration into tissues, with most laser energy absorbed by very superficial tissues, similar to the canine studies [35,36,37]. Clipping and cleansing the skin improved penetration, and one study showed better penetration in light horses [37], while another showed no effect of skin color [36].

3.5. Pain

Intervention, Control and Clinical Effects

In the treatment of pain with laser, three dog, one cat, and six horse studies were identified (Table 3). Of these, one dog, one cat, and five horse studies met the inclusion criteria, and of these seven articles, none had a low risk, three had a moderate, and four had a high risk of bias. A study of dogs undergoing treatment for pain after ovariohysterectomy with laser acupuncture suggested an improved pain relief compared to meloxicam [38]. A similar study of pain relief after ovariohysterectomy was also performed in cats [39]. Although laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture were similar in the treatment of pain, both treatments required fewer rescue analgesics compared to placebo. Three horse studies evaluated laser treatment for back pain. one study had no controls; therefore, no conclusions could be drawn about its effect [40]. The other two suggested positive results regarding the use of laser for the treatment of back pain [41,42]. An uncontrolled study of laser treatment for laminitis indicated an improvement; however, no conclusions could be drawn [43]. Another laser study in horses treated with epidural anesthesia suggested that laser treatment prolonged analgesia with concomitant epidural anesthesia [44].

3.6. Neurological Conditions

Intervention, Control and Clinical Effects

Of 20 canine studies regarding photobiomodulation for neurologic conditions, six met the inclusion criteria, with one having a low, three a moderate, and two a high risk of bias (Table 4). Only one of the four studies of laser for the postoperative treatment of intervertebral disk disease [45,46,47] showed a positive effect [48]. However, the dose of laser used in that study was unclear. Another experimental study of sciatic nerve injury indicated an improvement in EMG activity after laser treatment [49]. A study of laser use in treating degenerative myelopathy did not have a control group (comparison to a historical control group was used), had other confounding factors that may have influenced the results, and the laser dose used to compare Class III and Class IV lasers was not the same [50].

4. Discussion

In this systematic literature review, 45 studies were identified and evaluated in which light therapy was used to treat musculoskeletal and neurologic conditions, skin and wounds, and pain, in dogs and horses, as well as ovariohysterectomy in cats.
Of the 13 articles on musculoskeletal conditions, 4 experimental studies investigated tissue temperature changes and light penetration depths [10,16,17,18]. The studies with a low risk of bias had conflicting results, varying from positive effects on weight distribution and pain scores, to no significant differences. Of the 19 articles on skin and wounds, the majority were experimental studies investigating the healing of surgically-created wounds, skin and hair characteristics affecting laser penetration, and light penetration depths. The studies with a low risk of bias showed no significant differences in quality or rate of wound healing. Of the seven articles on pain, all were clinical studies, with some suggesting some benefit regarding pain relief.
Finally, of the six articles regarding neurologic conditions, laser treatment had mixed benefits. The single study with a low risk of bias reported no significant differences in time to reach recovery or duration of postoperative IV opioid administration following intervertebral disk herniation surgery [46]. One experimental study evaluated the effect of laser therapy after experimental crush sciatic nerve injury and suggested some benefit [49].
The reasons for the studies’ risks of bias, which make it difficult to draw certain conclusions from the literature review results, are several. In the evaluated studies, the small groups of animals were consistently a major source of a high risk of bias, as well as studies where control groups were missing or where people who evaluated/made measurements on the animals were aware of the treatment given. Study groups with individuals of different ages, genders, and breeds could also contribute to a large spread of the results. The design of some of the studies was of insufficient quality to convince the research and veterinary scientific communities to accept (or discard) the therapy. Additionally, a major reason for the difficulty in drawing any firm conclusions is the heterogeneity of the treatment protocols. Despite the majority of studies looking at therapeutic laser therapy, the included studies used different types of lasers, with different wavelengths. Further, there was no agreement regarding dose and treatment time, and in many cases, the treatment parameters were not fully described. Considering the heterogeneity between studies and the low number of studies for each combination of species and indication, pooled statistical analysis with meta-analysis was not feasible. With many small studies, the possibility of publication bias increases; small studies with a negative outcome are less likely to be published [51]. The methods to detect and adjust for publication bias require that there are at least some larger studies to be used as a reference [52]. This made it impossible to conduct any further statistical analyses on the material.
When a method is introduced to veterinary medicine, it is important to know its clinical effects for its proposed indications. Before a sufficient number of studies have been conducted, and a meta-analysis of the effects performed, it is important to have knowledge of the method’s mode of action and application. The results of this literature review suggest that several factors may affect this proposed mechanism of action; the penetration depth of light depends on the wavelength of the laser, if the hair coat is clipped or not, and the type of tissue that is irradiated. The fact that some lasers may cause an increase in tissue temperature, and subsequent increase in blood flow [16,17], may be positive for healing processes; however, it may also pose an increased risk of injury [34]. It is also possible that the influence of light therapy, with a focus on the laser, on tissue effects depends on the total dosage of laser radiation used, and the time and method of radiation. It has been suggested that radiation in the early stages of healing, and repeated radiation over a certain period, could have different amounts of effectiveness on tissues such as bone [53].

5. Conclusions

The systematic literature review undertaken in this study found a general lack of quality evidence in the scientific documentation regarding the clinical effects of laser and LED light therapy in horses, dogs, and cats. For most of the indications, there was insufficient scientific evidence for favorable clinical effects; the studies were (a) negative or (b) of insufficient quality, or (c) the results were contradictory or (d) confirmatory results were lacking. Although some beneficial effects have been reported for laser therapy, the conflicting study results and unclear application for clinical use are explained by the wide variety of treatment parameters used in the studies, such as wavelength, laser class, dose and effect, and the frequency and duration of treatment. In many cases, the description of phototherapy use was incomplete, such as the dose used.
Although potential mechanisms of action have been evaluated in tissue and cell culture, as well as some live animal experiments, clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and proper use of light therapy must be conducted prior to its widespread application for clinical use. Moving forward, multi-institutional studies evaluating a large number of patients with strict inclusion criteria for various conditions and complete description of the application of light therapy are recommended. Additionally, dose titration studies are needed to determine the optimal dose, power, and frequency of light therapy for clinical use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; Methodology; all authors, Formal analysis; D.L.M.; Data curation; D.L.M.; Writing—original draft preparation; D.L.M.; Writing—review and editing; all authors, Funding acquisition; A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This systematic literature review was partly funded by SLU Future One Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Grant number: SLU.ua.2020.4.2-3148.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the most helpful and professional librarians, Åsa Ode, Britt-Marie Bergquist and Jenny Casey Eriksson, responsible for developing the search strategy and creation of the initial reference library to review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liebert, A.; Kiat, H. The history of light therapy in hospital physiotherapy and medicine with emphasis on Australia: Evolution into novel areas of practice. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2021, 37, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pryor, B.; Millis, D.L. Therapeutic Laser in Veterinary Medicine. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2015, 45, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Avci, P.; Gupta, A.; Sadasivam, M.; Vecchio, D.; Pam, Z.; Pam, N.; Hamblin, M.R. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: Stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2013, 32, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Higgins, J.; Thomas, J. (Eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 6.2; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current2021 (accessed on 8 April 2022).
  5. Statens Beredning för Medicinsk och Social Utvärdering [SBU]. SBU:s Metodbok 2022. Available online: https://www.sbu.se/sv/metod/sbus-metodbok/?pub=48286 (accessed on 8 April 2022).
  6. Looney, A.L.; Huntingford, J.L.; Blaeser, L.L.; Mann, S. A randomized blind placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on canine elbow osteoarthritis. Can. Vet. J. 2018, 59, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Rogatko, C.P.; Baltzer, W.I.; Tennant, R. Preoperative low level laser therapy in dogs undergoing tibial plateau levelling osteotomy: A blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 2017, 30, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Renwick, A.I.; Brodbelt, D.C.; Ferguson, J.; Abreu, H. Influence of class IV laser therapy on the outcomes of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Vet. Surg. 2018, 47, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kennedy, K.C.; Martinez, S.A.; Martinez, S.E.; Tucker, R.L.; Davies, N.M. Effects of low-level laser therapy on bone healing and signs of pain in dogs following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2018, 79, 893–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santiago, V.; Piram, A.; Fuziy, A. Effect of soft laser in bone repair after expansion of the midpalatal suture in dogs. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2012, 142, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wozniak, P.; Brzeski, W.; Chyczewski, M.; Jalynski, M. The influence of limited strength laser radiation on the effective treatment of dogs with osteomyelitis. Med. Weter. 1997, 53, 665–668. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindholm, A.C.; Swensson, U.; de Mitri, N.; Collinder, E. Clinical effects of betamethasone and hyaluronan, and of defocalized carbon dioxide laser treatment on traumatic arthritis in the fetlock joints of horses. J. Vet. Med. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2002, 49, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bergh, A.; Nyman, G.; Roepstorff, L.; Zhou, Q.; Hallberg, M.; Drevemo, S.; Roethlisberger-Holm, K. Defocused CO2 laser therapy in traumatic arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joint: A randomized clinical study. Equine Comp. Exerc. Phys. 2006, 4, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zielinska, P.; Nicpon, J.; Kielbowicz, Z.; Soroko, M.; Dudek, K.; Zaborski, D. Effects of high intensity laser therapy in the treatment of tendon and ligament injuries in performance horses. Animals 2020, 8, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marr, C.M.; Love, S.; Boyd, J.S.; McKellar, Q. Factors affecting the clinical outcome of injuries to the superficial digital flexor tendon in National Hunt and point-to-point racehorses. Vet. Rec. 1993, 132, 476–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bergh, A.; Nyman, G.; Lundeberg, T.; Drevemo, S. Effect of defocused CO2 laser on equine tissue perfusion. Acta Vet. Scand. 2006, 47, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Godlewska, M.; Soroko, M.; Zielinska, P.; Dudek, K. The use of thermography for assessment of high-intensity laser therapy in racehorses: Pilot study. Med. Weter.-Vet. Med.-Sci. Pract. 2020, 10, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monici, M.; Gnerucci, A.; Falconi, T.; Bani, D.; Cialdai, F.; Fusi, F.; Romano, G. Laser therapy penetration depth: A near-infrared study on a horse tendon model. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018, 8, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gammel, J.E.; Biskup, J.J.; Drum, M.G.; Newkirk Kim Lux, C.N. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the healing of surgically closed incisions and surgically created open wounds in dogs. Vet. Surg. 2018, 47, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kurach, L.M.; Stanley, B.J.; Gazzola, K.M.; Fritz, M.C.; Steficek, B.A.; Hauptman, J.G.; Seymour, K.J. The Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Healing of Open Wounds in Dogs. Vet. Surg. 2015, 44, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Debraekt, M.M.H.I.; Vanalphen, F.A.M.; Kuijpersjagtman, A.M.; Maltha, J.C. Effect of low-level laser therapy on wound-healing after palatal surgery in beagle dogs. Lasers Surg. Med. 1991, 11, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wardlaw, J.L.; Gazzola, K.M.; Wagoner, A.; Brinkman, E.; Burt, J.; Butler, R.; Gunter, J.M.; Senter, L.H. Laser Therapy for Incision Healing in 9 Dogs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 5, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bharti, B.; Pandey, S.S.; Garg, U.K.; Shukla, B.P. Low level laser therapy for the healing of contaminated wounds in dogs: Histopathological changes. Indian J. Vet. Surg. 2013, 34, 57–58. [Google Scholar]
  24. Marchegiani, A.; Spaterna, A.; Cerquetella, M.; Tambella, A.M.; Fruganti, A.; Paterson, A. Fluorescence biomodulation in the management of canine interdigital pyoderma cases: A prospective, single-blinded, randomized and controlled clinical study. Vet. Dermatol. 2019, 30, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stich, A.N.; Rosenkrantz, W.S.; Griffin, C.E. Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy on localized canine atopic dermatitis severity score and localized pruritic visual analog score in pedal pruritus due to canine atopic dermatitis. Vet. Dermatol. 2014, 25, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kampa, N.; Jitpean, S.; Seesupa, S.; Hoisang, S. Penetration depth study of 830 nm low-intensity laser therapy on living dog tissue. Vet. World 2020, 7, 1417–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hochman-Elam, L.N.; Heidel, R.E.; Shmalberg, J.W. Effects of laser power, wavelength, coat length, and coat color on tissue penetration using photobiomodulation in healthy dogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 84, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  28. Keerti, N.; Bhargava, M.K.; Madhu, S.; Dharmendra, K.; Bhowmick, D. Low level laser therapy for healing of aural haematoma in dogs. Intas Polivet 2016, 2, 262–269. [Google Scholar]
  29. Olivieri, L.; Cavina, D.; Radicchi, G.; Miragliotta, V.; Abramo, F. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy on hair regrowth in dogs with noninflammatory alopecia: A pilot study. Vet. Dermatol. 2015, 26, 35–39.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaneps, A.J.; Hultgren, B.D.; Riebold, T.W.; Shires, G.M. Laser therapy in the horse: Histopathologic response. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1984, 45, 581–582. [Google Scholar]
  31. Petersen, S.L.; Botes, C.; Olivier, A.; Guthrie, A.J. The effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on wound healing in horses. Equine Vet. J. 1999, 31, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gomez-Villamandos, R.J.; Santisteban Valenzuela, J.M.; Ruiz Calatrava, I.; Gomez-Villamandos, J.C.; Avila Jurado, I. He-Ne laser therapy by fibroendoscopy in the mucosa of the equine upper airway. Lasers Surg. Med. 1995, 16, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bader, O.A.; Eesa, M.J. Treatment of hyper-granulated limb wounds in horses. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci. 2011, 2, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bergh, A.; Ridderstråle, Y.; Ekman, S. Defocused CO2 laser on equine skin: A histological examination. Equine Vet. J. 2007, 39, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duesterdieck-Zellmer, K.F.; Larson, M.K.; Plant, T.K.; Sundholm-Tepper, A.; Payton, M.E. Ex vivo penetration of low-level laser light through equine skin and flexor tendons. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2016, 77, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ryan, T.; Smith, R.K.W. An investigation into the depth of penetration of low level laser therapy through the equine tendon in vivo. Ir. Vet. J. 2007, 60, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luna, S.P.L.; Schoen, A.; Trindade, P.H.E.; Rocha, P.B. Penetration profiles of a class iv therapeutic laser and a photobiomodulation therapy device in equine skin. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 85, 102846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tomacheuski, R.M.; Taffarel, M.O.; Cardoso, G.S.; Derussi, A.A.P.; Ferrante, M.; Volpato, R.; Luna, S.P.L. Postoperative analgesic effects of laserpuncture and meloxicam in bitches submitted to ovariohysterectomy. Vet. Sci. 2020, 21, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nascimento, F.F.; Marques, V.I.; Crociolli, G.C.; Nicácio, G.M.; Nicácio, I.P.A.G.; Cassu, R.N. Analgesic efficacy of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 81, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martin, B.B., Jr.; Klide, A.M. Treatment of chronic back pain in horses. Stimulation of acupuncture points with a low powered infrared laser. Vet. Surg. 1987, 16, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Haussler, K.K.; Manchon, P.T.; Donnell, J.R.; Frisbie, D.D. Effects of low-level laser therapy and chiropractic care on back pain in quarter horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 86, 102891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brevault, S.; Dallongeville, E.; Geffroy, O. Etude de l’efficacite de la therapie laser dans la gestion des dorsalgies du cheval de sport [Study of the effectiveness of laser therapy in the management of dorsalgia in horses]. Prat. Vet. Equine 2016, 191, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
  43. Petermann, U. Comparison of pre- and post-treatment pain scores of twenty one horses with laminitis treated with acupoint and topical low level impulse laser therapy. Am. J. Tradit. Chin. Vet. Med. 2011, 1, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ghazaleh, N.; Sharifi, D.; Ghamsari, S.; Mokmeli, S.; Rasooli, A. Evaluation of low level laser effects on epidural anaesthesia in horse. Iran. J. Vet. Surg. 2018, 1, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bruno, E.; Canal, S.; Antonucci, M.; Bernardini, M.; Balducci, F.; Musella, V.; Mussoni, M.; Spinella, G. Perilesional photobiomodulation therapy and physical rehabilitation in post-operative recovery of dogs surgically treated for thoracolumbar disk extrusion. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bennaim, M.; Porato, M.; Jarleton, A.; Hamon, M.; Carroll, J.D.; Gommeren, K.; Balligand, M. Preliminary evaluation of the effects of photobiomodulation therapy and physical rehabilitation on early postoperative recovery of dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy for treatment of thoracolumbar intervertebral disk disease. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2017, 78, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williams, C.C.; Barone, G. Is low level laser therapy an effective adjunctive treatment to hemilaminectomy in dogs with acute onset parapleglia secondary to intervertebral disc disease? J. Vet. Int. Med. 2011, 25, 730–731. [Google Scholar]
  48. Draper, W.E.; Schubert, T.A.; Clemmons, R.M.; Miles, S.A. Low-level laser therapy reduces time to ambulation in dogs after hemilaminectomy: A preliminary study. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2012, 53, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharifi, D.; Hadjibekloo, A.R.; Ghamsari, S.M.; Taghvi, H.R. Evaluation of low level laser effects on muscular ability in dog: An animal model. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Univ. Tehran 2005, 4, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller, L.A.; Torraca, D.G.; De Taboada, L. Retrospective observational study and analysis of two different photobiomodulation therapy protocols combined with rehabilitation therapy as therapeutic interventions for canine degenerative myelopathy. Photobiomodul. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2020, 38, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, F.; Parekh, S.; Hooper, L.; Loke, Y.K.; Ryder, J.; Sutton, A.J.; Hing, C.; Kwok, C.S.; Pang, C.; Harvey, I. Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technol. Assess. 2010, 14, 1–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rücker, G.; Carpenter, J.R.; Schwarzer, G. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis. Biom. J. 2011, 53, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saito, S.; Shimizu, N. Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irradiation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during expansion in the rat. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1997, 111, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 00667 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the stages of the selection process used for identification of studies eligible for final analysis.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the stages of the selection process used for identification of studies eligible for final analysis.
Animals 13 00667 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: musculoskeletal conditions.
Table 1. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: musculoskeletal conditions.
Musculoskeletal Conditions
StudyStudy DesignControl GroupStudy SampleIntervention and DosageOutcome VariablesMain Results Study Risk of Bias
Looney AL et al., 2018 [6]RCTYes20 dogs10 to 20 J/cm2 (12 Watts, 980 nm, continuous) based on size of dog vs. 0 J/cm2 for 6 weeksLameness score, Helsinki Chronic Pain Index pain score, NSAID doseReduction in NSAID dose, lameness score, pain score in PBMT vs. sham group in dogs with elbow osteoarthritisLow
Rogatko CP et al., 2016 [7] RCTYes27 dogsSingle preoperative treatment 3 J/cm2 (6 watts, 800–970 nm dual wavelength, continuous and pulsed) vs. sham treatment Lameness score, response to manipulation, force plate evaluation, radiographic healingIncreased weight bearing of treated dogs on force plate at 8 weeks after TPLO surgery, no other differences Low
Renwick SM et al., 2018 [8]RCTYes95 dogs Three treatments in a 4 day post-operative period, optional fourth treatment 10–14 days post-op, total joules of 252 to 2280 J (up to 15 watt continuous, 20 watt peak power, 660 nm red [100 mW], 800, 905, and 970 nm infrared, with 10 phases of different pulse frequency vs. placebo of red light (660 nm [4 mW]). Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs, adjusted Canine Orthopedic Index, radiographic healing index of osteotomy, time to cessation of NSAID administration, wound healingGait section of adjusted Canine Orthopedic Index improved in laser group compared to control group 8 weeks after TPLO surgery. No other differences.Low
Kennedy KC, et al. 2018 [9]RCTYes12 dogs2.25 J/cm2 during hospital treatment and 1.5 J/cm2 during at-home treatments (class 2 laser 635 nm) vs. control group treated with the same laser units, with the 5-mW diodes replaced with red LED light-bulbs. Accelerometers, Canine Brief Pain Inventory, force plate evaluation, radiographs, synovial fluid inflammatory markers Improved ground reaction forces and pain scores in control group compared to laser groupLow
Santiago V et al. 2014 [10] Case control experimentalYes11 dogsGroup 1: of 90 to 120 J/cm2, 790 to 904 nm.
Group 2: no laser		Histologic specimens of palatal suture after maxilla expansionSignificant difference in the quality of palatal sutures visually observed. No difference in number of osteoblasts.Moderate
Wozniak P et al., 1997 [11]Case StudyNo16 dogsDetails lacking other than continuous 810 nm wavelengthClinical, radiographic and hematologic clinical assessmentsAuthors state that most dogs had a positive result of photobiomodulation in dogs with clinical signs of osteomyelitis High
Lindholm AC et al., 2002 [12]RCTComparison group179 horses60 J/cm2 (25 watts, 10,600 nm) treatments on days 1, 3 and 5 vs. 12 mg betamethasone and 20 mg HA in affected fetlock jointsLameness score, flexion test, radiographic and ultrasonographic evaluationsCarbon dioxide laser treatment had 80% response rate vs. 68% for betamethasone/hyaluronic acid treatment for arthritis of the fetlock jointModerate
Bergh A, et al. 2006 [13]RCTYes16 horses91 J/cm2 (16 watts), 5 treatments over 1 week Lameness score, accerelrometer, synovial fluid inflammatory markersNo significant differences in lameness scores or synovial fluid inflammatory markersLow
Zielinska P, et al. 2020 [14]RCTYes25 horses16 J/cm2 (808 nm, 5 watts, 700 Hz) and 16 J/cm2 (980 nm, 4 watts, 1000 Hz) vs. control groupPain, swelling, lameness, ultrasound evaluationLaser therapy improved pain, edema, lameness, and lesion percentage, but not tendon lesion echogenicityLow
Marr CM et al., 1993 [15]Retrospective StudyNo73 horsesLaser compared with polysulfated glycosaminoglyans or conservative therapyReturn to work, time out of trainingNo significant differences among groups regarding return to work or time out of training High
Bergh A et al., 2006 [16]Controlled prospective studyYes10 horses91 J/cm2 (10,600 nm, 16 watts, continuous)Skin and muscle temperature, blood perfusionLaser treatment increased perfusion and skin temperature in both clipped and unclipped skin, with greater increases in clipped skin. No changes in muscle perfusion or temperature. Low
Godlewska M et al., 2020 [17]Prospective studyNo16 horses20 J/cm2 (600 J total, 808 nm, 4 watts, 700 Hz) and 15 J/cm2 (980 nm, 450 J total, 2000 Hz)Surface temperature measurements obtained by thermography cameraSurface temperature of fetlock joints increased by a mean of 3.0 degrees C after laser treatmentLow
Monici M et al., 2018 [18]Ex-vivo experimental studyNoCadaveric specimens from 1 horseTwo laser diodes, 905 nm (25 watt peak power with 100 ns pulse width, 10 Hz) and 808 nm (1.1 watt continuous mode)Laser penetration measured in up to 50 μm thickness sections of tendon and ligament with pyroelectric detectorPenetration depth values for superficial digital flexor tendons and suspensory ligaments were 0.5 mm and 0.16 mm, respectively, corresponding to a respective power attenuation factor of 10−3/mm and 10−4/mm, respectivelyModerate
Table
Table 2. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: skin and wound healing.
Table 2. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: skin and wound healing.
Skin and Wound Healing
StudyStudy DesignControl GroupStudy SampleIntervention and DosageOutcome VariablesMain Results Study Risk of Bias
Gammel JE et al., 2018 [19]RCTYes10 dogs5 J/cm2 (980 nm, 2 to 3.5 watts, daily treatment for 5 days) vs. sham treatmentVisual assessment, wound measurements, photographs, and biopsies of surgical incisions and punch biopsy woundsNo differences between groups regarding subjective assessment of healing time and wound measurements. Control group had more necrosis and perivascular lymphocytes and macrophages at day 7, and treated group had more perivascular lymphocytes and macrophages on day 14Low
Kurach LM et al., 2015 [20]RCTYes10 dogs1.125 J/cm2 (635 nm, 7.5 mW) 3 times weekly for 32 days vs. standard of care managementWound planimetry, percent contractions and epithelialization, histologic evaluationNo differences between treated and control wounds for any parameterLow
Debraekt MM et al., 1991 [21]RCTYes30 dogs1 J/cm2 (830 nm, 30 mW) 3 times per week for 10 treatments vs. sham treatmentWound areas and contraction from standard photographs of Von Langenbeck’s palatal repair No significant differences in quality or rate of wound healingLow
Wardlaw JL et al., 2019 [22]RCTYes9 dogs8 J/cm2 (850 nm laser, pulsed 8 Hz with 90% on, 10% off emissions, and 670 nm LED) daily for 7 days vs. non-laser treated controlsDigital photographs and incision healing scores following intervertebral disc surgeryLaser treatment resulted in improved scar scale and cosmetic wound healingModerate
Bharti, B et al. 2013 [23]RCTYes18 dogs3 J (10 Hz for 5 min) or 6 J (20 Hz for 10 min) daily for 5 days vs. dressing and antiseptic liquidBiopsies on days 0 and 14No differences between treated and control groups in histopathological examinationsModerate
Marchegiani, A. et al., 2019 [24]RCTYes36 dogsBlue LED device with peak wavelength between 440 and 460 nm, power
density of between 55 and 129 mW/cm
2, for 2 min
and antibiotic vs. antibiotic control treatment		Global lesion score, neutrophil engulfing bacterial score for evaluation of canine interdigital pyodermaSignificant improvement in both scoring systems compared to antibiotic control group, and decreased time to resolution of lesionsModerate
Stich AN et al., 2014 [25]RCTYes30 dogs4 J/cm2 (980 nm and 810 nm dual wavelength with 80%/20% output, 4 W, 3 times per week for 2 weeks, then 2 times per week for 2 weeks) vs. placebo laser Localized atopic dermatitis severity score and owner localized pruritic visual analog score in dogs with atopic dermatitisNo significant differences between groups from weeks 0 and 5, but both groups had decreased scores from baselineLow
Kampa N et al. 2020 [26]Controlled trialNo24 dogs4 J/cm2 (830 nm, 200 mW) continuous and pulsed laser with contact and non-contact applicationPower meter to determine penetration depth through abdominal skinContinuous laser had higher mean output power than pulsed laser, mean output power greater for contact vs. non-contact technique, tissue penetration up to 14 mm of tissue depthLow
Hochman-Elam LN et al., 2020 [27]Prospective research studyN/A47 dogsTwo laser systems used, Class IV (980/810 nm, 0.5, 1,5, 3, and 5 W assessed) and Class IIIb (904 nm, 500 mW)Thermophile laser sensor to detect light penetration through inguinal fold and calcaneal tendon in different coloured dogs with varying coat lengthsLaser transmission was greater in Class IV laser, higher powers, dogs with shaved skin, less skin pigment. Coat length was not a significant predictor of laser penetration. Low
Keerti N et al., 2016 [28]RCTYes12 dogs2.4 J (30 Hz, 2 or 4 min) for 7 days vs. antibiotic controlVisual score cards for evaluation of inflammation, exudation, embedding of sutures, and gross appearance of suture line in dogs with aural hematomasLaser treated dogs had less inflammation, exudation, minimum embedding of sutures and faster healing High
Olivieri L et al., 2014 [29]Case studyNo (untreated area of skin for comparison)7 dogs3 J/cm2 (3 diodes, 470 nm, 685 nm, 830 nm, 13 × 16 MW, 4 × 50 mW, and 4 × 200 mW, respectively, 5 Hz) twice weeklyHair regrowth in dogs with canine non-inflammatory alopeciaHair regrowth greatly improved in 6/7 dogs, improved in 1High
Kaneps AJ et al., 1984 [30]RCTYes6 horses57 mJ, (904 nm, pulsed with 300 nsec pulse dura-tion), 15 min, for 5 daysHistologic evaluation of skin and superficial digital flexor tendons of horse with surgical incisionsNo qualitative differences in healing between laser irradiated and nonirradiated tissuesLow
Petersen SL et al., 1999 [31]RCTYes6 horses2 J/cm2 (830 nm, 30 mW) daily vs. nontreated controlsPhotoplanimetry to evaluate wound contraction and epithelialization on surgically created open woundsLaser had no clinically significant effect on wound healingLow
Gomez-Villamandos RJ et al., 1995 [32]RCTYes12 horsesHe-Ne fibroendoscope, daily for 7 daysHistopathology of created pharyngeal mucosal ulcersLaser treatment accelerated cicatrisation faster than controlsModerate
Bader OA et al., 2011 [33]RCTYes40 wounds9.72 J/cm2 laser treatment compare with bandage alone, copper sulfate ointment, silver nitrate ointment, red mercury ointmentClinical and histopathology of created wounds with granulation tissue Surgical removal of granulation tissue followed by laser treatment resulted in more rapid healingModerate
Bergh A, 2007 [34]RCTNo13 horses91 J/cm2 to skin of hamstrings, 137 J/cm2 to fetlock, and 450 J/cm2 to loin areas (10,600 nm, 16–20 W)Histology of skin in horsesDose dependent changes occurred in skin histology after laser, with severe tissue damage in the 450 J/cm2 doseLow
Duesterdieck-Zellmer KF et al., 2016 [35]Research StudyNo19 equine cadavers1 W, 800 and 970 nmPercentage of energy penetration by photodetector measured in superficial digital and deep digital flexor tendons before and after clipping and after shaving in horses of different skin colorClipping or shaving improved laser penetration, light-colored skin allowed the greatest penetration, 800 nm was best in light-colored skin, and 970 nm best in dark-colored skin. Only 1–20% and 0.1–4% of energy was absorbed by SDFT and DDFT, respectivelyLow
Ryan T et al., 2007 [36]Research StudyNo9 equine cadavers500 mW, 810 nmPhotodetector for measuring penetration of laser in tendons Coat colour did not affect penetration to superficial digital flexor tendons. Clipped hair and skin cleaned with alcohol increased light transmissionLow
Luna SPL et al., 2020 [37]Experimental studyNo12 horses2 lasers compared, 67.92 J/cm2 (980 nm, 9 W) and 0.34 J/cm2 (905 nm, superpulsed peak power 50 W, 1.25 W average output) Cervical skin thickness measured with a cutometer and ultrasound, percentage of laser penetration measured with photodectorThere was greater penetration in cervical skin with the superpulsed laser than the class IV laser. There was also greater penetration in light skin horsesModerate
Table
Table 3. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: pain.
Table 3. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: pain.
Pain
StudyStudy DesignControl GroupStudy SampleIntervention and DosageOutcome VariablesMain Results Study Risk of Bias
Tomacheuski RM et al., 2020 [38]RCTNo16 dogs10 J over 5 acupuncture points (904 nm, 124 Hz) laser acupuncture vs. meloxicamGlasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale and Dynamic Interactive Visual Analog ScaleDogs with laser acupuncture had lower pain scores at several time points following routine ovariohysterectomyModerate
Nascimento FF et al., 2019 [39]RCTYes30 cats3 J/cm2 (904 nm, 70 mW, 124 Hz) at acupuncuture points vs. electroacupuncture at same points vs. controlInteractive Visual Analogue Scale and UNESP-Botucatu Multidimensional Composite Pain Scale in cats undergoing routine ovariohysterectomy. The pain scores did not significantly differ between the treatment groups at any time point. The prevalence of rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the control group than in the laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture groups Moderate
Martin BB et al., 1987 [40]Case studyNo14 horses3 mW, 904 nm, 360 Hz, 2 min contact over each of five acupuncture points once weekly for 8–16 weeksClinical signs of back pain, ability to perform, owner evaluation of horses with back painClinical signs alleviated in 10, 3 unchanged, 1 lost to follow-upHigh
Haussler KK et al., 2020 [41]RCTNo61 horses94 J/cm2 (4 810 nm diode lasers, 3 W total power) laser applied to 5–10 sites based on clinical findings compared with chiropractic or combined laser and chiropractic treatmentVisual analog scale of perceived back pain and dysfunction, detailed spinal examinations evaluating pain, muscle tone, and stiffness. Laser therapy produced significant reductions in back pain, epaxial muscle hypertonicity, and trunk stiffness. Combined laser and chiropractic produced similar reductions. Chiropractic treatment by itself did not produce any significant changes in back pain, muscle hypertonicity, or trunk stiffness.Moderate
Brevault S et al., 2016 [42]RCTYesDetails unavailableDetails unavailableMuscle tone, back mobility, deep and superficial sensitivity, dynamic assessment and rider evaluation of back pain in horsesMuscle tone, back mobility, deep and superficial sensitivity improved with laser treatment, but no differences in dynamic assessment and rider evaluationHigh
Petermann U, 2011 [43]Case studyNo21 horsesDetails unavailable, laser therapy to acupuncture pointsPain score of horses with laminitisPost treatment pain scores improved over pre-treatment scoresHigh
Ghazaleh N et al., 2018 [44]Prospective experimental cross-over designYes5 horsesLaser treatment (3000 Hz for 10 min) compared with saline, lidocaine, and laser plus lidocaine caudal epidural injectionsMotor and sensory blockade evaluations assess by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, noxious stimulus with a pin, and pinch test in horses undergoing epidural analgesiaNo difference in sensory or motor stimulation response between groups, but laser in combination with lidocaine had a longer duration of analgesia than laser or epidural aloneHigh
Table
Table 4. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: neurologic conditions.
Table 4. Summary of laser and LED therapy based on a systematic review of the published literature: neurologic conditions.
Neurologic Conditions
StudyStudy DesignControl GroupStudy SampleIntervention and DosageOutcome VariablesMain Results Study Risk of Bias
Bruno E et al., 2020 [45]Retrospective studyYes24 dogs4 J/cm2 (808 and 905 nm, 50% duty cycle, 18 Hz,1.2 W with peak power of 75 W, correction of dose with skin color) daily at the time of rehabilitation vs. rehabilitation and no laser. Modified Frankel scoring system in dogs undergoing postoperative care following intervertebral disk herniation surgeryThere was no statistical difference in time to regain ambulatory abilityModerate
Bennaim M et al., 2017 [46]RCTYes32 dogs12 J (810 nm, 1 W cluster probe with 5 clusters, 5.5 W/cm2, 2.5 Hz) daily for 5 days vs. laser and physical rehabilitation with sham laser or sham laser onlyDuration of postoperative IV opioid administration and recovery grades in dogs following intervertebral disk herniation surgeryTime to reach recovery and duration of postoperative IV opioid administration did not differ among groupsLow
Williams CC et al., 2011 [47]RCTYes17 dogs635 nm, 9–1151 Hz, other details not available vs. controlRecovery time following intervertebral disk herniation surgeryLaser did not shorten recovery times Moderate
Draper WE, et al. 2012 [48]RCTYes36 dogs12 J (810 nm, 1 W cluster probe with 5 clusters, 25 W/cm2) over 3 sites for 1 min/site daily for 5 days vs. no treatmentModified Frankel scoring system in dogs following intervertebral disk herniation surgeryTime to achieve a modified Frankel score of 4 was significantly lower in the laser group compared to the control group Moderate
Sharifi, D et al. 2005 [49]Experimental controlled studyYes10 dogsDetails not available regarding laser treatment except 10 min of laser treatment daily for 2 weeks vs. no laserElectromyography (EMG)EMG showed significant differences in muscle force of the semimembranosus and semitendinosus muscles in dogs undergoing experimental crush sciatic nerve injuryHigh
Miller LA et al., 2020 [50]RetrospectiveNo20 dogsClass III laser 8 J/cm2 (904 nm, 500 mW) vs. Class IV laser 14–21 J/cm2 (980 nm, 6–12 W)Time from symptom onset and euthanasia, time between symptom onset and nonambulatory paresis or paralysis Dogs receiving Class IV laser had slower disease progression and longer survival timesHigh
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Millis, D.L.; Bergh, A. A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: Laser Therapy. Animals 2023, 13, 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040667

AMA Style

Millis DL, Bergh A. A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: Laser Therapy. Animals. 2023; 13(4):667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040667

Chicago/Turabian Style

Millis, Darryl L., and Anna Bergh. 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: Laser Therapy" Animals 13, no. 4: 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040667

APA Style

Millis, D. L., & Bergh, A. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: Laser Therapy. Animals, 13(4), 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040667

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop