[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.3115/1218955.1219039dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Generalized multitext grammars

Published: 21 July 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Generalized Multitext Grammar (GMTG) is a synchronous grammar formalism that is weakly equivalent to Linear Context-Free Rewriting Systems (LCFRS), but retains much of the notational and intuitive simplicity of Context-Free Grammar (CFG). GMTG allows both synchronous and independent rewriting. Such flexibility facilitates more perspicuous modeling of parallel text than what is possible with other synchronous formalisms. This paper investigates the generative capacity of GMTG, proves that each component grammar of a GMTG retains its generative power, and proposes a generalization of Chomsky Normal Form, which is necessary for synchronous CKY-style parsing.

References

[1]
A. Aho and J. Ullman. 1969. Syntax directed translations and the pushdown assembler. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 3:37--56, February.
[2]
T. Becker, A. Joshi, and O. Rambow. 1991. Long-distance scrambling and tree adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Berlin, Germany.
[3]
E. Bertsch and M. J. Nederhof. 2001. On the complexity of some extensions of RCG parsing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 66--77, Beijing, China.
[4]
M. Dras and T. Bleam. 2000. How problematic are clitics for S-TAG translation? In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+5), Paris, France.
[5]
J. Hopcroft, R. Motwani, and J. Ullman. 2001. Introduction to Automota Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, USA.
[6]
I. Dan Melamed, G. Satta, and B. Wellington. 2004. Generalized multitext grammars. Technical Report 04-003, NYU Proteus Project. http://nlp.cs.nyu.edu/pubs/.
[7]
I. Dan Melamed. 2003. Multitext grammars and synchronous parsers. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the North American Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL), pages 158--165, Edmonton, Canada.
[8]
I. Dan Melamed. 2004. Statistical machine translation by parsing. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Barcelona, Spain.
[9]
O. Rambow and G. Satta. 1996. Synchronous models of language. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Santa Cruz, USA.
[10]
O. Rambow and G. Satta. 1999. Independent parallelism in finite copying parallel rewriting systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 223:87--120, July.
[11]
O. Rambow. 1995. Formal and Computational Aspects of Natural Language Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
[12]
S. Shieber. 1994. Restricting the weak-generative capactiy of synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. Computational Intelligence, 10(4):371--386.
[13]
D. J. Weir. 1988. Characterizing Mildly Context-Sensitive Grammar Formalisms. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
[14]
D. Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. Computational Linguistics, 23(3):377--404, September.
[15]
D. H. Younger. 1967. Recognition and parsing of context-free languages in time n3. Information and Control, 10(2):189--208, February.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Prefix probabilities for linear context-free rewriting systemsProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Parsing Technologies10.5555/2206329.2206348(151-162)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2011
  • (2010)Syntax-driven machine translation as a model of ESL revisionProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters10.5555/1944566.1944723(1373-1381)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2010
  • (2010)Learning to translate with source and target syntaxProceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.5555/1858681.1858827(1443-1452)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2010
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ACL '04: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
July 2004
729 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 21 July 2004

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Prefix probabilities for linear context-free rewriting systemsProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Parsing Technologies10.5555/2206329.2206348(151-162)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2011
  • (2010)Syntax-driven machine translation as a model of ESL revisionProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters10.5555/1944566.1944723(1373-1381)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2010
  • (2010)Learning to translate with source and target syntaxProceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.5555/1858681.1858827(1443-1452)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2010
  • (2010)Optimal parsing strategies for linear context-free rewriting systemsHuman Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.5555/1857999.1858117(769-776)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2010
  • (2009)Optimal reduction of rule length in linear context-free rewriting systemsProceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.5555/1620754.1620833(539-547)Online publication date: 31-May-2009
  • (2008)Statistical machine translationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/1380584.138058640:3(1-49)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2008
  • (2006)Quasi-synchronous grammarsProceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation10.5555/1654650.1654655(23-30)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2006
  • (2006)Empirical lower bounds on the complexity of translational equivalenceProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.3115/1220175.1220298(977-984)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2006
  • (2005)Some computational complexity results for synchronous context-free grammarsProceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing10.3115/1220575.1220676(803-810)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2005
  • (2005)Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection across parallel textsNatural Language Engineering10.1017/S135132490500384011:3(311-325)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media