[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

On Undecidability of Unary Nonnested PFP Operators for One Successor Function Theory

  • BRIEF COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Russian Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the decidability of first-order logic extensions. For example, it is established in Zolotov’s works that a logic with a unary transitive closure operator for the one successor theory is decidable. We show that in a similar case, a logic with a unary partial fixed point operator is undecidable. For this purpose, we reduce the halting problem for the counter machine to the problem of truth of the underlying formula. This reduction uses only one unary nonnested partial fixed operator that is applied to a universal or existential formula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. A. V. Aho and J. D. Ullman, “Universality of data retrieval languages,” in Proc. 6th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages–POPL ʼ79, San Antonio, Texas, 1979 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1979), pp. 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/567752.567763

  2. Yu. Gurevich and S. Shelah, “Fixed-point extensions of first-order logic,” Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 32, 265–280 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(86)90055-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S. M. Dudakov and M. A. Taitslin, “Collapse results for query languages in database theory,” Russ. Math. Surv. 61, 195–253 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1070/rm2006v061n02abeh004311

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. S. Zolotov, “On decidability of the theory with the transitive closure operator,” Lobachevskii J. Math. 36, 434–440 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995080215040186

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. S. Sekorin, “On equivalence of PFP-operator and PFP-quantifier,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1902, 012085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1902/1/012085

  6. S. M. Dudakov, “On safety of unary and nonunary IFP Operators,” Autom. Control Comput. Sci. 53, 683–688 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/s0146411619070034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. L. Minsky, Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Sekorin.

Ethics declarations

The author of this work declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekorin, V.S. On Undecidability of Unary Nonnested PFP Operators for One Successor Function Theory. Russ Math. 68, 79–82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X24700300

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066369X24700300

Keywords:

Navigation