The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue

• Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E., &Kornblum, S. (1989). Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements: Characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 529–543.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters.Vision Research,11, 459–474.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Briand, K., &Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 228–241.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visuo-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 188–202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Egly, R., &Homa, D. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 142–159.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Eriksen, C. W., &Webb, J. M. (1989). Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 175–183.

  Google Scholar 

• Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Sc Performance,11, 583–597.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M. (1988).Visual attention and the acquisition of extrafoveal information during eye fixations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 91–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and scene perception. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 260–283). New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M. (in press). The interface between perception and action: Evidence from eye movement control. In S. Davis & K. Aikens (Eds.),Vancouver studies in cognitive science: Vol. 4. Problems in perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Henderson, J. M., &Ferreira, F. (1990). The effect of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye-movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 417–429.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and parafoveal preview on object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 449–463.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 196–208,

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, H. C., &Zimba, L. D. (1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 409–430

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, H. C., &Zimba, L. D. (1987). Natural boundaries for the spread of directed visual attention.Neuropsychologia,2, 5–18.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Kjnsbourne, M. (1987). Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.),Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. New York: North-Holland.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, R., Kingstone, A., &Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Klein, R., &Mccormick, P. (1989). Covert visual orienting: Hemifield activation can be mimicked by zoom lens and midlocation placement strategies.Acta Psychologica,70, 235–250.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Laberge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Madden, D. J. (1992). Selective attention and visual search: Revision of an allocation model and application to age differences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 821–836.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Mccormick, P. A., &Klein, R. (1990). The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting.Acta Psychologica,75, 225–242.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, T. D., &Eriksen, C. W. (1987). Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 576–586.

  Google Scholar 

• Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nakayama, K., &Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and lexical access in reading. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 143–163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccadic preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., &Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 912–922.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Remington, R., &Pierce, L. (1984). Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 393–399.

  Google Scholar 

• Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Kjnsbourne, M., &Moscovitch, M. (1990). Hemispheric control of spatial attention.Brain & Cognition,12, 240–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting of attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &Mclean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., &Sheehy, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 59–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Tassinari, G., Aguoti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., &Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntary allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia,25, 55–71.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tsal, Y. (1989). Do illusory conjunctions support the feature integration theory? A critical review of theory and findings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 394–400.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yantis, S. (1988). On analog movements of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 203–206.

  Google Scholar 

• Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references