Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman-Kärber method

• Blackwell, H. R. (1953).Psychophysical thresholds: Experimental studies of methods of measurement (Rep. No. 36). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Bulletin of the Engineering Research Institute.

  Google Scholar 

• Bush, R. R. (1963). Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. I, pp. 429–469). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Church, J. D., &Cobb, E. B. (1973). On the equivalence of the Spearman-Kärber and maximum likelihood estimates of the mean.Journal of the American Statistical Association,68, 201–202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Engen, T. (1971). Psychophysics: I. Discrimination and detection. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.),Woodworth and Schlosberg’s experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 11–46). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

  Google Scholar 

• Epstein, B., &Churchman, C. W. (1944). On the statistics of sensitivity data.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,15, 90–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Falmagne, J. C. (1985).Elements of psychophysical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fechner, G. T. (1860).Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

  Google Scholar 

• Feller, W. (1971).An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. II, 2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• García-Pérez, M. A. (2002). Properties of some variants of adaptive staircases with fixed step sizes.Spatial Vision,15, 303–321.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gescheider, G. A. (1997).Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldstein, L. J., Lay, D. L., &Schneider, D. I. (1987).Calculus and its applications (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Green, D. M. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,87, 2662–2674.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Green, D. M., Richards, V. M., &Forrest, T. G. (1989). Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,86, 629–636.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1986). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 623–632.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones, F. N. (1956). A forced-choice method of limits.American Journal of Psychology,69, 672–673.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kärber, G. (1931). Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche [A contribution to the collective treatment of a pharmacological experimental series].Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie,162, 480–483.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klein, S. A. (2001). Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1421–1455.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klein, S. A., & Macmillan, N. A. (Eds.) (2001). Psychometric functions and adaptive methods [Special issue].Perception & Psychophysics,63(8).

• Lam, C. F., Dubno, J. R., &Mills, J. H. (1999). Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: A computer simulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,106, 1969–1976.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Leek, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1279–1292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Linschoten, M. R., Harvey, L. O., Jr.,Eller, P. M., &Jafek, B. W. (2001). Fast and accurate measurement of taste and smell thresholds using a maximum-likelihood adaptive staircase procedure.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1330–1347.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Luce, R. D. (1963). A threshold theory for simple detection experiments.Psychological Review,70, 61–79.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Luce, R. D. (1993).Sound and hearing: A conceptual introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• McKee, S. P., Klein, S. A., &Teller, D. Y. (1985). Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 286–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J. (1998). Cupid: A program for computations with probability distributions.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 544–545.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J., &Ulrich, R. (2001). On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1399–1420.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, J., &Ulrich, R. (2003). A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 11–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., &Boes, D. C. (1974).Introduction to the theory of statistics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Mortensen, U. (2002). Additive noise, Weibull functions, and the approximation of psychometric functions.Vision Research,42, 2371–2393.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (1999). The surface-weight illusion: On the contribution of grip force to perceived heaviness.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 23–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function.Computer Journal,3, 175–184.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ross, S. M. (2000).Introduction to probability models (7th ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sen, A. R. (1985). Location parameter, estimation of. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.),Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 101–105). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Spearman, C. (1908). The method of “right and wrong cases” (“constant stimuli”) without Gauss’s formulae.British Journal of Psychology,2, 227–242.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, S., &Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., &Zukofsky, P. (1982). Timing by skilled musicians. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music (pp. 181–239). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Strasburger, H. (2001a). Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1348–1355.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Strasburger, H. (2001b). Invariance of the psychometric function for character recognition across the visual field.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1356–1376.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stuart, A., &Ord, J. K. (1987).Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics: Vol. 1. Distributional theory (5th ed.). London: Griffin.

  Google Scholar 

• Treutwein, B., &Strasburger, H. (1999). Fitting the psychometric function.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 87–106.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trevan, J. W. (1927). The error of determination of toxicity.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B,101, 483–514.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 224–239.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wichmann, F. A., &Hill, N. J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1293–1313.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wonnacott, T. H., &Wonnacott, R. H. (1977).Introductory statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H. (1954).Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.

  Google Scholar 

• Yeshurun, Y. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial tasks.Vision Research,39, 293–306.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references