Abstract
Behavioral differences in the visual processing of objects and backgrounds as a function of cultural group are well documented. Recent neuroimaging evidence also points to cultural differences in neural activation patterns. Compared with East Asians, Westerners’ visual processing is more object focused, and they activate neural structures that reflect this bias for objects. In a recent adaptation study, East Asian older adults showed an absence of an object-processing area but normal adaptation for background areas. In the present study, 75 young and old adults (half East Asian and half Western) were tested in an fMR-adaptation study to examine differences in object and background processing as well as object—background binding. We found equivalent background processing in the parahippocampal gyrus in all four groups, diminished binding processes in the hippocampus in elderly East Asians and Westerners, and diminished object processing in elderly versus young adults in the lateral occipital complex. Moreover, elderly East Asians showed significantly less adaptation response in the object areas than did elderly Westerners. These findings demonstrate the malleability of perceptual processes as a result of differences in cohort-specific experiences or in cultural exposure over time.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.
Chee, M. W., Goh, J. O., Venkatraman, V., Tan, J. C., Gutchess, A., Sutton, B., et al. (2006). Age related changes in object processing and contextual binding revealed using fMR-adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 495–507.
Chiu, L. H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 235–242.
Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 12629–12633.
Crum, R. M., Anthony, J. C., Bassett, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 2386–2391.
Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 109–114.
Eldridge, L. L., Knowlton, B. J., Furmanski, C. S., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Engel, S. A. (2000). Remembering episodes: A selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1149–1152.
Epstein, R. [A.], Graham, K. S., & Downing, P. E. (2003). Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron, 37, 865–876.
Epstein, R. A., Higgins, J. S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005). Learning places from views: Variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 73–83.
Epstein, R. [A.], & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598–601.
Goh, J. O., Siong, S. C., Park, D., Gutchess, A., Hebrank, A., & Chee, M. W. (2004). Cortical areas involved in object, background, and object-background processing revealed with functional magnetic resonance adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10223–10228.
Gong, Y. (1983). Revision of Wechsler’s Adult Intelligence Scale in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 15, 362–370.
Grill-Spector, K., Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Research, 41, 1409–1422.
Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2001). fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293–321.
Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Boduroĝlu, A., & Park, D. C. (2006). Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 102–109.
Hedden, T., Park, D. C., Nisbett, R. [E.], Ji, L.-J., Jing, Q., & Jiao, S. (2002). Cultural variation in verbal versus spatial neuropsychological function across the life span. Neuropsychology, 16, 65–73.
Henke, K., Weber, B., Kneifel, S., Wieser, H. G., & Buck, A. (1999). Human hippocampus associates information in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 5884–5889.
Ji, L.-J., Zhang, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (2004). Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87, 57–65.
Joseph, J. E., & Gathers, A. D. (2003). Effects of structural similarity on neural substrates for object recognition. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 1–16.
Madden, D. J., & Langley, L. K. (2003). Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search. Psychology & Aging, 18, 54–67.
Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., Good, C. D., Hartley, T., Frackowiak, R. S., & Burgess, N. (2003). Navigation expertise and the human hippocampus: A structural brain imaging analysis. Hippocampus, 13, 250–259.
Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., et al. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8135–8139.
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.
Maylor, E. A., & Lavie, N. (1998). The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychology & Aging, 13, 563–573.
McCarley, J. S., Mounts, J. R., & Kramer, A. F. (2004). Age-related differences in localized attentional interference. Psychology & Aging, 19, 203–210.
McGonigle, D. J., Howseman, A. M., Athwal, B. S., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Holmes, A. P. (2000). Variability in fMRI: An examination of intersession differences. NeuroImage, 11, 708–734.
Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N. J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain & Cognition, 49, 277–296.
Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 197–206.
Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mather, M., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). Aging and reflective processes of working memory: Binding and test load deficits. Psychology & Aging, 15, 527–541.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 826–837.
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 11163–11170.
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.
Ojemann, J. G., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A. Z., McKinstry, R. C., Raichle, M. E., & Conturo, T. E. (1997). Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. NeuroImage, 6, 156–167.
Park, D. C., Puglisi, J. T., & Smith, A. D. (1986). Memory for pictures: Does an age-related decline exist? Psychology & Aging, 1, 11–17.
Park, D. C., Puglisi, J. T., & Sovacool, M. (1984). Picture memory in older adults: Effects of contextual detail at encoding and retrieval. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 213–215.
Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Morrell, R. W., Puglisi, J. T., & Dudley, W. N. (1990). Effects of contextual integration on recall of pictures in older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 45, P52-P58.
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (1995). Late experience alters vision. Nature, 376, 648–649.
Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 145–159.
Pringle, H. L., Irwin, D. E., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 89–95.
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5205–5215.
Rodrigue, K. M., & Raz, N. (2004). Shrinkage of the entorhinal cortex over five years predicts memory performance in healthy adults. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 956–963.
Rosen, A. C., Prull, M. W., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Stoub, T., O’Hara, R., Friedman, L., et al. (2003). Differential associations between entorhinal and hippocampal volumes and memory performance in older adults. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 1150–1160.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
Schneider, P., Sluming, V., Roberts, N., Scherg, M., Goebel, R., Specht, H. J., et al. (2005). Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl’s gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1241–1247.
Smith, A. D., Park, D. C., Cherry, K., Berkovsky, K. (1990). Age differences in memory for concrete and abstract pictures. Journal of Gerontology, 45, P205-P209.
Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology & Aging, 10, 527–539.
Sutton, B. P., Goh, J., Hebrank, A., Colcombe, S., Welsh, R., Chee, M., & Park, D. C. (2007). Investigation and validation of intersite fMRI studies using same imaging hardware. Manuscript in preparation.
Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS—R manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by BMRC Grant 04/1/36/19/372 to M.W.C. as well as by National Institute on Aging Grants R01 AGO15047 and R01 AGO60625-15 to D.C.P. E.D.L. was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Training Grant T32 MH19554.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goh, J.O., Chee, M.W., Tan, J.C. et al. Age and culture modulate object processing and object—scene binding in the ventral visual area. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 44–52 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.1.44
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.1.44