[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Cold tolerance response mechanisms revealed through comparative analysis of gene and protein expression in multiple rice genotypes

  • Gabriela Moraes de Freitas,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America, Department of Botany, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Julie Thomas,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Rohana Liyanage,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Jackson O. Lay,

    Roles Formal analysis, Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Supratim Basu,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Venkategowda Ramegowda,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Marcelo Nogueira do Amaral,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Letícia Carvalho Benitez,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Eugenia Jacira Bolacel Braga,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Botany, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil

    ⨯
  • Andy Pereira

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    apereira@uark.edu

    Affiliation Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

Due to its tropical origin and adaptation, rice is significantly impacted by cold stress, and consequently sustains large losses in growth and productivity. Currently, rice is the second most consumed cereal in the world and production losses caused by extreme temperature events in the context of "major climatic changes" can have major impacts on the world economy. We report here an analysis of rice genotypes in response to low-temperature stress, studied through physiological gas-exchange parameters, biochemical changes in photosynthetic pigments and antioxidants, and at the level of gene and protein expression, towards an understanding and identification of multiple low-temperature tolerance mechanisms. The first effects of cold stress were observed on photosynthesis among all genotypes. However, the tropical japonica genotypes Secano do Brazil and Cypress had a greater reduction in gas exchange parameters like photosynthesis and water use efficiency in comparison to the temperate japonica Nipponbare and M202 genotypes. The analysis of biochemical profiles showed that despite the impacts of low temperature on tolerant plants, they quickly adjusted to maintain their cellular homeostasis by an accumulation of antioxidants and osmolytes like phenolic compounds and proline. The cold tolerant and sensitive genotypes showed a clear difference in gene expression at the transcript level for OsGH3-2, OsSRO1a, OsZFP245, and OsTPP1, as well as for expression at the protein level for LRR-RLKs, bHLH, GLYI, and LTP1 proteins. This study exemplifies the cold tolerant features of the temperate japonica Nipponbare and M202 genotypes, as observed through the analysis of physiological and biochemical responses and the associated changes in gene and protein expression patterns. The genes and proteins showing differential expression response are notable candidates towards understanding the biological pathways affected in rice and for engineering cold tolerance, to generate cultivars capable of maintaining growth, development, and reproduction under cold stress. We also propose that the mechanisms of action of the genes analyzed are associated with the tolerance response.

Citation: de Freitas GM, Thomas J, Liyanage R, Lay JO, Basu S, Ramegowda V, et al. (2019) Cold tolerance response mechanisms revealed through comparative analysis of gene and protein expression in multiple rice genotypes. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019

Editor: Niranjan Baisakh, Louisiana State University, UNITED STATES

Received: November 10, 2018; Accepted: May 24, 2019; Published: June 10, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 de Freitas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: Funding support from the National Science Foundation (NSF-MCB 1716844) award to communicating author Andy Pereira is acknowledged, for project titled "Systems genetics analysis of photosynthetic carbon metabolism in rice".

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Climate change can strongly influence agriculture with temperature extremes, cold temperatures being a significant cause of damage in limiting crop yield. Although rice (Oryza sativa L.), is one of the world's most important crops consumed as a major part of the diet [1], it is sensitive to cold compared to the temperate crops such as wheat and barley, due to its origin and adaptation for cultivation in tropical and subtropical regions of the world.

The sensitivity and symptoms of plants to cold stress vary with the growth stage. Rice, exposed to cold stress at the vegetative stage, shows symptoms like yellowing of leaves, lower stature, and decreased tillering [2]. Other symptoms include damage to the photosynthetic machinery, more specifically the ultrastructure of chloroplasts, altering the light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna complexes [3] and/or modifying thylakoid structures [4], and an overall reduction in photosynthetic processes by cold temperatures thereby leading to a deficit in plant energy resources.

Under cold stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is induced [5] and can cause severe damage to various cellular components such as altering the membrane lipid composition due to excess accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), and an increase in antioxidants that can scavenge ROS and protect rice plants against oxidative damage [6].

In this research report we present results on the physiological responses of a sample of rice O. sativa sub-species japonica genotypes to cold stress, estimated through quantification of photosynthetic parameters, ROS mediated damage, accumulation of antioxidants and osmolytes, that distinguish the sensitive and tolerance rice phenomes. In addition, we present here the analyses of several stress-responsive genes OsBURB-16, OsGH3-2, OsSFR6, ZFP245, OsACA6, Ctb1, OsSAP1, OsTPP1 and OsSRO1a (S1 Table) that can potentially contribute towards the observed mechanisms of tolerance.

Results and discussion

Rice is a major global food crop and a model crop for cereals. To understand the basis of acclimation stability under cold, we used a set of rice genotypes contrasting in their tolerance towards cold and evaluated the photosynthetic, biochemical, gene and protein expression response parameters. The results we describe here suggest the presence of complex mechanisms that involve the interaction of many biochemical and physiological pathways along with hormonal cross-talk contributing to cold tolerance.

The analysis of cold-stress-responsive gene expression at the transcript and protein level, along with the phenotypic response, provides an understanding of cold stress tolerance mechanisms in the multiple plant systems. This information is needed since there is little information available on the signaling pathways responsible for low-temperature acclimation and the differential expression of genes at the transcript and proteins level that provide a crucial role in chilling stress signaling [7,8].

The response of photosynthetic parameters to cold stress

The first effects of cold stress on plants are observed in photosynthesis [9], which was found to be highly affected in the rice genotypes studied (Fig 1A). However, Secano do Brazil and Cypress display > 80% reduction compared to Nipponbare and M202. The reduced air and leaf temperature usually reduce the evaporative demand [10,11], observed as reduced transpiration in all genotypes studied (Fig 1B). However, the tolerant genotypes displayed the highest water use efficiency in comparison to sensitive ones under cold stress (Fig 1C). Under well-watered conditions all the genotypes showed very similar levels but on exposure to stress there was a significant reduction by about 75%.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Response in physiological parameters of rice genotypes treated to low temperature stress.

Plants under control (28° C) and stress (10° C) conditions show response in: A) Photosynthesis, B) Transpiration Rate, C) Water use efficiency (WUE), D) Intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci), E) Stomatal conductance, F) Fv'/Fm'. Data are expressed as the result of five replications (plants). The asterisks indicate significance at P ≤ 0.01 (analyzed by Student’s t-test) for comparison of stress treatment vs control, and between control plants for difference to Nipponbare, as standard tolerant genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g001

The chilling stress caused direct effects on stomata, provoking two potential causes of stomatal closure. In Secano do Brazil and Cypress, the direct inhibition of mesophyll photosynthesis (Fig 1A) caused a rise in ci (Fig 1D), with an associated stomatal closure (Fig 1E) [12,13]. In Nipponbare and M202, the stomata were the primary target of the chilling stress and their closure led to a reduction in ci, prompting a decline in photosynthesis [10,14]. Photo-inhibition can be one of the primary causes of reduction in photosynthesis after cooling [15–16] and is characterized by a reduction in Quantum Efficiency of PSII [17]. A significant reduction was seen in Secano do Brazil and Cypress under stress, but for the same conditions, the tolerant genotypes did not suffer photoinhibition (Fig 1F). The fluorescence parameter Fv’/Fm’ is regarded as a suitable assay for plant tolerance and sensitivity to cold [18], due to inherent tolerance or physiological acclimation.

Biochemical parameters affected by cold-stress

When plants are exposed to low-temperature stress, Chlorophyll biosynthesis is affected (Fig 2A), and the results of the experiment show that Nipponbare and M202 do not sense the stress like the sensitive genotypes Secano do Brazil and Cypress, which show a significant impact on the biosynthesis of Chlorophyll (Fig 2A). According to [17], this is because the impact on Chlorophyll biosynthesis is due to down-regulation of gene expression and protein abundance of several enzymes involved in tetrapyrrole metabolisms described in other studies [19,20,21].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. ROS mediated damage evaluated in different rice genotypes treated to low temperatures.

Plants under control (28° C) and stress (10° C) conditions showed response in: A) Chlorophyll content, B) Hydrogen peroxide H2O2 and C) Lipid peroxidation MDA. Data was expressed as the mean of five replications. The asterisks indicate significance at P ≤ 0.01 (analyzed by Student’s t-test) for comparison of stress treatment vs control, and between control plants for difference to Nipponbare, taken as standard tolerant genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g002

The anthocyanins, which are induced by environmental stresses [22], have a role in modifying the quantity and quality of captured light [23], by protecting from the effects of UV‐B [24], and scavenging of reactive oxygen intermediates under stress. However, our data showed a significant reduction in M202 by about 50% and by about 75% in Secano do Brazil, while Cypress showed no difference between the control and stressed plants (Fig 3A). These results do not support the hypothesis that anthocyanins are needed to serve an auxiliary photo-protective role in leaves, because this variation is independent of the concentrations of chlorophyll (Figs 2A and 3A). However, the anthocyanins are found predominantly associated with leaf mesophyll [25], a location that is unsuitable for screening out UV-B but ideal for the scavenging of oxygen radicals produced by chloroplasts. The phenolic content showed an increase in all genotypes, with the highest content in the sensitive genotypes Secano do Brazil and Cypress (Fig 3B). This increase may help in restricting the penetration of UV-B into the inner tissues of the plant [26], and contribute to their antioxidant ability, which inhibits lipid peroxidation by trapping the lipid alkoxyl radicals [27,28].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Non enzymatic antioxidants and enzymatic antioxidants were evaluated in different rice genotypes treated to low temperatures.

Plants under control (28° C) and stress (10° C) conditions showed response in: A) Anthocyanin content, B) total phenolic content, C) superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, D) catalase CAT activity, E) Peroxidase activity, and F) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl-DPPH activity. Data are expressed as the result of five replications. The asterisks indicate significance at P ≤ 0.01 (analyzed by Student’s t-test) for comparison of stress treatment vs control, and between control plants for difference to Nipponbare, taken as standard tolerant genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g003

Proline and soluble sugars are also known to protect rice from damage due to cold stress [29]. Proline content was found to be enhanced by cold stress in all genotypes (Fig 4A), with the tolerant lines showing a higher synthesis in control and stress conditions, with results similar to that obtained earlier [30]. Proline is involved in the removal of stress-related excess H+, maintains oxidative respiration at optimal cytosolic pH [31], acts as a reservoir of carbon and nitrogen, and increases protein water-binding ability through its hydrophobic interactions with the surface residues of proteins [32].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Response of rice plants to temperature treatments, with control (28° C) and stress (10° C) conditions showing differential response in osmolyte content.

A) Proline, B) Glucose content and C) Sucrose content. Data are expressed as the mean of five replications. The asterisks indicate significance at P ≤ 0.01 (analyzed by Student’s t-test) for comparison of stress treatment vs control, and between control plants for difference to Nipponbare, taken as standard tolerant genotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g004

Soluble sugars like glucose and sucrose can accumulate in plants under stress, and act as osmoprotectants against freezing/dehydration damage as described previously [33]. The tolerant genotypes (Nipponbare and M202) showed no significant difference in glucose content, although the sensitive genotypes showed a decrease (Fig 4B). In contrast, the sucrose content showed a high increase in the tolerant genotypes compared to the control, while for the sensitive genotypes a significant drop was observed (Fig 4C). Such an increase in sucrose has been documented previously [34], suggesting that an increase under low temperature can be a useful marker for cold tolerance in rice.

Many plant subcellular locations such as the cell wall, plasma membrane, mitochondria, and chloroplast, at the site of thylakoid electron transport; and the nucleus are intrinsically responsible for producing ROS in response to stress [35,36,37]. To avoid disastrous damage to protein and lipid components, plants have numerous antioxidant systems. Among these, ROS (e.g. H2O2) can cause cellular and tissue damage by degradation of polyunsaturated lipids to form MDA, which is a reactive aldehyde causing toxic cellular stress [38]. Nipponbare, despite showing the highest H2O2 production under stress (Fig 2B), showed the lowest damage on the plasma membrane (Fig 2C); whereas the tolerant M202 under stress, with no significant H2O2 induction, showed damage with MDA induction. In contrast, the sensitive genotypes had high production of H2O2 and MDA, causing a great impact on the cell membranes, as shown previously [39].

The antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD and CAT, present in tolerant genotypes can compete against ROS formation [40], providing antioxidant activity to offer protection from oxidative stress damage [41].These enzymatic mechanisms, found among plants challenged to cold and other abiotic stresses, function in ROS scavenging by the reduction of superoxide radicals into H2O2 as analyzed here for the SOD (Fig 3C), CAT (Fig 3D) and POD (Fig 3E) expression activities that catalyze H2O2 into H2O and protect the plant cells from H2O2 accumulation [42]. The bulk of H2O2 from SOD catalysis remains biologically toxic. SOD activity observed under stress (Fig 3C) in cold tolerant genotypes, can limit plant damage from ROS, and is lower in cold-sensitive genotypes. H2O2 production by SOD enzymes can also function in oxidative stress signaling, to play the role of a secondary messenger and protect reactions leading to induced CAT and POD activity in plants [43]. Biochemical analysis of cold-sensitive genotypes revealed that the lower increase of CAT and POD activity could reduce the efficiency of the plant cells to scavenge damaging free radicals. The analyses suggest that most of the plant’s response in increasing antioxidant activity has an important role towards cold stress tolerance. The high stability and increased rate of CAT and POD activity are known to confer cold-induced oxidative stress tolerance [44,45].

DPPH application was used to measure free radicals as a measure of stress tolerance [46]. The increase in DPPH radical scavenging (Fig 3F), observed in Nipponbare and M202, also appears to be correlated with the degree of plant stress tolerance [47,48]. Cold tolerance has been quantified by measuring the reduction in growth rate and cell membrane stability [49]. The DPPH assay reveals a higher antioxidant capacity in the tolerant genotypes (Fig 3F), supporting the relationship between antioxidant capacity and cold tolerance. The observed relationship between CAT and POD activity, and cell membrane stability, supports the importance of sustaining an optimum antioxidant content under stress for the expression of cold tolerance. Cold-tolerance in plants is generally associated with a higher antioxidant capacity that is induced under stress, compared to the response of cold-sensitive plants [50].

Gene expression responses to cold-stress treatment

To support our studies on phenotypic and biochemical responses to cold stress of tolerant and sensitive rice genotypes, a bibliographic review was conducted and identified several stress-responsive genes under low-temperature conditions. From this literature, we selected nine cold-regulated genes, and their expression behavior was characterized in the four different genotypes at different time points after stress (3h, 6h, 24h, and 48h) in the vegetative plant growth stages (Fig 5). Cold acclimation can involve alterations in gene expression and changes in the levels of particular proteins following cold treatment [51].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. Relative expression of genes (S1 Table) conferring stress tolerance to low temperatures in rice.

Stress tolerance related genes are shown in a time-course of 03–48 h after stress initiation. Data are results from three biological replicates and are expressed as the relative quantification (RQ) ratio of fold change of stress treatment to control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g005

The plant cell wall, which can be considered a layer to safeguard against abiotic stress such as cold [36], is a complex structure inserted in a physiologically active pectin matrix, cross-linked with structural proteins and, depending on the tissue/organ, with lignin [52,53]. The OsBURP16 gene, encodes a putative precursor of PG1β, a subunit that regulates the activity of polygalacturonase (PG), an enzyme which hydrolyzes pectin, and changes the composition of the plant cell wall [54]. Our data showed that the expression of OsBURP16 was induced maximally in sensitive genotypes (Secano do Brazil and Cypress) and had an increased transcript level with time, while Nipponbare and M202 had little variability in the same period (Fig 5). Therefore, the OsBURP16 gene can be considered as an indicator of cold stress sensitivity [54]. Unlike OsBURP16, OsACA6 exhibited an increased level of expression in tolerant genotypes and Secano do Brazil (sensitive), however, Nipponbare had a higher expression. Located in the plasma membrane are pumps or antiporters, which act on the cold response pathway involving the influx of Ca2+ from the apoplast to cytosol [55].

Under cold stress, plants exhibit a decrease in H2O2 and MDA content, with an increase in membrane stability, CAT, SOD and APX expression [35], and proline content [29]. These changes have been shown to indicate a positive response of cold tolerance in transgenic tobacco [56].

The OsGH3-2 and Ctb1 genes show early and maximal induction after 3 h of stress and decrease with time in the tolerant Nipponbare and M202, while in Cypress and Secano do Brazil there is an increase in expression with time (Fig 5). The overexpression of OsGH3-2 [57], has been shown to decrease drought resistance and stomatal closure, as well as increase water loss and improvement of cold and oxidative stress tolerance in rice at the vegetative stage. On the other hand, [58] report that in association with CAT, Ctb1 participates directly in the regulatory pathway of small-RNAs and promotes cold-tolerance at the reproductive stage.

OsSRO1a and OsSAP1 were quickly induced after 3 h, reaching a maximum at 48 h in Nipponbare and M202 (Fig 5). For the sensitive genotypes, we found the same pattern, although the expression was lower. SRO are proteins involved in ADP-ribose conjugation, DNA repair, apoptosis, transcription, and chromatin remodeling [59]. They possess a C-terminal RCD1-SROTAF4 domain and interact with AP2/EREBP and transcription factors OsDREB2A [60]. In rice, OsSRO1 has a role in drought and oxidative stress tolerance, stomatal closure and H2O2 accumulation [61]. SAPs can interact with proteins via their zinc-finger domains [62], such as OsSAP1 with cytoplasmic kinase OsRLCK253 [63]. OsSAP1 can regulate the stress responses by either modulating the expression of genes or by interaction with other proteins [64]. Altogether, our results suggest that this interaction may have relevance in stress physiology and cold-acclimation.

Trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (TPP) is a sugar storage metabolic regulator and acts in protection against abiotic stress [65,66]. In rice, overexpression has shown increased tolerance to abiotic stresses [67,68]. Our data showed that the OsTPP1gene is induced after 24 h and increases more at 48 h in the tolerant genotypes, while Cypress and Secano do Brazil show a slight induction at 3 h that goes down completely after 48h (Fig 5). These results agree with other studies [69], that show overexpression of OsTPP1is enhanced in salt and cold tolerance of rice. Moreover, they also showed that in plants with high expression of OsBURP16 there is a decrease in trehalose content.

Among the genes studied for expression under cold stress, OsZFP245 and OsSFR6 showed the highest induction in the tolerant genotypes, with the peak induction at 48 h. In Cypress, OsSFR6 showed increased expression unto 24 h. However, in the sensitive Secano do Brazil both genes (OsZFP245 and OsSFR6) were induced early with maximal expression at 3 h, and sensitive Cypress induced OsSFR6 early with the highest expression at 24h (Fig 5). Located in the nucleus, OsSFR6 acts to induce Cold-On Regulated (COR) genes via transcription factors CRT⁄DREs 2A and CBFs 1–3 [70], and OsZFP245, a zinc finger protein gene with the role of increasing proline content and antioxidant enzymes [71,72].

A model for low-temperature tolerance mechanisms (Fig 6) was developed by integrating information on gene expression response to cold in the genotypes, to improve our understanding of how stress is perceived by cells and how the regulatory cascade of signals act to promote tolerance to suboptimal temperatures.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 6. Model displaying mechanisms of tolerance to low temperatures in rice.

The regulatory cascade indicates the perception and induction of damage in response to low temperatures, the response in gene expression changes to the stress treatment, as well as the induction of biochemical responses (S3 Table) leading to low temperature tolerance, with an increase in concentration due to the presence of ROS. Abbreviations shown indicate the changes in components affected. Pm: Plasma membrane; Cw: Cell wall; Ch: Chloroplast; N: Nucleus; Grey arrow: Calcium efflux Black arrows: Cold perception; X: Degradation of pectin caused by increased polygalacturonase induced by increased expression of OsBURP16; Red arrow: Induction; Blue arrow: Induction of cold tolerance; Between brackets: Increase in concentration due to ROS. Dotted: Association of Ctb1 and CAT for miRNA induction. Upward arrows: Increased concentration due to induction of ROS; X: Association of Ctb1 and CAT for miRNA induction. The regulatory cascade of perception and induction of damage in response to low temperatures, and response of genes to the stress treatment, as well as the induction of biochemical responses leading to tolerance to low temperatures, leading from an increased concentration of ROS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.g006

Stress is perceived by cells through molecular signals, which in turn, induce a concomitant expression of multiple genes (cited in the text). They act in the perception and induction of damage caused by suboptimal temperatures generating responses that may, for example, increase the activity of antioxidant and osmoprotectant enzymes, and result in greater tolerance to stress.

Differential protein expression under cold-stress

To improve our understanding on the response of rice plants to cold stress, we used a comparative proteomics approach to study the effect of cold stress on rice genotypes differing in tolerance and observed differential protein expression between tolerant and sensitive genotypes (S1 Table).

The leucine-rich repeats protein kinases (LRR-RLKs) play an important role in regulating plant responses to abiotic stress [73], supported by our data that shows tolerant genotypes have higher expression compared to the sensitive. These results were also observed earlier [74], which supports that GsLRPK increases kinase activity in the presence of cold stress and increases expression of low-temperature- responsive genes, resulting in an enhancement in the tolerance to cold stress. Other kinases like the Fructokinase-2, Phosphoribulokinase, and Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 1 genes are also regulated by environmental stresses and show the same expression behavior in tolerant genotypes.

GF14 shows significant homology with protein kinase-dependent regulatory proteins [75]. In rice, the 14-3-3 proteins GF14b, GF14c, GF14e and GF14f, interact with target proteins that are involved in stress response [76]. GF14-a showed low expression in sensitive genotypes and high expression for GF14-f, suggesting that they may be involved in mechanisms of tolerance and/or acclimatization to adverse environmental conditions.

The bHLH proteins are a group of transcription factors that carry out key roles in phytochrome signal transduction, cell fate determination and stomatal differentiation [77]. These transcription factors are stress-inducible under drought, cold or high-salinity and are brassinosteroid-responsive[77,78], and this inductive behavior was also observed in the cold tolerant M202 and Nipponbare genotypes.

In plants, methylglyoxal a by-product of glycolysis, is toxic and causes damage to cells, and high cellular concentrations are generated from unfavorable environmental conditions [79,80]. Glyoxalase proteins are very important for limiting methylglyoxal levels, and for this, the plants have a glyoxalase system with multiple isoforms of both GLYI and GLYII proteins[81,82,83]. Due to its role in methylglyoxal detoxification, over-expression of glyoxalase system in plants confers significant tolerance against adverse environmental conditions [79,84,85,86,87,88]. Evidence of increased tolerance was demonstrated by elevated protein expression (Putative glyoxalase I) in the tolerant genotypes studied.

Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) play an important role in abiotic stress tolerance [89], and can facilitate the inter-membrane exchange and transfer of various amphiphilic molecules including phospholipids, glycolipids, steroids, acyl-CoAs, and fatty acids [90]. Transcript levels of LTPs increased in response to drought [91], salt [92] and cold [93] and the increase of non-specific lipid-transfer protein 1 expression in tolerant genotypes give more support to its role of increasing tolerance to abiotic stress.

Conclusions

This study supports that the genotypes Nipponbare and M202 have tolerance to low temperatures with the evidence of physiological responses, such as photosynthesis showing lower reduction, better efficient use of water without suffering photoinhibition, or reduction in the Quantum Efficiency of PSII. The biochemical profile showed that for the same genotypes, chlorophyll biosynthesis was not affected. Among the anthocyanins, a significant decrease in their content was observed, which identified pigments associated with the leaf mesophyll that act directly in the elimination of oxygen radicals produced by the chloroplasts. Accumulation of proline, glucose, and sucrose was also observed, these being osmoprotectants against freezing and dehydration damage. Antioxidants in the same tolerant genotypes, despite showing high production of H2O2 under stress, did not cause a high impact on the plasma membrane or the high activity of the antioxidant enzymes. SOD, CAT, POD and DPPH enzymes play an important role in stress tolerance. Differential expression of genes and proteins: the genes OsGH3-2, OsSRO1a, OsZFP245 and OsTPP1; and the LRR-RLKs, BHLH, GLYI, and LTP1 proteins, showed a clear difference in expression between tolerant and sensitive, thus suggesting that these genes are good candidates for identification of low-temperature tolerant genotypes in rice that are capable of maintaining growth, development, and production at the desired agronomic levels. Finally, based on our studies, a schematic representative model of cold tolerance in rice (Fig 6) is proposed outlining mechanisms of action of the genes analyzed with differential responses in resistant genotypes, with the objective of improving our understanding of the operation of tolerance to low temperatures. To summarize the results, our analysis shows for the first time the role of different antioxidants and osmolytes in modulating the physiological responses contributing to tolerance. In addition, this report also identifies markers for screening of cold tolerance in multiple rice genotypes, along with few putative protein markers identified from LCMS/MS analysis.

Materials and methods

Plant growth conditions and cold stress treatment

Seeds of the genotypes temperate japonica Nipponbare and M202 (tolerant), and the tropical japonica Cypress and Secano do Brazil (sensitive) from the USDA mini-core collection [94] were sterilized, immersed in deionized water and germinated in the dark for five days. After germination, seedlings of the same size were transplanted into 500 ml capacity plastic pots filled with commercial substrate (Redi-earth) with known water retention capacity and weight. All the individual genotypes in the pots were grown in a Conviron growth chamber set at26/22° C ±1°C day/night temperature and light intensity of 600 μmolm-2s-1, with day/night cycle of 14/10h, and kept in trays filled with water simulating flooded conditions with periodic commercial fertilization using Miracle-Gro (Scotts Miracle-Gro Products) for the entire period of the experiment.

Fifteen days after transplanting, the uniformly growing plants were divided into two groups with 20 pots each, five pots per genotype, each containing one plant. One group was kept under ideal conditions (28° C) and served as control, while another set of trays was used for low treatment temperature (10° C) as described [95] with adaptations. For both treatments, the plants were kept under the conditions described for a period of 72h. For this experiment, the experimental design was a complete randomized design and the data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test (1%), using the SAS 9.3 statistical program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

For the analysis of gene expression, 2 cm leaf tissue fragments were collected at four times 3h, 6h, 24h, and 48h, after low-temperature initiation, while the samples for the biochemical and proteomic analyses were collected only at 72 hours. The photosynthesis and photochemical efficiency of PSII were evaluated using the second fully expanded leaf at 72h using a portable photosynthesis meter (LI-6400XT; LI-COR) at a CO2 concentration of 370 μmol mol-1light intensity of 1,000 μmol m-2 s-1 and 55% to 60% relative humidity.

Biochemical analysis

Chlorophyll content was estimated following the method of [96], using absorbance for chlorophyll a at 663 nm and chlorophyll b at 645 nm, that was measured with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The hydrogen peroxide content was determined as described [97], with absorbance at 390 nm. Malondialdehyde (MDA) Buffer solution was made with 0.07% NaH2PO42H2O and 1.6% Na2HPO4, 1% H2O2, and 20% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.5% thiobarbituric acid. The absorbance of the supernatant was read at 532nm and MDA concentration was calculated using the MDA extinction coefficient of 155 mM-1cm-1 [98]. Anthocyanin was quantified as described [99], the absorbance measured at 525 nm and the anthocyanin concentration calculated in mg/gm of fresh weight using the millimolar extinction coefficient of 31.6. The content of phenolics in the extract was determined according to [100] with some modifications, with absorbance measured at 760 nm.

For the determination of Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT) and total Peroxidases (POD), the total proteins were extracted as described [101]. Total Superoxide dismutase activity, the basis of its ability to inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) [102], was assayed as described [103] with some modifications, the absorbance of the reaction mixture measured at 560 nm. Catalase enzyme activity was assayed as described [104], with the decrease in H2O2 assayed by a decrease in optical density at 240 nm, and the activity calculated using the extinction coefficient of 40 mm-1 for H2O2. The peroxidase (POD) activity was determined using the method of [105].

The antioxidant activity of the extracts, based on the scavenging activity of the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical, was determined following [106]. The absorbance at 517 nm was used to calculate [(A0-A1)/A0] x 100 where A0 is the absorbance of the control, and A1 is the extract. Glucose was estimated using 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) according to the method described [107]. The absorbance was recorded at 570 nm where glucose served as the standard. The sucrose was estimated using the method described by [108], and the absorbance was recorded at 620 nm. Free proline content was determined according to the procedure of [109], and the red color intensity was measured at 520 nm.

Analysis of Gene expression

Total RNA was extracted, using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), from rice genotypes and cDNA was synthesized using 2 μg total RNA treated with DNAse using GoScript reverse transcription system (Promega). RT-qPCR reactions were performed using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega) with Ubiquitin as an internal reference gene [110]in a 96-CFX thermocycler(Bio-Rad).The temperature increase (0.5° C 10 s-1) from 55°C to 95°C was used for the analysis of the melting curve. Non-transcribed RNA was also run as a negative control. For qPCR analysis the primers were selected based on literature searches on their role in cold tolerance and sequences derived from accession numbers obtained from rice genome databases were used for primer designing using IDT primer designing tool. The primers used are listed in S2 Table. The relative expression differences for each of the samples in individual experiments was determined by normalizing the Ct value for each gene in relation to Ubiquitin Ct value and the relative fold change was calculated using the equation 2-ΔΔCt [111]. The expression analysis was performed with three biological replicates and two technical replicates. Total RNA isolated from three different leaves collected from three different plants under control and treatment are treated as biological replicates while an aliquot of same sample for each sample was duplicated serving as technical replicates. Data were used in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test (1%), using the statistical program SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Analysis of protein expression

Total protein of four rice genotypes used in this work was extracted using the Protein Isolation Buffer and methodology as described by [95]. The protein concentration in each sample was determined by the Bradford assay [112] using bovine albumin as the standard (Fraction V, Sigma). Total protein samples were loaded onto SDS-PAGE-Gel, with samples of 90 μg of protein. Spots of interest, showing differences were excised from the gel and digested using the protocol described by [113]. All MALDI-MS and MS/MS analyses were performed using Ultraflex II MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). All LC-MS/MS was performed using Bruker Amazon-SL quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer with a captive spray ionization source. The resulting LC-MS/MS spectra were analyzed by Skyline-daily 3.6.9 software and shown in S1 Table [114].

Supporting information

S1 Table. Genes with accession numbers, forward and reverse primer sequences, and efficiency.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.s001

(PDF)

S2 Table. Summary of proteins identified by MS/MS (MALDI TOF/TOF) differentially expressed between the tolerant (Nipponbare and M202) and sensitive (Secano do Brazil and Cypress) genotypes in response to cold stress.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.s002

(PDF)

S3 Table. Quantification of biochemical changes under cold stress.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Quantification of whole plant gas-exchange physiological changes under cold stress.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.s004

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Quantitative PCR results of stress responsive differentially expressed genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218019.s005

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Fairhurst TH, Dobermann A. Rice in the Global Food Supply. 2002. Better Crop Int 16:8–11.
  2. 2. Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang S, et al. Rice and cold stress: methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci. 2014. Rice 7:24. pmid:25279026
  3. 3. Hüner NPA. Chloroplast redox imbalance governs phenotypic plasticity: the “grand design of photosynthesis” revisited. 2012. Front Plant Sci 3:1–12.
  4. 4. Santarius KA. Freezing of Isolated Thylakoid Membranes in Complex Media .7. The Effect of Bovine Serum-Albumin. 1991. Biochem Und Physiol Der Pflanz 187:149–162.
  5. 5. Song S-Y, Chen Y, Chen J, et al. Physiological mechanisms underlying OsNAC5-dependent tolerance of rice plants to abiotic stress. 2011. Planta 234:331–345. pmid:21448719
  6. 6. Sato Y, Masuta Y, Saito K, et al. Enhanced chilling tolerance at the booting stage in rice by transgenic overexpression of the ascorbate peroxidase gene, OsAPXa. 2011. Plant Cell Rep. 30:399–406. pmid:21203887
  7. 7. Lata C, Prasad M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. 2011. J Exp Bot 62:4731–4748. pmid:21737415
  8. 8. Wingler A. 2015. Comparison of signaling interactions determining annual and perennial plant growth in response to low temperature. 2015. Front Plant Sci. 5:1–9. pmid:25628637
  9. 9. Peng X, Teng L, Yan X, et al. The cold responsive mechanism of the paper mulberry: decreased photosynthesis capacity and increased starch accumulation. 2015. BMC Genomics 16:898. pmid:26537770
  10. 10. Allen DJ, Ort DR. Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6:36–42. pmid:11164376
  11. 11. Tardieu F. Plant response to environmental conditions: Assessing potential production, water demand, and negative effects of water deficit. 2013. Front Physiol 4 FEB:1–11.
  12. 12. Araújo WL, Fernie AR, Nunes-Nesi A. Control of stomatal aperture. 2011; Plant Signal Behav.6:1305–1311. pmid:21847028
  13. 13. Haworth M, Killi D, Materassi A, et al. Impaired Stomatal Control Is Associated with Reduced Photosynthetic Physiology in Crop Species Grown at Elevated [CO2]. 2016. Front Plant Sci. 7:1–13.
  14. 14. Cold Tuteja N., Salinity, and Drought Stress. 2005. Plant Stress Biol From Genomics to Syst Biol 137–159.
  15. 15. Takahashi S, Tamashiro A, Sakihama Y, et al. High-susceptibility of photosynthesis to photoinhibition in the. 2002. BMC Plant Biol 8:1–8.
  16. 16. Hüve K, Bichele I, Rasulov B, Niinemets Ü. When it is too hot for photosynthesis: Heat-induced instability of photosynthesis in relation to respiratory burst, cell permeability changes and H2O2 formation. 2011. Plant, Cell Environ. 34:113–126. pmid:21029116
  17. 17. Dutta S, Mohanty S, Tripathy BC. Role of Temperature Stress on Chloroplast Biogenesis and Protein Import in Pea. 2009. Plant Physiol 150:1050–1061. pmid:19403728
  18. 18. Bonnecarrère V, Borsani O, Díaz P, et al. Response to photooxidative stress induced by cold in japonica rice is genotype dependent. 2011. Plant Sci 180:726–732. pmid:21421424
  19. 19. Tewari AK, Tripathy BC. Temperature-stress-induced impairment of chlorophyll biosynthetic reactions in cucumber and wheat. 1998. Plant Physiol pmid:9662527
  20. 20. Tewari AK, Tripathy BC. Acclimation of chlorophyll biosynthetic reactions to temperature stress in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). 1999. Planta.
  21. 21. Mohanty S, Grimm B, Tripathy BC. Light and dark modulation of chlorophyll biosynthetic genes in response to temperature. 2006. Planta 224:692–699. pmid:16523349
  22. 22. Chalker-Scott L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. 1999. Photochem Photobiol. 70:1–9.
  23. 23. Barker DH, Seaton GGR, Robinson SA. Internal and external photoprotection in developing leaves of the CAM plant Cotyledon orbiculata. 1997; Plant, Cell & Environ. 20:617–624.
  24. 24. Burger J, Edwards GE. Photosynthetic Efficiency, and Photodamage by UV and Visible Radiation, in Red versus Green Leaf Coleus Varieties. 1996. Plant Cell Physiol. 37:395–399,
  25. 25. Gould KS, Markham KR, Smith RH, Goris JJ. Functional role of anthocyanins in the leaves of Quintinia serrata A. Cunn. 2000. J Exp Bot 51:1107–1115. pmid:10948238
  26. 26. Kondo N, Kawashima M. Enhancement of the Tolerance to Oxidative Stress in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) Seedlings by UV-B Irradiation: Possible Involvement of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidative Enzymes. 2000. J Plant Res. 113:311–317.
  27. 27. Milić BL, Djilas SM, Čanadanović-Brunet JM. Antioxidative activity of phenolic compounds on the metal-ion breakdown of lipid peroxidation system. 1998. Food Chem 61:443–447.
  28. 28. Michalak A. Phenolic Compounds and Their Antioxidant Activity in Plants Growing under Heavy Metal Stress. 2006. Plant Cell 15:523–530.
  29. 29. Zhang L, Becker DF. Connecting proline metabolism and signaling pathways in plant senescence. 2015. Front Plant Sci 6:1–8.
  30. 30. Kim SI, Tai TH. Evaluation of seedling cold tolerance in rice cultivars: A comparison of visual ratings and quantitative indicators of physiological changes. 2011. Euphytica 178:437–447.
  31. 31. Venekamp JH. Regulation of cytosol acidity in plants under conditions of drought. 1989. Physiol Plant 76:112–117.
  32. 32. Brigitte Schobert HT. Unusual solution properties of proline and its the properties of proline. 1977. Biochim Biophys Acta 541:270–277.
  33. 33. Yuanyuan M, Yali Z, Jiang L, Hongbo S. Roles of plant soluble sugars and their responses to plant cold stress. 2010. J Biotechnol 8:2004–2010.
  34. 34. Morsy MR, Almutairi AM, Gibbons J, et al. The OsLti6 genes encoding low-molecular-weight membrane proteins are differentially expressed in rice cultivars with contrasting sensitivity to low temperature. 2005. Gene 344:171–180. pmid:15656983
  35. 35. Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. 2010. Plant Physiol Biochem. 48:909–930. pmid:20870416
  36. 36. Le Gall H, Philippe F, Domon JM, Gillet F, Pelloux J, Rayon C. Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. 2015. Plants 4(1):112–66. pmid:27135320
  37. 37. Pospíšil P. Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Photosystem II as a Response to Light and Temperature Stress. 2016. Front Plant Sci 7:1–12.
  38. 38. Pamplona R. Advanced lipoxidation end-products. 2011. Chem Biol Interact 192:14–20. pmid:21238437
  39. 39. Kim SI, Tai TH. Evaluation of seedling cold tolerance in rice cultivars: A comparison of visual ratings and quantitative indicators of physiological changes. 2011. Euphytica 178:437–447.
  40. 40. Tripathy BC, Oelmüller R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. 2012. Plant Signal Behav 7:1621–1633. pmid:23072988
  41. 41. Chang-Quan W, Rui-Chang L. Enhancement of superoxide dismutase activity in the leaves of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in response to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. 2008. Acta Physiol Plant 30:841–847.
  42. 42. Carrasco-Ríos L, Pinto M. Effect of salt stress on antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves in two contrasting corn, 'Lluteno' and 'Jubilee'. 2014. Chil J Agric Res. 74:89–95.
  43. 43. Anjum S, Xie X, Wang L. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. 2011; African J Agric Res 6:2026–2032.
  44. 44. You J, Chan Z. ROS Regulation During Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. 2015. Front Plant Sci 6:1–15.
  45. 45. Wang J, Wu B, Yin H, et al. Overexpression of CaAPX Induces Orchestrated Reactive Oxygen Scavenging and Enhances Cold and Heat Tolerances in Tobacco. 2017b. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–15. pmid:28386551
  46. 46. Cui XH, Murthy HN, Wu CH, Paek KY. Sucrose-induced osmotic stress affects biomass, metabolite, and antioxidant levels in root suspension cultures of Hypericum perforatum L. 2010. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 103:7–14.
  47. 47. Weidner S., Kordala E., Brosowska-Arendt W., Karamac M., Kosinska A., & Amarowicz R. Phenolic compounsand properites antioxidants in Grapevine roots (Vitis Vinifera L.) under drought stress followed by recovery. 2009. Acta Soc Bot Pol 78:97–103.
  48. 48. Dominguez-Perles R, Martinez-Ballesta MC, Riquelme F, et al. Novel varieties of broccoli for optimal bioactive components under saline stress. 2011. J Sci Food Agric 91:1638–1647. pmid:21445869
  49. 49. Huang GT, Ma SL, Bai LP, et al. Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. 2012. Mol Biol Rep. 39:969–987. pmid:21573796
  50. 50. Caverzan A, Passaia G, Rosa SB, et al. Plant responses to stresses: Role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. 2012. Genet Mol Biol 35:1011–1019. pmid:23412747
  51. 51. Knight MR, Knight H. Low-temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants. 2012. New Phytol. 195:737–751. pmid:22816520
  52. 52. Park YB, Cosgrove DJ. A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. 2012. Plant Physiology. Jan 1:pp-111. pmid:22362871
  53. 53. Houston K, Tucker MR, Chowdhury J, et al. The Plant Cell Wall: A Complex and Dynamic Structure As Revealed by the Responses of Genes under Stress Conditions. 2016. Front Plant Sci. 7:1–18.
  54. 54. Liu H, Ma Y, Chen N, et al. Overexpression of stress-inducible OsBURP16, the β subunit of polygalacturonase 1, decreases pectin content and cell adhesion and increases abiotic stress sensitivity in rice. 2014. Plant, Cell Environ. 37:1144–1158. pmid:24237159
  55. 55. Huda KM, Banu MSA, Garg B, Tula S, Tuteja R, & Tuteja N. Os ACA6, a P‐type IIB Ca2+ ATP ase promotes salinity and drought stress tolerance in tobacco by ROS scavenging and enhancing the expression of stress‐responsive genes. 2013.The Plant Journal, 76(6), 997–1015. pmid:24128296
  56. 56. Huda KMK, Akhter Banu MS, Yadav S, et al. Salinity and drought tolerant OsACA6 enhances cold tolerance in transgenic tobacco by interacting with stress-inducible proteins. 2014. Plant Physiol Biochem 82:229–238. pmid:24992889
  57. 57. Du H, Wu N, Fu J, et al. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and methylation and chromatin patterning abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. 2012. J Exp Bot 63:695–709.
  58. 58. Saito K, Hayano-Saito Y, Kuroki M, Sato Y. Map-based cloning of the rice cold tolerance gene Ctb1. 2010. Plant Sci 179:97–102.
  59. 59. Hassa PO, Hottiger MO. The diverse biological roles of mammalian PARPS, a small but powerful family of poly-ADP-ribose polymerases. 2008. Front Biosci 13:3046–82. pmid:17981777
  60. 60. Vainonen JP, Jaspers P, Wrzaczek M, et al. RCD1–DREB2A interaction in leaf senescence and stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. 2012. Biochem J 442:573–581. pmid:22150398
  61. 61. You J, Zong W, Li X, et al. The SNAC1-targeted gene OsSRO1c modulates stomatal closure and oxidative stress tolerance by regulating hydrogen peroxide in rice. 2013. J Exp Bot 64:569–583. pmid:23202132
  62. 62. Kanneganti V, Gupta AK. Overexpression of OsiSAP8, a member of stress associated protein (SAP) gene family of rice confers tolerance to salt, drought and cold stress in transgenic tobacco and rice. 2008. Plant Mol Biol. 66:445–462. pmid:18205020
  63. 63. Giri J, Vij S, Dansana PK, Tyagi AK. Rice A20/AN1 zinc-finger containing stress-associated proteins (SAP1/11) and a receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase (OsRLCK253) interact via A20 zinc-finger and confer abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. 2011. New Phytol. 191:721–732. pmid:21534973
  64. 64. Kothari KS, Dansana PK, Giri J, Tyagi AK. Rice Stress Associated Protein 1 (OsSAP1) Interacts with Aminotransferase (OsAMTR1) and Pathogenesis-Related 1a Protein (OsSCP) and Regulates Abiotic Stress Responses. 2016. Front Plant Sci. 7:1057. pmid:27486471
  65. 65. Wiemken A. Trehalose in yeast, stress protectant rather than reserve carbohydrate. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1990. Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 58:209–217.
  66. 66. Strøm AR, Kaasen I. Trehalose metabolism in Escherichia coli: stress protection and stress regulation of gene expression. 1993. Mol Microbiol 8:205–210. pmid:8391102
  67. 67. Garg AK, Kim J-K, Owens TG, et al. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. 2002. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:15898–15903. pmid:12456878
  68. 68. Jang I, Oh S, Seo J, et al. Expression of a bifunctional fusion of the Escherichia coli genes for trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in transgenic rice plants increases trehalose accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance without stunting growth. 2003. Plant Physiol. 131:516–524. pmid:12586876
  69. 69. Ge LF, Chao DY, Shi M, et al. Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene OsTPP1 confers stress tolerance in rice and results in the activation of stress responsive genes. 2008. Planta. 228:191–201. pmid:18365248
  70. 70. Wathugala DL, Richards SA, Knight H, Knight MR. OsSFR6 is a functional rice orthologue of SENSITIVE TO FREEZING-6 and can act as a regulator of COR gene expression, osmotic stress and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. 2011. New Phytol 191:984–995. pmid:21585388
  71. 71. Huang J, Wang JF, Wang QH, Zhang HS. Identification of a rice zinc finger protein whose expression is transiently induced by drought, cold but not by salinity and abscisic acid. 2005. DNA Seq. 16:130–6. pmid:16147864
  72. 72. Huang J., Sun S.J., Xu D.Q., Yang X., Bao Y.M., Wang Z.F., Tang H.J., and Zhang H. Increased tolerance of rice to cold, drought and oxidative stresses mediated by the overexpression of a gene that encodes the zinc finger protein ZFP245. 2009. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 389: 556–561. pmid:19751706
  73. 73. Wang J, Liu S, Li C, et al. PnLRR-RLK27, a novel leucine-rich repeats receptor-like protein kinase from the Antarctic moss Pohlia nutans, positively regulates salinity and oxidation-stress tolerance. 2017a. PLoS One 12:e0172869. pmid:28241081
  74. 74. Yang L, Wu K, Gao P, et al. GsLRPK, a novel cold-activated leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase from Glycinesoja, is a positive regulator to cold stress tolerance. 2014. Plant Sci 215–216:19–28. pmid:24388511
  75. 75. Aitken A, Collinge DB, van Heusden BPH, et al. 14-3-3 Proteins: a Highly Conserved, Widespread Family of Eukaryotic Proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992; 17:498–501. pmid:1471260
  76. 76. Cooper B, Clarke JD, Budworth P, et al. A network of rice genes associated with stress response and seed development. 2003. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:4945–4950. pmid:12684538
  77. 77. Zhang H, Fang Q, Zhang Z, et al. The role of respiratory burst oxidase homologues in elicitor-induced stomatal closure and hypersensitive response in Nicotiana benthamiana. 2009. J Exp Bot 60:3109–3122. pmid:19454596
  78. 78. Seki M, Ishida J, Narusaka M, et al. Monitoring the expression pattern of around 7,000 Arabidopsis genes under ABA treatments using a full-length cDNA microarray. 2002. Funct Integr Genomics 2:282–291. pmid:12444421
  79. 79. Yadav SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Ray M, et al. Methylglyoxal levels in plants under salinity stress are dependent on glyoxalase I and glutathione. 2005. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337:61–67. pmid:16176800
  80. 80. Rabbani N, Thornalley PJ. Glyoxalase in diabetes, obesity and related disorders. 2011. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22:309–317. pmid:21335095
  81. 81. Mustafiz A, Singh AK, Pareek A, et al. Genome-wide analysis of rice and Arabidopsis identifies two glyoxalase genes that are highly expressed in abiotic stresses. 2011. Funct Integr Genomics 11:293–305. pmid:21213008
  82. 82. Kaur C, Vishnoi A, Ariyadasa TU, et al. Episodes of horizontal gene-transfer and gene-fusion led to co-existence of different metal-ion specific glyoxalase I. 2013. Sci Rep. 3:1–10. pmid:24220130
  83. 83. Ghosh A, Islam T. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of glyoxalase gene families in soybean (Glycine max) indicate their development and abiotic stress specific response. 2016. BMC Plant Biol. 16:87. pmid:27083416
  84. 84. Veena Reddy VS, Sopory SK. Glyoxalase I from Brassica juncea: Molecular cloning, regulation and its over-expression confer tolerance in transgenic tobacco under stress. 1999. Plant J. 17:385–395. pmid:10205896
  85. 85. Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. 2003. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:14672–7. pmid:14638937
  86. 86. Álvarez VMF, Inostroza-Blancheteau C, Timmermann T, et al. Overexpression of GlyI and GlyII genes in transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) plants confers salt tolerance by decreasing oxidative stress. 2013; Mol Biol Rep 40:3281–3290. pmid:23283739
  87. 87. Kaur C, Ghosh A, Pareek A, et al. Glyoxalases and stress tolerance in plants. 2014. Biochem Soc Trans. 42:485–490. pmid:24646265
  88. 88. Mustafiz A, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, et al. A unique Ni2+ -dependent and methylglyoxal-inducible rice glyoxalase I possesses a single active site and functions in abiotic stress response. 2014. Plant J 78:951–963. pmid:24661284
  89. 89. Edstam MM, Laurila M, Höglund A, et al. Characterization of the GPI-anchored lipid transfer proteins in the moss Physcomitrella patens. 2014. Plant Physiol Biochem. 75:55–69. pmid:24374350
  90. 90. Wei K, Zhong X. Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in maize.2014. BMC plant biology. Dec;14(1):281. pmid:25348423
  91. 91. Guo C, Ge X, Ma H. The rice OsDIL gene plays a role in drought tolerance at vegetative and reproductive stages. 2013. Plant Mol Biol. 82:239–253. pmid:23686450
  92. 92. Moraes GP, Benitez LC, do Amaral MN, et al. Expression of LTP genes in response to saline stress in rice seedlings. 2015. Genet Mol Res 14:8294–8305. pmid:26345756
  93. 93. Moraes De Freitas GP, Basu S, Ramegowda V, et al. Comparative analysis of gene expression in response to cold stress in diverse rice genotypes. 2016. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 471:253–259. pmid:26855133
  94. 94. Agrama HA, Yan W, Lee F, Fjellstrom R, Chen M-H, Jia M, McClung A. 2009. Genetic assessment of a mini-core developed from the USDA rice gene bank. Crop Science. 49: 1336–1346.
  95. 95. Ramegowda V, Basu S, Krishnan A, Pereira A. Rice growth under drought kinase is required for Drought Tolerance and Grain Yield under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions. 2014. Plant Physiol 166:1634–1645. pmid:25209982
  96. 96. Arnon DI. Copper Enzymes in Isolated Chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. 1949; Plant Physiol 24:1–15. pmid:16654194
  97. 97. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. 2000. Plant Sci 151:59–66.
  98. 98. Fu J, Huang B. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. 2001. Environ Exp Bot. 45:105–114. pmid:11275219
  99. 99. Ithal N, Reddy AR. Rice flavonoid pathway genes, OsDfr and OsAns, are induced by dehydration, high salt and ABA, and contain stress responsive promoter elements that interact with the transcription activator, OsC1-MYB. 2004. Plant Sci 166:1505–1513.
  100. 100. Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro 2011. Food Chem. 73:285–290.
  101. 101. Anderson MD, Prasad TK, Stewart CR. Changes in Isozyme Profiles of Catalase, Peroxidase, and Glutathione Reductase during Acclimation to Chilling in Mesocotyls of Maize Seedlings. 1995; Plant Physiol. 109:1247–1257. pmid:12228666
  102. 102. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. 1971. Anal Biochem 44:276–287. pmid:4943714
  103. 103. Alonso R, Elvira S, Castillo F, Gimeno B. Interactive effects of ozone and drought stress on pigments and activities of antioxidative enzymes in Pinus halpensis. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2001; 905–916.
  104. 104. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. 2000. Plant Sci 151:59–66.
  105. 105. Srinivas ND, Rashmi KR, Raghavarao KSMS. Extraction and purification of a plant peroxidase by aqueous two-phase extraction coupled with gel filtration. 1999. Process Biochem 35:43–48.
  106. 106. Kumaran A, Joel Karunakaran R. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. 2006. Food Chem 97:109–114.
  107. 107. Lindsay H. Methods in potato research a colorimetric estimation of reducing sugars in potatoes with 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid. 1973. 16:176–179.
  108. 108. Van Handel E. Direct microdetermination of sucrose. 1968. Anal Biochem 22:280–283. pmid:5641848
  109. 109. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. 1973. Plant Soil. 39:205–207.
  110. 110. Moraes GP, Benitez LC, Do Amaral MN, Vighi IL, Auler PA, Da Maia LC, Bianchi VJ, Braga EJ. Evaluation of reference genes for RT-qPCR studies in the leaves of rice seedlings under salt stress. Genet Mol Res. 2015 Jan 1;14(1):2384–98. pmid:25867385
  111. 111. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. 2001. Methods 25:402–408. pmid:11846609
  112. 112. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. 1976. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. pmid:942051
  113. 113. Alvarez VM, Von Der Weid I, Seldin L, Santos ALS. Influence of growth conditions on the production of extracellular proteolytic enzymes in Paenibacillus peoriae NRRL BD-62 and i SCE2. 2006; Lett Appl Microbiol 43:625–630. pmid:17083708
  114. 114. Packialakshmi B, Liyanage R, Lay JO Jr, Okimoto R, Rath NC. Proteomic Changes in the Plasma of Broiler Chickens with Femoral Head Necrosis. 2016. Biomark Insights. 11:55–62. pmid:27147818