[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/967900.968152acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Cost effective transcoding for QoS adaptive multimedia streaming

Published: 14 March 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Transcoding is a core technique that is used in providing quality-of-service (QoS) adaptive multimedia streaming service. Many studies have examined how best to perform transcoding and reduce computation overhead. However, the issue of when to transcode has not been adequately studied in previous research. This paper addresses this issue and presents a simple and intelligent approach that can be used to reduce both disk bandwidth and space requirements. Our approach determines the optimum time to apply transcoding by considering the potential benefits that can be realized. For instance, in order to save disk bandwidth for frequently accessed content, it pre-creates and stores multiple QoS versions. On the other hand, in order to save disk space for rarely accessed content, it stores only a single QoS version and performs transcoding on the fly. The key is to find the optimal threshold between pre-created multiple QoS versions and on-demand transcoding. We compute the optimal threshold by using a mathematical model. A simulation-based experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of our new approach highlights three advantages. First, our method effectively reduces both disk bandwidth and space requirements. Second, our technique is more efficient for skewed access patterns. Third, the threshold computed by our mathematical model results in improved performance regardless of environmental parameters.

References

[1]
P. Assuno and M. Ghanbari. Post-processing of mpeg-2 coded video for transmission at lower bit-rates. In IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 1998--2001, 1996.
[2]
P. Assuno and M. Ghanbari. A frequency-domain video transcoder for dynamic bit-rate reduction of mpeg-2 bitstreams. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 8:953--977, December 1998.
[3]
E. Barrau. Mpeg video transcoding to a fine-granular scalable format. In IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing, pages 717--720, 2002.
[4]
N. Feamster and S. Wee. An mpeg-2 to h.263 transcoder. In SPIE Conf. Voice, Video Data Communications, 1999.
[5]
K. Fung, Y. Chan, and W. C. Siu. New architecture for dynamic frame-skipping transcoder. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 11:886--900, August 2002.
[6]
J. Hwang, T. Wu, and C. W. Lin. Dynamic frame-skipping in video transcoding. In IEEE Workshop Multimedia Signal Processing, pages 616--621, 1998.
[7]
R. Kjartan, M. Roger, and Z. Josip. Transcoding versus multiple image versions in image servers with qos capabilities. In Norsk Informatik konferanse, pages 141--151, 2001.
[8]
W. Li. Overview of fine granularity scalability in mpeg-4 video standard. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 11:301--317, March 2001.
[9]
N.Memon and R. Rodilia. Transcoding gif images to jpeg-ls. IEEE Trans. Consumer Electon., 43:423--429, August 1997.
[10]
W. Y. Lum and F. C. M. Lau. On balancing between transcoding overhead and spatial consumption in content adaptation. In ACM Mobicom conf., pages 239--250, 2002.
[11]
H. Sun, W. Kwok, and J. Zdepski. Architectures for mpeg compressed bitstream scaling. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 6:191--199, April 1996.
[12]
P. Yin, A. Vetro, B. Lui, and H. Sun. Drift compensation for reduced spatial resolution transcoding. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 12:1009--1020, November 2002.

Index Terms

  1. Cost effective transcoding for QoS adaptive multimedia streaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing
    March 2004
    1733 pages
    ISBN:1581138121
    DOI:10.1145/967900
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 March 2004

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. QoS
    2. multimedia streaming
    3. transcoding

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SAC04
    Sponsor:
    SAC04: The 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 14 - 17, 2004
    Nicosia, Cyprus

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

    Upcoming Conference

    SAC '25
    The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 31 - April 4, 2025
    Catania , Italy

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 411
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media