[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article
Free access

A profile of today`s computer literacy student

Published: 01 February 1986 Publication History

Abstract

What are the opinions and biases of students entering this course today? What do these students think they know, what do they think they should be learning? Have their opinions been altered by the technological and software trends? Do younger and older students have similar or markedly differing views and computer experiences. Can the needs of the students be met by such courses, or are the students actually more technologically literate than we believe? Noting the changes that have taken place over the last three or four years in the literacy course, the authors prepared a survey that was completed by all the students in two universities (317 students) during the first class of the fall 1985 semester. The results of that survey are the basis of this paper.

Cited By

View all
  • (1991)The achievement of blacks in introductory computer science at a predominantly white public universityACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/122106.12210723:2(2-8)Online publication date: 1-May-1991
  • (1988)The Impact of Pre‐College Computer Exposure on Student Achievement in Introductory Computer Programming CoursesComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408800101071:1(73-84)Online publication date: Jan-1988
  • (2013)Do Non‐Computer Science Students Need to Program?*Journal of Engineering Education10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00636.x90:4(535-541)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2013

Recommendations

Reviews

Diane Walz

This paper reports the results of a survey of 317 students entering computer literacy classes at two universities. Students were asked to report their levels of computer experience and to answer questions about their attitudes and expectations for the class. A large percentage of students already had experience using computers. The specific type of experience was different for traditional (21 years of age or younger) versus older students. Half of the traditional students had previously taken a computer course and many reported that they were already comfortable using computers. Most of the students stressed the importance of “hands on” experience, learning terminology, use of packages, and programming. They expressed an appreciation for the computer's relevance to business applications. While specific results about students with little or no computer experience were not reported, inferences about the inexperienced students can be made from the reported experience level statistics. Literacy classes are often geared to the average student, with little or no computer experience assumed. This paper should prove useful to administrators and teachers of such classes since this documented profile of an actual class population differs from the population for which such classes are intented.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 18, Issue 1
Proceedings of the 17th SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education
February 1986
304 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/953055
Issue’s Table of Contents
  • cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '86: Proceedings of the seventeenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
    February 1986
    336 pages
    ISBN:0897911784
    DOI:10.1145/5600
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 1986
Published in SIGCSE Volume 18, Issue 1

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)93
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (1991)The achievement of blacks in introductory computer science at a predominantly white public universityACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/122106.12210723:2(2-8)Online publication date: 1-May-1991
  • (1988)The Impact of Pre‐College Computer Exposure on Student Achievement in Introductory Computer Programming CoursesComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408800101071:1(73-84)Online publication date: Jan-1988
  • (2013)Do Non‐Computer Science Students Need to Program?*Journal of Engineering Education10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00636.x90:4(535-541)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2013
  • (1987)Measuring Microcomputer LiteracyJournal of Educational Technology Systems10.2190/GWUU-H8D4-KPFG-L8XX16:1(29-43)Online publication date: 1-Sep-1987

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media