[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article
Free access

Becoming a computer scientist

Published: 01 November 1990 Publication History

Abstract

It is well known that women are significantly underrepresented in scientific fields in the United States, and computer science is no exception. As of 1987- 1988, women constituted slightly more than half of the U.S. population and 45% of employed workers in the U.S., but they made up only 30% of employed computer scientists. Moreover, they constituted only 10% of employed doctoral-level computer scientists. During the same time period, women made up 20% of physicians and, at the doctoral level, 35% of psychologists, 22% of life scientists, and 10% of mathematicians employed in the U.S. On the other hand, there are some disciplines in which women represent an even smaller proportion at the doctoral level: in 1987-88, 8% of physical scientists, and only 2.5% of engineers were women [21].1 The underrepresentation of women in computer science is alarming for at least two reasons. First, it raises the disturbing possibility that the field of computer science functions in ways that prevent or hinder women from becoming part of it. If this is so, those in the discipline need to evaluate their practices to ensure that fair and equal treatment is being provided to all potential and current computer scientists. Practices that exclude women are not only unethical, but they are likely to thwart the discipline's progress, as potential contributors to the field are discouraged from participation.
The second reason for concern about the underrepresentation of women in computer science relates to demographic trends in the U.S., which suggest a significant decrease in the number of white males entering college during the next decade. At the same time, the number of jobs requiring scientific or engineering training will continue to increase. Because white males have traditionally constituted the vast majority of trained scientists and engineers in this country, experts have predicted that a critical labor shortage is likely early in the next century [4, 25]. To confront this possibility, the federal government has begun to expend resources to study the problem further. A notable example is the establishment of a National Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology. Their final report, issued in December of 1989, lists a number of government and industrial programs aimed at preventing a labor shortage by increasing the number of women and minorities trained as scientists and engineers [5].
In light of these facts, the Committee on the Status of Women in Computer Science, a subcommittee of the ACM's Committee on Scientific Freedom and Human Rights, was established with the goal of studying the causes of women's continued underrepresentation in the field, and developing proposed solutions to problems found. It is the committee's belief that the low number of women working as computer scientists is inextricably tied up with the particular difficulties that women face in becoming computer scientists.
Studies show that women in computer science programs in U.S. universities terminate their training earlier than men do. Between 1983 and 1986 (the latest year for which we have such figures) the percentage of bachelor's degrees in computer science awarded to women was in the range of 36-37%, while the percentage of master's degrees was in the range of 28-30s. During the same time span, the percentage of doctoral degrees awarded to women has only been in the range of 10-12%, and it has remained at that level, with the exception of a slight increase in 1989 [16, 21]. Moreover, the discrepancy between the numbers of men and women continues to increase when we look at the people who are training the future computer scientists: women currently hold only 6.5% of the faculty positions in the computer science and computer engineering departments in the 158 Ph.D.-granting institutions included in the 1988- 1989 Taulbee Survey (See Communications September 1990). In fact, a third of these departments have no female faculty members at all [16]. This pattern of decreasing representation is generally consistent with that of other scientific and engineering fields [4, 25]. It is often described as “pipeline shrinkage”: as women move along the academic pipeline, their percentages continue to shrink.
The focus of this report is pipeline shrinkage for women in computer science. We describe the situation for women at all stages of training in computer science, from the precollege level through graduate school. Because many of the problems discussed are related to the lack of role models for women who are in the process of becoming computer scientists, we also concern ourselves with the status of women faculty members. We not only describe the problems, but also make specific recommendations for change and encourage further study of those problems whose solutions are not yet well understood.
Of course, our focus on computer science in the university by no means exhausts the set of issues that are relevant to an investigation of women in computer science. Most notably, we do not directly address issues that are of concern exclusively or primarily to women in industry. Although some of the problems we discuss are common to all women computer scientists, there are, without doubt, other problems that are unique to one group or the other. Nonetheless, the committee felt that an examination of the process of becoming a computer scientist provided a good starting point for a wider investigation of women in the field. Clearly, to increase the number of women in industrial computer science, one must first increase the number of women trained in the discipline. Thus, we need to consider why women stop their training earlier than men: too few women with bachelor's degrees in computer science translates into too few women in both industry and academia. Moreover, because of the documented positive effects of same-sex role models [12], it is also important to consider why women drop out in higher numbers than do men even later in their academic training: too few women with doctorate degrees results in too few women faculty members. This in turn means inadequate numbers of role models for younger women in the process of becoming computer scientists.

References

[1]
Arnold, K. Retaining high-achieving women in science and engineering. In AAAS Symposium on Women and Girls in Science and Technology, uuly 1987). Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
[2]
Barriers to equality in academia: Women in computer science at MIT. Laboratory for Computer Science and the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at M.I.T., 1983.
[3]
Burton, M. D. Gender differences in professional socialization: A study of women and men becoming computer scientists. Tech. Rep, Carnegie- Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1987. Committee on Social Science Research in Computing, Social and Decision Sciences Department.
[4]
Changing America: The new face of science and engineering- Interim Rep. The Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1988.
[5]
Changing America: The new face of science and engineering-Final Rep. The Task Force on Women, Minorities, and the Handicapped in Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., 1989.
[6]
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., and Neuschatz, M. The final disadvantage: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Tech. Rep., Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. Center for Science and Technology.
[7]
Failor. B. The Historv of EYH. MathlScience Network Broadcast, (Winter 1990), 5.
[8]
Gilbert, L., Gallesich, J. M., and Evans, S. L. Sex of faculty role model and students' self-perceptions of competency. Sex Roles 9, 5 (597%607), 1983.
[9]
Grigolia, M. Computer Science Reentry Program. Camp. Res. News, 2, 2 (April 19, 1990).
[10]
Hall, R. M. and Sandler, B. R. The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C., 1982.
[11]
Hall, R. M. and Sandier B. R. The classroom climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C., 1986.
[12]
Hornig, L.S. Women in science and engineering: Why so few? Tech. Rev., 87, 8 (31-41), 1984.
[13]
Huff, C. and Cooper, J. Sex bias in educational software: The effect of designers' stereotypes on the software they design. J. Applied Sot. Psych., 17, 6 (1987), 519-532.
[14]
Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., and Eccles, J.S. Pool halls, chips, and war games: Women in the culture of computing. Psych. of Women Q., 9 (1985), 451-462.
[15]
Lantz, A. An Evaluation of Programs for Reentry of Women Scientists. In S. Humphreys, Ed., Women and Minorities in Science: Strategies for Increasing Participation. Westview Press, 1982.
[16]
Leveson, N. Women in computer science: A Report for the NSF CISE Cross Directorate Activities Advisory Committee, 1989.
[17]
Long, J. S. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces. To be published.
[18]
Marriage, family, and scientific careers: Institutional policy versus research findings. American Association for the Advancement of Science. In Proceedings of a Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the AAAS (1989).
[19]
NSF. Research in undergraduate institutions (RUI). Program Announcement, Directorate for Scientific, Technological, and International Affairs, 1989.
[20]
NSF. Visiting professorships for women. Grants for Research and Education in Science and Engineer-ing Program Announcement, Octo- ber 1989.
[21]
Report on women and minorities in science and engineering. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1988.
[22]
Sloat, B. Women in science: A university program of intervention, out-reach, and research. In Second International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women (April 1984. Gorningen, the Netherlands).
[23]
Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S., and Zubrow, D. Encountering an Alien Cu1ture.J. of Sm. Issues 40, 3 (1984), 31-48.
[24]
&n-sock, A. The women's science and engineering network. European Journal of Physics, 8, 2 (1987), 151- 152.
[25]
Widnall, S. E. AAAS Presidential Lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241 (1988), 1740-1745.
[26]
Zappert, L. T., and Stanbury, K. In the pipeline: A comparative analysis of men and women in graduate programs in science, engineering, and medicine at Stanford University. Tech. Rep. Working Paper 20, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford University Stanford, CA, 1984.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ten Years, Ten Trends: The First Decade of an Affordable At-Scale DegreeProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3662038(143-153)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Why Women Go ElsewhereHandbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch015(311-329)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
  • (2020)PixassoProceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3386527.3406747(361-364)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 33, Issue 11
Nov. 1990
123 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/92755
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 1990
Published in CACM Volume 33, Issue 11

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)323
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ten Years, Ten Trends: The First Decade of an Affordable At-Scale DegreeProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3662038(143-153)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Why Women Go ElsewhereHandbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch015(311-329)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
  • (2020)PixassoProceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3386527.3406747(361-364)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2020
  • (2017)What computing instructors did last summer: Experiences and lessons learned2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2017.8190723(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2017
  • (2016)Success, Hype or Myth for Women in Computing?Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/2998581.2998609(198-202)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2016
  • (2016)ReferencesCommunities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM10.1145/2973856.2973871Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Hypertext, Digital Libraries, and Beyond: A History of ACM SIGWEBCommunities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM10.1145/2973856.2973870Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Framing Computer Security and Privacy, 1967–1992Communities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM10.1145/2973856.2973869Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Other Places of Invention: Computer Graphics at the University of UtahCommunities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM10.1145/2973856.2973868Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Concern for the 'Disadvantaged': ACM's Role in Training and Education for Communities of Color (1958–1975)Communities of Computing: Computer Science and Society in the ACM10.1145/2973856.2973867Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media