[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Priming the pipeline

Published: 01 June 2002 Publication History

Abstract

In 1997 The Backyard Project, a pilot program of the Garnett Foundation, was instituted to encourage high school girls to explore careers in the computer industry (See 〈http://taz.cs.ubc.ca/swift/archives/garnett.html〉). At that time, the Garnett Foundation commissioned the Global Strategy Group to execute a survey of 652 college-bound high school students (grades 9 through 12), to help discover directions that The Backyard Project might take to try to move toward the mission of the pilot program. It conducted the study by telephone between March 25 and April 8, 1997 in the Silicon Valley, Boston, and Austin metropolitan areas. It conducted all interviews using a random digit dialing methodology, derived from a file of American households with high incidences of adolescent children. The survey had an overall margin of error of + 3.8%.The top six answers from girls to the survey question "Why are girls less likely to pursue computer science careers?" in order of perceived importance by the girls were: "not enough role models"; "women have other interests"; "didn't know about the industry"; "limited opportunity"; "negative media"; and "too nerdy".The Backyard Project, in existence from 1998-2001, sponsored computer camps on college campuses for high school girls. The first camp in 1998, served 24 girls and by 2000, it had grown to an eight-city program designed to give 360 girls, most from low-income families, a week to learn high tech fundamentals and meet women in the computer industry. This high growth rate reflects the urgent need for programs such as this one.The following discusses the six responses given above by the girl survey respondents. The quotes that follow (unless otherwise noted), speak to the issues raised in the survey and are taken from comments made by the high school girls attending the camp at Stanford University in 1999.

References

[1]
Camp, T. "The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline," inroads (SIGCSE Bulletin), 34(2), 2002, Reprinted from Communications of the ACM, 40(10), pp. 103-110, 1997.
[2]
Joint Venture Index of Silicon Valley, 1997.
[3]
American Association of University Women. AAUW Gender Gaps: Where Schools Still Fail Our Children, 1998, http://www.aauw.org/
[4]
From a report by APCO Associates, Seattle WA for the Garnett Foundation, 1999, http://www.thegarnettfoundation.com and http://www.apcoworldwide.com/Seattle/home.html
[5]
Gürer, D. and Camp, T. "An ACM-W Literature Review on Women in Computing," inroads (SIGCSE Bulletin), 34(2), 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Can Anyone Learn to Code? A Qualitative Study of Place-Based Information Technology Training ProgramsEconomic Development Quarterly10.1177/0891242424127684539:1(37-48)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Recruiting Practices in Informal CS LearningACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/368882924:4(1-29)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
  • (2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 34, Issue 2
Women and Computing
June 2002
176 pages
ISSN:0097-8418
DOI:10.1145/543812
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2002
Published in SIGCSE Volume 34, Issue 2

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Can Anyone Learn to Code? A Qualitative Study of Place-Based Information Technology Training ProgramsEconomic Development Quarterly10.1177/0891242424127684539:1(37-48)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Recruiting Practices in Informal CS LearningACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/368882924:4(1-29)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2024
  • (2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2022)How Gender, Ethnicity, and Public Presentation Shape Coding Perseverance after HackathonsProceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3564721.3564727(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2022
  • (2022)“I remember how to do it”: exploring upper elementary students’ collaborative regulation while pair programming using epistemic network analysisComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2022.204467233:3(429-457)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2022
  • (2021)The Early Bird Gets the Worm: Major Retention in CS3Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3430665.3456335(422-428)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Get Paid to Program: Evaluating an Employment-Aware After-School Program for High School Women of ColorProceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/3341525.3387357(212-218)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020
  • (2019)Underrepresented Groups Threats to Belonging in Computing2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985905(1-4)Online publication date: Feb-2019
  • (2018)Culturally Relevant CS Pedagogy - Theory & Practice2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT)10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491699(1-5)Online publication date: Feb-2018
  • (2016)Diversity and the Information Technology Workforce: Barriers and OpportunitiesJournal of Computer Information Systems10.1080/08874417.2003.1164753543:4(63-71)Online publication date: Feb-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media