[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/500286.500297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Process descriptions as organisational accounting devices: the dual use of workflow technologies

Published: 30 September 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Workflow technologies present a problem for CSCW. On the one hand, they are perhaps the most successful form of groupware technology in current use; but on the other, they have been subject to sustained and cogent critiques, particularly from perspective of the analysis of everyday working activities. This leads inevitably to the question: in the face of these critiques, just why and how do work-flow technologies prove effective? This paper suggests that part of the solution lies in the fact that workflow technologies play more than one role in organisations, and that, in fact, the success of work flow technologies may have little to do with the typical relationship of those technologies to the accomplishment of everyday work. On the basis of the notion of a dual role for workflow technologies, I lay out a framework for considering the design and analysis of workflow systems that may help to bridge between these two roles.

References

[1]
Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., and Grasso, A. (1997). Rethinking CSCW Systems: The Architecture of Milano. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'97 (Lancaster, UK). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[2]
Ball, T. and Eick, S. (1996). Software Visualization in the Large. IEEE Computer, 29(4), 33-43.
[3]
Bentley, R. and Dourish, P. (1995). Medium versus Mechanism: Supporting Collaboration through Customisation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[4]
Bittner, E. (1965). The Concept of Organisation. Social Research, 32, 239-55 (reproduced in Turner, ed, Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin).
[5]
Bowers, J., Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1995), Workflow from Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[6]
Button, G. (1995). What's Wrong with Speech Act Theory. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work,3,39-42.
[7]
Button, G. and Harper, R. (1993). Taking the organisation into accounts. In Button (ed.), Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology. London: Routledge.
[8]
Dourish, P., Holmes, J., MacLean, A., Marqvardsen, P., and Zbylsaw, A., (1996). Freeflow: Mediating between Representation and Action in Workflow Systems. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'96 (Boston, MA). New York: ACM.
[9]
Dourish, P., Bentley, R., Jones, R. and MacLean, A. (1999). A Matter of Perspective: Using Process Descriptions to Index Document History. Proc. ACM Conf. Supporting Group Work GROUP'99 (Phoenix,AZ).NewYork:ACM.
[10]
Dourish, P., Edwards, K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K.,Salisbury,M.,Terry,D.andThornton,J.(2000).Extending Document Management Systems with Active Properties. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 18(2), 140-170.
[11]
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[12]
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On Formal Structures of Practical Action. In McKinney and Tiryakian (eds), Theoretical Sociology, 337-366. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
[13]
Grinter, R. (1996). Supporting Articulation Work Using Configuration Management Systems. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 5(4), 447-465.
[14]
Grinter, R. (2000). Workflow Systems: Occasions for Success and Failure. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 9(2), 189-214.
[15]
Haake, J. and Wilson, B. (1992). Supporting Collaborative Writing of Hyperdocuments in SEPIA. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'92 (Toronto, Ontario). New York: ACM.
[16]
Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1994). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution.NewYork: HarperCollins.
[17]
LaMarca, A., Edwards, K., Dourish, P., Lamping, J., Smith, I. and Thornton, J. (1999). Taking the Work out of Workflow: Mechanisms for Document-Centered Collaboration. Proc. European Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'99 (Copenhagen, Denmark). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[18]
Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., and Flores, F. (1992). The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'92 (Toronto, Ontario). New York: ACM.
[19]
Randall, D., Rouncefield, M., and Hughes, J. (1995). Chalk and Cheese: BPR and Ethnomethodologically-Informed Ethnography in CSCW. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW'95 (Stockholm, Sweden). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[20]
Robertson, G., Card, S. and Mackinlay, J. (1993). Information Visualization using 3D Interactive Animation. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 56-71.
[21]
Schmidt, K. (1997). Of Maps and Scripts: The Status of Formal Constructs in Cooperative Work. Proc. ACM Conf. Supporting Group Work GROUP'97 (Phoenix, AZ). New York: ACM.
[22]
Star, S. L. (1989). The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Problem Solving. In Gasser and Huhns (eds), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Volume 2. London: Pitman.
[23]
Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
[24]
Swenson, K., Maxwell, R., Matsumoto, T., Saghari, B. and Irwin, K. (1994). A Business Process Environment Supporting Collaborative Planning. Collaborative Computing, 1(1), 15-34.
[25]
Suchman, L. (1985). Office Procedures as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(4), 320-328.
[26]
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Suchman, L. (1993). Technologies of Accountability: Of Lizards and Aeroplanes. In Button (ed), Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology. London: Routledge.
[28]
Suchman, L. (1994). Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 2(3). 177-190.
[29]
Suchman, L. (1995). Speech Acts and Voices: Response to Winograd et al. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work,3,85-95.
[30]
Winograd, T. (1986). A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'86 (Austin, TX). New York: ACM.
[31]
Winograd, T. (1994). Categories, Disciplines and Social Coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2, 191- 197.
[32]
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enforced Dependencies for Active ObjectsActive Object Languages: Current Research Trends10.1007/978-3-031-51060-1_13(359-374)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Non-userInternet Policy Review10.14763/2022.2.166311:2Online publication date: 21-Apr-2022
  • (2022)The Craft and Coordination of Data Curation: Complicating Workflow Views of Data ScienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551396:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '01: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
September 2001
310 pages
ISBN:1581132948
DOI:10.1145/500286
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 September 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

GROUP01
Sponsor:
GROUP01: Conference on Supporting GROUP Work
September 30 - October 3, 2001
Colorado, Boulder, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25
The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
January 12 - 15, 2025
Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enforced Dependencies for Active ObjectsActive Object Languages: Current Research Trends10.1007/978-3-031-51060-1_13(359-374)Online publication date: 29-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Non-userInternet Policy Review10.14763/2022.2.166311:2Online publication date: 21-Apr-2022
  • (2022)The Craft and Coordination of Data Curation: Complicating Workflow Views of Data ScienceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551396:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Extending a Human-AI Collaboration Framework with Dynamism and SocialityProceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3533406.3533407(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2022
  • (2022)Working with WoltProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928236:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Cost analysis for a resource sensitive workflow modelling languageScience of Computer Programming10.1016/j.scico.2022.102896(102896)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2022)Explaining ambiguity in scientific languageSynthese10.1007/s11229-022-03792-x200:5Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2021)Orienting, Framing, Bridging, Magic, and Counseling: How Data Scientists Navigate the Outer Loop of Client Collaborations in Industry and AcademiaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34760525:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Street-Level Algorithms and AI in Bureaucratic Decision-MakingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491145:CSCW1(1-23)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
  • (2021)Tensions in Representing Behavioral Data in an Electronic Health RecordComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-021-09402-7Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media