More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow Design

Authors:

Călin Neamțu,

Dorin-Mircea Popovici,

Mateescu-Suciu Liliana,

Adrien Syrotnik,

Matei-Ioan PopoviciAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, Volume 17, Issue 2

Article No.: 19, Pages 1 - 21

https://doi.org/10.1145/3639933

Published: 23 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Cultural institutions are increasingly prioritizing the utilization of diverse mixed reality technologies to enrich the visitor experience during their physical exhibitions. These institutions are actively integrating virtual assets to enhance interactivity and facilitate immersive storytelling experiences. The use of extended reality technologies in cultural heritage dissemination has become a common solution to improve the perception on cultural heritage of their visitors. The objective of the proposed research is to conduct a comparative analysis of three distinct extended reality applications used in cultural heritage experiences. The proposed workflow integrates advanced 3D scanning technology and additive manufacturing techniques to produce tangible replicas which are further enhanced using extended reality technologies, such as augmented reality, desktop virtual reality, and immersive virtual reality. To evaluate the developed extended reality applications, we have conducted various System Usability Scale tools to assess applications’ usability while also trying to identify the most appropriate application that can be integrated within the museum exhibition. From a utility point of view, we found no notable differences in the user perceptions between proposed solutions, whereas from a usability and satisfaction point of view, the most preferred solution was the augmented reality one. The workflow is presented in sufficient detail to ensure the replication of the results.

References

[1]

A. Marto, A. Gonçalves, M. Melo, and M. Bessa. 2022. A survey of multisensory VR and AR applications for cultural heritage. Comput. Graph 102 (2022), 426–440, DOI:

Digital Library

[2]

N. Inoue. 2010. Application of ultra-realistic communication research to digital museum. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI’10). 29–32. DOI:

Digital Library

[3]

S. Vert, D. And one, A. Ternauciuc, V. Mihaescu, O. Rotaru, M. Mocofan, C. Orhei, and R. Vasiu. 2021. User evaluation of a multi-platform digital storytelling concept for cultural heritage. Mathematics 9, 21 (2021), 2678. DOI:

[4]

X. Xie and X. Tang. 2018. The application of augmented reality technology in digital display for intangible cultural heritage: The case of Cantonese furniture. In Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction in Context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10902. Springer, 334–343. DOI:

Digital Library

[5]

K. Jung, V. T. Nguyen, D. Piscarac, and S. C. Yoo. 2020. Meet the virtual Jeju Dol Harubang—The mixed VR/AR application for cultural immersion in Korea's main heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 9, 6 (2020), 367. DOI:

[6]

A. Pagano, A. Palombini, G. Bozzelli, M. De Nino, I. Cerato, and S. Ricciardi. 2020. ArkaeVision VR game: User experience research between real and virtual Paestum. Appl. Sci. 10, 9 (2020), 3182. DOI:

[7]

I. Ghani, A. Rafi, and P. Woods. 2019. The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 24, 6 (2019), 861–872. DOI:

Digital Library

[8]

C. Fidas, S. Sylaiou, and T. Kobayashi. 2021. Editorial for special issue “Virtual Reality and Its Application in Cultural Heritage.” Appl. Sci. 11, 4 (2021), 1530. DOI:

[9]

B. Constantinescu, R. Bugoi, V. Cojocaru, M. Radtke, T. Calligaro, J. Salomon, L. Pichon, S. Rohrs, D. Ceccato, E. Oberlander-Tarnoveanu, C. Ionescu, and D. Pop. 2009. Dacian bracelets and Transylvanian gold: Ancient history and modern analyses. ArchéoSciences 33 (2009), 221–225. DOI:

[10]

G. Florea (Ed.). 2015. Matrița de bronz de la Sarmizegetusa Regia/The Bronze Matrix from Sarmizegetusa Regia (Grădiștea de Munte, Hunedoara County, Romania). Editura Mega.

[11]

M. K. Bekele and E. Champion. 2019. A comparison of immersive realities and interaction methods: Cultural learning in virtual heritage. Front. Robot. AI 6 (2019), 1–14. DOI:

[12]

R. G. Boboc, E. Băutu, F. Gîrbacia, N. Popovici, and D. M. Popovici. 2022. Augmented reality in cultural heritage: An overview of the last decade of applications. Appl. Sci. 12, 19 (2022), 9859. DOI:

[13]

E. Selmanović, S. Rizvic, C. Harvey, D. Boskovic, V. Hulusic, M. Chahin, and S. Sljivo. 2020. Improving accessibility to intangible cultural heritage preservation using virtual reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 2 (2020), 1–19. DOI:

Digital Library

[14]

C. Fenu and F. Pittarello. 2018. Svevo tour: The design and the experimentation of an augmented reality application for engaging visitors of a literary museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 114 (2018), 20–35. DOI:

[15]

F. Hruby, L. F. Á. Sánchez, R. Ressl, and E. G. Escobar-Briones. 2020. An empirical study on spatial presence in immersive geo-environments. PFG—J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 88, 2 (2020), 155–163. DOI:

[16]

S. Sylaiou, K. Mania, A. Karoulis, and M. White. 2010. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68, 5 (2010), 243–253. DOI:

Digital Library

[17]

P. Koutsabasis, A. Gardeli, P. Vogiatzidakis, V. Nikolakopoulou, P. Chatzigrigoriou, and S. Vosinakis. 2021. Location-based games for cultural heritage: Applying the design thinking process. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter (CHI Greece’21). 1–8. DOI:

Digital Library

[18]

P. Galatis, D. Gavalas, V. Kasapakis, G. Pantziou, and C. Zaroliagis. 2016. Mobile augmented reality guides in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 8th EAI International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services (MobiCASE’16). 11–19. DOI:

Digital Library

[19]

V. Nikolakopoulou et al. 2022. Design and user experience of a hybrid mixed reality installation that promotes Tinian marble crafts heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 4 (2022), Article 60, 21 pages. DOI:

Digital Library

[20]

D. Petrelli and S. O'Brien. 2018. Phone vs. tangible in museums: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). 1–12. DOI:

Digital Library

[21]

E. Not and D. Petrelli. 2018. Blending customisation, context-awareness and adaptivity for personalised tangible interaction in cultural heritage. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 114 (2018), 3–19. DOI:

[22]

C. S. C. Dalim, H. Kolivand, H. Kadhim, M. S. Sunar, and M. Billinghurst. 2017. Factors influencing the acceptance of augmented reality in education: A review of the literature. J. Comput. Sci. 13, 11 (2017), 581–589. DOI:

[23]

T. H. Jung, H. Lee, N. Chung, and M. C. tom Dieck. 2018. Cross-cultural differences in adopting mobile augmented reality at cultural heritage tourism sites. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 30, 3 (2018), 1621–1645. DOI:

[24]

F. Serravalle, A. Ferraris, D. Vrontis, A. Thrassou, and M. Christofi. 2019. Augmented reality in the tourism industry: A multi-stakeholder analysis of museums. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 32 (2019), 100549. DOI:

[25]

HTC. n.d. VIVE Pro. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.vive.com

[26]

Ultraleap for Developers. n.d. Leap Motion Orion 4.0.0. Retrieved June 8, 2023 from https://developer.leapmotion.com/releases/leap-motion-orion-400

[27]

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca. n.d. 3D Scanning and Measuring Laboratory. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://3dmsl.utcluj.ro/

[28]

Creaform. n.d. Go!SCAN 3D Scanner. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.creaform3d.com/en/goscan-3d-g2-scanner

[29]

Dassault Systèmes. n.d. CATIA V5 Portfolio. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/v5/portfolio/

[30]

Autodesk. n.d. 3ds Max Software. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.autodesk.com/products/3ds-max/

[31]

Stratasys. n.d. F123 Series: FDM 3D Printer. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.stratasys.com/en/3d-printers/printer-catalog/fdm-printers/f123-series-printers/

[32]

Unity. n.d. Unity 2021.3.4. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://unity.com/releases/editor/whats-new/2021.3.4

[33]

Vuforia Engine Developer Portal. n.d. XXX. Retrieved May 6, 2023 from https://developer.vuforia.com/forum/general-discussions/news-and-announcements/vuforia-engine-102

[34]

John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. CRC Press.

[35]

F. Reichheld. 2003. The one number you need to grow. Harv. Bus. Rev., December 2003.

[36]

J. F. Bajec. 2019. The interpretation and utilization of cultural heritage and its values by young people in Slovenia: Is Heritage Really Boring and Uninteresting? Etnološka Trib.: Godišnjak Hrvat. Etnološkog Društva 49, 42 (2019), 173–193. DOI:

Cited By

Xu JWen CLiu DZhao W(2024)VR Baixi: Improving Cultural Heritage Learning of Qin Dynasty via Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Virtual Reality Technology10.1145/3711496.3711504(51-59)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3711496.3711504
Borhani ZOrtega F(2024)Enhancing Replicability in XR HCI Studies: A Survey-Based Approach2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020(42-46)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020
Li YYang RZou JXu HTian F(2024)Human-Centric Virtual Museum: Redefining the Museum Experience Through Immersive and Interactive EnvironmentsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861(1-12)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow Design
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. Usability testing

Recommendations

Augmented Experiences in Cultural Spaces through Social Participation

Technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Social Computing offer promising opportunities to envision and shape augmented experiences in a wide variety of cultural spaces. Such interactive technologies act as a hook to attract visitor's ...
Evaluating Digital Cultural Heritage ‘In the Wild’: The Case For Reflexivity
Special Issue on the Evaluation of Digital Cultural Resources

Digital heritage interpretation is often untethered from traditional museological techniques and environments. As museums and heritage sites explore the potential of locative technologies and ever more sophisticated content-triggering mechanisms for use ...
VR Games and the Dissemination of Cultural Heritage
Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions: Understanding Humans
Abstract
Known as the Eighth Wonder of the World, the Emperor Qingshihuang’s Mausoleum and Terracotta Warriors contain rich information and unique value in the field of history, culture, military, science and technology and so on, highlight the core values ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Volume 17, Issue 2

June 2024

355 pages

EISSN:1556-4711

DOI:10.1145/3613557

Editor:
Karina Rodriguez-Echavarria
University of Brighton, UK

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 February 2024

Online AM: 09 January 2024

Accepted: 04 December 2023

Revised: 15 November 2023

Received: 24 August 2023

Published in JOCCH Volume 17, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation grant CCCDI-UEFISCDI

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
700
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)566
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Xu JWen CLiu DZhao W(2024)VR Baixi: Improving Cultural Heritage Learning of Qin Dynasty via Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Virtual Reality Technology10.1145/3711496.3711504(51-59)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3711496.3711504
Borhani ZOrtega F(2024)Enhancing Replicability in XR HCI Studies: A Survey-Based Approach2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020(42-46)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020
Li YYang RZou JXu HTian F(2024)Human-Centric Virtual Museum: Redefining the Museum Experience Through Immersive and Interactive EnvironmentsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861(1-12)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861
Pei Y(2024)The value of technology and interactive systems in cultural heritage interpretation: a study based on existing empirical researchMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2024.2408240(1-19)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2408240

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents