[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow Design

Published: 23 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Cultural institutions are increasingly prioritizing the utilization of diverse mixed reality technologies to enrich the visitor experience during their physical exhibitions. These institutions are actively integrating virtual assets to enhance interactivity and facilitate immersive storytelling experiences. The use of extended reality technologies in cultural heritage dissemination has become a common solution to improve the perception on cultural heritage of their visitors. The objective of the proposed research is to conduct a comparative analysis of three distinct extended reality applications used in cultural heritage experiences. The proposed workflow integrates advanced 3D scanning technology and additive manufacturing techniques to produce tangible replicas which are further enhanced using extended reality technologies, such as augmented reality, desktop virtual reality, and immersive virtual reality. To evaluate the developed extended reality applications, we have conducted various System Usability Scale tools to assess applications’ usability while also trying to identify the most appropriate application that can be integrated within the museum exhibition. From a utility point of view, we found no notable differences in the user perceptions between proposed solutions, whereas from a usability and satisfaction point of view, the most preferred solution was the augmented reality one. The workflow is presented in sufficient detail to ensure the replication of the results.

References

[1]
A. Marto, A. Gonçalves, M. Melo, and M. Bessa. 2022. A survey of multisensory VR and AR applications for cultural heritage. Comput. Graph 102 (2022), 426–440, DOI:
[2]
N. Inoue. 2010. Application of ultra-realistic communication research to digital museum. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry (VRCAI’10). 29–32. DOI:
[3]
S. Vert, D. And one, A. Ternauciuc, V. Mihaescu, O. Rotaru, M. Mocofan, C. Orhei, and R. Vasiu. 2021. User evaluation of a multi-platform digital storytelling concept for cultural heritage. Mathematics 9, 21 (2021), 2678. DOI:
[4]
X. Xie and X. Tang. 2018. The application of augmented reality technology in digital display for intangible cultural heritage: The case of Cantonese furniture. In Human-Computer Interaction: Interaction in Context. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10902. Springer, 334–343. DOI:
[5]
K. Jung, V. T. Nguyen, D. Piscarac, and S. C. Yoo. 2020. Meet the virtual Jeju Dol Harubang—The mixed VR/AR application for cultural immersion in Korea's main heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information 9, 6 (2020), 367. DOI:
[6]
A. Pagano, A. Palombini, G. Bozzelli, M. De Nino, I. Cerato, and S. Ricciardi. 2020. ArkaeVision VR game: User experience research between real and virtual Paestum. Appl. Sci. 10, 9 (2020), 3182. DOI:
[7]
I. Ghani, A. Rafi, and P. Woods. 2019. The effect of immersion towards place presence in virtual heritage environments. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 24, 6 (2019), 861–872. DOI:
[8]
C. Fidas, S. Sylaiou, and T. Kobayashi. 2021. Editorial for special issue “Virtual Reality and Its Application in Cultural Heritage.” Appl. Sci. 11, 4 (2021), 1530. DOI:
[9]
B. Constantinescu, R. Bugoi, V. Cojocaru, M. Radtke, T. Calligaro, J. Salomon, L. Pichon, S. Rohrs, D. Ceccato, E. Oberlander-Tarnoveanu, C. Ionescu, and D. Pop. 2009. Dacian bracelets and Transylvanian gold: Ancient history and modern analyses. ArchéoSciences 33 (2009), 221–225. DOI:
[10]
G. Florea (Ed.). 2015. Matrița de bronz de la Sarmizegetusa Regia/The Bronze Matrix from Sarmizegetusa Regia (Grădiștea de Munte, Hunedoara County, Romania). Editura Mega.
[11]
M. K. Bekele and E. Champion. 2019. A comparison of immersive realities and interaction methods: Cultural learning in virtual heritage. Front. Robot. AI 6 (2019), 1–14. DOI:
[12]
R. G. Boboc, E. Băutu, F. Gîrbacia, N. Popovici, and D. M. Popovici. 2022. Augmented reality in cultural heritage: An overview of the last decade of applications. Appl. Sci. 12, 19 (2022), 9859. DOI:
[13]
E. Selmanović, S. Rizvic, C. Harvey, D. Boskovic, V. Hulusic, M. Chahin, and S. Sljivo. 2020. Improving accessibility to intangible cultural heritage preservation using virtual reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 2 (2020), 1–19. DOI:
[14]
C. Fenu and F. Pittarello. 2018. Svevo tour: The design and the experimentation of an augmented reality application for engaging visitors of a literary museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 114 (2018), 20–35. DOI:
[15]
F. Hruby, L. F. Á. Sánchez, R. Ressl, and E. G. Escobar-Briones. 2020. An empirical study on spatial presence in immersive geo-environments. PFG—J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 88, 2 (2020), 155–163. DOI:
[16]
S. Sylaiou, K. Mania, A. Karoulis, and M. White. 2010. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 68, 5 (2010), 243–253. DOI:
[17]
P. Koutsabasis, A. Gardeli, P. Vogiatzidakis, V. Nikolakopoulou, P. Chatzigrigoriou, and S. Vosinakis. 2021. Location-based games for cultural heritage: Applying the design thinking process. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter (CHI Greece’21). 1–8. DOI:
[18]
P. Galatis, D. Gavalas, V. Kasapakis, G. Pantziou, and C. Zaroliagis. 2016. Mobile augmented reality guides in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the 8th EAI International Conference on Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services (MobiCASE’16). 11–19. DOI:
[19]
V. Nikolakopoulou et al. 2022. Design and user experience of a hybrid mixed reality installation that promotes Tinian marble crafts heritage. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 15, 4 (2022), Article 60, 21 pages. DOI:
[20]
D. Petrelli and S. O'Brien. 2018. Phone vs. tangible in museums: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18). 1–12. DOI:
[21]
E. Not and D. Petrelli. 2018. Blending customisation, context-awareness and adaptivity for personalised tangible interaction in cultural heritage. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 114 (2018), 3–19. DOI:
[22]
C. S. C. Dalim, H. Kolivand, H. Kadhim, M. S. Sunar, and M. Billinghurst. 2017. Factors influencing the acceptance of augmented reality in education: A review of the literature. J. Comput. Sci. 13, 11 (2017), 581–589. DOI:
[23]
T. H. Jung, H. Lee, N. Chung, and M. C. tom Dieck. 2018. Cross-cultural differences in adopting mobile augmented reality at cultural heritage tourism sites. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 30, 3 (2018), 1621–1645. DOI:
[24]
F. Serravalle, A. Ferraris, D. Vrontis, A. Thrassou, and M. Christofi. 2019. Augmented reality in the tourism industry: A multi-stakeholder analysis of museums. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 32 (2019), 100549. DOI:
[25]
HTC. n.d. VIVE Pro. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.vive.com
[26]
Ultraleap for Developers. n.d. Leap Motion Orion 4.0.0. Retrieved June 8, 2023 from https://developer.leapmotion.com/releases/leap-motion-orion-400
[27]
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca. n.d. 3D Scanning and Measuring Laboratory. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://3dmsl.utcluj.ro/
[28]
Creaform. n.d. Go!SCAN 3D Scanner. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.creaform3d.com/en/goscan-3d-g2-scanner
[29]
Dassault Systèmes. n.d. CATIA V5 Portfolio. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/v5/portfolio/
[30]
Autodesk. n.d. 3ds Max Software. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.autodesk.com/products/3ds-max/
[31]
Stratasys. n.d. F123 Series: FDM 3D Printer. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://www.stratasys.com/en/3d-printers/printer-catalog/fdm-printers/f123-series-printers/
[32]
Unity. n.d. Unity 2021.3.4. Retrieved June 6, 2023 from https://unity.com/releases/editor/whats-new/2021.3.4
[33]
[34]
John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. CRC Press.
[35]
F. Reichheld. 2003. The one number you need to grow. Harv. Bus. Rev., December 2003.
[36]
J. F. Bajec. 2019. The interpretation and utilization of cultural heritage and its values by young people in Slovenia: Is Heritage Really Boring and Uninteresting? Etnološka Trib.: Godišnjak Hrvat. Etnološkog Društva 49, 42 (2019), 173–193. DOI:

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Replicability in XR HCI Studies: A Survey-Based Approach2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020(42-46)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Human-Centric Virtual Museum: Redefining the Museum Experience Through Immersive and Interactive EnvironmentsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861(1-12)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
  • (2024)The value of technology and interactive systems in cultural heritage interpretation: a study based on existing empirical researchMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2024.2408240(1-19)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
    Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 17, Issue 2
    June 2024
    355 pages
    EISSN:1556-4711
    DOI:10.1145/3613557
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2024
    Online AM: 09 January 2024
    Accepted: 04 December 2023
    Revised: 15 November 2023
    Received: 24 August 2023
    Published in JOCCH Volume 17, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ICT technologies in support of creating new cultural experiences or digital artefacts
    2. virtual and augmented reality technologies for virtual and digital museums
    3. human-computer interfaces for virtual and digital museums
    4. gesture-based interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation grant CCCDI-UEFISCDI

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)593
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enhancing Replicability in XR HCI Studies: A Survey-Based Approach2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct64951.2024.00020(42-46)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Human-Centric Virtual Museum: Redefining the Museum Experience Through Immersive and Interactive EnvironmentsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2408861(1-12)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The value of technology and interactive systems in cultural heritage interpretation: a study based on existing empirical researchMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2024.2408240(1-19)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media