[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3639476.3639760acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Designing Trustful Cooperation Ecosystems is Key to the New Space Exploration Era

Published: 24 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In the emerging space economy, autonomous robotic missions with specialized goals such as mapping and mining are gaining traction, with agencies and enterprises increasingly investing resources. Multirobot systems (MRS) research has provided many approaches to establish control and communication layers to facilitate collaboration from a technical perspective, such as granting more autonomy to heterogeneous robotic groups through auction-based interactions in mesh networks. However, stakeholders' competing economic interests often prevent them from cooperating within a proprietary ecosystem. Related work suggests that distributed ledger technology (DLT) might serve as a mechanism for enterprises to coordinate workflows and trade services to explore space resources through a transparent, reliable, non-proprietary digital platform. We challenge this perspective by pointing to the core technical weaknesses of block chains, in particular, increased energy consumption, low throughput, and full transparency through redundancy. Our objective is to advance the discussion in a direction where the benefits of DLT from an economic perspective are weighted against the drawbacks from a technical perspective. We finally present a possible DLT-driven heterogeneous MRS for map exploration to study the opportunities for economic collaboration and competitiveness.

References

[1]
U. S. P. Srinivas Aditya, Roshan Singh, Pranav Kumar Singh, and Anshuman Kalla. 2021. A Survey on Blockchain in Robotics: Issues, Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 196 (Dec. 2021), 10.
[2]
George A. Akerlof. 1970. The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 3 (Aug. 1970), 488--500.
[3]
Rabi' Al-Akhar. 2019. Space Science and Technology - the Official Portal of the UAE Government., 14 pages. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/science-and-technology/key-sectors-in-science-and-technology/space-science-and-techno
[4]
Ph. Saint Aubert, M. Hervieux, J. L. Perbos, E. Saggese, and C. Soprano. 1986. Centralized vs Decentralized Options for a European Data Relay Satellite System. Acta Astronautica 13 (1986), 387.
[5]
Renan Lima Baima and Esther Luna Colombini. 2021. Modeling Object's Affordances via Reward Functions. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Sys., Man, and Cyb. IEEE, Melbourne, Australia, 2183--2190.
[6]
Sue A. Baldor, Carlos Quiroz, and Paul Wood. 2013. Applying a Cloud Computing Approach to Storage Architectures for Spacecraft. In 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE, Big Sky, Montana, 1--6.
[7]
Mariel Borowitz. 2019. Strategic Implications of the Proliferation of Space Situational Awareness Technology and Information: Lessons Learned from the Remote Sensing Sector. Space Policy 47 (Feb. 2019), 18--27.
[8]
Bert-Jan Butijn, Damian A. Tamburri, and Willem-Jan van den Heuvel. 2020. Blockchains: A Systematic Multivocal Literature Review. Comput. Surveys 53, 3, Article 61 (July 2020), 37 pages.
[9]
Lesley Conn. 2021. Global Space Economy Nears $447B. https://www.thespacereport.org/uncategorized/global-space-economy-nears-447b/
[10]
Consensys Space. 2018. Open Source Space. https://www.consensys.space/
[11]
Florian Cordes. 2018. Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Hybrid Wheeled-Leg Exploration Rover in the Context of Multi-Robot Systems. Kumulative Dissertation. Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
[12]
Ian A. Crawford. 2015. Lunar Resources: A Review. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth 39, 2 (April 2015), 137--167.
[13]
P. De Filippi and Andrea Leiter. 2021. Blockchain in Outer Space. American Journal of International Law 115 (2021), 413--418.
[14]
A. Deshpande and J. Luntz. 2003. Decentralized Control for a Team of Physically Cooperating Robots. In Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., Vol. 2. IEEE, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 1757--1762 vol.2.
[15]
Alexander Dettmann, Thomas Voegele, Jorge Ocón, Iulia Dragomir, Shashank Govindaraj, Matteo de Benedetti, Valérie Ciarletti, Rafik Hassen-Khodja, Thierry Germa, Raphael Viards, Gonzalo J. Paz-Delgado, and Laura M. Mantoani. 2022. COROB-X: A Cooperative Robot Team for the Exploration of Lunar Skylights. In ASTRA 2022 16th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation. ESA-ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 9. https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-03751549
[16]
M. Bernardine Dias, Robert Zlot, Nidhi Kalra, and Anthony Stentz. 2006. Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis. Proc. IEEE 94, 7 (July 2006), 1257--1270.
[17]
Eduardo Castelló Ferrer, Ognjen Rudovic, Thomas Hardjono, and Alex Pentland. 2018. RoboChain: A Secure Data-Sharing Framework for Human-Robot Interaction. In The Tenth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. IARA XPS Press, Rome, Italy, 124 to 130.
[18]
Yang Gao and Steve Chien. 2017. Review on Space Robotics: Toward Top-Level Science through Space Exploration. Science Robotics 2, 7 (June 2017), eaan5074.
[19]
Sergio Garcıa, Claudio Menghi, Patrizio Pelliccione, Thorsten Berger, and Rebekka Wohlrab. 2018. An Architecture for Decentralized, Collaborative, and Autonomous Robots. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). IEEE, Seattle, WA, 75--7509.
[20]
Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf, and Srdjan Capkun. 2016. On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3--16.
[21]
Shahla Ghobadi and John D'Ambra. 2011. Coopetitive Knowledge Sharing: An Analytical Review of Literature. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 9, 4 (Jan. 2011), 307--317. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/coopetitive-knowledge-sharing-an-analytical-review-of-literature
[22]
Jason Goo, Ojas Bora, Priyansh Manne, Kazem Mullah, Kayden Tilden, Jeremy Hartley, Ayame Kunieda, Savannah Laver, Stephanie Lee, Laquan Shuai, and Isaiah Li Yun Tan. 2019. Blockchain Lunar Registry. https://diana.io
[23]
Tobias Guggenberger, Johannes Sedlmeir, Gilbert Fridgen, and André Luckow. 2022. An In-Depth Investigation of the Performance Characteristics of Hyperledger Fabric. Computers & Industrial Engineering 173 (Nov. 2022), 108716.
[24]
Jeffrey S. Harrison and Caron H. St. John. 1996. Managing and Partnering with External Stakeholders. Academy of Management Perspectives 10, 2 (May 1996), 46--60.
[25]
Eduard Hartwich, Alexander Rieger, Johannes Sedlmeir, Dominik Jurek, and Gilbert Fridgen. 2023. Machine Economies. Electronic Markets 33, 1 (July 2023), 36.
[26]
Hussein. Ibrahim, Marwa A. Shouman, Nawal A. El-Fishawy, and Ayman. Ahmed. 2021. Literature Review of Blockchain Technology in Space Industry: Challenges and Applications. In Int. Conf. Electron. Eng. IEEE, Menouf, Egypt, 1--8.
[27]
Niclas Kannengiesser, Sebastian Lins, Christian Sander, Klaus Winter, Hellmuth Frey, and Ali Sunyaev. 2022. Challenges and Common Solutions in Smart Contract Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 11 (Dec. 2022), 4291--4318.
[28]
Ameer Tamoor Khan, Xinwei Cao, Shuai Li, and Zoran Milosevic. 2019. Blockchain Technology with Applications to Distributed Control and Cooperative Robotics: A Survey. International Journal of Robotics and Control 2, 1 (Jan. 2019), 36.
[29]
Amanda M. Leon. 2018. Mining for Meaning: An Examination of the Legality of Property Rights in Space Resources. Virginia Law Review 104, 3 (May 2018), 497--546. jstor:44864188 https://www.jstor.org/stable/44864188
[30]
Mathias Link, David Parker, Massimo Sabbatini, and Franziska . 2021. ESA-ESRIC Space Resources Challenge - Prospecting Technologies - Call. https://www.spaceresourceschallenge.esa.int
[31]
Sergey Lonshakov, Aleksandr Krupenkin, Aleksandr Kapitonov, Evgeny Radchenko, Alisher Khassanov, and A. Starostin. 2018. Robonomics: Platform for Integration of Cyber Physical Systems into Human Economy for Engineers, Smart Cities and Industry 4.0 Creators.
[32]
Ralph D. Lorenz. 2020. How Far Is Far Enough? Requirements Derivation for Planetary Mobility Systems. Advances in Space Research 65, 5 (March 2020), 1383--1401.
[33]
Bernardo Martinez Rocamora, Cagri Kilic, Christopher Tatsch, Guilherme A. S. Pereira, and Jason N. Gross. 2023. Multi-Robot Cooperation for Lunar In-Situ Resource Utilization. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 10 (March 2023), 1149080.
[34]
Abdulkadir Memduhoglu and Melih Basaraner. 2018. Possible Contributions of Spatial Semantic Methods and Technologies to Multi-Representation Spatial Database Paradigm. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3, 3 (Oct. 2018), 108--118.
[35]
D. Miller. 1985. A Spatial Representation System for Mobile Robots. In 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Proceedings, Vol. 2. IEEE, St. Louis, MO, USA, 122--127.
[36]
Satoshi Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
[37]
NASA. 2016. Space Technology Roadmaps and Priorities Revisited. Technical Report. The National Academies Press, DC, USA.
[38]
Alina Orlova, Roberto Nogueira, and Paula Chimenti. 2020. The Present and Future of the Space Sector: A Business Ecosystem Approach. Space Policy 52 (May 2020), 101374.
[39]
Peter Pilgerstorfer and Evangelos Pournaras. 2017. Self-Adaptive Learning in Decentralized Combinatorial Optimization - A Design Paradigm for Sharing Economies. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 12th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS). IEEE, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 54--64.
[40]
Nikiforos Pittaras. 2022. A Cooperative Reinforcement Learning Environment for Detecting and Penalizing Betrayal. arXiv:2210.12841
[41]
Alberto Pretto, Stéphanie Aravecchia, Wolfram Burgard, Nived Chebrolu, Christian Dornhege, Tillmann Falck, Freya Fleckenstein, Alessandra Fontenla, Marco Imperoli, Raghav Khanna, Frank Liebisch, Philipp Lottes, Andres Milioto, Daniele Nardi, Sandro Nardi, Johannes Pfeifer, Marija Popović, Ciro Potena, Cédric Pradalier, Elisa Rothacker-Feder, Inkyu Sa, Alexander Schaefer, Roland Siegwart, Cyrill Stachniss, Achim Walter, Wera Winterhalter, Xiaolong Wu, and Juan Nieto. 2021. Building an Aerial-Ground Robotics System for Precision Farming: An Adaptable Solution. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 28, 3 (Sept. 2021), 29--49.
[42]
Félix Quinton, Christophe Grand, and Charles Lesire. 2023. Market Approaches to the Multi-Robot Task Allocation Problem: A Survey. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 107, 2 (Feb. 2023), 29.
[43]
Martin J. Schuster, Marcus G. Müller, Sebastian G. Brunner, H. Lehner, P. Lehner, R. Sakagami, A. Dömel, Lukas Meyer, B. Vodermayer, R. Giubilato, M. Vayugundla, Josef Reill, Florian Steidle, Ingo von Bargen, K. Bussmann, Rico Belder, P. Lutz, W. Stürzl, Michal S., Moritz Maier, S. Stoneman, Andre F. Prince, B. Rebele, M. Durner, E. Staudinger, Siwei Zhang, Robert P., Esther Bischoff, C. Braun, Susanne Schröder, E. Dietz, S. Frohmann, Anko Börner, H. Hübers, B. Foing, R. Triebel, Alin O. Albu, and A. Wedler. 2020. The ARCHES Space-Analogue Demonstration Mission: Towards Heterogeneous Teams of Autonomous Robots for Collaborative Scientific Sampling in Planetary Exploration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5, 4 (Oct. 2020), 5315--5322.
[44]
Johannes Sedlmeir, Hans Ulrich Buhl, Gilbert Fridgen, and Robert Keller. 2020. The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth. Business & Inf. Sys. Eng. 62, 6 (2020), 599--608.
[45]
Johannes Sedlmeir, Jonathan Lautenschlager, Gilbert Fridgen, and Nils Urbach. 2022. The Transparency Challenge of Blockchain in Organizations. Electronic Markets 32 (2022), 1779--1794.
[46]
Volker Strobel, Eduardo Castelló Ferrer, and Marco Dorigo. 2018. Managing Byzantine Robots via Blockchain Technology in a Swarm Robotics Collective Decision Making Scenario. In Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Auton. Agents MultiAgent Syst. (AAMAS '18). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 541--549.
[47]
Pavlos Triantafyllou, Rafael Afonso Rodrigues, Sirapoab Chaikunsaeng, Diogo Almeida, Graham Deacon, Jelizaveta Konstantinova, and Giuseppe Cotugno. 2021. A Methodology for Approaching the Integration of Complex Robotics Systems: Illustration through a Bimanual Manipulation Case Study. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 28 (2021), 88.
[48]
Matthew Weinzierl and Mehak Sarang. 2021. The Commercial Space Age Is Here. Harvard Busi. Rev . (2021), 1. hbr.org/2021/02/the-commercial-space-age-is-here
[49]
Stephan Zheng, Alexander Trott, Sunil Srinivasa, Nikhil Naik, Melvin Gruesbeck, David C. Parkes, and Richard Socher. 2020. The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-driven Tax Policies. arXiv:2004.13332
[50]
Robert Zlot, Anthony Stentz, M.Bernardine Dias, and Scott Thayer. 2002. Multi-Robot Exploration Controlled by a Market Economy. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292), Vol. 3. IEEE, DC, USA, 3016--3023.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Coopetitive Lunar Mapping: A distributed non-proprietary Multi-Robot Coordination using Blockchain-based Cost Optimisation2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)10.1109/CASE59546.2024.10711434(1276-1282)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE-NIER'24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results
April 2024
127 pages
ISBN:9798400705007
DOI:10.1145/3639476
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 May 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. autonomous agent
  2. blockchain
  3. coordination
  4. coopetition
  5. multi-agent systems
  6. multi-robot systems
  7. space economy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR)
  • PayPal/PEARL Grant

Conference

ICSE-NIER'24
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)113
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)39
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Coopetitive Lunar Mapping: A distributed non-proprietary Multi-Robot Coordination using Blockchain-based Cost Optimisation2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)10.1109/CASE59546.2024.10711434(1276-1282)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media