[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3637528.3671942acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Money Never Sleeps: Maximizing Liquidity Mining Yields in Decentralized Finance

Published: 24 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The popularity of decentralized finance has drawn attention to liquidity mining (LM). In LM, a user deposits her cryptocurrencies into liquidity pools to provide liquidity for exchanges and earn yields. Different liquidity pools offer varying yields and require different pairs of cryptocurrencies. A user can exchange a cryptocurrency for another with some exchange costs. Thus, an LM solution consists of exchange transactions and deposit transactions, guaranteeing (1) each exchange transaction must exchange one cryptocurrency for another at a specific rate (i.e., the exchange constraint); (2) the amounts of cryptocurrencies deposited in a liquidity pool must exceed the required threshold (i.e., the minimum constraint); (3) each deposit transaction must deposit a specific pair of cryptocurrencies at a certain rate in a liquidity pool (i.e., the deposit constraint); and (4) the cryptocurrencies used in the solution do not exceed the cryptocurrencies that the user has (i.e., the budget constraint). Selecting the most profitable LM solution is challenging due to the vast number of candidate solutions. To address this challenge, we define the yield maximization liquidity mining (YMLM) problem. Given a set of liquidity pools, a set of the user's cryptocurrencies, a set of exchange rates, and an evaluation function, YMLM aims to find an LM solution with maximal yields, satisfying the minimum, exchange, deposit, and budget constraints. We prove that YMLM is NP-hard and cannot be solved by algorithms with constant approximation ratios. To tackle YMLM, we propose two algorithms, namely YMLM\_GD and YMLM\_SK, with parameterized approximation ratios. Extensive experiments on both real and synthetic datasets show that our approaches outperform the baselines in yields.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - A prompt 2-minute promotional video
Video showing the background and motivation

References

[1]
[n.d.]. [Online] Binance. https://www.binance.com/zh-CN.
[2]
[n.d.]. [Online] Sushi Analytics. https://www.sushi.com/analytics.
[3]
[n.d.]. [Online] Uniswap V3 Development Book. https://uniswapv3book.com/.
[4]
[n.d.]. [Online] Uniswap V3 Pools Listed on Defillama. https://defillama.com/ yields?project=uniswap-v3.
[5]
Nazmiye Ceren Abay, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Yulia R Gel, Murat Kantarcioglu, Umar D Islambekov, Yahui Tian, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. 2019. Chainnet: Learning on blockchain graphs with topological features. In 2019 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM). IEEE, 946--951.
[6]
Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Murat Kantarcioglu, and Yulia R Gel. 2021. Data Science on Blockchains. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 4025--4026.
[7]
Jun Aoyagi. 2020. Liquidity provision by automated market makers. Available at SSRN 3674178 (2020).
[8]
Peng Cheng, Hao Xin, and Lei Chen. 2017. Utility-aware ridesharing on road networks. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data. 1197--1210.
[9]
Sizheng Fan, Tian Min, Xiao Wu, and Cai Wei. 2023. Towards understanding governance tokens in liquidity mining: a case study of decentralized exchanges. World Wide Web 26, 3 (2023), 1181--1200.
[10]
Zhou Fan, Francisco J Marmolejo-Cossío, Ben Altschuler, He Sun, XintongWang, and David Parkes. 2022. Differential Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3 and Implications for Contract Design. In Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. 9--17.
[11]
Tian Guo, Albert Bifet, and Nino Antulov-Fantulin. 2018. Bitcoin volatility forecasting with a glimpse into buy and sell orders. In 2018 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM). IEEE, 989--994.
[12]
Lioba Heimbach, Eric Schertenleib, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2022. Risks and returns of uniswap v3 liquidity providers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08904 (2022).
[13]
Lioba Heimbach, Ye Wang, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2021. Behavior of liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13822 (2021).
[14]
Charles AR Hoare. 1962. Quicksort. The computer journal 5, 1 (1962), 10--16.
[15]
Sihao Hu, Zhen Zhang, Shengliang Lu, Bingsheng He, and Zhao Li. 2023. Sequence-based target coin prediction for cryptocurrency pump-and-dump. Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data 1, 1 (2023), 1--19.
[16]
Teng Hu, Xiaolei Liu, Ting Chen, Xiaosong Zhang, Xiaoming Huang, Weina Niu, Jiazhong Lu, Kun Zhou, and Yuan Liu. 2021. Transaction-based classification and detection approach for Ethereum smart contract. Information Processing & Management 58, 2 (2021), 102462.
[17]
Xin Huang,Wenbin Zhang, Xuejiao Tang, Mingli Zhang, Jayachander Surbiryala, Vasileios Iosifidis, Zhen Liu, and Ji Zhang. 2021. LSTM Based Sentiment Analysis for Cryptocurrency Prediction. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. 617--621.
[18]
Ariel Kulik and Hadas Shachnai. 2010. There is no EPTAS for two-dimensional knapsack. Inform. Process. Lett. 110, 16 (2010), 707--710.
[19]
Michael Neuder, Rithvik Rao, Daniel J Moroz, and David C Parkes. 2021. Strategic liquidity provision in uniswap v3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12033 (2021).
[20]
Wangze Ni, Peng Cheng, and Lei Chen. 2022. Mixing transactions with arbitrary values on blockchains. In 2022 IEEE 38th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 2602--2614.
[21]
Wangze Ni, Peng Cheng, Lei Chen, and Xuemin Lin. 2021. When the recursive diversity anonymity meets the ring signature. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data. 1359--1371.
[22]
Ravali Pochampally, Anish Das Sarma, Xin Luna Dong, Alexandra Meliou, and Divesh Srivastava. 2014. Fusing data with correlations. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 433--444.
[23]
Geoffrey Ramseyer, Ashish Goel, and David Mazières. 2023. {SPEEDEX}: A Scalable, Parallelizable, and Economically Efficient Decentralized {EXchange}. In 20th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 23). 849--875.
[24]
Jieying She, Yongxin Tong, and Lei Chen. 2015. Utility-aware social eventparticipant planning. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. 1629--1643.
[25]
Kyle Soska, Jin-Dong Dong, Alex Khodaverdian, Ariel Zetlin-Jones, Bryan Routledge, and Nicolas Christin. 2021. Towards understanding cryptocurrency derivatives: A case study of BitMEX. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 45--57.
[26]
Friedhelm Victor and Andrea Marie Weintraud. 2021. Detecting and quantifying wash trading on decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 23--32.
[27]
Lei Wu, Siwei Wu, Yajin Zhou, Runhuai Li, Zhi Wang, Xiapu Luo, Cong Wang, and Kui Ren. 2020. Ethscope: A transaction-centric security analytics framework to detect malicious smart contracts on ethereum. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.08278 (2020).
[28]
Xihan Xiong, Zhipeng Wang, William Knottenbelt, and Michael Huth. 2023. Demystifying Just-in-Time (JIT) Liquidity Attacks on Uniswap V3. Cryptology ePrint Archive (2023).

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '24: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
August 2024
6901 pages
ISBN:9798400704901
DOI:10.1145/3637528
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 August 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. blockchain
  2. decentralized finance
  3. liquidity mining
  4. optimization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • RIF Project
  • CRF Project
  • Microsoft Research Asia Collaborative Research Grant
  • National Science Foundation of China
  • AOE Project
  • Guangdong Province Science and Technology Plan Project
  • HKUST-Webank joint research lab grants
  • Innovation and Technology Fund - Partnership Research Programme (ITF-PRP)
  • Theme-based project
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
  • the Hong Kong RGC GRF Project
  • Hong Kong ITC ITF
  • Innovation and Technology Fund - Innovation and Technology Support Programme (ITF-ITSP)
  • Zhujiang scholar program
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Research Matching Grant Scheme (RMGS)
  • Postdoc Matching Fund Scheme

Conference

KDD '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 150
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)150
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media