[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3635636.3664260acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent Agents

Published: 23 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in employing intelligent agents in writing. Previous work emphasizes the evaluation of the quality of end product—whether it was coherent and polished, overlooking the journey that led to the product, which is an invaluable dimension of the creative process. To understand how to recognize human efforts in co-writing with intelligent writing systems, we adapt Flower and Hayes’ cognitive process theory of writing and propose CoCo Matrix, a two-dimensional taxonomy of entropy and information gain, to depict the new human-agent co-writing model. We define four quadrants and situate thirty-four published systems within the taxonomy. Our research found that low entropy and high information gain systems are under-explored, yet offer promising future directions in writing tasks that benefit from the agent’s divergent planning and the human’s focused translation. CoCo Matrix, not only categorizes different writing systems but also deepens our understanding of the cognitive processes in human-agent co-writing. By analyzing minimal changes in the writing process, CoCo Matrix serves as a proxy for the writer’s mental model, allowing writers to reflect on their contributions. This reflection is facilitated through the measured metrics of information gain and entropy, which provide insights irrespective of the writing system used.

References

[1]
2021. VALUE rubrics - Inquiry and Analysis. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-inquiry-and-analysis. Accessed: 2024-4-8.
[2]
Abdulla Alsharhan. [n. d.]. Natural Language Generation and Creative Writing A Systematic Review. ([n. d.]).
[3]
Robert W Andrews, J Mason Lilly, Divya Srivastava, and Karen M Feigh. 2023. The role of shared mental models in human-AI teams: a theoretical review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 24, 2 (2023), 129–175.
[4]
B Azhagusundari, Antony Selvadoss Thanamani, 2013. Feature selection based on information gain. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) 2, 2 (2013), 18–21.
[5]
Jianzhu Bao, Yasheng Wang, Yitong Li, Fei Mi, and Ruifeng Xu. 2022. AEG: Argumentative Essay Generation via A Dual-Decoder Model with Content Planning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 5134–5148. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.343
[6]
Advait Bhat, Saaket Agashe, Parth Oberoi, Niharika Mohile, Ravi Jangir, and Anirudha Joshi. 2023. Interacting with next-phrase suggestions: How suggestion systems aid and influence the cognitive processes of writing. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 436–452.
[7]
Alan S Brown. 1973. An empirical verification of Mednick’s associative theory of creativity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2, 6 (1973), 429–430.
[8]
Oğuz’Oz’ Buruk. 2023. Academic writing with GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT): reflections on practices, efficacy and transparency. In Proceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference. 144–153.
[9]
Daniel Buschek, Martin Zürn, and Malin Eiband. 2021. The impact of multiple parallel phrase suggestions on email input and composition behaviour of native and non-native english writers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[10]
Daniel Buschek, Martin Zürn, and Malin Eiband. 2021. The impact of multiple parallel phrase suggestions on email input and composition behaviour of native and non-native english writers. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[11]
Tsung-Shu Chang, Yitong Li, Hui-Wen Huang, and Beth Whitfield. 2021. Exploring EFL students’ writing performance and their acceptance of AI-based automated writing feedback. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies. 31–35.
[12]
John Joon Young Chung, Wooseok Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Hwaran Lee, Eytan Adar, and Minsuk Chang. 2022. TaleBrush: Sketching stories with generative pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19.
[13]
Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A Smith. 2018. Creative writing with a machine in the loop: Case studies on slogans and stories. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 329–340.
[14]
Elizabeth Clark and Noah A Smith. 2021. Choose your own adventure: Paired suggestions in collaborative writing for evaluating story generation models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 3566–3575.
[15]
Hai Dang, Karim Benharrak, Florian Lehmann, and Daniel Buschek. 2022. Beyond text generation: Supporting writers with continuous automatic text summaries. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–13.
[16]
Hai Dang, Karim Benharrak, Florian Lehmann, and Daniel Buschek. 2022. Beyond text generation: Supporting writers with continuous automatic text summaries. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–13.
[17]
Hai Dang, Sven Goller, Florian Lehmann, and Daniel Buschek. 2023. Choice over control: How users write with large language models using diegetic and non-diegetic prompting. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17.
[18]
Louis Deslauriers, Logan S McCarty, Kelly Miller, Kristina Callaghan, and Greg Kestin. 2019. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 39 (2019), 19251–19257.
[19]
Linda Flower and John R Hayes. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication 32, 4 (1981), 365–387.
[20]
Albert Gatt and Emiel Krahmer. 2018. Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 61 (2018), 65–170.
[21]
Katy Gero, Alex Calderwood, Charlotte Li, and Lydia Chilton. 2022. A Design Space for Writing Support Tools Using a Cognitive Process Model of Writing. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing 2022), Ting-Hao ’Kenneth’ Huang, Vipul Raheja, Dongyeop Kang, John Joon Young Chung, Daniel Gissin, Mina Lee, and Katy Ilonka Gero (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.in2writing-1.2
[22]
Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B Chilton. 2019. How a Stylistic, Machine-Generated Thesaurus Impacts a Writer’s Process. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 597–603.
[23]
Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B Chilton. 2019. Metaphoria: An algorithmic companion for metaphor creation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.
[24]
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, and Lydia Chilton. 2022. Sparks: Inspiration for science writing using language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1002–1019.
[25]
Maliheh Ghajargar, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Love Lagerkvist. 2022. A redhead walks into a bar: Experiences of writing fiction with artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 25th international academic MindTrek conference. 230–241.
[26]
Mika Hämäläinen and Khalid Alnajjar. 2021. Human Evaluation of Creative NLG Systems: An Interdisciplinary Survey on Recent Papers. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics (GEM 2021), Antoine Bosselut, Esin Durmus, Varun Prashant Gangal, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yacine Jernite, Laura Perez-Beltrachini, Samira Shaikh, and Wei Xu (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.gem-1.9
[27]
Dennis Hocevar. 1980. Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence 4, 1 (1980), 25–40.
[28]
Chieh-Yang Huang, Shih-Hong Huang, and Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang. 2020. Heteroglossia: In-situ story ideation with the crowd. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[29]
Maurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson, and Mor Naaman. 2023. Co-writing with opinionated language models affects users’ views. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–15.
[30]
Karen Sparck Jones and Julia R Galliers. 1995. Evaluating natural language processing systems: An analysis and review. (1995).
[31]
Jakob Karolus, Sebastian S Feger, Albrecht Schmidt, and Paweł W Woźniak. 2023. Your Text Is Hard to Read: Facilitating Readability Awareness to Support Writing Proficiency in Text Production. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 147–160.
[32]
Jeongyeon Kim, Sangho Suh, Lydia B Chilton, and Haijun Xia. 2023. Metaphorian: Leveraging Large Language Models to Support Extended Metaphor Creation for Science Writing. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 115–135.
[33]
Hyung-Kwon Ko, Subin An, Gwanmo Park, Seung Kwon Kim, Daesik Kim, Bohyoung Kim, Jaemin Jo, and Jinwook Seo. 2022. We-toon: A Communication Support System between Writers and Artists in Collaborative Webtoon Sketch Revision. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–14.
[34]
Mina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum, Vipul Raheja, Hua Shen, Subhashini Venugopalan, Thiemo Wambsganss, David Zhou, Emad A Alghamdi, 2024. A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14117 (2024).
[35]
Mina Lee, Percy Liang, and Qian Yang. 2022. Coauthor: Designing a human-ai collaborative writing dataset for exploring language model capabilities. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–19.
[36]
Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out. 74–81.
[37]
Zhexiong Liu, Diane Litman, Elaine Wang, Lindsay Matsumura, and Richard Correnti. 2023. Predicting the Quality of Revisions in Argumentative Writing. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2023). Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada, 275–287. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.bea-1.24
[38]
Piotr Mirowski, Kory W Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, and Richard Evans. 2023. Co-writing screenplays and theatre scripts with language models: Evaluation by industry professionals. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–34.
[39]
Hiroyuki Osone, Jun-Li Lu, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2021. BunCho: ai supported story co-creation via unsupervised multitask learning to increase writers’ creativity in japanese. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–10.
[40]
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 311–318.
[41]
Ritika Poddar, Rashmi Sinha, Mor Naaman, and Maurice Jakesch. 2023. AI Writing Assistants Influence Topic Choice in Self-Presentation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.
[42]
Melissa Roemmele and Andrew S Gordon. 2018. Automated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on intelligent user interfaces companion. 1–2.
[43]
Claude Elwood Shannon. 2001. A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 5, 1 (2001), 3–55.
[44]
Ben Shneiderman and Pattie Maes. 1997. Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. interactions 4, 6 (1997), 42–61.
[45]
Nikhil Singh, Guillermo Bernal, Daria Savchenko, and Elena L Glassman. 2023. Where to hide a stolen elephant: Leaps in creative writing with multimodal machine intelligence. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 5 (2023), 1–57.
[46]
Sarah Sterman, Evey Huang, Vivian Liu, and Eric Paulos. 2020. Interacting with literary style through computational tools. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[47]
Sangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and Haijun Xia. 2024. Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
[48]
Xaver Tomihiro Toyozaki and Keita Watanabe. 2018. Ambientletter: Letter presentation method for discreet notification of unknown spelling when handwriting. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 36–38.
[49]
Thiemo Wambsganss, Andreas Janson, Tanja Käser, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2022. Improving students argumentation learning with adaptive self-evaluation nudging. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–31.
[50]
Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Cetto, Matthias Söllner, Siegfried Handschuh, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2020. AL: An adaptive learning support system for argumentation skills. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14.
[51]
Ruyuan Wan, Naome Etori, Karla Badillo-urquiola, and Dongyeop Kang. 2022. User or Labor: An Interaction Framework for Human-Machine Relationships in NLP. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Data Science with Human-in-the-Loop (Language Advances), Eduard Dragut, Yunyao Li, Lucian Popa, Slobodan Vucetic, and Shashank Srivastava (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Hybrid), 112–121. https://aclanthology.org/2022.dash-1.14
[52]
Kento Watanabe, Yuichiroh Matsubayashi, Kentaro Inui, Tomoyasu Nakano, Satoru Fukayama, and Masataka Goto. 2017. Lyrisys: An interactive support system for writing lyrics based on topic transition. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on intelligent user interfaces. 559–563.
[53]
Richard W Woodman and Lyle F Schoenfeldt. 1990. An interactionist model of creative behavior.The Journal of Creative Behavior (1990).
[54]
Shaomei Wu, Lindsay Reynolds, Xian Li, and Francisco Guzmán. 2019. Design and evaluation of a social media writing support tool for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[55]
Daijin Yang, Yanpeng Zhou, Zhiyuan Zhang, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and Ray LC. 2022. AI as an Active Writer: Interaction strategies with generated text in human-AI collaborative fiction writing.
[56]
Ann Yuan, Andy Coenen, Emily Reif, and Daphne Ippolito. 2022. Wordcraft: story writing with large language models. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 841–852.
[57]
Zheng Zhang, Jie Gao, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, and Toby Jia-Jun Li. 2023. VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07810 (2023).
[58]
Yubo Zhao and Xiying Bao. 2023. Narratron: Collaborative Writing and Shadow-playing of Children Stories with Large Language Models. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–6.

Index Terms

  1. CoCo Matrix: Taxonomy of Cognitive Contributions in Co-writing with Intelligent Agents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    C&C '24: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition
    June 2024
    718 pages
    ISBN:9798400704857
    DOI:10.1145/3635636
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 June 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Collaborative Interaction
    2. Creativity
    3. Interaction Paradigms
    4. Writing

    Qualifiers

    • Poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    C&C '24
    Sponsor:
    C&C '24: Creativity and Cognition
    June 23 - 26, 2024
    IL, Chicago, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 131
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media