Cited By
View all- Marques BSantos BDias P(2024)Ten years of immersive education: Overview of a Virtual and Augmented Reality course at postgraduate levelComputers & Graphics10.1016/j.cag.2024.104088124(104088)Online publication date: Nov-2024
Enhancing the Educational Process of Geosciences through 3D Reconstruction, Virtual Reality and a Large Display
Authors: 
Bernardo Marques, Andreia Santos, Rúben Sobral, João Martins, Fernado Almeida, Paulo Dias, Beatriz Sousa SantosAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 480 - 482
Abstract
This work proposed the use of 3D Reconstruction, Virtual Reality (VR), and a Large Display to enhance the education process of geosciences at the university level. This approach enables teachers to immerse themselves and interact with 3D virtual replicas of real-world locations. In turn, this is cast to a projector, allowing them to better explain specific concepts to an audience of students, which can acquire new knowledge and gain a deeper understanding. A user study was conducted with 20 participants (from geosciences and computer science engineering) to evaluate this proposal versus a traditional static image approach. We report the results obtained, suggesting the VR condition represents the predominant condition for a set of dimensions considered relevant for the tasks defined.
References
[1]
Dennis Beck. 2019. Augmented and virtual reality in education: Immersive learning research. Journal of Educational Computing Research 57, 7 (2019), 1619–1625.
[2]
Shao-Chen Chang, Ting-Chia Hsu, and Morris Siu-Yung Jong. 2020. Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science. Computers & Education 146 (2020).
[3]
Piyaphong Chenrai and Sukonmeth Jitmahantakul. 2019. Applying virtual reality technology to geoscience classrooms. Review of International Geographical Education Online 9, 3 (2019), 577–590.
[4]
David Hamilton, Jim McKechnie, Edward Edgerton, and Claire Wilson. 2021. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education 8, 1 (2021), 1–32.
[5]
Aleshia Hayes, Lea Anne Daughrity, and Nanxi Meng. 2021. Approaches to integrate virtual reality into K-16 lesson plans: An introduction for teachers. TechTrends 65 (2021), 394–401.
[6]
Alexander Klippel, Jiayan Zhao, Kathy Lou Jackson, Peter La Femina, Chris Stubbs, Ryan Wetzel, Jordan Blair, Jan Oliver Wallgrün, and Danielle Oprean. 2019. Transforming earth science education through immersive experiences: Delivering on a long held promise. Journal of Educational Computing Research 57, 7 (2019), 1745–1771.
[7]
Bernardo Marques, Andreia Portela, Tomé Carvalho, Raquel Ferreira, Diana Siso, Miguel Marques, Duarte Almeida, Paulo Dias, and Beatriz Sousa Santos. 2022. Supporting multi-user co-located training for industrial procedures through immersive virtual reality (vr) and a large-scale display. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). 749–750.
[8]
Naheem Noah and Sanchari Das. 2021. Exploring evolution of augmented and virtual reality education space in 2020 through systematic literature review. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 32 (2021).
[9]
George Papanastasiou, Athanasios Drigas, Charalabos Skianis, Miltiadis Lytras, and Effrosyni Papanastasiou. 2019. Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality 23 (2019), 425–436.
[10]
Jaziar Radianti, Tim A Majchrzak, Jennifer Fromm, and Isabell Wohlgenannt. 2020. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education 147 (2020).
[11]
Mario A Rojas-Sánchez, Pedro R Palos-Sánchez, and José A Folgado-Fernández. 2023. Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies 28, 1 (2023), 155–192.
[12]
Anthony Scavarelli, Ali Arya, and Robert J Teather. 2021. Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality 25 (2021), 257–277.
[13]
Michael Thees, Sebastian Kapp, Martin P Strzys, Fabian Beil, Paul Lukowicz, and Jochen Kuhn. 2020. Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior 108 (2020).
[14]
Jiayan Zhao, Peter LaFemina, Julia Carr, Pejman Sajjadi, Jan Oliver Wallgrün, and Alexander Klippel. 2020. Learning in the field: Comparison of desktop, immersive virtual reality, and actual field trips for place-based STEM education. In IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). 893–902.
Index Terms
- Enhancing the Educational Process of Geosciences through 3D Reconstruction, Virtual Reality and a Large Display
Recommendations
Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User InteractionTwo major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Procedurally generated virtual reality from 3D reconstructed physical space
VRST '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologyWe present a novel system for automatically generating immersive and interactive virtual reality (VR) environments using the real world as a template. The system captures indoor scenes in 3D, detects obstacles like furniture and walls, and maps walkable ...
Visualizing the keyboard in virtual reality for enhancing immersive experience
SIGGRAPH '17: ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 PostersRecently, virtual reality (VR) becomes more and more popular and provides users an immersive experience with a head-mounted display (HMD). However, in some applications, users have to interact with physical objects while immersed in VR. With a non-see-...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2023
607 pages
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 December 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- This research was supported by IEETA, funded through FCT
Conference
MUM '23
MUM '23: International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
December 3 - 6, 2023
Vienna, Austria
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 47Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)35
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Marques BSantos BDias P(2024)Ten years of immersive education: Overview of a Virtual and Augmented Reality course at postgraduate levelComputers & Graphics10.1016/j.cag.2024.104088124(104088)Online publication date: Nov-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format