[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3623509.3635272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Engaging Environmental Learning: A Tangible Approach for Conveying Environmental Data in Education Using Weight

Published: 11 February 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method for communicating environmental information in an engaging and memorable manner. Instead of traditional visual or written communication, our approach involves physical representation of data, using weight as the key element. Using food as a case study, we demonstrate the carbon footprint of food items through life-sized models that accurately reflect their actual weight. In an educational setting, students collectively discuss and estimate emissions for sample foods, followed by hands-on interaction. Each model's weight mirrors its carbon footprint, from 50 grams for half a kilo of potatoes to 13 kilograms for half a kilo of beef. Early tests show a significant "Wow!" factor, particularly for high-emission foods. This tangible experience leaves a lasting impression, potentially influencing future choices. Our approach can extend to other areas like energy. The paper concludes with design recommendations for future work.

References

[1]
Jonathan E. Adler. 2008. Surprise. Educational Theory 58, 2 (2008), 149–173.
[2]
Lukasz Aleksandrowicz, Rosemary Green, Edward J. Joy, Pete Smith, and Andy Haines. 2016. The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and Health: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE 11, 11 (2016).
[3]
Terry Anderson and Julie Shattuck. 2012. Design-based research. Educational Researcher 41, 1 (2012), 16–25.
[4]
Karlijn L. van den Broek. 2019. Household energy literacy: A critical review and a conceptual typology. Energy Research & Social Science 57 (2019), 101256.
[5]
Annika Carlsson Kanyama, Björn Hedin, and Cecilia Katzeff. 2021. Differences in environmental impact between plant-based alternatives to dairy and dairy products: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 13, 22 (2021), 12599.
[6]
Annika Carlsson-Kanyama and Alejandro D. González. 2009. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89, 5 (2009).
[7]
Ruth Charrondiere and Barbara Stadlmayr. 2012. FAO/INFOODS density database, version 2.0. In Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations technical workshop report.
[8]
M. Crippa, E. Solazzo, D. Guizzardi, F. Monforti-Ferrario, F.N. Tubiello, and A. Leip. 2021. Food Systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food 2, 3 (2021), 198–209.
[9]
Patricia Eustachio Colombo, Emma Patterson, Anna Karin Lindroos, Alexandr Parlesak, and Liselotte Schäfer Elinder. 2020. Sustainable and acceptable school meals through optimization analysis: An intervention study. Nutrition Journal 19, 1 (2020).
[10]
FAO. 2021. Renewable energy and agri-food systems: Advancing Energy and food security towards Sustainable Development Goals (2021).
[11]
Meadhbh I. Foster and Mark T. Keane. 2015. Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty. Cognitive Psychology 81 (2015), 74–116.
[12]
Meadhbh I. Foster and Mark T. Keane. 2018. The role of surprise in learning: Different surprising outcomes affect memorability differentially. Topics in Cognitive Science 11, 1 (2018), 75–87.
[13]
E. Hallström, A. Carlsson-Kanyama, and P. Börjesson. 2015. Environmental impact of dietary change: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 91 (2015), 1–11.
[14]
Björn Hedin, Lucas Grönborg, and Gustav Johansson. 2022. Food Carbon Literacy: A definition and framework exemplified by designing and evaluating a digital grocery list for increasing food carbon literacy and changing behavior. Sustainability 14, 19 (2022), 12442.
[15]
Sami Karjalainen. 2011. Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy and Buildings 43, 2–3 (2011), 458–467.
[16]
Birgit Landquist, Maria Nordborg, and Sara Hornborg. 2016. Litteraturstudie av miljöpåverkan från konventionellt och ekologiskt producerade livsmedel. Stockholm: Livsmedelsverket.
[17]
Susan Michie 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (V1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 46, 1 (2013), 81–95.
[18]
Susan Michie, Maartje M. van Stralen, and Robert West. 2011. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6, 1 (2011).
[19]
Edward Munnich and Michael A. Ranney. 2018. Learning from surprise: Harnessing a metacognitive surprise signal to build and adapt belief networks. Topics in Cognitive Science 11, 1 (2018), 164–177.
[20]
Cecilia Nälsén, Monika Pearson, and Eva Warensjö Lemming. 2012. Livsmedels-och näringsintag bland vuxna i Sverige. Stockholm: Livsmedelsverket
[21]
Arminda Paço and Tânia Lavrador. 2017. Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management 197 (2017), 384–392.
[22]
Thomas G. Puk and Adam Stibbards. 2012. Systemic ecological illiteracy? shedding light on meaning as an act of thought in higher learning. Environmental Education Research 18, 3 (2012), 353–373.
[23]
Nai Ming Tsang. 2013. Surprise in Social Work Education. Social Work Education 32, 1 (2013), 55–67.
[24]
RISE. 2021. The open access list – an extract from the RISE Food climate database d v 2.0
[25]
Georgios K. Ntinas, Maximilian Neumair, Christos D. Tsadilas, and Joachim Meyer. 2017. Carbon footprint and cumulative energy demand of greenhouse and open-field tomato cultivation systems under Southern and Central European climatic conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (2017), 3617–3626.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interacting with Environmental Data: Utilizing Weight as a Medium in Enhancing Carbon LiteracyProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3661085(429-431)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
TEI '24: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
February 2024
1058 pages
ISBN:9798400704024
DOI:10.1145/3623509
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 February 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Food product carbon literacy
  2. Physicalization of data
  3. Sustainable development
  4. Tangible interaction

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Swedish Energy Agency

Conference

TEI '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%

Upcoming Conference

TEI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)127
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interacting with Environmental Data: Utilizing Weight as a Medium in Enhancing Carbon LiteracyProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3661085(429-431)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media