[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3606150.3606158acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

TARGET-tool: Participatory Design of an Interactive Professional Development Tool for Secondary School Physical Education Teachers

Published: 15 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Secondary school physical education (PE) teachers are continuously challenged to find ways to support students learning and motivate them for an active and healthy lifestyle. To address this complexity, continuing teacher professional development (TPD) is key. Technological tools can facilitate the effective delivery of TPD in this context. Successful implementation of this technology, however, is not self-evident. Based on the general aim of effectively integrating technologies in the educational process and focusing on the needs of educators, this study examines how the evidence-based theoretical TARGET framework for creating a motivating PE learning climate might be embedded into a digital professional development tool for PE teachers, useful in everyday practice. It presents a case study in which a multidisciplinary team of researchers, designers, and end-users iteratively went through several phases of need identification, idea generation, designing, development, and testing. By using a participatory approach, we were able to collect contextualized data and gain insights into users’ preferences, requirements, and ideas for designing and engaging with the tool. Based on these insights the TPD TARGET-tool for PE teachers was ultimately developed. The most prominent characteristics of this tool are (1) the combination of an evaluative function with teaching strategy support, (2) the strong emphasis on ease of use due to the complex PE teaching context, (3) the avoidance of social comparison, and suggestions of normative judgment, and (4) the allowance for a high level of customization and teacher autonomy.

References

[1]
Ángel Abós, Javier Sevil, José Antonio Julián, Alberto Abarca-Sos, and Luis García-González. 2017. Improving students’ predisposition towards physical education by optimizing their motivational processes in an acrosport unit. Eur Phys Educ Rev 23, 4 (2017), 444–460.
[2]
Francisco J. Almolda-Tomás, Javier Sevil-Serrano, José A. Julián-Clemente, Alberto Abarca-Sos, Alberto Aibar-Solana, and Luis García-González. 2014. Application of teaching strategies for Improving students’ situational motivation in physical education. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 12, 2 (2014), 391–417.
[3]
Carole Ames. 1992. Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation. J Educ Psychol 84, 3 (1992), 261–271.
[4]
Carole Ames. 1992. Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. In Motivation in sport and exercise, G.C. Roberts (ed.). Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, 161–176.
[5]
Carole Ames and Jennifer Archer. 1988. Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students’ Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes. J Educ Psychol 80, 3 (1988), 260–267.
[6]
Jophus Anamuah-Mensah, Frank Banks, Bob Moon, and Freda Wolfenden. 2012. New modes of teacher pre-service training and professional support. In Teacher Education and the Challenge of Development: A Global Analysis, Bob Moon (ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, 201–211.
[7]
Noam Angrist, David K Evans, Deon Filmer, Rachel Glennerster, F Halsey Rogers, and Shwetlena Sabarwal. 2020. How to Improve Education Outcomes Most Efficiently? A Comparison of 150 Interventions using the New Learning-Adjusted Years of Schooling Metric. Policy Res Work Pap (2020).
[8]
Kathleen Armour, Mikael Quennerstedt, Fiona Chambers, and Kyriaki Makopoulou. 2017. What is ‘effective’ CPD for contemporary physical education teachers? A Deweyan framework. Sport Educ Soc 22, 7 (2017), 799–811.
[9]
Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3 (2009), 114–123.
[10]
Eric P S Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing reflection: On the Use of Reflection in Interactive System Design. Proc 2014 Conf Des Interact Syst (2014), 93–102.
[11]
Gert Biesta, Mark Priestley, and Sarah Robinson. 2017. Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. J Curriculum Stud 49, 1 (2017), 38–54.
[12]
Linda Birt, Suzanne Scott, Debbie Cavers, Christine Campbell, and Fiona Walter. 2016. Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qual Health Res 26, 13 (2016), 1802–1811.
[13]
Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (2015), 24–31.
[14]
Rock Braithwaite, Christopher M. Spray, and Victoria E. Warburton. 2011. Motivational climate interventions in physical education: A meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc 12, 6 (November 2011), 628–638.
[15]
John Brooke. 2013. SUS: A Retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies 8, 2 (2013), 29–40.
[16]
Ashley Casey, Victoria Goodyear, and Kathleen M Armour. 2017. Digital technologies and learning in physical education: Pedagogical cases. Routledge, New York.
[17]
Woojung Chang and Steven A. Taylor. 2015. The Effectiveness of Customer Participation in New Product Development: A Meta-Analysis. J Marketing 80, 1 (2015), 47–64.
[18]
Anne Cox and Lavon Williams. 2008. The Roles of Perceived Teacher Support, Motivational Climate, and Psychological Need Satisfaction in Students’ Physical Education Motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychology 30, 2 (March 2008), 222–239.
[19]
Linda Darling-Hammond, Maria E. Hyler, and Madelyn Gardner. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute., Palo Alto, CA.
[20]
Christopher DeLuca, Jason Shulha, Ulemu Luhanga, Lyn M. Shulha, Theodore M. Christou, and Don A. Klinger. 2015. Collaborative inquiry as a professional learning structure for educators: a scoping review. Prof Dev Educ 41, 4 (2015), 640–670.
[21]
Anind K. Dey, Gregory D. Abowd, and Daniel Salber. 2001. A Conceptual Framework and a Toolkit for Supporting the Rapid Prototyping of Context-Aware Applications. Hum-comput Interact 16, 2 (2001), 97–166.
[22]
Joyce L. Epstein. 1989. Family structures and student motivation: A developmental perspective. In Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions, C. Ames and R. Ames (eds.). Academic Press, New York, 259–295.
[23]
Michael S. Garet, Andrew C Porter, Laura Desimone, Beatrice F Birman, and Kwang Suk Yoon. 2001. What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. Am Educ Res J 38, 4 (2001), 915–945.
[24]
Takeshi Goto, Daiki Sakurai, and Sho Ooi. 2020. Proposal of Feedback System based on Skeletal Analysis in Physical Education Classes. 2020 4th Int Conf Educ Multimedia Technology (2020), 133–139.
[25]
Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles, John N Lavis, Sophie J Hill, and Janet E Squires. 2012. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci 7, 1 (2012), 50–50.
[26]
Chris G. Harwood, Richard J. Keegan, Jonathan M.J. Smith, and Adam S. Raine. 2015. A systematic review of the intrapersonal correlates of motivational climate perceptions in sport and physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc 18, C (May 2015), 9–25.
[27]
Peter Hastie, Oleg Sinelnikov, Tristan Wallhead, and Todd Layne. 2014. Perceived and actual motivational climate of a mastery-involving sport education season. Eur Phys Educ Rev 20, 2 (2014), 215–228.
[28]
Sara Hennessy, Björn Haßler, and Riikka Hofmann. 2016. Pedagogic change by Zambian primary school teachers participating in the OER4Schools professional development programme for one year. Res Pap Educ 31, 4 (2016), 399–427.
[29]
Sara Hennessy, Sophia D'Angelo, Nora McIntyre, Saalim Koomar, Adam Kreimeia, Lydia Cao, Meaghan Brugha, and Asma Zubairi. 2022. Technology Use for Teacher Professional Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A systematic review. Comput Educ Open 3, (2022), 100080.
[30]
Sara Hennessy, Ruth Kershner, Elisa Calcagni, and Farah Ahmed. 2021. Supporting practitioner‐led inquiry into classroom dialogue with a research‐informed professional learning resource: A design‐based approach. Rev Educ 9, 3 (2021).
[31]
Ivo van Hilvoorde and Jeroen Koekoek. 2018. Next generation PE: Thoughtful integration of digital technologies. In Digital Technology in Physical Education: Global Perspectives. 1–16.
[32]
Annemarieke Hoekstra, Fred Korthagen, Mieke Brekelmans, Douwe Beijaard, and Jeroen Imants. 2009. Experienced teachers’ informal workplace learning and perceptions of workplace conditions. J Work Learn 21, 4 (2009), 276–298.
[33]
Immy Holloway and Kathleen Galvin. 2017. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare, 4th Edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
[34]
Elena Jurasaite‐Harbison. 2009. Teachers’ workplace learning within informal contexts of school cultures in the United States and Lithuania. J Work Learn 21, 4 (2009), 299–321.
[35]
Finn Kensing and Joan Greenbaum. 2013. Heritage: Having a Say. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design, Jesper Simonsen; Toni Robertson (eds.). Routledge, 21–36.
[36]
Carolyn W. Keys and Lynn A. Bryan. 2001. Co‐constructing inquiry‐based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. J Res Sci Teach 38, 6 (August 2001), 631–645.
[37]
Jeroen Koekoek and Ivo van Hilvoorde. 2018. Digital Technology in Physical Education: Global Perspectives (1st ed.). Routledge, London.
[38]
Fred Korthagen and Angelo Vasalos. 2005. Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teach Teach Theory Pract 11, 1 (2005), 47–71.
[39]
Christa Krijgsman, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Jan van Tartwijk, Jolien Maes, Lars Borghouts, Greet Cardon, Tim Mainhard, and Leen Haerens. 2017. Performance grading and motivational functioning and fear in physical education: A self-determination theory perspective. Learn Individ Differ 55, C (April 2017), 202–211.
[40]
Eleni A. Kyza and Iolie Nicolaidou. 2016. Co-designing reform-based online inquiry learning environments as a situated approach to teachers’ professional development. Codesign 13, 4 (September 2016), 1–26.
[41]
Natalie Lander, Steven Lewis, Darius Nahavandi, Kyler Amsbury, and Lisa M. Barnett. 2022. Teacher perspectives of online continuing professional development in physical education. Sport Educ Soc 27, 4 (2022), 434–448.
[42]
Clayton Lewis, Peter G. Polson, Cathleen Wharton, and John Rieman. 1990. Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. Proc Sigchi Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Empower People - Chi ’90 (1990), 235–242.
[43]
Deborah Lupton. 2013. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Crit Public Health 23, 4 (2013), 1–11.
[44]
Yudan Ma, Bin Yu, Tilde Bekker, Jun Hu, and Steven Vos. 2020. FitBirds: Designing Heart Rate Feedback for Playful and Social Physical Education. In (Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society), NordiCHI ’20, 1–4.
[45]
Danica Mast, Michel Bosman, Sylvia Schipper, and Sanne de Vries. 2017. BalanSAR. Proc Eleventh Int Conf Tangible Embed Embodied Interact (2017), 625–631.
[46]
Terry Mayes and Sara De Freitas. 2013. Technology-enhanced learning: The role of theory. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (2nd ed.). Routledge, New York, 41–54.
[47]
Patrick J McEwan. 2015. Improving Learning in Primary Schools of Developing Countries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Experiments. Rev Educ Res 85, 3 (2015), 353–394.
[48]
Jacobiene A. Meirink, Paulien C. Meijer, Nico Verloop, and Theo C.M. Bergen. 2009. Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teach Teach Educ 25, 1 (2009), 89–100.
[49]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proc Sigchi Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Celebrating Interdepend - Chi ’94 (1994), 152–158.
[50]
OECD. 2005. Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Educ Train Policy (2005).
[51]
World Health Organization. 2018. Promoting physical activity in the education sector. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, Denmark.
[52]
David Orr, Jo Westbrook, John Pryor, Naureen Durrani, Judy Sebba, and Christine Adu-Yeboah. 2013. What are the impacts and cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve performance of untrained and under-trained teachers in the classroom in developing countries? EPPI- Centre, Social Science Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
[53]
Jonathan Osborne, Shirley Simon, Andri Christodoulou, Christina Howell‐Richardson, and Katherine Richardson. 2013. Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50, 3 (2013), 315–347.
[54]
Mary O'Sullivan and Dena Deglau. 2006. Principles of Professional Development. J Teach Phys Educ 25, 4 (2006), 441–449.
[55]
Melissa Parker and Kevin Patton. 2017. What research tell us about effective continuing professional development for physical education teachers. In Routledge Handbook of Physical Education Pedagogies., C.D. Ennis (ed.). London, 447–460.
[56]
Samantha J. Phillips, Dil Sen, and Roseanne McNamee. 2008. Risk factors for work-related stress and health in head teachers. Occup Med-c 58, 8 (2008), 584–586.
[57]
Drew Polly and Michael J. Hannafin. 2010. Reexamining technology's role in learner-centered professional development. Educ Technology Res Dev 58, 5 (2010), 557–571.
[58]
Tom Power. 2019. Approaches to Teacher Professional Development in Low-to-Middle-Income Countries. In Sustainable English Language Teacher Development at Scale. Lessons from Bangladesh. Bloomsbury Academic, London, 47–65.
[59]
Kristi Roth. 2014. Technology for Tomorrow's Teachers. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance 85, 4 (2014), 3–5.
[60]
Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2017. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications, New York.
[61]
Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Codesign 4, 1 (2008), 5–18.
[62]
Brown Seely, John Seely Brown, and Paul Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
[63]
Karlijn Sporrel, Nicky Nibbeling, Shihan Wang, Dick Ettema, and Monique Simons. 2019. Unraveling mHealth exercise interventions for adults: A scoping review on the implementations and designs of persuasive strategies (Preprint). Jmir Mhealth Uhealth 9, 1 (2019), e16282.
[64]
Shyam Sundar, Saraswathi Bellur, and Haiyan Jia. 2012. Motivational Technologies: A Theoretical Framework for Designing Preventive Health Applications. International conference on persuasive technology 7284, (2012), 112–122.
[65]
Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson, Heather Barrar, and Irene Fung. 2007. Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.
[66]
Jakob Trischler, Per Kristensson, and Don Scott. 2018. Team diversity and its management in a co-design team. J Serv Manage 29, 1 (2018), 120–145.
[67]
UNESCO. 2015. Quality physical education (QPE): Guidelines for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing, Paris, France.
[68]
Diego Vasconcellos, Philip D. Parker, Toni Hilland, Renata Cinelli, Katherine B. Owen, Nathanial Kapsal, Jane Lee, Devan Antczak, Nikos Ntoumanis, Richard M. Ryan, and Chris Lonsdale. 2020. Self-Determination Theory Applied to Physical Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Educ Psychol 112, 7 (2020), 1444–1469.
[69]
Philippa Velija, Susan Capel, Will Katene, and Sid Hayes. 2008. `Does knowing stuff like PSHE and citizenship make me a better teacher?’: Student teachers in the teacher training figuration. Eur Phys Educ Rev 14, 3 (2008), 389–406.
[70]
Hedy S. Wald. 2015. Refining a definition of reflection for the being as well as doing the work of a physician. Med Teach 37, 7 (2015), 696–699.
[71]
Gwen Weeldenburg, Lars B. Borghouts, Menno Slingerland, and Steven Vos. 2020. Similar but different: Profiling secondary school students based on their perceived motivational climate and psychological need-based experiences in physical education. Plos One 15, 2 (February 2020), e0228859.
[72]
Gwen Weeldenburg, Lars Borghouts, Tim van de Laak, Teun Remmers, Menno Slingerland, and Steven Vos. 2022. TARGETing secondary school students’ motivation towards physical education: The role of student-perceived mastery climate teaching strategies. Plos One 17, 9 (2022), e0274964.
[73]
Ben Williamson. 2014. Algorithmic skin: health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education. Sport Educ Soc 20, 1 (2014), 133–151.
[74]
Dapeng Yang, Eung-Soo Oh, and Yingchun Wang. 2020. Hybrid Physical Education Teaching and Curriculum Design Based on a Voice Interactive Artificial Intelligence Educational Robot. Sustainability-basel 12, 19 (2020), 8000.
[75]
Kwang Suk Yoon, Teresa Duncan, Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Beth Scarlosss, and Kathy L. Shapley. 2007. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, Washington, DC.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluation of the digital teacher professional development TARGET-tool for optimizing the motivational climate in secondary school physical educationEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-024-10379-572:4(2325-2348)Online publication date: 15-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. TARGET-tool: Participatory Design of an Interactive Professional Development Tool for Secondary School Physical Education Teachers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICFET '23: Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies
      June 2023
      188 pages
      ISBN:9798400707353
      DOI:10.1145/3606150
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 15 August 2023

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Educational Technology
      2. Human-computer Interaction
      3. Participatory Design
      4. Physical Education
      5. Teacher Professional Development

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      ICFET 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)272
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)42
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Evaluation of the digital teacher professional development TARGET-tool for optimizing the motivational climate in secondary school physical educationEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-024-10379-572:4(2325-2348)Online publication date: 15-May-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media