[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3678299.3678343acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesamConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Hierarchical, Modular Music Sequencer

Published: 18 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Musical structure is replete with hierarchy, modularity, reuse, and variation. We are interested in how these aspects of music may be employed in a tool for composition and performance. We describe an experimental music sequencer we have developed which is meant to help musicians build complex, highly modular, hierarchical musical structures. The musician begins with basic musical elements, then groups them into larger structures to combine them in a wide variety of ways. The same elements may be reused in many contexts, and may be parameterized and customized each time, creating variation. This sequencer is meant as both a composition and performance tool. We discuss past research in hierarchy and modularity in music, detail our sequencer approach, outline ways that it provides hierarchy and modularity, and discuss how we intend to use its basic model as a jumping-off point for introducing machine learning, optimization, and experimentation into the sequencing process.

References

[1]
Samer Abdallah, Nicolas Gold, and Alan Marsden. 2016. Analysing Symbolic Music with Probabilistic Grammars. Springer, 157–189.
[2]
Daniel Gábana Arellano and Andrew P McPherson. 2014. Radear: A Tangible Spinning Music Sequencer. In Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). 84–85.
[3]
Matt Bellingham, Simon Holland, and Paul Mulholland. 2014. An Analysis of Algorithmic Composition Interaction Design with Reference to Cognitive Dimensions. Technical Report. Department of Computing, The Open University, https://oro.open.ac.uk/90308/.
[4]
Alan F. Blackwell, Emma Cocker, Geoff Cox, Alex McLean, and Thor Magnusson. 2022. Live Coding: A User’s Manual. MIT Press.
[5]
Phil Burk, Larry Polansky, and David Rosenbloom. 1994. HMSL, the Hierarchical Music Specification Language. https://softsynth.com/hmsl/. As of 1/1/2024.
[6]
Emilios Cambouropoulos. 2001. The Local Boundary Detection Model (LBDM) and its application in the study of expressive timing. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 290–293.
[7]
Filippo Carnovalini, Nicholas Harley, Steven T Homer, Antonio Rodà, and Geraint A Wiggins. 2021. Musical Structure Analysis and Generation Through Abstraction Trees. In International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research. Springer, 282–300.
[8]
Filippo Carnovalini and Antonio Rodà. 2019. A Multilayered Approach to Automatic Music Generation and Expressive Performance. In Workshop on Multilayer Music Representation and Processing (MMRP). IEEE, 41–48.
[9]
Jean-Michaël Celerier. 2018. Authoring Interactied Media: a Logical & Temporal Approach. Ph. D. Dissertation. Université de Bordeaux.
[10]
David Cope. 2005. Computer Models of Musical Creativity. The MIT Press.
[11]
Shuqi Dai, Zheng Zhang, and Gus G. Xia. 2018. Music Style Transfer: A Position Paper. arxiv:1803.06841 [cs.SD]
[12]
Thomas Fischer and Wing Lau. 2006. Marble track music sequencers for children. In Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 141–144.
[13]
Anders Friberg. 2006. pDM: An Expressive Sequencer with Real-Time Control of the KTH Music-Performance Rules. Computer Music Journal 30, 1 (2006), 37–48.
[14]
Liam Goodacre. 2017. Context: A Modular Approach to Sequencing. In Workshop on Musical Metacreation (MUME 2017).
[15]
Ryan Groves. 2016. Towards the generation of melodic structure. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Musical Metacreation. 1–8.
[16]
Chris Halaby. 2010. The Early Days of Software Sequencers. KVR Audio. https://www.kvraudio.com/focus/the_early_days_of_software_sequencers_15670. As of 1/1/2024.
[17]
Goffredo Haus and Alberto Sametti. 1991. Scoresynth: A System for the Synthesis of Music Scores Based on Petri Nets and a Music Algebra. Computer 24, 7 (1991), 56–60.
[18]
Fred Lerdahl and Ray S. Jackendoff. 1985. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT press.
[19]
Sean Luke. 2019. Stochastic Synthesizer Patch Exploration in Edisyn. In Conference on Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design (EvoMUSART). Springer, 12.
[20]
Alan Marsden, Satoshi Tojo, and Keiji Hirata. 2018. No Longer ‘Somewhat Arbitrary’: Calculating Salience in GTTM-style Reduction. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on digital libraries for musicology. 26–33.
[21]
Keiji Hirata Masatoshi Hamanaka and Satoshi Tojo. 2006. Implementing “A Generative Theory of Tonal Music”. Journal of New Music Research 35, 4 (2006), 249–277.
[22]
Keiji Hirata Masatoshi Hamanaka and Satoshi Tojo. 2022. Implementation of melodic morphing based on generative theory of tonal music. Journal of New Music Research 51, 1 (2022), 86–102.
[23]
James McCartney. [n. d.]. SuperCollider. https://supercollider.github.io. As of 1/1/2024.
[24]
Jon McCormack, Peter McIlwain, Aidan Lane, and Alan Dorin. 2007. Generative composition with Nodal. In Workshop on Music and Artificial Life (at ECAL). 13.
[25]
Alex McLean. [n. d.]. Tidal Cycles. https://tidalcycles.org. As of 1/1/2024.
[26]
Gabriele Medeot, Srikanth Cherla, Katerina Kosta, Matt McVicar, Samer Abdallah, Marco Selvi, Ed Newton-Rex, and Kevin Webster. 2018. StructureNet: Inducing Structure in Generated Melodies.725–731.
[27]
David Meredith, Kjell Lemström, and Geraint Wiggins. 2002. Algorithms for discovering repeated patterns in multidimensional representations of polyphonic music. Journal of New Music Research 31, 4 (2002), 321–345.
[28]
Chris Nash. 2014. Manhattan: End-User Programming for Music. In Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). 221–226.
[29]
Orthogonal Inc.2024. Flow. https://orthogonal.one/products/flow/. As of 1/1/2024.
[30]
Christopher Young Penney. 1988. The design of an hierarchical event sequencer as an environment for computer-aided composition. Master’s thesis. University of California, San Diego.
[31]
James Ratliff (“Nornec”). 2019. Midinous. https://midinous.com. As of 1/1/2024.
[32]
Martin Rohrmeier. 2013. Musical expectancy: Bridging music theory, cognitive and computational approaches. Zeitschrift Der Gesellschaft Für Musiktheorie [Journal of the German-Speaking Society of Music Theory] 10, 2 (2013), 343–371.
[33]
Heinrich Schenker. 1935. Free Composition (Der freie Satz). Longman. Longman Music Series, Ernst Oster, translator.
[34]
Federico Simonetta, Filippo Carnovalini, Nicola Orio, and Antonio Rodà. 2018. Symbolic music similarity through a graph-based representation. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2018 on Sound in Immersion and Emotion. 1–7.
[35]
David Temperley. 2011. Composition, perception, and Schenkerian theory. Music Theory Spectrum 33, 2 (2011), 146–168.
[36]
Gissel Velarde, Tillman Weyde, and David Meredith. 2013. An Approach to Melodic Segmentation and Classification Based on Filtering with the Haar-wavelet. Journal of New Music Research 42, 4 (2013), 325–345.
[37]
Geraint A. Wiggins. 2021. Structure, Abstraction and Reference in Artificial Musical Intelligence. In Handbook of Artificial Intelligence for Music. Springer Nature.

Index Terms

  1. A Hierarchical, Modular Music Sequencer

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AM '24: Proceedings of the 19th International Audio Mostly Conference: Explorations in Sonic Cultures
      September 2024
      565 pages
      ISBN:9798400709685
      DOI:10.1145/3678299
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 September 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Hierarchical Representation of Music
      2. Music Generation
      3. Music Production
      4. Sequencer

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • European Research Executive Agency

      Conference

      AM '24

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 177 of 275 submissions, 64%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 95
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
      Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media