[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3670947.3670970acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Plant Simulation Tool for Collaborative Biology Experiments in Middle-school Classrooms: An In-the-wild Study

Published: 21 September 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Computer-aided simulation-based platforms have been shown to be effective tools for teaching STEM concepts. At the same time, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) platforms encourage different viewpoints and approaches from the learners which can enrich the learning experience in STEM classrooms. The deployment in recent years of networked personal devices such as Chromebooks in classrooms has motivated educators to design collaborative learning tools for these devices. However, prior work has shown that using one-on-one devices may discourage students from talking among each other, which hinders collaboration. To understand the affordances of personal devices for CSCL tools within Biology curricula, we designed a collaborative plant growth simulation application that provides mirrored plant growth simulation views for every group member to facilitate a common visualization. In this paper, we present our findings from an in-the-wild study that evaluated the affordance and usability of the plant growth simulation application and investigated the nature of collaboration and engagement aided through the simulation mirroring feature. Our study results showed that the plant simulation application had high usability and acceptance. Moreover, mirroring the plant growth simulation improved collaboration, generated excitement, and stimulated conversation. We also identified episodes where collaboration was hindered due to off-task activities, troubleshooting, group dynamics, and lack of understanding that led us to outline some potential guidelines to improve the collaborative learning experience for the students in Biology classroom.

References

[1]
Laia Albó, Davinia Hernández-Leo, and Verónica Moreno Oliver. 2019. Smartphones or laptops in the collaborative classroom? A study of video-based learning in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology 38, 6 (2019), 637–649.
[2]
Cynthia M D'Angelo, Daisy Rutstein, and Christopher J Harris. 2016. Learning with STEM Simulations in the Classroom: Findings and Trends from a Meta-analysis. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430495
[3]
Alissa N Antle and Sijie Wang. 2013. Comparing motor-cognitive strategies for spatial problem solving with tangible and multi-touch interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, 2013. 65–72.
[4]
Mustafa Başer and Soner Durmuş. 2010. The Effectiveness of Computer Supported Versus Real Laboratory Inquiry Learning Environments on the Understanding of Direct Current Electricity among Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics 6, 1 (2010), 47–61.
[5]
Andrea Bellucci, Aneesh P. Tarun, Ahmed Sabbir Arif, and Ali Mazalek. 2016. Developing responsive and interactive environments with the ROSS toolkit. In TEI 2016 - Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Tangible Embedded and Embodied Interaction, February 14, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 782–785. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2854123.
[6]
Florian Block, James Hammerman, Michael Horn, Amy Spiegel, Jonathan Christiansen, Brenda Phillips, Judy Diamond, E Margaret Evans, and Chia Shen. 2015. Fluid grouping: Quantifying group engagement around interactive tabletop exhibits in the wild. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2015. 867–876.
[7]
John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4–7.
[8]
Céline Byukusenge, Florien Nsanganwimana, and Albert Paulo Tarmo. 2022. Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching and Learning Biology: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.1
[9]
Clark A Chinn and Betina A Malhotra. 2002. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Sci Educ 86, 2 (2002), 175–218.
[10]
Tamara Clegg, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Jason Yip, Helene Gelderblom, Alex Kuhn, Tobin Valenstein, Becky Lewittes, and Allison Druin. 2012. Technology for promoting scientific practice and personal meaning in life-relevant learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2012. 152–161.
[11]
National Research Council. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press.
[12]
Sarah D'Angelo, D Harmon Pollock, and Michael Horn. 2015. Fishing with friends: using tabletop games to raise environmental awareness in aquariums. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2015. 29–38.
[13]
Jacob Davidsen and Ruben Vanderlinde. 2016. ‘You should collaborate, children’: a study of teachers’ design and facilitation of children's collaboration around touchscreens. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25, 5 (2016), 573–593.
[14]
Abigail C Evans, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Katie Davis. 2016. Modeling collaboration patterns on an interactive tabletop in a classroom setting. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, 2016. 860–871.
[15]
N. D. Finkelstein, W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky, S. Reid, and R. Lemaster. 2005. When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 1, 1 (October 2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103
[16]
Rowanne Fleck, Yvonne Rogers, Nicola Yuill, Paul Marshall, Amanda Carr, Jochen Rick, and Victoria Bonnett. 2009. Actions Speak Loudly with Words: Unpacking Collaboration Around the Table.
[17]
Rowanne Fleck, Asimina Vasalou, and Konstantina Stasinou. 2021. Tablet for two: How do children collaborate around single player tablet games? Int J Hum Comput Stud 145, (2021), 102539.
[18]
Jillian Galbraith. 2003. Connecting with plants: lessons for life. Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney 14, 2 (2003), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517032000103303
[19]
Dana Gnesdilow and Sadhana Puntambekar. 2021. Comparing middle school students’ science explanations during physical and virtual laboratories. J Sci Educ Technol (2021), 1–12.
[20]
Marcela Hernández-de-Menéndez, Antonio Vallejo Guevara, and Ruben Morales-Menendez. 2019. Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 13, 3 (September 2019), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00558-7
[21]
J. Huppert, S. Michal Lomask, and R. Lazarowitz. 2002. Computer simulations in the high school: Students’ cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. Int J Sci Educ 24, 8 (August 2002), 803–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049150
[22]
Jay L. Lemke. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation., Norwood, NJ.
[23]
Heisawn Jeong, Cindy E Hmelo-Silver, and Kihyun Jo. 2019. Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educ Res Rev 28, (2019), 100284.
[24]
Donna Karno and Beth Hatcher. 2020. Building computer supported collaborative learning environments in early childhood classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development 68, 1 (February 2020), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09686-z
[25]
Joel K Kiboss, Mwangi Ndirangu, and Eric W Wekesa. 2004. Effectiveness of a Computer-Mediated Simulations Program in School Biology on Pupils’ Learning Outcomes in Cell Theory.
[26]
Dongsik Kim and Seunghee Lee. 2002. Designing collaborative reflection supporting tools in e-project-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13, 4 (2002), 375–392.
[27]
David Klahr, Lara M. Triona, and Cameron Williams. 2007. Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. J Res Sci Teach 44, 1 (January 2007), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20152
[28]
Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 31, (2012), 486–490.
[29]
Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 31, (2012), 486–490.
[30]
Gili Marbach-Ad, Yosi Rotbain, and Ruth Stavy. 2008. Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. J Res Sci Teach 45, 3 (March 2008), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20222
[31]
Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Yannis Dimitriadis, Alejandra Martinez-Monés, Judy Kay, and Kalina Yacef. 2013. Capturing and analyzing verbal and physical collaborative learning interactions at an enriched interactive tabletop. Int J Comput Support Collab Learn 8, 4 (December 2013), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9184-1
[32]
Engineering, and Medicine National Academies of Sciences. 2019. Science and Engineering for Grades 6-12. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.17226/25216
[33]
National Research Council. 2009. A New Biology for the 21st Century. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12764
[34]
Angela M O'Donnell and Cindy E Hmelo-Silver. 2013. Introduction: What is collaborative learning?: An overview. The international handbook of collaborative learning (2013), 1–15.
[35]
Jennifer K Olsen, Nikol Rummel, and Vincent Aleven. 2017. Learning alone or together? A combination can be best! . Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[36]
Jonathan Osborne. 2014. Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge, New York, NY, 593–613.
[37]
Miyoung Park, Emma Anderson, and Susan Yoon. 2017. Learning Biology Coherently Through Complex Systems, Scientific Practices, and Agent-Based Simulations. . Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[38]
Janet C Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children, 2006. 81–88.
[39]
Dave Arthur R Robledo and Maricar S Prudente. 2021. Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Activities vs. Traditional Interventions in Teaching Biology: A Meta-Analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) 12, 10 (2021), 4927–4937. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5824594
[40]
Toni Kempler Rogat and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2011. Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cogn Instr 29, 4 (2011), 375–415.
[41]
Stacey D Scott, Karen D Grant, and Regan L Mandryk. 2003. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In ECSCW 2003: Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
[42]
Orit Shaer, Megan Strait, Consuelo Valdes, Taili Feng, Michael Lintz, and Heidi Wang. 2011. Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2011. 2817–2826.
[43]
Brian Shambare and Clement Simuja. 2022. A Critical Review of Teaching With Virtual Lab: A Panacea to Challenges of Conducting Practical Experiments in Science Subjects Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Schools in South Africa. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 50, 3 (March 2022), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211058051
[44]
Lara Kathleen Smetana and Randy L. Bell. 2012. Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ 34, 9 (June 2012), 1337–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.605182
[45]
Gerry Stahl. 2023. Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. In CSCL 2002 Proceedings, 2023. Taylor & Francis.
[46]
Masanori Sugimoto, Kazuhiro Hosoi, and Hiromichi Hashizume. 2004. Caretta: a system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2004. 41–48.
[47]
Afroza Sultana, Alex Bakogeorge, Tudor Tibu, Litong Zeng, Shafagh Hadinezhad, Luigi Zaccagnini, Xuesong Cang, Dana Gnesdilow, Aneesh P Tarun, and Sadhana Puntambekar. 2023. In-class Collaborative Learning Environment for Middle School Children: A Usability Study. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 2023. 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3593915
[48]
Koun tem Sun, Yuan cheng Lin, and Chia jui Yu. 2008. A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Comput Educ 50, 4 (May 2008), 1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.003
[49]
Kimberly Tanner and Deborah Allen. 2005. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Understanding the wrong answers-teaching toward conceptual change. Cell Biology Education 4, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
[50]
Aneesh Tarun, Veronica Andric, Lesi Yang, Tudor Tibu, Luigi Zaccagnini, Litong Zeng, Shafagh Hadinezhad, Xuesong Cang, William Goss, Samantha Baker, Dana Gnesdilow, Sadhana Puntambekar, Mike Tissenbaum, and Ali Mazalek. 2022. SimSnap: Supporting Collaborative Learning through Reconfigurable Simulations. Computersupported collaborative learning (2022). Retrieved November 6, 2022 from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10346682
[51]
Mike Tissenbaum, Camillia Matuk, Matthew Berland, Leila Lyons, Felipe Cocco, Marcia Linn, Jan L Plass, Nik Hajny, Al Olsen, and Beat Schwendimann. 2016. Real-time visualization of student activities to support classroom orchestration. . Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[52]
Mike Tissenbaum and Jim Slotta. 2019. Supporting classroom orchestration with real-time feedback: A role for teacher dashboards and real-time agents. Int J Comput Support Collab Learn 14, (2019), 325–351.
[53]
Eva Erdosne Toth, Lisa R. Ludvico, and Becky L. Morrow. 2014. Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: the role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments 22, 5 (September 2014), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102
[54]
W. N. Udin, M. Ramli, and Muzzazinah. 2020. Virtual laboratory for enhancing students’ understanding on abstract biology concepts and laboratory skills: A systematic review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, May 22, 2020. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042025
[55]
Salome Wörner, Jochen Kuhn, and Katharina Scheiter. 2022. The best of two worlds: A systematic review on combining real and virtual experiments in science education. Rev Educ Res 92, 6 (2022), 911–952.
[56]
Litong Zeng, Shafagh Hadinezhad, and Mike Tissenbaum. 2023. Spatially Manipulable Interactive Note Taking Tool to Facilitate Collaborative Learning in Science Education. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, 2023. 614–618.

Index Terms

  1. A Plant Simulation Tool for Collaborative Biology Experiments in Middle-school Classrooms: An In-the-wild Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    GI '24: Proceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference
    June 2024
    437 pages
    ISBN:9798400718281
    DOI:10.1145/3670947
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 September 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Biology curriculum
    2. Biology simulation
    3. CSCL
    4. Collaborative learning
    5. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
    6. classroom learning
    7. collaborative simulation
    8. cross-device interaction
    9. in-the-wild classroom study
    10. middle school STEM education
    11. multi-device platform
    12. plant growth simulation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation-NSF
    • Canada Research Chairs Program

    Conference

    GI '24
    GI '24: Graphics Interface
    June 3 - 6, 2024
    NS, Halifax, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 206 of 508 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 23
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media