Misconfiguration Software Testing for Failure Emergence in Autonomous Driving Systems
Article No.: 85, Pages 1913 - 1936
Abstract
The optimization of a system’s configuration options is crucial for determining its performance and functionality, particularly in the case of autonomous driving software (ADS) systems because they possess a multitude of such options. Research efforts in the domain of ADS have prioritized the development of automated testing methods to enhance the safety and security of self-driving cars. Presently, search-based approaches are utilized to test ADS systems in a virtual environment, thereby simulating real-world scenarios. However, such approaches rely on optimizing the waypoints of ego cars and obstacles to generate diverse scenarios that trigger violations, and no prior techniques focus on optimizing the ADS from the perspective of configuration. To address this challenge, we present a framework called ConfVE, which is the first automated configuration testing framework for ADSes. ConfVE’s design focuses on the emergence of violations through rerunning scenarios generated by different ADS testing approaches under different configurations, leveraging 9 test oracles to enable previous ADS testing approaches to find more types of violations without modifying their designs or implementations and employing a novel technique to identify bug-revealing violations and eliminate duplicate violations. Our evaluation results demonstrate that ConfVE can discover 1,818 unique violations and reduce 74.19% of duplicate violations.
References
[1]
April 2024. Source Code and Data of ConfVE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11406940
[2]
April 2024. Video Recordings of ConfVE. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11051748
[3]
August 2021. Dreamland’s Grading System. https://bit.ly/3nfe48e
[4]
August 2021. Google’s Self-Driving Car Caused Its First Accident. https://bit.ly/3acQwgO
[5]
August 2021. Look, no hands! Test driving a Google car. https://bit.ly/3kWXPAm
[6]
August 2021. Open Vehicles Compatible with Apollo. https://apollo.auto/vehicle/certificate_en.html
[7]
August 2021. Self-Driving Tesla Was Involved in Fatal Crash, U.S. Says. https://nyti.ms/3abv3Vq
[8]
August 2021. Tesla: Autopilot was on during deadly Mountain View crash. https://bayareane.ws/3U1p4av
[9]
August 2021. Tesla driver dies in first fatal crash while using autopilot mode. https://bit.ly/3nlNavo
[10]
August 2021. There are some scary similarities between Tesla’s deadly crashes linked to Autopilot. https://bit.ly/3Zppqsz
[11]
August 2023. 5 Traffic Laws You Might Not Realize You Broke. https://bit.ly/45V7vy7
[12]
August 2023. Autoware Foundation Members. https://autoware.org/about/members/
[13]
August 2023. Autoware: Open-source software for urban autonomous driving. https://bit.ly/3xPVmuH
[14]
August 2023. Contributing Factors To Aggressive Driving. https://bit.ly/48giaF7
[15]
August 2023. What You Need to Know About Unsafe Lane Changes. https://bit.ly/3PoMViF
[16]
December 2022. Baidu Apollo: An open autonomous driving platform. http://apollo.auto/
[17]
February 2018. Two Years On, A Father Is Still Fighting Tesla Over Autopilot And His Son’s Fatal Crash. https://bit.ly/42OFMxS
[18]
February 2022. Waymo to begin charging for robotaxi rides in San Francisco. https://tcrn.ch/3lUBoNd
[19]
February 2024. Autoware release/v1.0. https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware/tree/release/v1.0
[20]
Feburary 2023. Dangers of Speeding: Facts and Problems | Wilson Kehoe Winingham. bit.ly/3JW0Fzv
[21]
July 2022. U.S. agency to review if Pony.ai complied with crash reporting order. https://tinyurl.com/42twsa2b
[22]
June 2018. Tesla Autopilot System Found Probably at Fault in 2018 Crash. https://nyti.ms/3qXuioY
[23]
June 2021. Baidu is building Level 4 autonomous robotaxis called Apollo Moon in China. https://bit.ly/3HQ46qH
[24]
June 2022. GM’s Cruise starts charging fares for driverless rides in San Francisco. https://reut.rs/40rtGJu
[25]
June 2022. Toyota Follows Tesla In Developing A Vision-Based Self-Driving System. https://bit.ly/3TQQNuw
[26]
March 2018. Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam. https://nyti.ms/40IHWxd
[27]
March 2022. Self-Driving Fundamentals: Featuring Apollo | Udacity. https://bit.ly/3RnMVC0
[28]
March 2023. Apollo: An open autonomous driving platform. https://bit.ly/3XSQUa5
[29]
March 2023. Tesla Autopilot. https://www.tesla.com/autopilot
[30]
March 2023. Uber Advanced Technolgoy Group. https://ubr.to/40tYsBA
[31]
March 2023. Waymo. https://waymo.com/
[32]
November 2018. Baidu hits the gas on autonomous vehicles with Volvo and Ford deals. https://tcrn.ch/3EL8Prj
[33]
October 2020. Ford unveils new self-driving test vehicle for 2022 launch. https://cnb.cx/3zi2AIQ
[34]
October 2021. Tesla Sold 2 Million Electric Cars: First Automaker To Reach Milestone. https://bit.ly/3G1zDVm
[35]
September 2023. Inquiry about time cost of simulation · autowarefoundation · Discussion #3853 · GitHub. https://bit.ly/432LLiU
[36]
September 2023. Motion sickness: MedlinePlus Genetics. https://bit.ly/3sYuoCe
[37]
September 2023. TIER IV Autoware Evaluator. https://bit.ly/49SKfSX
[38]
Raja Ben Abdessalem, Shiva Nejati, Lionel C. Briand, and Thomas Stifter. 2016. Testing advanced driver assistance systems using multi-objective search and neural networks. In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2016, Singapore, September 3-7, 2016, David Lo, Sven Apel, and Sarfraz Khurshid (Eds.). ACM, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/2970276.2970311
[39]
Raja Ben Abdessalem, Shiva Nejati, Lionel C. Briand, and Thomas Stifter. 2018. Testing vision-based control systems using learnable evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 27 - June 03, 2018, Michel Chaudron, Ivica Crnkovic, Marsha Chechik, and Mark Harman (Eds.). ACM, 1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180160
[40]
Hanna Bellem, Barbara Thiel, Michael Schrauf, and Josef F Krems. 2018. Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 55 (2018), 90–100.
[41]
Michele Bertoncello and Dominik Wee. 2015. Ten ways autonomous driving could redefine the automotive world. McKinsey & Company, 6 (2015).
[42]
Ranjita Bhagwan, Sonu Mehta, Arjun Radhakrishna, and Sahil Garg. 2021. Learning Patterns in Configuration. In 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2021, Melbourne, Australia, November 15-19, 2021. IEEE, 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678525
[43]
Alessandro Calò, Paolo Arcaini, Shaukat Ali, Florian Hauer, and Fuyuki Ishikawa. 2020. Generating Avoidable Collision Scenarios for Testing Autonomous Driving Systems. In 13th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Validation and Verification, ICST 2020, Porto, Portugal, October 24-28, 2020. IEEE, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST46399.2020.00045
[44]
Ezequiel Castellano, Ahmet Cetinkaya, Cédric Ho Thanh, Stefan Klikovits, Xiaoyi Zhang, and Paolo Arcaini. 2021. Frenetic at the SBST 2021 Tool Competition. In 14th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2021, Madrid, Spain, May 31, 2021. IEEE, 36–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBST52555.2021.00016
[45]
Mingfei Cheng, Yuan Zhou, and Xiaofei Xie. 2023. BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2023, Seattle, WA, USA, July 17-21, 2023, René Just and Gordon Fraser (Eds.). ACM, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597926.3598072
[46]
Krzysztof Czarnecki. 2018. Operational design domain for automated driving systems. Taxonomy of Basic Terms “, Waterloo Intelligent Systems Engineering (WISE) Lab, University of Waterloo, Canada.
[47]
Kalyanmoy Deb, Samir Agrawal, Amrit Pratap, and T. Meyarivan. 2000. A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI, Marc Schoenauer, Kalyanmoy Deb, Günther Rudolph, Xin Yao, Evelyne Lutton, Juan Julian Merelo, and Hans-Paul Schwefel (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 849–858. isbn:978-3-540-45356-7
[48]
Jerry L Deffenbacher, David M Deffenbacher, Rebekah S Lynch, and Tracy L Richards. 2003. Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: a comparison of high and low anger drivers. Behaviour research and therapy, 41, 6 (2003), 701–718.
[49]
Yao Deng, Xi Zheng, Mengshi Zhang, Guannan Lou, and Tianyi Zhang. 2022. Scenario-Based Test Reduction and Prioritization for Multi-Module Autonomous Driving Systems. arxiv:2209.01546 arXiv:2209.01546 [cs]
[50]
Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, and Xiaowei Xu. 1996. A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96), Portland, Oregon, USA, Evangelos Simoudis, Jiawei Han, and Usama M. Fayyad (Eds.). AAAI Press, 226–231. http://www.aaai.org/Library/KDD/1996/kdd96-037.php
[51]
Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation. June 2009. Analysis of Lane-Change Crashes and Near-Crashes. https://bit.ly/3WUnLtO
[52]
Félix-Antoine Fortin, Simon Grenier, and Marc Parizeau. 2013. Generalizing the improved run-time complexity algorithm for non-dominated sorting. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO ’13, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 6-10, 2013, Christian Blum and Enrique Alba (Eds.). ACM, 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2463372.2463454
[53]
Alessio Gambi, Marc Müller, and Gordon Fraser. 2019. AsFault: testing self-driving car software using search-based procedural content generation. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, ICSE 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 25-31, 2019, Joanne M. Atlee, Tevfik Bultan, and Jon Whittle (Eds.). IEEE / ACM, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00030
[54]
Joshua Garcia, Yang Feng, Junjie Shen, Sumaya Almanee, Yuan Xia, and Qi Alfred Chen. 2020. A comprehensive study of autonomous vehicle bugs. In ICSE ’20: 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 27 June - 19 July, 2020, Gregg Rothermel and Doo-Hwan Bae (Eds.). ACM, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380397
[55]
J.F. Golding. 2016. Chapter 27 - Motion sickness. In Neuro-Otology, Joseph M. Furman and Thomas Lempert (Eds.) (Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 137). Elsevier, 371–390. issn:0072-9752 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63437-5.00027-3
[56]
Xue Han and Tingting Yu. 2016. An Empirical Study on Performance Bugs for Highly Configurable Software Systems. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2016, Ciudad Real, Spain, September 8-9, 2016. ACM, 23:1–23:10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962602
[57]
Fitash Ul Haq, Donghwan Shin, and Lionel C. Briand. 2022. Efficient Online Testing for DNN-Enabled Systems using Surrogate-Assisted and Many-Objective Optimization. In 44th IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2022, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, May 25-27, 2022. ACM, 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510188
[58]
Yuqi Huai, Sumaya Almanee, Yuntianyi Chen, Xiafa Wu, Qi Alfred Chen, and Joshua Garcia. 2023. scenoRITA: Generating Diverse, Fully-Mutable, Test Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicle Planning. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2023.3309610
[59]
Yuqi Huai, Yuntianyi Chen, Sumaya Almanee, Tuan Ngo, Xiang Liao, Ziwen Wan, Qi Alfred Chen, and Joshua Garcia. 2023. Doppelgänger Test Generation for Revealing Bugs in Autonomous Driving Software. In 45th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2023, Melbourne, Australia, May 14-20, 2023. IEEE, 2591–2603. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE48619.2023.00216
[60]
Tri Huynh, Alessio Gambi, and Gordon Fraser. 2019. AC3R: automatically reconstructing car crashes from police reports. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings, ICSE 2019, Montreal, QC, Canada, May 25-31, 2019, Joanne M. Atlee, Tevfik Bultan, and Jon Whittle (Eds.). IEEE / ACM, 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00031
[61]
Chijung Jung, Ali Ahad, Jinho Jung, Sebastian G. Elbaum, and Yonghwi Kwon. 2021. Swarmbug: debugging configuration bugs in swarm robotics. In ESEC/FSE ’21: 29th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Athens, Greece, August 23-28, 2021, Diomidis Spinellis, Georgios Gousios, Marsha Chechik, and Massimiliano Di Penta (Eds.). ACM, 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468601
[62]
Lorenzo Keller, Prasang Upadhyaya, and George Candea. 2008. ConfErr: A tool for assessing resilience to human configuration errors. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks With FTCS and DCC (DSN). IEEE, Anchorage, AK. 157–166. isbn:978-1-4244-2397-2 https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2008.4630084
[63]
Seulbae Kim, Major Liu, Junghwan John Rhee, Yuseok Jeon, Yonghwi Kwon, and Chung Hwan Kim. 2022. DriveFuzz: Discovering Autonomous Driving Bugs through Driving Quality-Guided Fuzzing. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2022, Los Angeles, CA, USA, November 7-11, 2022, Heng Yin, Angelos Stavrou, Cas Cremers, and Elaine Shi (Eds.). ACM, 1753–1767. https://doi.org/10.1145/3548606.3560558
[64]
Florian Klück, Lorenz Klampfl, and Franz Wotawa. 2021. GABezier at the SBST 2021 Tool Competition. In 14th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2021, Madrid, Spain, May 31, 2021. IEEE, 38–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBST52555.2021.00017
[65]
Guanpeng Li, Yiran Li, Saurabh Jha, Timothy Tsai, Michael B. Sullivan, Siva Kumar Sastry Hari, Zbigniew Kalbarczyk, and Ravishankar K. Iyer. 2020. AV-FUZZER: Finding Safety Violations in Autonomous Driving Systems. In 31st IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE 2020, Coimbra, Portugal, October 12-15, 2020, Marco Vieira, Henrique Madeira, Nuno Antunes, and Zheng Zheng (Eds.). IEEE, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE5003.2020.00012
[66]
Shanshan Li, Wang Li, Xiangke Liao, Shaoliang Peng, Shulin Zhou, Zhouyang Jia, and Teng Wang. 2018. ConfVD: System Reactions Analysis and Evaluation Through Misconfiguration Injection. IEEE Trans. Reliab., 67, 4 (2018), 1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2018.2865962
[67]
Chengjie Lu, Yize Shi, Huihui Zhang, Man Zhang, Tiexin Wang, Tao Yue, and Shaukat Ali. 2023. Learning Configurations of Operating Environment of Autonomous Vehicles to Maximize their Collisions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49, 1 (2023), Jan., 384–402. issn:1939-3520 https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3150788 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
[68]
Chengjie Lu, Huihui Zhang, Tao Yue, and Shaukat Ali. 2021. Search-Based Selection and Prioritization of Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Systems. In Search-Based Software Engineering, Una-May O’Reilly and Xavier Devroey (Eds.). 12914, Springer International Publishing, Cham. 41–55. isbn:978-3-030-88105-4 978-3-030-88106-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88106-1_4 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
[69]
Anna C Mastroianni, Ruth R Faden, and Daniel D Federman. 1994. Women and health research.
[70]
Flávio Medeiros, Christian Kästner, Márcio Ribeiro, Rohit Gheyi, and Sven Apel. 2016. A comparison of 10 sampling algorithms for configurable systems. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2016, Austin, TX, USA, May 14-22, 2016, Laura K. Dillon, Willem Visser, and Laurie A. Williams (Eds.). ACM, 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884793
[71]
Mahshid Helali Moghadam, Markus Borg, and Seyed Jalaleddin Mousavirad. 2021. Deeper at the SBST 2021 Tool Competition: ADAS Testing Using Multi-Objective Search. In 14th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing, SBST 2021, Madrid, Spain, May 31, 2021. IEEE, 40–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBST52555.2021.00018
[72]
Caroline Criado Perez. 2019. Invisible women: Data bias in a world designed for men. Abrams.
[73]
Christina Rödel, Susanne Stadler, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Seattle, WA, USA, September 17 - 19, 2014, Linda Ng Boyle, Gary E. Burnett, Peter Fröhlich, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Erika Miller, and Yuqing Wu (Eds.). ACM, 11:1–11:8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667330
[74]
Guodong Rong, Byung Hyun Shin, Hadi Tabatabaee, Qiang Lu, Steve Lemke, Martins Mozeiko, Eric Boise, Geehoon Uhm, Mark Gerow, Shalin Mehta, Eugene Agafonov, Tae Hyung Kim, Eric Sterner, Keunhae Ushiroda, Michael Reyes, Dmitry Zelenkovsky, and Seonman Kim. 2020. LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Driving. In 23rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, ITSC 2020, Rhodes, Greece, September 20-23, 2020. IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294422
[75]
Mohamed Shawky. 2020. Factors affecting lane change crashes. IATSS Research, 44, 2 (2020), 155–161. issn:0386-1112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.12.002
[76]
Xudong Sun, Runxiang Cheng, Jianyan Chen, Elaine Ang, Owolabi Legunsen, and Tianyin Xu. 2020. Testing Configuration Changes in Context to Prevent Production Failures. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI 2020, Virtual Event, November 4-6, 2020. USENIX Association, 735–751. https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi20/presentation/sun
[77]
Kuo-Chung Tai and Yu Lei. 2002. A Test Generation Strategy for Pairwise Testing. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 28, 1 (2002), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.979992
[78]
Haoxiang Tian, Yan Jiang, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan, Jun Wei, Wei Chen, Shuo Li, and Dan Ye. 2022. MOSAT: Finding Safety Violations of Autonomous Driving Systems using Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm. 13.
[79]
Haoxiang Tian, Guoquan Wu, Jiren Yan, Yan Jiang, Jun Wei, Wei Chen, Shuo Li, and Dan Ye. 2022. Generating Critical Test Scenarios for Autonomous Driving Systems via Influential Behavior Patterns. 13.
[80]
Mark Turner and Michael J Griffin. 1999. Motion sickness in public road transport: the effect of driver, route and vehicle. Ergonomics, 42, 12 (1999), 1646–1664.
[81]
Riley Underwood, Quang-Hung Luu, and Huai Liu. 2023. A Metamorphic Testing Framework and Toolkit for Modular Automated Driving Systems. In 8th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Metamorphic Testing, MET@ICSE 2023, Melbourne, Australia, May 14, 2023. IEEE, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MET59151.2023.00010
[82]
Tianyin Xu, Jiaqi Zhang, Peng Huang, Jing Zheng, Tianwei Sheng, Ding Yuan, Yuanyuan Zhou, and Shankar Pasupathy. 2013. Do not blame users for misconfigurations. In ACM SIGOPS 24th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP ’13, Farmington, PA, USA, November 3-6, 2013, Michael Kaminsky and Mike Dahlin (Eds.). ACM, 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1145/2517349.2522727
[83]
Sai Zhang and Michael D. Ernst. 2013. Automated diagnosis of software configuration errors. In 35th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’13, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 18-26, 2013, David Notkin, Betty H. C. Cheng, and Klaus Pohl (Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606577
[84]
Sai Zhang and Michael D. Ernst. 2014. Which configuration option should I change? In 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’14, Hyderabad, India - May 31 - June 07, 2014, Pankaj Jalote, Lionel C. Briand, and André van der Hoek (Eds.). ACM, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568251
[85]
Sai Zhang and Michael D. Ernst. 2015. Proactive detection of inadequate diagnostic messages for software configuration errors. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA 2015, Baltimore, MD, USA, July 12-17, 2015, Michal Young and Tao Xie (Eds.). ACM, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771783.2771817
[86]
Ziyuan Zhong, Gail E. Kaiser, and Baishakhi Ray. 2021. Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehicles. CoRR, abs/2109.06126 (2021), arXiv:2109.06126. arxiv:2109.06126
Index Terms
- Misconfiguration Software Testing for Failure Emergence in Autonomous Driving Systems
Recommendations
BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
ISSTA 2023: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and AnalysisTesting Autonomous Driving Systems (ADSs) is a critical task for ensuring the reliability and safety of autonomous vehicles. Existing methods mainly focus on searching for safety violations while the diversity of the generated test cases is ignored, ...
A Scenario Distribution Model for Effective and Efficient Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
ASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software EngineeringWhile autonomous driving systems are expected to change future means of mobility and reduce road accidents, understanding intensive and complex traffic situations is essential to enable testing of such systems under realistic traffic conditions. ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
2770 pages
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 12 July 2024
Published in PACMSE Volume 1, Issue FSE
Badges
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 305Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)305
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)101
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in