PrivatEyes: Appearance-based Gaze Estimation Using Federated Secure Multi-Party Computation
Authors: 
Mayar Elfares, Pascal Reisert, Zhiming Hu, Wenwu Tang, Ralf Küsters, 
Andreas BullingAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 232, Pages 1 - 23
Abstract
Latest gaze estimation methods require large-scale training data but their collection and exchange pose significant privacy risks. We propose PrivatEyes - the first privacy-enhancing training approach for appearance-based gaze estimation based on federated learning (FL) and secure multi-party computation (MPC). PrivatEyes enables training gaze estimators on multiple local datasets across different users and server-based secure aggregation of the individual estimators' updates. PrivatEyes guarantees that individual gaze data remains private even if a majority of the aggregating servers is malicious. We also introduce a new data leakage attack DualView that shows that PrivatEyes limits the leakage of private training data more effectively than previous approaches. Evaluations on the MPIIGaze, MPIIFaceGaze, GazeCapture, and NVGaze datasets further show that the improved privacy does not lead to a lower gaze estimation accuracy or substantially higher computational costs - both of which are on par with its non-secure counterparts.
References
[1]
Mihai Bâce, Sander Staal, and Andreas Bulling. 2020. Quantification of Users' Visual Attention During Everyday Mobile Device Interactions. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376449
[2]
Shumeet Baluja and Dean Pomerleau. 1993. Non-intrusive gaze tracking using artificial neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 6 (1993).
[3]
Daniel Bernau, Philip-William Grassal, Jonas Robl, and Florian Kerschbaum. 2019. Assessing differentially private deep learning with membership inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11328 (2019).
[4]
Pradipta Biswas et al. 2021. Appearance-based gaze estimation using attention and difference mechanism. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 3143--3152.
[5]
Keith Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, and Karn Seth. 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 1175--1191.
[6]
Kallista Bonawitz, Peter Kairouz, Brendan Mcmahan, and Daniel Ramage. 2022. Federated learning and privacy. Commun. ACM, Vol. 65, 4 (2022), 90--97.
[7]
Efe Bozkir, Onur Günlü, Wolfgang Fuhl, Rafael F Schaefer, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2021. Differential privacy for eye tracking with temporal correlations. Plos one, Vol. 16, 8 (2021), e0255979.
[8]
Efe Bozkir, Süleyman Özdel, Mengdi Wang, Brendan David-John, Hong Gao, Kevin Butler, Eakta Jain, and Enkelejda Kasneci. 2023. Eye-tracked Virtual Reality: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods and Privacy Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14080 (2023).
[9]
Efe Bozkir, Ali Burak Ünal, Mete Akgün, Enkelejda Kasneci, and Nico Pfeifer. 2020. Privacy preserving gaze estimation using synthetic images via a randomized encoding based framework. In ACM symposium on eye tracking research and applications. 1--5.
[10]
Andreas Bulling and Hans Gellersen. 2010. Toward mobile eye-based human-computer interaction. IEEE Pervasive Computing, Vol. 9, 4 (2010), 8--12.
[11]
Andreas Bulling and Daniel Roggen. 2011. Recognition of Visual Memory Recall Processes Using Eye Movement Analysis. In Proc. ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp). 455--464. https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030172
[12]
Andreas Bulling, Christian Weichel, and Hans Gellersen. 2013. EyeContext: Recognition of high-level contextual cues from human visual behaviour. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 305--308.
[13]
Lukas Burkhalter, Hidde Lycklama, Alexander Viand, Nicolas Küchler, and Anwar Hithnawi. 2021. Rofl: Attestable robustness for secure federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03311 (2021).
[14]
Mihai Bâce, Sander Staal, and Andreas Bulling. 2020. Quantification of Users' Visual Attention During Everyday Mobile Device Interactions. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376449
[15]
Virginio Cantoni, Chiara Galdi, Michele Nappi, Marco Porta, and Daniel Riccio. 2015. GANT: Gaze analysis technique for human identification. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 48, 4 (2015), 1027--1038.
[16]
Jixu Chen and Qiang Ji. 2008. 3D gaze estimation with a single camera without IR illumination. In 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1--4.
[17]
Jinsoo Choi, Byungtae Ahn, Jaesik Parl, and In So Kweon. 2013. Appearance-based gaze estimation using kinect. In 2013 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence. IEEE, 260--261.
[18]
Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Chuan Guo, Somesh Jha, and Laurens van der Maaten. 2021. EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.12727 (2021).
[19]
Ivan Damgård, Kasper Damgård, Kurt Nielsen, Peter Sebastian Nordholt, and Tomas Toft. 2016. Confidential benchmarking based on multiparty computation. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 169--187.
[20]
Ivan Damgård, Valerio Pastro, Nigel Smart, and Sarah Zakarias. 2012. Multiparty computation from somewhat homomorphic encryption. In Annual Cryptology Conference. Springer, 643--662.
[21]
Ye Dong, Xiaojun Chen, Kaiyun Li, Dakui Wang, and Shuai Zeng. 2021. FLOD: Oblivious defender for private Byzantine-robust federated learning with dishonest-majority. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Springer, 497--518.
[22]
Cynthia Dwork, Aaron Roth, et al. 2014. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 9, 3--4 (2014), 211--407.
[23]
Mayar Elfares, Zhiming Hu, Pascal Reisert, Andreas Bulling, and Ralf Küsters. 2022. Federated Learning for Appearance-based Gaze Estimation in the Wild. In Proc. NeurIPS Workshop on Gaze Meets ML (GMML). 1--11.
[24]
Myrthe Faber, Robert Bixler, and Sidney K D'Mello. 2018. An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 50, 1 (2018), 134--150.
[25]
Hossein Fereidooni, Samuel Marchal, Markus Miettinen, Azalia Mirhoseini, Helen Möllering, Thien Duc Nguyen, Phillip Rieger, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi, Thomas Schneider, Hossein Yalame, et al. 2021. SAFELearn: Secure aggregation for private federated learning. In 2021 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE, 56--62.
[26]
Matt Fredrikson, Somesh Jha, and Thomas Ristenpart. 2015. Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In ACM CCS. 1322--1333.
[27]
Filippo Galli, Sayan Biswas, Kangsoo Jung, Tommaso Cucinotta, and Catuscia Palamidessi. 2022. Group privacy for personalized federated learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2206.03396
[28]
Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, and Michael Moeller. 2020. Inverting gradients-how easy is it to break privacy in federated learning? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020), 16937--16947.
[29]
Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Nathan Dowlin, Kim Laine, Kristin Lauter, Michael Naehrig, and John Wernsing. 2016. Cryptonets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 201--210.
[30]
Dan Witzner Hansen and Qiang Ji. 2009. In the eye of the beholder: A survey of models for eyes and gaze. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 32, 3 (2009), 478--500.
[31]
Zecheng He, Tianwei Zhang, and Ruby B Lee. 2019. Model inversion attacks against collaborative inference. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 148--162.
[32]
Craig Hennessey, Borna Noureddin, and Peter Lawrence. 2006. A single camera eye-gaze tracking system with free head motion. In Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications. 87--94.
[33]
Keita Higuchi, Soichiro Matsuda, Rie Kamikubo, Takuya Enomoto, Yusuke Sugano, Junichi Yamamoto, and Yoichi Sato. 2018. Visualizing gaze direction to support video coding of social attention for children with autism spectrum disorder. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 571--582.
[34]
Briland Hitaj, Giuseppe Ateniese, and Fernando Perez-Cruz. 2017. Deep models under the GAN: information leakage from collaborative deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 603--618.
[35]
Philip S Holzman, Leonard R Proctor, Deborah L Levy, Nicholas J Yasillo, Herbert Y Meltzer, and Stephen W Hurt. 1974. Eye-tracking dysfunctions in schizophrenic patients and their relatives. Archives of general psychiatry, Vol. 31, 2 (1974), 143--151.
[36]
Sabrina Hoppe, Tobias Loetscher, Stephanie A Morey, and Andreas Bulling. 2018. Eye movements during everyday behavior predict personality traits. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2018), 105.
[37]
Michael Xuelin Huang, Tiffany CK Kwok, Grace Ngai, Stephen CF Chan, and Hong Va Leong. 2016a. Building a personalized, auto-calibrating eye tracker from user interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5169--5179.
[38]
Michael Xuelin Huang, Jiajia Li, Grace Ngai, and Hong Va Leong. 2016b. Stressclick: Sensing stress from gaze-click patterns. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 1395--1404.
[39]
Michael Xuelin Huang, Jiajia Li, Grace Ngai, and Hong Va Leong. 2017. Screenglint: Practical, in-situ gaze estimation on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2546--2557.
[40]
J Thomas Hutton, JA Nagel, and Ruth B Loewenson. 1984. Eye tracking dysfunction in Alzheimer-type dementia. Neurology, Vol. 34, 1 (1984), 99--99.
[41]
Swati Jindal and Roberto Manduchi. 2022. Contrastive Representation Learning for Gaze Estimation.
[42]
Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan, Brendan Avent, Aurélien Bellet, Mehdi Bennis, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji, K. A. Bonawitz, Zachary Charles, Graham Cormode, Rachel Cummings, Rafael G.L. D'Oliveira, Salim El Rouayheb, David Evans, Josh Gardner, Zachary Garrett, Adrià Gascón, Badih Ghazi, Phillip B. Gibbons, Marco Gruteser, Zaid Harchaoui, Chaoyang He, Lie He, Zhouyuan Huo, Ben Hutchinson, Justin Hsu, Martin Jaggi, Tara Javidi, Gauri Joshi, Mikhail Khodak, Jakub Kone?ný, Aleksandra Korolova, Farinaz Koushanfar, Sanmi Koyejo, Tancrède Lepoint, Yang Liu, Prateek Mittal, Mehryar Mohri, Richard Nock, Ayfer Özgür, Rasmus Pagh, Mariana Raykova, Hang Qi, Daniel Ramage, Ramesh Raskar, Dawn Song, Weikang Song, Sebastian U. Stich, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Florian Tramèr, Praneeth Vepakomma, Jianyu Wang, Li Xiong, Zheng Xu, Qiang Yang, Felix X. Yu, Han Yu, and Sen Zhao. 2019. Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04977
[43]
Marcel Keller. 2020. MP-SPDZ: A versatile framework for multi-party computation. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 1575--1590.
[44]
Marcel Keller, Valerio Pastro, and Dragos Rotaru. 2018. Overdrive: making SPDZ great again. In Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Springer, 158--189.
[45]
Daniel Kifer and Ashwin Machanavajjhala. 2011. No free lunch in data privacy. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. 193--204.
[46]
Joohwan Kim, Michael Stengel, Alexander Majercik, Shalini De Mello, David Dunn, Samuli Laine, Morgan McGuire, and David Luebke. 2019. Nvgaze: An anatomically-informed dataset for low-latency, near-eye gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--12.
[47]
Ron Kohavi and George H John. 1995. Automatic parameter selection by minimizing estimated error. In Machine Learning Proceedings 1995. Elsevier, 304--312.
[48]
Kyle Krafka, Aditya Khosla, Petr Kellnhofer, Harini Kannan, Suchendra Bhandarkar, Wojciech Matusik, and Antonio Torralba. 2016. Eye tracking for everyone. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2176--2184.
[49]
Jing Li, Zejin Chen, Yihao Zhong, Hak-Keung Lam, Junxia Han, Gaoxiang Ouyang, Xiaoli Li, and Honghai Liu. 2022. Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation for ASD Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics (2022).
[50]
Jingjie Li, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Kassem Fawaz, and Younghyun Kim. 2021. $$Kal$varepsilon$ido$$:$$Real-Time$$ Privacy Control for $$Eye-Tracking$$ Systems. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium. 1793--1810.
[51]
Jiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, and Bruno Ribeiro. 2020. Membership inference attacks and defenses in supervised learning via generalization gap. ArXiv, Vol. abs/2002.12062 (2020).
[52]
Ke Liang, Youssef Chahir, Michele Molina, Charles Tijus, and Francc ois Jouen. 2013. Appearance-based gaze tracking with spectral clustering and semi-supervised gaussian process regression. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa. 17--23.
[53]
Ao Liu, Lirong Xia, Andrew Duchowski, Reynold Bailey, Kenneth Holmqvist, and Eakta Jain. 2019. Differential privacy for eye-tracking data. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. 1--10.
[54]
Jian Liu, Mika Juuti, Yao Lu, and Nadarajah Asokan. 2017. Oblivious neural network predictions via minionn transformations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 619--631.
[55]
Pengrui Liu, Xiangrui Xu, and Wei Wang. 2022b. Threats, attacks and defenses to federated learning: issues, taxonomy and perspectives. Cybersecurity, Vol. 5, 1 (2022), 1--19.
[56]
Yugeng Liu, Rui Wen, Xinlei He, Ahmed Salem, Zhikun Zhang, Michael Backes, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Mario Fritz, and Yang Zhang. 2022a. $$ML-Doctor$$: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22). 4525--4542.
[57]
Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Aguera y Arcas. 2017. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR, 1273--1282.
[58]
Luca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2019. Exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning. In 2019 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP). IEEE, 691--706.
[59]
Payman Mohassel and Peter Rindal. 2018. ABY3: A mixed protocol framework for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security. 35--52.
[60]
Payman Mohassel and Yupeng Zhang. 2017. Secureml: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. In 2017 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP). IEEE, 19--38.
[61]
Carlos Hitoshi Morimoto, Arnon Amir, and Myron Flickner. 2002. Detecting eye position and gaze from a single camera and 2 light sources. In 2002 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 4. IEEE, 314--317.
[62]
Thien Duc Nguyen, Phillip Rieger, Roberta De Viti, Huili Chen, Björn B Brandenburg, Hossein Yalame, Helen Möllering, Hossein Fereidooni, Samuel Marchal, Markus Miettinen, et al. 2022. $$FLAME$$: Taming backdoors in federated learning. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22). 1415--1432.
[63]
Kobbi Nissim, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Adam Smith. 2007. Smooth sensitivity and sampling in private data analysis. In ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. 75--84.
[64]
Lucas Paletta, Martin Pszeida, Amir Dini, Silvia Russegger, Sandra Schuessler, Anna Jos, Eva Schuster, Josef Steiner, and Maria Fellner. 2020. MIRA--A Gaze-based Serious Game for Continuous Estimation of Alzheimer's Mental State. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 1--3.
[65]
Jiawei Qin, Takuru Shimoyama, Xucong Zhang, and Yusuke Sugano. 2023. Domain-Adaptive Full-Face Gaze Estimation via Novel-View-Synthesis and Feature Disentanglement. arxiv: 2305.16140 [cs.CV]
[66]
Mayank Rathee, Conghao Shen, Sameer Wagh, and Raluca Ada Popa. 2023. Elsa: Secure aggregation for federated learning with malicious actors. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 1961--1979.
[67]
Sashank Reddi, Zachary Charles, Manzil Zaheer, Zachary Garrett, Keith Rush, Jakub Konevc nỳ, Sanjiv Kumar, and H Brendan McMahan. 2020. Adaptive federated optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00295 (2020).
[68]
Bita Darvish Rouhani, M Sadegh Riazi, and Farinaz Koushanfar. 2018. Deepsecure: Scalable provably-secure deep learning. In Proceedings of the 55th annual design automation conference. 1--6.
[69]
Ahmed Salem, Apratim Bhattacharya, Michael Backes, Mario Fritz, and Yang Zhang. 2020. $$Updates-Leak$$: Data set inference and reconstruction attacks in online learning. In 29th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 20). 1291--1308.
[70]
Negar Sammaknejad, Hamidreza Pouretemad, Changiz Eslahchi, Alireza Salahirad, and Ashkan Alinejad. 2017. Gender classification based on eye movements: A processing effect during passive face viewing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 13, 3 (2017), 232.
[71]
Reza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, and Vitaly Shmatikov. 2017. Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In IEEE S&P. 3--18.
[72]
Brian A Smith, Qi Yin, Steven K Feiner, and Shree K Nayar. 2013. Gaze locking: passive eye contact detection for human-object interaction. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 271--280.
[73]
Julian Steil and Andreas Bulling. 2015. Discovery of everyday human activities from long-term visual behaviour using topic models. In Proceedings of the 2015 acm international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 75--85.
[74]
Julian Steil, Inken Hagestedt, Michael Xuelin Huang, and Andreas Bulling. 2019. Privacy-aware eye tracking using differential privacy. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. 1--9.
[75]
Yusuke Sugano, Yasuyuki Matsushita, and Yoichi Sato. 2014. Learning-by-synthesis for appearance-based 3d gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1821--1828.
[76]
Marc Tonsen, Julian Steil, Yusuke Sugano, and Andreas Bulling. 2017. Invisibleeye: Mobile eye tracking using multiple low-resolution cameras and learning-based gaze estimation. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 1, 3 (2017), 1--21.
[77]
Marc Tonsen, Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, and Andreas Bulling. 2016. Labelled Pupils in the Wild: A Dataset for Studying Pupil Detection in Unconstrained Environments. In Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (Charleston, South Carolina) (ETRA '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139--142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857491.2857520
[78]
Roberto Valenti, Nicu Sebe, and Theo Gevers. 2011. Combining head pose and eye location information for gaze estimation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 21, 2 (2011), 802--815.
[79]
Roel Vertegaal et al. 2003. Attentive user interfaces. Commun. ACM, Vol. 46, 3 (2003), 30--33.
[80]
Mika Westerlund. 2019. The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology innovation management review, Vol. 9, 11 (2019).
[81]
Erroll Wood, Tadas Baltruvs aitis, Louis-Philippe Morency, Peter Robinson, and Andreas Bulling. 2016a. A 3D Morphable Eye Region Model for Gaze Estimation. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 297--313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--46448-0_18
[82]
Erroll Wood, Tadas Baltruvs aitis, Louis-Philippe Morency, Peter Robinson, and Andreas Bulling. 2016b. Learning an appearance-based gaze estimator from one million synthesised images. In Proc. ACM International Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA). 131--138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857491.2857492
[83]
Xi Wu, Matthew Fredrikson, Somesh Jha, and Jeffrey F Naughton. 2016. A methodology for formalizing model-inversion attacks. In 2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF). IEEE, 355--370.
[84]
Dingdong Yang, Seunghoon Hong, Yunseok Jang, Tianchen Zhao, and Honglak Lee. 2019. Diversity-sensitive conditional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09024 (2019).
[85]
Kun Yu, Shlomo Berkovsky, Ronnie Taib, Dan Conway, Jianlong Zhou, and Fang Chen. 2017. User Trust Dynamics: An Investigation Driven by Differences in System Performance. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 307--317. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025219
[86]
Yu Yu and Jean-Marc Odobez. 2020. Unsupervised representation learning for gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7314--7324.
[87]
Xucong Zhang, Michael Xuelin Huang, Yusuke Sugano, and Andreas Bulling. 2018. Training Person-Specific Gaze Estimators from Interactions with Multiple Devices. In Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174198
[88]
Xucong Zhang, Seonwook Park, Thabo Beeler, Derek Bradley, Siyu Tang, and Otmar Hilliges. 2020b. Eth-xgaze: A large scale dataset for gaze estimation under extreme head pose and gaze variation. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 365--381.
[89]
Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, and Andreas Bulling. 2017b. Everyday eye contact detection using unsupervised gaze target discovery. In Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. 193--203.
[90]
Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. 2015. Appearance-based Gaze Estimation in the Wild. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 4511--4520. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299081
[91]
Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. 2017c. It's written all over your face: Full-face appearance-based gaze estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 51--60.
[92]
Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. 2019. MPIIGaze: Real-World Dataset and Deep Appearance-Based Gaze Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI), Vol. 41, 1 (2019), 162--175. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2778103
[93]
Yuheng Zhang, Ruoxi Jia, Hengzhi Pei, Wenxiao Wang, Bo Li, and Dawn Song. 2020a. The secret revealer: Generative model-inversion attacks against deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 253--261.
[94]
Zhifei Zhang, Yang Song, and Hairong Qi. 2017a. Age progression/regression by conditional adversarial autoencoder. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5810--5818.
[95]
Bo Zhao, Konda Reddy Mopuri, and Hakan Bilen. 2020. idlg: Improved deep leakage from gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.02610 (2020).
Index Terms
- PrivatEyes: Appearance-based Gaze Estimation Using Federated Secure Multi-Party Computation
Recommendations
Secure Multi-Party Computation without Agreement
It has recently been shown that authenticated Byzantine agreement, in which more than a third of the parties are corrupted, cannot be securely realized under concurrent or parallel (stateless) composition. This result puts into question any usage of ...
An efficient fair UC-secure protocol for two-party computation
With the development of modern Internet and mobile networks, there is an increasing need for collaborative privacy-preserving applications. Secure multi-party computation SMPC gives a general solution to these applications and has become a hot topic. ...
Leveraging the "Multi" in secure multi-party computation
WPES '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic societySecure Multi-Party Computation enables parties with private data to collaboratively compute a global function of their private data, without revealing that data. The increase in sensitive data on networked computers, along with improved ability to ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 28 May 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue ETRA
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 100Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)100
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in