Corpus Summarization and Exploration using Multi-Mosaics
Article No.: 81, Pages 1 - 3
Abstract
In fields such as translation studies and computational linguistics, various tools are used to analyze the content of text corpora, and extract keywords and other entities for analysis. Concordancing – arranging passages of text corpus in alphabetical order of user-defined keywords – is one of most widely used forms of text analysis. This paper describes Multi-Mosaics, a tool for text analysis using multiple implicitly linked Concordance Mosaic visualisations. Multi-Mosaics supports examining linguistic relationships within the context windows surrounding multiple extracted keywords.
References
[1]
Mona Baker. 1993. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair 233 (1993), 250.
[2]
Mona Baker. 2020. Rehumanizing the migrant: the translated past as a resource for refashioning the contemporary discourse of the (radical) left. Palgrave Communications 6, 1 (2020), 1–16.
[3]
S. Bernardini and D. Kenny. 2020. Corpora. In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies, M. Bake and G. Saldanha (Eds.). Routledge, 110–115. In press.
[4]
Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3 Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec. 2011), 2301–2309.
[5]
Jan Buts. 2020. Community and authority in ROAR Magazine. Palgrave Communications 6, 1 (2020), 1–12.
[6]
Jan Buts, Mona Baker, Saturnino Luz, and Eivind Engebretsen. 2021. Epistemologies of evidence-based medicine: a plea for corpus-based conceptual research in the medical humanities. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy(2021), 1–12.
[7]
Jinho Choi and Yong-Sik Hwang. 2014. Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 83 (2014), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.004
[8]
Chris Culy and Verena Lyding. 2010. Double Tree: An Advanced KWIC Visualization for Expert Users. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2010 14th International Conference. 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2010.24
[9]
Chris Culy and Verena Lyding. 2011. Corpus Clouds - Facilitating Text Analysis by Means of Visualizations. In Human Language Technology. Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6562. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20095-3_32
[10]
Cristian Felix, Steven Franconeri, and Enrico Bertini. 2018. Taking Word Clouds Apart: An Empirical Investigation of the Design Space for Keyword Summaries. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1(2018), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2746018
[11]
Petra Isenberg, Tobias Isenberg, Michael Sedlmair, Jian Chen, and Torsten Möller. 2017. Visualization as Seen through its Research Paper Keywords. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1(2017), 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598827
[12]
Stefan Jänicke and Gerik Scheuermann. 2017. On the Visualization of Hierarchical Relations and Tree Structures with TagSpheres. In Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, José Braz, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, Paul Richard, Lars Linsen, Alexandru Telea, Sebastiano Battiato, and Francisco Imai (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 199–219.
[13]
Huajiao Li, Haizhong An, Yue Wang, Jiachen Huang, and Xiangyun Gao. 2016. Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 450 (2016), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.017
[14]
H. P. Luhn. 1960. Key word-in-context index for technical literature (kwic index). American Documentation 11, 4 (1960), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090110403
[15]
Saturnino Luz and Shane Sheehan. 2014. A Graph Based Abstraction of Textual Concordances and Two Renderings for their Interactive Visualisation. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Como, Italy) (AVI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2598187
[16]
Saturnino Luz and Shane Sheehan. 2020. Methods and visualization tools for the analysis of medical, political and scientific concepts in Genealogies of Knowledge. Palgrave Communications 6, 1 (2020), 1–20.
[17]
Ben Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307
[18]
Jan Svartvik. 2011. Directions in corpus linguistics: proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82 Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991. Vol. 65. Walter de Gruyter.
[19]
Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg. 2008. Tag clouds and the case for vernacular visualization. Interactions 15, 4 (2008), 49–52.
[20]
Martin Wattenberg and Fernanda B Viégas. 2008. The word tree, an interactive visual concordance. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6(2008), 1221–1228.
Recommendations
An automatic non-English sentiment lexicon builder using unannotated corpus
Sentiment lexicons in the English language are widely accessible while in many other languages, these resources are extremely deficient. Current techniques and methods for sentiment analysis focus mainly on the English language, whereas other languages ...
Using frames to disambiguate prepositions
In natural language processing (NLP), disambiguation is the procedure used to solve name conflicts of polysemic concepts (different meanings); in fact, phrase disambiguation is a problem not totally solved in NLP. Several disambiguation types exist; for ...
Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora
HLT '01: Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology researchThis paper describes a system and set of algorithms for automatically inducing stand-alone monolingual part-of-speech taggers, base noun-phrase bracketers, named-entity taggers and morphological analyzers for an arbitrary foreign language. Case studies ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2022
414 pages
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 06 June 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Demonstration
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
AVI 2022
AVI 2022: International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
June 6 - 10, 2022
Frascati, Rome, Italy
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 43Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)7
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format