[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3514094.3534149acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Diversity by Design?: Balancing the Inclusion and Protection of Users in an Online Social Platform

Published: 27 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The unreflected promotion of diversity as a value in social interactions --- including in technology-mediated ones --- risks emphasizing the benefits of inclusion without recognizing the potential harm of failing to protect vulnerable individuals or account for the empowerment of marginalized groups. Adopting the position that technology is not value-neutral, we seek to answer the question of how technology-mediated social platforms can accommodate diversity by design by balancing the often tension-ridden principles of protection and inclusion. In this paper, we present our research program, developed strategy, as well as first analyses and results. Building on approaches from scenario analysis and Value Sensitive Design, we identify key arguments for a "diversity by design''-agenda. Furthermore, we discuss how these arguments can be operationalized and implemented in a diversity-aware chatbot and provide a critical reflection on the limits and drawbacks of the proposed approach.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (10.1145:3514094.3534149.mp4)
The unreflected promotion of diversity as a value in social interactions - including in technology-mediated ones - risks emphasizing the benefits of inclusion without recognizing the potential harm of failing to protect vulnerable individuals or account for the empowerment of marginalized groups. Adopting the position that technology is not value-neutral, we seek to answer the question of how technology-mediated social platforms can accommodate diversity by design by balancing the often tension-ridden principles of protection and inclusion. In this paper, we present our research program, developed strategy, as well as first analyses and results. Building on approaches from scenario analysis and Value Sensitive Design, we identify key arguments for a "diversity by design"-agenda. Furthermore, we discuss how these arguments can be operationalized and implemented in a diversity-aware chatbot and provide a critical reflection on the limits and drawbacks of the proposed approach.

References

[1]
Himan Abdollahpouri. 2019. Popularity Bias in Ranking and Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Vincent Conitzer, Gillian Hadfield, and Shannon Vallor (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 529--530. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314309
[2]
Regine Bendl, Edeltraud Hanappi-Egger, and Roswitha Hofmann. 2012. Diversität und Diversitätsmanagement (1. aufl. ed.). Utb-studi-e-book, Vol. 3519. UTB GmbH, Stuttgart.
[3]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (1. edition ed.). Polity.
[4]
Wiebe Bijker. 2017. Constructing Worlds: Reflections on Science, Technology and Democracy (and a Plea for Bold Modesty). Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3 (2017), 315--331. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.170
[5]
Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[6]
Axel Bruns. 2019. Filter Bubble. Internet Policy Review 8, 4 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426
[7]
Manuel Castells. 2009. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I (2. edition ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
[8]
Nicole Chi, Emma Lurie, and Deirdre K. Mulligan. 2021. Reconfiguring Diversity and Inclusion for AI Ethics. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/11952.107 arXiv:2105.02407
[9]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. The MIT Press.
[10]
Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1988. Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law. Harvard Law Review 101, 7 (1988), 1331--1387.
[11]
Jessie Daniels. 2009. Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham and Boulder and New York and Toronto and Plymouth, UK.
[12]
Marco Dean. 2019. Scenario Planning: A Literature Review. https://www.doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.12629.24802 (2019).
[13]
Phan Minh Dung. 1995. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 2 (Sept. 1995), 321--357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004- 3702(94)00041-X
[14]
Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (illustrated edition ed.). St Martin's Press.
[15]
European Commission. 1999. The EU Values. https://ec.europa.eu/componentlibrary/ eu/about/eu-values/
[16]
Berenice Fisher and Joan Tronto. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives (1990), 35--62.
[17]
Luciano Floridi. 2010. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Rainer Forst. 2013. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051200
[19]
Batya Friedman and David Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[20]
Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, 3 (1996), 330--347. https://doi.org/10. 1145/230538.230561
[21]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media (illustrated edition ed.). Yale University Press.
[22]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2020. Content Moderation, AI, and the Question of Scale. Big Data and Society 7, 2 (July 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234
[23]
Robert Gorwa, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. Algorithmic Content Moderation: Technical and Political Challenges in the Automation of Platform Governance. Big Data and Society 7, 1 (2020), 1--15.
[24]
Mary L. Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
[25]
Natali Helberger. 2019. On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders. Digital Journalism 7, 8 (2019), 993--1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1623700
[26]
Paula Helm. 2017. What Can Self-Organised Group Therapy Teach Us About Anonymity? Ephemera. Theory and Politics in Organization 17/2 (2017), 327--350.
[27]
Paula Helm. 2018. Treating Sensitive Topics Online: A Privacy Dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology 20, 4 (Dec. 2018), 303--313. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10676-018--9482--4
[28]
Antonis C. Kakas and Loizos Michael. 2016. Cognitive Systems: Argument and Cognition. IEEE Intelligent Informatics Bulletin 17, 1 (2016), 14--20.
[29]
Cory Knobel and Geoffrey C. Bowker. 2011. Values in Design. Commun. ACM 54, 7 (2011), 26--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/1965724.1965735
[30]
John Law. 2007. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, London.
[31]
Karen Lumsden and Emily Harmer. 2019. Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--12633--9
[32]
Scott M. Lundberg and Su-In Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 4768--4777.
[33]
Catharine A. MacKinnon. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press.
[34]
Ishani Maitri. 2009. Silencing Speech. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39, 2 (2009), 309--338. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.0.0050
[35]
Loizos Michael. 2016. Cognitive Reasoning and Learning Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 4th International BICAWorkshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition (CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1895). New York City, New York, U.S.A., 2--23.
[36]
Loizos Michael. 2019. Machine Coaching. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Macao SAR, P.R. China, 80--86.
[37]
Loizos Michael. 2020. Machine Ethics through Machine Coaching. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop in Implementing Machine Ethics.
[38]
Loizos Michael. 2021. Explainability and the Fourth AI Revolution. CoRR abs/2111.06773 (2021). arXiv:2111.06773
[39]
Loizos Michael and Leslie G. Valiant. 2008. A First Experimental Demonstration of Massive Knowledge Infusion. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Gerhard Brewka and Jérôme Lang (Eds.). AAAI Press, Sydney, Australia, 378--389.
[40]
George A. Miller. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (1995), 39--41.
[41]
Linda Monsees. 2021. Information Disorder, Fake News and the Future of Democracy. Globalizations (2021), 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1927470
[42]
Lisa P. Nathan, Predrag V. Klasnja, and Batya Friedman. 2007. Value Scenarios: A Technique for Envisioning Systemic Effects of New Technologies. In Proceedings of the CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2585--2590. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241046
[43]
Cathy O'Neil. 2017. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (1st edition ed.). Penguin Books UK.
[44]
Eli Pariser. 2012. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. Penguin Books, London.
[45]
Maya Ranganathan. 2019. Re-Scripting the Nation in "Post Truth' Era: The Indian Story. Asian Ethnicity (2019), 1--15.
[46]
Andreas Reckwitz. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices. European Journal of Social Theory 5, 2 (2002), 243--263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
[47]
Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?" Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1135--1144.
[48]
Sarah T. Roberts. 2019. Behind the Screen. Yale University Press.
[49]
Laura Schelenz, Matteo Busso, Ivano Bison, Amalia de Götzen, Daniel Gatica- Perez, Fausto Giunchiglia, Lakmal Meegahapola, and Salvador Ruiz-Correa. 2021. The Theory, Practice, and Ethical Challenges of Designing a Diversity-Aware Platform for Social Relations. In Proceedings of the 4th AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462595
[50]
Paul J. H. Schoemaker. 1995. Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. HMIT Sloan Management Review 36, 2 (1995).
[51]
M. S. Silberman, B. Tomlinson, R. LaPlante, J. Ross, L. Irani, and A. Zaldivar. 2018. Responsible Research with Crowds: Pay Crowdworkers at Least Minimum Wage. Commun. ACM 61, 3 (2018), 39--41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180492
[52]
Robyn Speer, Joshua Chin, and Catherine Havasi. 2017. ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4444--4451.
[53]
Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. YAGO: A Core of Semantic Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (Banff, Alberta, Canada). New York, NY, USA, 697--706.
[54]
Charles Taylor. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Duke University Press.
[55]
Charles Taylor. 2007. A Secular Age. Harvard University Press.
[56]
Alexander Tischbirek. 2017. Die Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung (1 ed.). Studien und Beiträge zum Öffentlichen Recht, Vol. 35. Mohr Siebeck. X, 239 pages.
[57]
Efthymia Tsamoura, Timothy M. Hospedales, and Loizos Michael. 2021. Neural- Symbolic Integration: A Compositional Perspective. In Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 5051--5060.
[58]
Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. 2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press.
[59]
UNESCO. 2005. The Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. https://en.unesco.org/creativity/convention (2005).
[60]
Tommaso Venturini. 2019. From Fake to Junk News: The Data Politics of Online Virality. In Data Politics. Routledge, 123--144.
[61]
Steven Vertovec. 2012. "Diversity" and the Social Imaginary. European Journal of Sociology 53, 3 (2012), 287--312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000397561200015X
[62]
Jeremy Waldron. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[63]
Michael Walzer. 1984. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books, New York.
[64]
WeNet: The Internet of Us. 2022. Project Page: https://www.internetofus.eu/.
[65]
Jamie Woodcock and Mark Graham. 2020. The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction (1 ed.). Polity.
[66]
Michael J. Zimmerman and Ben Bradley. 2019. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). Stanford University.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Disclosing Diverse Perspectives of News Articles for Navigating between Online Journalism ContentProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685414(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)My Future with My Chatbot: A Scenario-Driven, User-Centric Approach to Anticipating AI ImpactsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659026(2071-2085)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Tackling Language Modelling Bias in Support of Linguistic DiversityProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658925(562-572)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AIES '22: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
July 2022
939 pages
ISBN:9781450392471
DOI:10.1145/3514094
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. content moderation
  2. design
  3. diversity
  4. ethics
  5. inclusion
  6. intervention
  7. matching algorithms
  8. norms
  9. platform technology
  10. protection
  11. social media

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

AIES '22
Sponsor:
AIES '22: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
May 19 - 21, 2021
Oxford, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 61 of 162 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)53
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Disclosing Diverse Perspectives of News Articles for Navigating between Online Journalism ContentProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685414(1-14)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)My Future with My Chatbot: A Scenario-Driven, User-Centric Approach to Anticipating AI ImpactsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659026(2071-2085)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Tackling Language Modelling Bias in Support of Linguistic DiversityProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3658925(562-572)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injusticeEthics and Information Technology10.1007/s10676-023-09742-626:1Online publication date: 27-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Diversity and neocolonialism in Big Data research: Avoiding extractivism while struggling with paternalismBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951723120680210:2Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Re-assessing hotel room performance before and during the pandemicJournal of Vacation Marketing10.1177/13567667231211349Online publication date: 7-Nov-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media