[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3511808.3557103acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hierarchically Constrained Adaptive Ad Exposure in Feeds

Published: 17 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

A contemporary feed application usually provides blended results of organic items and sponsored items~(ads) to users. Conventionally, ads are exposed at fixed positions. Such a fixed ad exposure strategy is inefficient due to ignoring users' personalized preferences towards ads. To this end,adaptive ad exposure is becoming an appealing strategy to boost the overall performance of the feed. However, existing approaches to implement the adaptive ad exposure strategy suffer from several limitations: 1) they usually fall into sub-optimal solutions because of only focusing on request-level optimization without consideration of the application-level performance and constraints, 2) they neglect the necessity of keeping the game-theoretical properties of ad auctions, and 3) they can hardly be deployed in large-scale applications due to high computational complexity. In this paper, we focus on the application-level performance optimization under hierarchical constraints in feeds and formulate adaptive ad exposure as a Dynamic Knapsack Problem. We propose Hierarchically Constrained Adaptive Ad Exposure~(HCA2E) that possesses the desirable game-theoretical properties, computational efficiency, and performance robustness. Comprehensive offline and online experiments on a leading e-commerce application demonstrate the performance superiority of HCA2E.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (CIKM22-app119.mp4)
Hierarchically Constrained Adaptive Ad Exposure in Feeds

References

[1]
Gagan Aggarwal, S Muthukrishnan, Dávid Pál, and Martin Pál. 2009. General auction mechanism for search advertising. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. 241--250.
[2]
Andrei Broder, Massimiliano Ciaramita, Marcus Fontoura, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Vanja Josifovski, Donald Metzler, Vanessa Murdock, and Vassilis Plachouras. 2008. To swing or not to swing: learning when (not) to advertise. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on information and knowledge management. 1003--1012.
[3]
Dagui Chen, Junqi Jin, Weinan Zhang, Fei Pan, Lvyin Niu, Chuan Yu, Jun Wang, Han Li, Jian Xu, and Kun Gai. 2019. Learning to Advertise for Organic Traffic Maximization in E-Commerce Product Feeds. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2527--2535.
[4]
GB Dantzig. 1955. Discrete variable extremum problems. In JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF AMERICA, Vol. 3. 560--560.
[5]
Deniz Dizdar, Alex Gershkov, and Benny Moldovanu. 2011. Revenue maximization in the dynamic knapsack problem. Theoretical Economics, Vol. 6, 2 (2011), 157--184.
[6]
Sahin Cem Geyik, Sergey Faleev, Jianqiang Shen, Sean O'Donnell, and Santanu Kolay. 2016. Joint optimization of multiple performance metrics in online video advertising. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 471--480.
[7]
Tore Hagglund and Karl J Astrom. 1995. PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society (1995).
[8]
Xiaotian Hao, Zhaoqing Peng, Yi Ma, Guan Wang, Junqi Jin, Jianye Hao, Shan Chen, Rongquan Bai, Mingzhou Xie, Miao Xu, et al. 2020. Dynamic knapsack optimization towards efficient multi-channel sequential advertising. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4060--4070.
[9]
Junqi Jin, Chengru Song, Han Li, Kun Gai, Jun Wang, and Weinan Zhang. 2018. Real-time bidding with multi-agent reinforcement learning in display advertising. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2193--2201.
[10]
Guogang Liao, Ze Wang, Xiaoxu Wu, Xiaowen Shi, Chuheng Zhang, Yongkang Wang, Xingxing Wang, and Dong Wang. 2021. Cross DQN: Cross Deep Q Network for Ads Allocation in Feed. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04353 (2021).
[11]
Xi Lin, Hui-Ling Zhen, Zhenhua Li, Qing-Fu Zhang, and Sam Kwong. 2019. Pareto multi-task learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 32 (2019), 12060--12070.
[12]
Xiangyu Liu, Chuan Yu, Zhilin Zhang, Zhenzhe Zheng, Yu Rong, Hongtao Lv, Da Huo, Yiqing Wang, Dagui Chen, Jian Xu, Fan Wu, Guihai Chen, and Xiaoqiang Zhu. 2021. Neural Auction: End-to-End Learning of Auction Mechanisms for E-Commerce Advertising. In KDD '21, Singapore. ACM, 3354--3364.
[13]
Roger B Myerson. 1981. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of operations research, Vol. 6, 1 (1981), 58--73.
[14]
Hamid Nazerzadeh, Amin Saberi, and Rakesh Vohra. 2013. Dynamic pay-per-action mechanisms and applications to online advertising. Operations Research, Vol. 61, 1 (2013), 98--111.
[15]
Harvey M Salkin and Cornelis A De Kluyver. 1975. The knapsack problem: a survey. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 22, 1 (1975), 127--144.
[16]
Volker Steinbiss, Bach-Hiep Tran, and Hermann Ney. 1994. Improvements in beam search. In Third international conference on spoken language processing.
[17]
Richard S Sutton and Andrew G Barto. 2018. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT press.
[18]
Martijn Van Otterlo and Marco Wiering. 2012. Reinforcement learning and markov decision processes. In Reinforcement learning. Springer, 3--42.
[19]
William Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance, Vol. 16, 1 (1961), 8--37.
[20]
Bo Wang, Zhaonan Li, Jie Tang, Kuo Zhang, Songcan Chen, and Liyun Ru. 2011. Learning to advertise: how many ads are enough?. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 506--518.
[21]
Weixun Wang, Junqi Jin, Jianye Hao, Chunjie Chen, Chuan Yu, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, Xiaotian Hao, Yixi Wang, Han Li, et al. 2019. Learning Adaptive Display Exposure for Real-Time Advertising. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2595--2603.
[22]
Christopher A Wilkens, Ruggiero Cavallo, and Rad Niazadeh. 2017. GSP: the cinderella of mechanism design. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 25--32.
[23]
Jinyun Yan, Zhiyuan Xu, Birjodh Tiwana, and Shaunak Chatterjee. 2020. Ads Allocation in Feed via Constrained Optimization. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3386--3394.
[24]
Weiru Zhang, Chao Wei, Xiaonan Meng, Yi Hu, and Hao Wang. 2018. The whole-page optimization via dynamic ad allocation. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018. 1407--1411.
[25]
Zhilin Zhang, Xiangyu Liu, Zhenzhe Zheng, Chenrui Zhang, Miao Xu, Junwei Pan, Chuan Yu, Fan Wu, Jian Xu, and Kun Gai. 2021. Optimizing Multiple Performance Metrics with Deep GSP Auctions for E-commerce Advertising. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 993--1001.
[26]
Xiangyu Zhao, Changsheng Gu, Haoshenglun Zhang, Xiwang Yang, Xiaobing Liu, Hui Liu, and Jiliang Tang. 2021. DEAR: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Advertising Impression in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 750--758.
[27]
Xiangyu Zhao, Xudong Zheng, Xiwang Yang, Xiaobing Liu, and Jiliang Tang. 2020. Jointly learning to recommend and advertise. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3319--3327.
[28]
Han Zhu, Junqi Jin, Chang Tan, Fei Pan, Yifan Zeng, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2017. Optimized cost per click in taobao display advertising. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2191--2200.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Deep Automated Mechanism Design for Integrating Ad Auction and Allocation in FeedProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657774(1211-1220)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Ad vs Organic: Revisiting Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design in E-commerce PlatformsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645638(235-244)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2023)PIER: Permutation-Level Interest-Based End-to-End Re-ranking Framework in E-commerceProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599886(4823-4831)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Hierarchically Constrained Adaptive Ad Exposure in Feeds

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2022
    5274 pages
    ISBN:9781450392365
    DOI:10.1145/3511808
    • General Chairs:
    • Mohammad Al Hasan,
    • Li Xiong
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive ad exposure
    2. dynamic knapsack problem
    3. hierarchically constrained optimization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Science and Technology Innovation 2030 ''New Generation Artificial Intelligence" Major Project
    • China NSF grant
    • Shanghai Science and Technology fund

    Conference

    CIKM '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 621 of 2,257 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Deep Automated Mechanism Design for Integrating Ad Auction and Allocation in FeedProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657774(1211-1220)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Ad vs Organic: Revisiting Incentive Compatible Mechanism Design in E-commerce PlatformsProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645638(235-244)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2023)PIER: Permutation-Level Interest-Based End-to-End Re-ranking Framework in E-commerceProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599886(4823-4831)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
    • (2023)LOVF: Layered Organic View Fusion for Click-through Rate Prediction in Online AdvertisingProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3592014(2139-2143)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media