More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Online Assessment and COVID: Opportunities and Challenges

Authors:

Sander J.J. Leemans,

Regina Berretta,

Ayse Aysin Bilgin,

Lakmali Jayarathna,

Judy SheardAuthors Info & Claims

ACE '22: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference

Pages 27 - 35

https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511865

Published: 14 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

As higher education moved abruptly online in response to COVID-19, it necessarily swept assessment along with it. Assessment has long been the subject of debate, particularly in the context of ensuring that the people being awarded the grades are those who actually did the work. While some universities have moved away from rigidly authenticated assessment, trusting the students to behave with integrity, others see value in ensuring that they assess the right people. This paper reports on interviews with a dozen leading computing educators in Australia, and finds that the move online brought by the pandemic has highlighted both of these positions. Some academics do indeed trust their students to behave with complete integrity and see no need to supervise or authenticate the students’ submitted work. Others strive to ensure integrity as long as all assessment remains online and unsupervised, and are desperate to return to invigilated formal examinations. We endeavour to find common ground in these positions, and discuss the likelihood of a sustainable future for assessment in computing education.

References

[1]

ACS. 2021. ACS Accreditation Manual – Volume 2: Accreditation Criteria. Australian Computer Society.

[2]

Alexander W Astin and Anthony Lising Antonio. 2012. Assessment for Excellence: the Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

[3]

Tracey Bretag. 2017. Good practice note: addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. https://doi.org/latest-news/publications/good-practice-note-addressing-contract-cheating-safeguard-academic

[4]

Tracey Bretag, Saadia Mahmud, Margaret Wallace, Ruth Walker, Colin James, Margaret Green, Julianne East, Ursula McGowan, and Lee Patridge. 2011. Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity 7, 2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v7i2.759

[5]

Kathryn Bridson and Scott D Fleming. 2021. Frequent, timed coding tests for training and assessment of full-stack web development skills: an experience report. In 52nd Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE 2021). 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432549

Digital Library

[6]

Peter Busch and Ayse Bilgin. 2014. Student and staff understanding and reaction: academic integrity in an Australian university. Journal of Academic Ethics 12, 3 (2014), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9214-2

[7]

Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2014. Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, 1947–1952.

[8]

Guy J Curtis, Margot McNeill, Christine Slade, Kell Tremayne, Rowena Harper, Kiata Rundle, and Ruth Greenaway. 2021. Moving beyond self-reports to estimate the prevalence of commercial contract cheating: an Australian study. Studies in Higher Education(2021), 1–13.

[9]

Seife Dendir and R Stockton Maxwell. 2020. Cheating in online courses: evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2 (2020), 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033

[10]

Shivangi Dhawan. 2020. Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 49, 1 (2020), 5–22.

[11]

Meena Jha, Simon, Regina Berretta, Ayse Bilgin, Judy Sheard, Lakmali Jayarathna, Sander JJ Leemans, and Trina Myers. 2021. Adaptability of academic integrity procedures and practices in the COVID-19-accelerated transition to online assessment. In 38th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education(ASCILITE 2021).

[12]

Lin Martin. 2021. Teaching and assessment in an online learning environment. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/teaching-assessment-online-learning-environment.pdf?v=1588049307

[13]

Sandy Q Qu and John Dumay. 2011. The qualitative research interview. Qualitative research in accounting & management (2011).

[14]

Alison Reedy, Darius Pfitzner, Laura Rook, and Leonie Ellis. 2021. Responding to the COVID-19 emergency: student and academic staff perceptions of academic integrity in the transition to online exams at three Australian universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity 17, 1 (2021), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9

[15]

James Ribaux, Charles Thevathayan, and Margaret Hamilton. 2021. Improving industry relevance and reducing plagiarism using milestones and video reflections. In 29th International Conference on Information Systems Development(ISD2021). 12 pages.

[16]

Gili Rusak and Lisa Yan. 2021. Unique exams: designing assessments for integrity and fairness. In 52nd Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE 2021). 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432556

Digital Library

[17]

Judy Sheard, Simon, Matthew Butler, Katrina Falkner, Michael Morgan, and Amali Weerasinghe. 2017. Strategies for maintaining academic integrity in first-year computing courses. In 2017 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education(ITiCSE 2017). 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059064

Digital Library

[18]

Simon, Beth Cook, Angela Carbone, Chris Johnson, Chris Lawrence, Mario Minichiello, and Judy Sheard. 2014. How well do academic integrity policies and procedures apply to non-text assessments?. In Sixth International Integrity and Plagiarism Conference(6IIPC). 16 pages.

[19]

Simon, Judy Sheard, Michael Morgan, Andrew Petersen, Amber Settle, Jane Sinclair, Gerry Cross, and Charles Riedesel. 2016. Negotiating the maze of academic integrity in computing education. In ITiCSE 2016 Working Group Reports(ITiCSE-WGR 2016). 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024906.3024910

Digital Library

[20]

Vandana Singh and Alexander Thurman. 2019. How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education 33, 4 (2019), 289–306.

[21]

TEQSA. 2019. Guidance note: academic integrity. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/guidance-note-academic-integrity

[22]

TEQSA. 2021. HESF domain 1: student participation and attainment. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/hesf-domain-1

[23]

TEQSA. 2021. Online learning good practice. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/guidance-note-academic-integrity

[24]

Universities Australia. 2017. UA Academic Integrity Best Practice Principles. Universities Australia. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/UA-Academic-Integrity-Best-Practice-Principles.pdf

Cited By

Sakzad APaul DSheard JBrankovic LSkerritt MLi NMinagar SSimon Billingsley WStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Diverging assessments: What, Why, and ExperiencesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630832(1161-1167)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630832
Aristeidou MCross SRossade KWood CRees TPaci P(2023)Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfactionJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1288840:1(342-359)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12888
Hickman HMcKeown PBell T(2023)Beyond Question Shuffling: Randomization Techniques in Programming Assessment2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342976(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342976
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Online Assessment and COVID: Opportunities and Challenges
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. E-learning
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Academic Integrity and Professional Integrity in Computing Education
ITiCSE '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Certain practices, such as unauthorised collaboration with other students and unreferenced copying from external sources, are generally considered in the educational context to be breaches of academic integrity. This paper explores whether there are ...
A Phenomenological Study of Online Assessment Perceptions of Macao Higher Learning Institutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: :Dual Perspectives of Students and Instructors
ICEDS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies

Online assessment is the key issue of studying online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Often, online assessments are understood as the mirror to face-to-face learning assessments. In fact, online assessment should start from the premise that all ...
An Investigation into Online Assessment Method from Students’ Perspectives
ICMET '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modern Educational Technology

The education sector has changed with the advent and development of the internet. Thanks to the internet, online teaching has spread all over the world and is becoming more and more popular, reflected even more clearly by the COVID-19 pandemic that has ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ACE '22: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference

February 2022

200 pages

ISBN:9781450396431

DOI:10.1145/3511861

Editors:
Judy Sheard
Monash University
,
Paul Denny
The University of Auckland

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 February 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Australian Council of Deans of ICT

Conference

ACE '22

ACE '22: Australasian Computing Education Conference

February 14 - 18, 2022

Virtual Event, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 161 of 359 submissions, 45%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
172
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)30
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sakzad APaul DSheard JBrankovic LSkerritt MLi NMinagar SSimon Billingsley WStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Diverging assessments: What, Why, and ExperiencesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630832(1161-1167)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630832
Aristeidou MCross SRossade KWood CRees TPaci P(2023)Online exams in higher education: Exploring distance learning students' acceptance and satisfactionJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1288840:1(342-359)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12888
Hickman HMcKeown PBell T(2023)Beyond Question Shuffling: Randomization Techniques in Programming Assessment2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342976(1-9)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342976
Nguyen NClark CJoyce CParsons CJuriansz J(2023)Student experience of online exams in professional programs: current issues and future trendsDigital Teaching, Learning and Assessment10.1016/B978-0-323-95500-3.00009-2(161-178)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95500-3.00009-2
Simon Sheard JLuxton-Reilly ASzabo C(2023)Computing Education Research in AustralasiaPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_17(373-394)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_17

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents