GMAP 2022: Workshop on Group Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
Authors: 
Federica Lucia Vinella, 
Amra Delić, Francesco Barile, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Judith MasthoffAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 280 - 282
Abstract
Group modeling adaptation and personalization is an area explored in parallel by two different research communities. On the one hand, the user modeling community focuses on the preferences aggregation problem: how to combine preferences of individuals in a group so as to personalize, adapt, and explain content for this group to consume or experience? On the other hand, the computer-supported collaboration community focuses on the group formation problem: how to construct a group that will work together efficiently to solve a particular task? This area becomes increasingly significant as work becomes more flexible, online, and distributed. The connecting tissue between both communities is the urgent need to design algorithms, whether for recommending group content or group formations, that steer away from top-down algorithmic decision-making, which has proven to stifle user agency and create power inequalities between users and algorithms. The aim of the workshop is, for the first time, to bring together the two communities working on the two sides of Group Recommendations, with an overall goal to rethink group recommendation and shift paradigms from the current algorithm-centric to a user- and group-centric focus.
References
[1]
Ali Alkhatib, Michael S Bernstein, and Margaret Levi. 2017. Examining crowd work and gig work through the historical lens of piecework. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4599–4616.
[2]
David Autor and Elisabeth Reynolds. 2020. The nature of work after the COVID crisis: Too few low-wage jobs. The Hamilton Project, Brookings(2020).
[3]
David Contreras, Maria Salamó, and Ludovico Boratto. 2021. Integrating Collaboration and Leadership in Conversational Group Recommender Systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 39, 4, Article 41 (aug 2021), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462759
[4]
Ana Cristina Costa, C Ashley Fulmer, and Neil R Anderson. 2018. Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39, 2 (2018), 169–184.
[5]
AL Delbecq, Richard Koenig, 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41, 2 (1976), 322–338.
[6]
Amra Delic, Julia Neidhardt, Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, and Francesco Ricci. 2018. An observational user study for group recommender systems in the tourism domain. Information Technology & Tourism 19, 1 (2018), 87–116.
[7]
Amra Delić, Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, and Marko Tkalčič. 2020. Group decision-making and designing group recommender systems. Handbook of e-Tourism(2020), 1–23.
[8]
Dreiza T. Dhaini A, Bouchnak C. 2020. Covid-19 as Accelerator for Digital Transformation and the Rise of the Gig Economy. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/sa/pdf/2020/covid-19-as-accelerator-of-digital-transformation-and-the-gig-economy.pdf. Accessed: 2021-22-12.
[9]
Mike Gartrell, Xinyu Xing, Qin Lv, Aaron Beach, Richard Han, Shivakant Mishra, and Karim Seada. 2010. Enhancing group recommendation by incorporating social relationship interactions. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work. 97–106.
[10]
Aniket Kittur, Lixiu Yu, Tom Hope, Joel Chan, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Karni Gilon, Felicia Ng, Robert E Kraut, and Dafna Shahaf. 2019. Scaling up analogical innovation with crowds and AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 6 (2019), 1870–1877.
[11]
Claus W Langfred. 2000. Work-group design and autonomy: A field study of the interaction between task interdependence and group autonomy. Small Group Research 31, 1 (2000), 54–70.
[12]
Ioanna Lykourentzou, Lionel Robert, Pierre-Jean Barlatier, 2021. Unleashing the Potential of Crowd Work: The Need for a Post-Taylorism Crowdsourcing Model. (2021).
[13]
Judith Masthoff. 2015. Group recommender systems: aggregation, satisfaction and group attributes. In Recommender Systems Handbook (2nd ed.), Francesco Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, USA, 743–776.
[14]
Judith Masthoff and Amra Delić. 2022. Group Recommender Systems: Beyond Preference Aggregation. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 381–420.
[15]
Thuy Ngoc Nguyen and Francesco Ricci. 2017. Dynamic Elicitation of User Preferences in a Chat-Based Group Recommender System. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing(Marrakech, Morocco) (SAC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1685–1692. https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019764
[16]
Thuy Ngoc Nguyen and Francesco Ricci. 2018. A chat-based group recommender system for tourism. Information Technology & Tourism 18, 1 (2018), 5–28.
[17]
Thuy Ngoc Nguyen, Francesco Ricci, Amra Delic, and Derek Bridge. 2019. Conflict resolution in group decision making: insights from a simulation study. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 29, 5 (2019), 895–941.
[18]
Lara Quijano-Sanchez, Juan A Recio-Garcia, Belen Diaz-Agudo, and Guillermo Jimenez-Diaz. 2013. Social factors in group recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 4, 1(2013), 1–30.
[19]
Daniela Retelny, Michael S Bernstein, and Melissa A Valentine. 2017. No workflow can ever be enough: How crowdsourcing workflows constrain complex work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW(2017), 1–23.
[20]
Silvia Rossi, Francesco Cervone, and Francesco Barile. 2018. An Altruistic-Based Utility Function for Group Recommendation. In Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVIII. Springer, 25–47.
[21]
Silvia Rossi, Claudia Di Napoli, Francesco Barile, and Luca Liguori. 2016. A multi-agent system for group decision support based on conflict resolution styles. In International Workshop on Conflict Resolution in Decision Making. Springer, 134–148.
[22]
Ellen Scully-Russ and Richard Torraco. 2020. The changing nature and organization of work: An integrative review of the literature. Human Resource Development Review 19, 1 (2020), 66–93.
[23]
Scott E Seibert, Gang Wang, and Stephen H Courtright. 2011. Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review.Journal of applied psychology 96, 5 (2011), 981.
[24]
Frederick Winslow Taylor. 2004. Scientific management. Routledge.
[25]
Rajan Vaish, Snehalkumar (Neil) S Gaikwad, Geza Kovacs, Andreas Veit, Ranjay Krishna, Imanol Arrieta Ibarra, Camelia Simoiu, Michael Wilber, Serge Belongie, Sharad Goel, 2017. Crowd research: Open and scalable university laboratories. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 829–843.
[26]
Melissa A Valentine, Daniela Retelny, Alexandra To, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, and Michael S Bernstein. 2017. Flash organizations: Crowdsourcing complex work by structuring crowds as organizations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 3523–3537.
[27]
Yihong Wang, Konstantinos Papangelis, Ioanna Lykourentzou, and Vassilis-Javed Khan. 2019. The changing landscape of crowdsourcing in China: from individual crowdworkers to crowdfarms. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 413–417.
[28]
Yihong Wang, Konstantinos Papangelis, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Hai-Ning Liang, Irwyn Sadien, Evangelia Demerouti, and Vassilis-Javed Khan. 2020. In Their Shoes: A Structured Analysis of Job Demands, Resources, Work Experiences, and Platform Commitment of Crowdworkers in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, GROUP(2020), 1–40.
[29]
Zhu Wang, Xingshe Zhou, Zhiwen Yu, Haipeng Wang, and Hongbo Ni. 2010. Quantitative evaluation of group user experience in smart spaces. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 41, 2 (2010), 105–122.
[30]
Alex J Wood, Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. Networked but commodified: The (dis) embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology 53, 5 (2019), 931–950.
Recommendations
GMAP 2023: 2nd Workshop on Group Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
UMAP '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationAlthough most existing recommender systems support single users, there are many scenarios where these systems target the needs of groups. Traits such as group mood, emotional contagion, and interpersonal relationships are often ill-defined ...
GMAP 2024: 3rd Workshop on Group Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
UMAP Adjunct '24: Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationWhile most recommender systems cater to individual users’ needs, there are numerous situations where these systems are needed to meet groups’ demands. These systems are broadly labelled as Group Recommender Systems (GRSys). Traits like interpersonal ...
Personalization of social media
FDIA'07: Proceedings of the 1st BCS IRSG conference on Future Directions in Information AccessThis article describes a framework that captures collaborative tagging systems, and derives from it an overview of user tasks that qualify for personalization in such a system. Major research areas have focused on some of these tasks, but we identify ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2022
409 pages
ISBN:9781450392327
DOI:10.1145/3511047
- General Chairs:
- Alejandro Bellogin,
- Ludovico Boratto,
- Olga C. Santos,
- Program Chairs:
- Liliana Ardissono,
- Bart Knijnenburg
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 04 July 2022
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
UMAP '22: 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 4 - 7, 2022
Barcelona, Spain
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 58Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)11
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format