More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

abstract

Incorporating Focus to Enhance Staff-student Interactions in Formative Feedback

Author:

Bansri Amish ModiAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE '22: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 2

Pages 652 - 653

https://doi.org/10.1145/3502717.3532115

Published: 07 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The Task-Oriented Portfolio Assessment (TOPA) model and associated software support have been demonstrated to be effective in engaging students in a range of computer science education units. This research revolves around incorporating additions to the TOPA model and software tooling to scaffold the formative feedback processes through improved student focus and more consistent tutor guidance.

References

[1]

Firat Batmaz Adewale Adesina, Roger Stone and Ian Jones. 2015. A Semi-Automatic Computer-Aided Assessment Approach for Marking and Providing Feedback Comments. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Lisbon, Portugal (May 2015), 93--100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1188913.1188915

Digital Library

[2]

John Biggs. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment . Higher Education, Vol. 32, 3 (1996), 347--364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

[3]

Susan M. Brookhart. 2013. How to Use and Create Rubrics .Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/deakin/detail.action?docID=1123215

[4]

Andrew Cain. 2014. Factors influencing student learning in portfolio assessed introductory programming. In Teaching, Assessment and Learning (TALE), 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, 55--62.

[5]

Andrew Cain, Laura Tubino, and Siva Krishnan. 2020. Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World . In Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World, Margaret Bearman, Phillip Dawson, Rola Ajjawi, Joanna Tai, and David Boud (Eds.). The Enabling Power of Assessment, Vol. 7. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--41956--1

[6]

Andrew Cain and Clinton J. Woodward. 2012. Toward constructive alignment with portfolio assessment for introductory programming. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2012 . 11--17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360322

[7]

Graham Gibbs and Claire Simpson. 2005. Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students' Learning . Learning and teaching in higher education 1 (2005), 3--31.

[8]

John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback . Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, 1 (2007), 81--112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

[9]

Check Yee Law, John Grundy, Andrew Cain, and Rajesh Vasa. 2015. A Preliminary Study of Open Learner Model Representation Formats to Support Formative Assessment . Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Vol. 2 (2015), 887--892. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2015.112

Digital Library

[10]

P Ramsden. 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education.

[11]

Jake Renzella and Andrew Cain. 2017. Supporting better formative feedback in task-oriented portfolio assessment. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) . IEEE, Hong Kong, 360--367.

[12]

Jake Renzella, Andrew Cain, and Jean-Guy Schneider. 2021. Verifying student identity in oral assessments with deep speaker . Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3 (2021), 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100044

[13]

Emma Smith and Stephen Gorard. 2005. 'They don't give us our marks': The role of formative feedback in student progress . Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 12, 1 (2005), 21--38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000333896

[14]

Barendsen Erik Smetsers Stegeman, Martijn and Sjaak. 2016. Designing a Rubric for Feedback on Code Quality in Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160--164. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999555

Digital Library

[15]

Joanna Tai, Rola Ajjawi, David Boud, Phillip Dawson, and Ernesto Panadero. 2018. Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work . Higher Education, Vol. 76, 3 (2018), 467--481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220--3

[16]

Laura Tubino, Andrew Cain, Jean Guy Schneider, Dhananjay Thiruvady, and Niroshinie Fernando. 2020. Authentic individual assessment for team-based software engineering projects . Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering June 2021 (2020), 71--81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377814.3381702

Digital Library

[17]

Laura Tubino, Jean Guy Schneider, Andrew Cain, Dhananjay Thiruvady, and Chathu Ranaweera. 2021. Reforming Assessment: Challenges beyond Design . Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering March (2021), 78--88. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET52601.2021.00017

Digital Library

[18]

Dylan Wiliam. 2011. What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 37, 1 (2011), 3--14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

[19]

C J Woodward, A Cain, S Pace, and Funke$sim$Kupper J Jones A. 2013. Helping Students Track Learning Progress Using Burn Down Charts. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering. IEEE, 104--109.

Cited By

Modi BCain AWood-Bradley GTubino LRenzella J(2023)Improving Computing Education through a Holistic Learning Framework: A Focus Group Study2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398342(1-8)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398342

Index Terms

Incorporating Focus to Enhance Staff-student Interactions in Formative Feedback

Recommendations

Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature

As online and blended learning has become common place educational strategy in higher education, educators need to reconceptualise fundamental issues of teaching, learning and assessment in non traditional spaces. These issues include concepts such as ...
Using Technology to Enhance Assessment and Feedback: A Framework for Evaluating Tools and Applications
ICEIT 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology

Although assessment and feedback are very important aspects of teaching and learning it has been regularly reported that there are issues with their practice. While research has shown ways to enhance assessment and feedback, and best practices have been ...
Formative assessment in b-learning: effectively monitoring students learning
TEEM '14: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

One of the objectives of Higher Education is the development of learner autonomy so that students can become effective and efficient learners, with the capability for lifelong learning and for actively engage in the development of a knowledge society. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE '22: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 2

July 2022

686 pages

ISBN:9781450392006

DOI:10.1145/3502717

General Chairs:
Brett A. Becker
University College Dublin, Ireland
,
Keith Quille
Technological University Dublin, Ireland
,
Mikko-Jussi Laakso
University of Turku, Finland
,
Program Chairs:
Erik Barendsen
Radboud University & Open University, The Netherlands
,
Simon
Unaffiliated, Australia

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 July 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Conference

ITiCSE 2022

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ITiCSE 2022: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

July 8 - 13, 2022

Dublin, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
72
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)6
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Modi BCain AWood-Bradley GTubino LRenzella J(2023)Improving Computing Education through a Holistic Learning Framework: A Focus Group Study2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398342(1-8)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398342

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents