research-article

Open access

Getting By With Help From My Friends: Group Study in Introductory Programming Understood as Socially Shared Regulation

Authors:

Nigel BoschAuthors Info & Claims

ICER '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1

Pages 164 - 176

https://doi.org/10.1145/3501385.3543970

Published: 03 August 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Background and Context. Metacognitive skills are important for all students learning to program and interest in applying pedagogical approaches in early programming courses that focus on metacognitive aspects is growing. However, most studies of such approaches are not rigorously based in theory, and when they are, almost always utilize foundational education and psychology theories from as far back as the 1970s. More recent theory is less tested, and not all relevant metacognitive theories have been explored in the computing education research literature.

Objectives. We present the first use in a programming education context of a newer metacognitive theory that explicitly examines the differences between self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially shared regulation. Our research questions are: 1) How do students express their learning strategies, both when working alone and when working in groups, and how do these align with existing models of self-regulation and co-regulation? and 2) To what extent do written expressions of self-regulation, co-regulation, and socially shared regulation relate to student performance?

Methods. Grounded in the above mentioned theory, we collected qualitative self-reflection and quantitative course performance data from nearly 1,000 students in an introductory programming course. We use these data to explore students’ self-regulation habits when studying alone and their co-regulation habits when studying in groups.

Findings. Our findings indicate that higher self-regulation correlates with higher performance, but higher co-regulation had the opposite effect. We explore these differences through a qualitative analysis of the self-reflection statements and identify co-regulation strategies to build upon existing models of self-regulation.

Implications. We identify emergent themes in our data that align with those in recent literature in self-regulated learning in computing education and present the first set of co-regulation themes in computing education. This work is at the frontier of self- and co-regulation in introductory programming and identifies several factors that can be used to advance future work and, most importantly, improve student outcomes.

References

[1]

Eshwar Bachu and Margaret Bernard. 2012. A Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Model for Educational Multiplayer Games. In 11th International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government. Las Vegas, NV.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Recommendations

What Do We Think We Think We Are Doing?: Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming

Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Programming Education: Theories and Exemplars of Use

Benefits of Self-explanation in Introductory Programming

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

HTML Format

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations