[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3599609.3599621acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impact of Labor Autonomy and Work-Life Balance on Job Satisfaction in Teleworking

Published: 19 July 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the impact of work autonomy and work-life balance on job satisfaction in teleworking. The non-probabilistic sampling technique was used for convenience, cross-sectional of causal relationship through the structural equation model (SEM). The study population was made up of people residing in Lima who reported having been working in the teleworking modality. The sample consisted of 326 teleworkers (65.3% women and 34.7% men). The results showed that both work autonomy and work-life balance have a direct, positive, and significant impact on job satisfaction; being the work-life balance the one that presented a greater impact on job satisfaction (R=0.679, p<0.000). Likewise, labor autonomy presented a minor impact (R= 0.405, p<0.000), but equally important.
The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic conditioned organizations to adopt the teleworking modality on a mandatory basis in several of their operations, registering an increase in the emotional exhaustion and work burnout that impacted the quality of life, mental health and job satisfaction of workers due to the effort in adapting to the job and the context they faced [1], [2] Among the most noticeable health consequences resulting from this situation were increased anxiety and sleep disorders [3], which had consequences on the effectiveness of the assigned functions and the productivity of workers [4], [5]. In addition, the abrupt change to teleworking affected the daily work obligations of the worker since they had to face the difficulties of the family environment and other events that impacted the development of their work responsibilities [6]. Due to this situation, managers developed new strategies with the help of technology to ensure employee productivity under the condition of teleworking [2], [7]. As a result, the flexibility of working from home became a new way of operating for many workers and a new work culture for organizations that, in some cases, extended beyond the mandatory restrictions and continued after the restart economy and the decrease in the post-pandemic health crisis [8].

References

[1]
I. N. G. Rabelo, A. L. Z. Jiménez, and O. E. Contreras-Pacheco, “Job satisfaction in the context of mandatory teleworking: An empirical study in the higher education sector [Satisfação no trabalho no contexto do teletrabalho forçado: um estudo empírico no setor do ensino superior] [Satisfacción laboral en el contexto d,” Estud. Gerenciales, vol. 38, no. 163, pp. 222–234, 2022.
[2]
E. E. Garcia-Salirrosas and D. Y. Millones-Liza, “Digital Skills and Job Performance in Remote Work,” in ICBIR 2022 - 2022 7th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research, Proceedings, 2022, pp. 723–726.
[3]
M. Kim, I. Park, H. An, B. Yun, and J. H. Yoon, “Teleworking Is Significantly Associated with Anxiety Symptoms and Sleep Disturbances among Paid Workers in the COVID-19 Era,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, 2023.
[4]
L. Martin, L. Hauret, and C. Fuhrer, “Digitally transformed home office impacts on job satisfaction, job stress and job productivity. COVID-19 findings,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 3 March, 2022.
[5]
D. Y. Millones-Liza and E. E. Garcia-Salirrosas, “Development and validation of a self-assessment scale of job performance in teleworking,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2022, pp. 164–168.
[6]
Z. Mohammed, D. Nandwani, A. Saboo, and P. Padakannaya, “Job satisfaction while working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: do subjective work autonomy, work-family conflict, and anxiety related to the pandemic matter?,” Cogent Psychol., vol. 9, no. 1, 2022.
[7]
J. Cho and I. Park, “Does Information Systems Support for Creativity Enhance Effective Information Systems Use and Job Satisfaction in Virtual Work?,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1865–1886, 2022.
[8]
A. N. Boakye, R. K. Asravor, and J. Essuman, “Work-life balance as predictors of job satisfaction in the tertiary educational sector,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023.
[9]
Y. Han and J. Wang, “Autonomy or Working Conditions?—Research on Heterogeneity and Influencing Mechanism of Self-Employment on Job Satisfaction in China,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023.
[10]
W. J. Aloulou, A. Amari, V. Ramadani, and A. A. N. Alboqami, “Saudi teleworkers and determinant factors of their work-life balance and satisfaction: Testing a sequential mediation model,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 188, 2023.
[11]
A. Sandmeier, S. Baeriswyl, A. Krause, and J. Muehlhausen, “Work until you drop: Effects of work overload, prolonging working hours, and autonomy need satisfaction on exhaustion in teachers,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 118, 2022.
[12]
J. A. Pranata, S. Hendrawan, M. R. Putra Riyanto, and W. Gunadi, “The Effect of Work-Life Balance and Work Motivation towards Intention to Work from Home in the Future with Job Satisfaction as a Mediator,” Rev. Cercet. si Interv. Soc., vol. 78, pp. 7–25, 2022.
[13]
A. Erro-Garcés, B. Urien, G. Čyras, and V. M. Janušauskienė, “Telework in Baltic Countries during the Pandemic: Effects on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 10, 2022.
[14]
É. St-Jean and M. Duhamel, “Employee work–life balance and work satisfaction: an empirical study of entrepreneurial career transition and intention across 70 different economies [Equilibrio trabajo-vida y satisfacción laboral de los empleados: un estudio empírico sobre la transición,” Acad. Rev. Latinoam. Adm., vol. 33, no. 3–4, pp. 321–335, 2020.
[15]
R. Palumbo, G. Flamini, L. Gnan, M. M. Pellegrini, D. Petrolo, and M. Fakhar Manesh, “Disentangling the implications of teleworking on work–life balance: a serial mediation analysis through motivation and satisfaction,” J. Organ. Eff., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 68–88, 2022.
[16]
S. Capecchi and G. O. Caputo, “JOB SATISFACTION AND TELEWORKING: A STUDY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION WORKERS IN ITALY,” Stat. Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 141–156, 2022.
[17]
J. C. Messenger and L. Gschwind, “Three generations of Telework: New ICTs and the (R)evolution from Home Office to Virtual Office,” New Technol. Work Employ., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 195–208, 2016.
[18]
K. Sonnenschein, Ø. Hagen, I. S. Rostad, and R. Wiik, “‘Make it possible for more people to work at home!’ representations of employee motivation and job satisfaction in Danish and Norwegian newspapers during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022.
[19]
H. Kim and C. Shimizu, “The Relationship between Geographic Accessibility to Neighborhood Facilities, Remote Work, and Changes in Neighborhood Satisfaction after the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 17, 2022.
[20]
P. Karácsony, “Impact of teleworking on job satisfaction among Slovakian employees in the era of COVID-19,” Probl. Perspect. Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021.
[21]
B. Mayer and M. Boston, “Residential built environment and working from home: A New Zealand perspective during COVID-19,” Cities, vol. 129, 2022.
[22]
D. W. Irawanto, K. R. Novianti, and K. Roz, “Work from home: Measuring satisfaction between work–life balance and work stress during the covid-19 pandemic in indonesia,” Economies, vol. 9, no. 3, 2021.
[23]
M. T. Jamal, W. R. Alalyani, P. Thoudam, I. Anwar, and E. Bino, “Telecommuting during covid 19: A moderated-mediation approach linking job resources to job satisfaction,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 1–17, 2021.
[24]
M. M. Caranto, R. P. Sergio, and M. Z. Oribiana, “Telecommuting Versus Traditional Work Environment: Determinants of Job Satisfaction as Perceived by Individual Contributors and Supervisors,” Eurasian Stud. Bus. Econ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 35–46, 2020.
[25]
T. D. Allen, T. D. Golden, and K. M. Shockley, “How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings,” Psychol. Sci. Public Interes., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 40–68, 2015.
[26]
S. A. Metselaar, L. den Dulk, and B. Vermeeren, “Teleworking at Different Locations Outside the Office: Consequences for Perceived Performance and the Mediating Role of Autonomy and Work-Life Balance Satisfaction,” Rev. Public Pers. Adm., pp. 1–23, 2022.
[27]
L. Mihalca, T. Irimias, and G. Brendea, “Teleworking During The Covid-19 Pandemic: Determining Factors Of Perceived Work Productivity, Job Performance, And Satisfaction,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, pp. 620–636, 2021.
[28]
S. Patanjali and N. M. K. Bhatta, “Work from Home During the Pandemic: The Impact of Organizational Factors on the Productivity of Employees in the IT Industry,” Vision, 2022.
[29]
F. Toscano and S. Zappalà, “Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1–14, 2020.
[30]
Á. Dias, C. Feixeira, L. Pereira, R. L. da Costa, and R. Gonçalves, “The work-life balance and job satisfaction,” Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 401–420, 2022.
[31]
J. Farfán, M. Peña, S. Fernández-Salinero, and G. Topa, “The moderating role of extroversion and neuroticism in the relationship between autonomy at work, burnout, and job satisfaction,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 1–12, 2020.
[32]
A. A. M. Davidescu, S.-A. Apostu, V. A. Strat, A. I. Scrădeanu, I. D. Zgură, and M. G. Horga, “The Impact Of Teleworking On The Romanians Employees’ Job Satisfaction. An Empirical Evidence Based On Multiple Correspondence Analysis (Mca) And Logistic Regression,” Amfiteatru Econ., vol. 23, no. 58, pp. 637–653, 2021.
[33]
J.-L. Zhao, X.-H. Li, and J. Shields, “Optimizing the relationship between job autonomy and knowledge workers’ satisfaction: The roles of crafting and value congruence,” Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 608–631, 2022.
[34]
J. R. Hackman and G. R. Oldham, Work Redesign. Addison-Wesley, 1980.
[35]
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–134, 1985.
[36]
M. Ewers and J. Kangmennaang, “New spaces of inequality with the rise of remote work: Autonomy, technostress, and life disruption,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 152, 2023.
[37]
M. Horwood, P. D. Parker, H. W. Marsh, J. Guo, and T. Dicke, “School autonomy policies lead to increases in principal autonomy and job satisfaction,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 115, 2022.
[38]
J. A. Khavis, J. Krishnan, and C. Tipton, “Implications of Employee Satisfaction and Work-Life Balance in Accounting Firms,” Curr. Issues Audit., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. P16–P26, 2022.
[39]
A. Aruldoss, K. Berube Kowalski, M. L. Travis, and S. Parayitam, “The relationship between work–life balance and job satisfaction: moderating role of training and development and work environment,” J. Adv. Manag. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 240–271, 2022.
[40]
M. Kelly, R. Soles, E. Garcia, and I. Kundu, “Job Stress, Burnout, Work-Life Balance, Well-Being, and Job Satisfaction among Pathology Residents and Fellows,” Am. J. Clin. Pathol., vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 449–469, 2020.
[41]
J. Hair, W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2013.
[42]
P. M. Bentler, S. Y. Lee, and L. J. Weng, “Multiple population covariance structure analysis under arbitrary distribution theory,” Commun. Stat. - Theory Methods, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1951–1964, 1987.
[43]
F. P. Morgeson and S. E. Humphrey, “The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1321–1339, 2006.
[44]
G. G. Fisher, C. A. Bulger, and C. S. Smith, “Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement,” J. Occup. Health Psychol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 441–456, 2009.
[45]
J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th ed. Pearson Education, 2010.
[46]
Hu L.-T. and Bentler P. M., “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives.,” Struct. Equ. Model., vol. 6, no. July 2012, pp. 1–55, 1999.
[47]
B. Kondratowicz, D. Godlewska-Werner, P. Połomski, and M. Khosla, “Satisfaction with job and life and remote work in the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of perceived stress, self-efficacy and self-esteem,” Curr. Issues Personal. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2022.
[48]
W. Guo, J. Hancock, D. Cooper, and M. Caldas, “Job autonomy and employee burnout: the moderating role of power distance orientation,” Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol., 2022.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Assessing the Effects of Remote Work on Employee Well-Being Across Different SectorsEmotional Intelligence and Networking Competencies10.1007/978-3-031-77543-7_9(127-141)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
  • (2024)From Old to New Ways of WorkingInternational Journal of Asian Business and Information Management10.4018/IJABIM.35650315:1(1-24)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Job Satisfaction in Remote Work: The Role of Positive Spillover from Work to Family and Work–Life BalanceBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1311091613:11(916)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Impact of Labor Autonomy and Work-Life Balance on Job Satisfaction in Teleworking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEEG '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government
    April 2023
    216 pages
    ISBN:9798400708398
    DOI:10.1145/3599609
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 July 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Job satisfaction
    2. Labor autonomy
    3. Teleworking
    4. Work life

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEEG 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)107
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Assessing the Effects of Remote Work on Employee Well-Being Across Different SectorsEmotional Intelligence and Networking Competencies10.1007/978-3-031-77543-7_9(127-141)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2025
    • (2024)From Old to New Ways of WorkingInternational Journal of Asian Business and Information Management10.4018/IJABIM.35650315:1(1-24)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
    • (2023)Job Satisfaction in Remote Work: The Role of Positive Spillover from Work to Family and Work–Life BalanceBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1311091613:11(916)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Work–life balance and employee commitment in the new normal: evidence from Indian railway using mixed-method approachKybernetes10.1108/K-06-2023-1002Online publication date: 26-Dec-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media