[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3597512.3599699acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Swarm Medicine: Developing guidance for in-human testing of emerging swarm-based cancer nanomedicines

Published: 11 July 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Abstract: The development of in silico methodology, active controllable nanoparticles (nanorobots) and collective nanosystems that work cooperatively rather than individually (nanoswarms) are emerging as the new frontier in cancer nanomedicine. A multimethod qualitative study was undertaken to develop an understanding of how the first-in-human cancer nanoswarm trial should be regulated from the perspective of various stakeholders. This poster presents the initial findings of the ongoing study. 21 semi-structured interviews with regulators, nanomedicine researchers, healthcare professionals and patients were conducted, with data subjected to thematic analysis. Five themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Patient Cancer Journey; (2) Perceptions; (3) Regulation; (4) Future Thinking and; (5) Stakeholder Interaction. Overall the results demonstrate a willingness from oncology patients to develop nanoswarm treatments, as well highlight concerns from all stakeholders around trust and transparency. In the next stage, we need to further explore with focus groups if there is a level of acceptance and awareness for regulating this technology amongst stakeholders before making final recommendations for a framework of what the first-in-human cancer nanoswarm clinical trial should look like.

References

[1]
Sia Chong Hock, Yan Mei Ying, and Chan Lai Wah. 2011. A Review of the Current Scientific and Regulatory Status of Nanomedicines and the Challenges Ahead. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 65, 2 (March 2011), 177–195. Retrieved November 18, 2021 from https://journal.pda.org/content/65/2/177.long.
[2]
Matimba Swana, Johanna Blee, Namid Stillman, Jonathan Ives, and Sabine Hauert. 2022. Swarms: The next frontier for cancer nanomedicine. In Cancer, Complexity, Computation. (1st ed.), Igor Balaz and Andrew Adamatzky (eds.). Springer, Emergence, Complexity, Computation Vol 46. Springer.
[3]
Sabine Hauert and Sangeeta N. Bhatia. 2014. Mechanisms of cooperation in cancer nanomedicine: towards systems nanotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 32, 9 (September 2014), 448–455.
[4]
Matej Vizovisek, Dragana Ristanovic, Stefano Menghini, Michael G. Christiansen, and Simone Schuerle. 2021. The Tumor Proteolytic Landscape: A Challenging Frontier in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021, Vol. 22, Page 2514 22, 5 (March 2021), 2514.
[5]
Manuela Tatiana Nistor and Alina Gabriela Rusu. 2018. Nanorobots with applications in medicine. Polymeric Nanomaterials in Nanotherapeutics (January 2018), 123–149.
[6]
Huaijuan Zhou, Carmen C. Mayorga-Martinez, Salvador Pané, Li Zhang, and Martin Pumera. 2021. Magnetically Driven Micro and Nanorobots. Chem Rev 121, 8 (April 2021), 4999–5041.
[7]
Simone Schuerle, Sandro Erni, Maarten Flink, Bradley E. Kratochvil, and Bradley J. Nelson. 2013. Three-dimensional magnetic manipulation of micro-and nanostructures for applications in life sciences. IEEE Trans Magn 49, 1 (2013), 321–330.
[8]
Mi Li, Haichang Li, Xiangguang Li, Hua Zhu, Zihui Xu, Lianqing Liu, Jianjie Ma, and Mingjun Zhang. 2017. A Bioinspired Alginate-Gum Arabic Hydrogel with Micro-/Nanoscale Structures for Controlled Drug Release in Chronic Wound Healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 27 (July 2017), 22160–22175.
[9]
Ouajdi Felfoul, Mahmood Mohammadi, Samira Taherkhani, Dominic De Lanauze, Yong Zhong Xu, Dumitru Loghin, Sherief Essa, Sylwia Jancik, Daniel Houle, Michel Lafleur, Louis Gaboury, Maryam Tabrizian, Neila Kaou, Michael Atkin, Té Vuong, Gerald Batist, Nicole Beauchemin, Danuta Radzioch, and Sylvain Martel. 2016. Magneto-aerotactic bacteria deliver drug-containing nanoliposomes to tumour hypoxic regions. Nat Nanotechnol 11, 11 (November 2016), 941–947.
[10]
Hyungmok Joh and Donglei Emma Fan. 2021. Materials and Schemes of Multimodal Reconfigurable Micro/Nanomachines and Robots: Review and Perspective. Advanced Materials 33, 39 (October 2021), 2101965.
[11]
Namid R. Stillman, Marina Kovacevic, Igor Balaz, and Sabine Hauert. 2020. In silico modelling of cancer nanomedicine, across scales and transport barriers. npj Computational Materials 2020 6:1 6, 1 (July 2020), 1–10.
[12]
Namid R. Stillman, Igor Balaz, Michail Antisthenis Tsompanas, Marina Kovacevic, Sepinoud Azimi, Sébastien Lafond, Andrew Adamatzky, and Sabine Hauert. 2021. Evolutionary computational platform for the automatic discovery of nanocarriers for cancer treatment. NPJ Comput Mater 7, 1 (September 2021), 150.
[13]
Marina Jirotka, Barbara Grimpe, Bernd Stahl, Grace Eden, and Mark Hartswood. 2017. Responsible research and innovation in the digital age. Commun ACM 60, 5 (April 2017), 62–68.
[14]
Ben Shneiderman. 2022. Human-centered AI. Oxford University Press, Glasgow.
[15]
Marissa Bird, Michael McGillion, E. M. Chambers, J. Dix, C. J. Fajardo, M. Gilmour, K. Levesque, A. Lim, S. Mierdel, Carley Ouellette, Anna. N. Polanski, Shannon. V. Reaume, Carly Whitmore, and Nancy Carter. 2021. A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework. Res Involv Engagem 7, 1 (December 2021), 1–12.
[16]
Thomas W. Concannon, Paul Meissner, Jo Anne Grunbaum, Newell McElwee, Jeanne Marie Guise, John Santa, Patrick H. Conway, Denise Daudelin, Elaine H. Morrato, and Laurel K. Leslie. 2012. A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. J Gen Intern Med 27, 8 (August 2012), 985.
[17]
Danielle C. Lavallee, Carla J. Williams, Ellen S. Tambor, and Patricia A. Deverka. 2012. Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: How will we measure success? J Comp Eff Res 1, 5 (September 2012), 397–407.
[18]
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, “The PCORI Engagement Rubric,” Feb. 2014. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf.
[19]
Alan F.T. Winfield and Marina Jirotka. 2018. Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 2133 (November 2018), 20180085.
[20]
Beverley Townsend, Colin Paterson, T. T. Arvind, Gabriel Nemirovsky, Radu Calinescu, Ana Cavalcanti, Ibrahim Habli, and Alan Thomas. 2022. From Pluralistic Normative Principles to Autonomous-Agent Rules. Minds Mach (Dordr) 32, 4 (December 2022), 683–715.
[21]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[22]
Michael Quinn Patton. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Qualitative Inquiry 3rd, (2002), 598.
[23]
Uwe Flick. 2014. An introduction to qualitative research (5th Edition ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. (2014)
[24]
Jonathan Ives. 2014. A method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics 28, 6 (July 2014), 302–312.
[25]
Richard Huxtable and Jonathan Ives. 2019. Mapping, framing, shaping: A framework for empirical bioethics research projects. BMC Med Ethics 20, 1 (November 2019), 1–8.

Index Terms

  1. Swarm Medicine: Developing guidance for in-human testing of emerging swarm-based cancer nanomedicines
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TAS '23: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems
        July 2023
        426 pages
        ISBN:9798400707346
        DOI:10.1145/3597512
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 11 July 2023

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. cancer nanomedicine
        2. clinical trials
        3. co-creation
        4. co-design
        5. co-production
        6. collective behavior
        7. cooperative behavior
        8. governance
        9. nanoparticles
        10. nanorobot
        11. nanoswarm
        12. stakeholder collaboration
        13. swarm

        Qualifiers

        • Extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        TAS '23

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 40
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
        Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media