Multi-context Physical Computing
Pages 615 - 616
Abstract
The use of microcontroller boards such as the Calliope Mini and BBC micro:bit is becoming increasingly popular in schools due to their versatility and affordability. This doctoral research aims to investigate the effectiveness and motivational potential of using microcontroller boards to introduce basic programming concepts to upper primary and lower secondary school students using Python. The primary focus is on the multi-context nature of microcontroller boards, exploring whether teaching programming concepts in different contexts, such as music, video games, and autonomous driving, can motivate a broader population of students compared to a single-context curriculum, such as Turtle Graphics or autonomous mobile robots. The research employs an educational design-based research approach. In the first cycle, a curriculum consisting of six lessons was developed and piloted in the context of gifted pull-out activities. The preliminary exploratory pilot study provides qualitative findings on students' responses to the curriculum, and algorithmic thinking gains were measured using a pre- and post-test. The results suggest that the curriculum has the potential to be an effective and engaging way to introduce basic programming concepts and that further research is needed to confirm these findings for larger populations. In the next educational design-based research cycle we plan to refine our measurement instruments and study design.
References
[1]
Saira Anwar, Nicholas Alexander Bascou, Muhsin Menekse, and Asefeh Kardgar. 2019. A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 9, 2 (2019), 19--42. Issue 2.
[2]
Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Gears of our childhood: constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on interaction design and children. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--182.
[3]
Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan. 2000. The ?what" and ?why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4 (2000), 227--268.
[4]
Gerald Futschek. 2006. Algorithmic Thinking: The Key for Understanding Computer Science. In Informatics Education -- The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers, Roland T. Mittermeir (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 159--168.
[5]
Susann Hartmann, Heike Wiesner, and Andreas Wiesner-Steiner. 2007. Robotics and Gender: The Use of Robotics for the Empowerment of Girls in the Classroom. In Gender Designs IT: Construction and Deconstruction of Information Society Technology, Isabel Zorn, Susanne Maass, Els Rommes, Carola Schirmer, and Heidi Schelhowe (Eds.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany, 175--188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--531--90295--1_12
[6]
Steve Hodges, Sue Sentance, Joe Finney, and Thomas Ball. 2020. Physical Computing: A Key Element of Modern Computer Science Education. Computer 53, 4 (2020), 20--30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2019.2935058
[7]
Yuhan Lin and David Weintrop. 2021. The landscape of Block-based programming: Characteristics of block-based environments and how they support the transition to text-based programming. Journal of Computer Languages 67 (2021), 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cola.2021.101075
[8]
Michael Lodi and Simone Martini. 2021. Computational thinking, between Papert and Wing. Science & Education 30, 4 (2021), 883--908.
[9]
Marc Lafuente Martínez, Olivier Lévêque, Isabel Benítez, Cécile Hardebolle, and Jessica Dehler Zufferey. 2022. Assessing Computational Thinking: Development and Validation of the Algorithmic Thinking Test for Adults. Journal of Educational Computing Research 60, 6 (2022), 1436--1463. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211057819 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211057819
[10]
Susan McKenney and Thomas C Reeves. 2018. Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge, London, UK.
[11]
Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, USA.
[12]
Marcos Román-González, Juan-Carlos Pérez-González, and Carmen Jiménez- Fernández. 2017. Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in human behavior 72 (2017), 678--691.
[13]
Xiaodan Tang, Yue Yin, Qiao Lin, Roxana Hadad, and Xiaoming Zhai. 2020. Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education 148 (2020), 103798.
[14]
Katerina Tsarava, Korbinian Moeller, Marcos Román-González, Jessika Golle, Luzia Leifheit, Martin Butz, and Manuel Ninaus. 2022. A cognitive definition of computational thinking in primary education. Computers & Education 179 (04 2022), 104425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104425
[15]
Nilüfer Atman Uslu, Gulay Öztüre Yavuz, and Yasemin Koçak Usluel. 2022. A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments 0, 0 (2022), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890
[16]
Kaiqin Yang, Xin Liu, and Guang Chen. 2020. The influence of robots on students' computational thinking: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 10, 8 (2020), 5.
Recommendations
Teaching with physical computing devices: the BBC micro:bit initiative
WiPSCE '17: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing EducationThere is a growing interest in small programmable devices that can be used in schools and in extra-curricular contexts to teach computer science. The BBC micro:bit is one such device; through a collaborative venture, micro:bits were recently distributed ...
Teaching Programming through Multi-Context Physical Computing
ITiCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2With the growing demand for computational skills in the job market, it's imperative that lower secondary school students grasp basic programming concepts such as repetition, modularity, conditionals, and variables. Yet, many students perceive computer ...
Algorithmic thinking development through physical computing activities with Arduino in STEM education
AbstractThe need to benefit from information technologies in the twenty-first century digital age is increasing in all economies to overcome problems and difficulties and to have desired solutions. So, developing algorithmic thinking has been important as ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2023
694 pages
ISBN:9798400701399
DOI:10.1145/3587103
- General Chairs:
- Mikko-Jussi Laakso,
- Mattia Monga,
- Program Chairs:
- Simon,
- Judithe Sheard
Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 29 June 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Abstract
Conference
ITiCSE 2023
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 73Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)31
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in