More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

An Exploratory Study of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) for Older Adult Patients with Chronic Diseases

Authors:

Monika Safford,

Saleh KalantariAuthors Info & Claims

CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Pages 12 - 16

https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3607023

Published: 14 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a central feature of clinical practice guidelines, and it is a key way to improve long-term communication and relationships between older adult patients and physicians. Previous studies have found that patients’ engagement in decision-making is closely associated with patient satisfaction and with improved treatment outcomes. However, medical decision-making can be complex. Healthcare often requires decisions that are time-sensitive, and when confronted with multiple possible treatments it is necessary to carefully assess the impact of each treatment on health outcomes and to consider potential harms as well as benefits. Effective communication tools can be useful for conducting this assessment in a shared fashion. In the current project, we conducted interviews with 12 participants, including seven older adults with chronic diseases and five clinicians who work with this patient population, with the goal of better understanding both groups’ perspectives and needs in the clinical setting. The interviews focused on the potential benefits that can be derived from an SDM-based technological platform, and the findings can be useful in the future design of such a platform.

References

[1]

Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Matthew Menear, Hubert Robitaille, and France Légaré. 2017. Are mobile health applications useful for supporting shared decision making in diagnostic and treatment decisions?Global Health Action 10, sup3 (June 2017), 1332259. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1332259

[2]

Seljelid B, Varsi C, Solberg Nes L, Øystese Ka, and Børøsund E. 2022. Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study. JMIR formative research 6, 4 (April 2022). https://doi.org/10.2196/34738 Publisher: JMIR Form Res.

[3]

D. S. Brody. 1980. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Annals of Internal Medicine 93, 5 (Nov. 1980), 718–722. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-93-5-718

[4]

Hao-Fei Cheng, Ruotong Wang, Zheng Zhang, Fiona O’Connell, Terrance Gray, F. Maxwell Harper, and Haiyi Zhu. 2019. Explaining Decision-Making Algorithms through UI: Strategies to Help Non-Expert Stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300789

Digital Library

[5]

Angela Coulter, Diana Stilwell, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Chirk Jenn Ng, and Trudy van der Weijden. 2013. A systematic development process for patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13, Suppl 2 (Nov. 2013), S2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2

[6]

Selena Davis, Abdul Roudsari, Rebecca Raworth, Karen L Courtney, and Lee MacKay. 2017. Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 24, 4 (July 2017), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw172

[7]

Carlos De Las Cuevas, Wenceslao Peñate, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, and Pedro Serrano-Aguilar. 2013. Shared decision making in psychiatric practice and the primary care setting is unique, as measured using a 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 9 (2013), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S49021

[8]

Glyn Elwyn, Marie Anne Durand, Julia Song, Johanna Aarts, Paul J. Barr, Zackary Berger, Nan Cochran, Dominick Frosch, Dariusz Galasiński, Pål Gulbrandsen, Paul K. J. Han, Martin Härter, Paul Kinnersley, Amy Lloyd, Manish Mishra, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Isabelle Scholl, Kounosuke Tomori, Lyndal Trevena, Holly O. Witteman, and Trudy Van der Weijden. 2017. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 359 (Nov. 2017), j4891. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4891

[9]

Christine M. Gaston and Geoffrey Mitchell. 2005. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 61, 10 (Nov. 2005), 2252–2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.015

[10]

Manh-Tung Ho, Ngoc-Thang B. Le, Peter Mantello, Manh-Toan Ho, and Nader Ghotbi. 2023. Understanding the acceptance of emotional artificial intelligence in Japanese healthcare system: A cross-sectional survey of clinic visitors’ attitude. Technology in Society 72 (Feb. 2023), 102166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102166

[11]

Tamara L. McCarron, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Jamie M. Boyd, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Nancy J. Marlett, and Thomas Noseworthy. 2019. Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review. Systematic Reviews 8, 1 (April 2019), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8

[12]

Annette M. O’Connor, John E. Wennberg, France Legare, Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas, Benjamin W. Moulton, Karen R. Sepucha, Andrea G. Sodano, and Jaime S. King. 2007. Toward the ’tipping point’: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 26, 3 (2007), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716

[13]

Ruth E. Pel-Littel, Bianca M. Buurman, Marjolein H. van de Pol, Jos W. R. Twisk, Linda R. Tulner, Mirella M. Minkman, Wilma J. M. Scholte Op Reimer, and Julia C. M. van Weert. 2023. Effects of a shared decision making intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the DICO study. BMC medical informatics and decision making 23, 1 (March 2023), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02099-2

[14]

Arwen H. Pieterse, Anne M. Stiggelbout, and Victor M. Montori. 2019. Shared Decision Making and the Importance of Time. JAMA 322, 1 (July 2019), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3785

[15]

L. Aubree Shay and Jennifer Elston Lafata. 2014. Understanding patient perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Education and Counseling 96, 3 (Sept. 2014), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.017

[16]

Julia C. M. van Weert, Barbara C. van Munster, Remco Sanders, René Spijker, Lotty Hooft, and Jesse Jansen. 2016. Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 16, 1 (April 2016), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0281-8

[17]

Himanshu Verma, Jakub Mlynar, Roger Schaer, Julien Reichenbach, Mario Jreige, John Prior, Florian Evéquoz, and Adrien Depeursinge. 2023. Rethinking the Role of AI with Physicians in Oncology: Revealing Perspectives from Clinical and Research Workflows. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581506

Digital Library

[18]

Thomas H. Wieringa, Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, Maartje de Wit, Oscar J. Ponce, Manuel F. Sanchez-Herrera, Nataly R. Espinoza, Yaara Zisman-Ilani, Marleen Kunneman, Linda J. Schoonmade, Victor M. Montori, and Frank J. Snoek. 2019. Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews 8, 1 (May 2019), 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4

Cited By

So JEstrada SJörke MBianchi EWang MHaghighi NFessele KLanday JCuadra A(2024)"They Make Us Old Before We're Old": Designing Ethical Health Technology with and for Older AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870178:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687017
Hao YFarzan RLópez CCardoso Llach DQuercia DMustafa MNiu SWong-Villacrés M(2024)Outcome First or Overview First? Optimizing Patient-Oriented Framework for Evidence-Based Healthcare Treatment Selections with XAI ToolsCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681859(248-254)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678884.3681859
Hao YLiu ZRiter RKalantari S(2024)Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer PatientsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642353(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642353

Index Terms

An Exploratory Study of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) for Older Adult Patients with Chronic Diseases

Recommendations

Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer Patients
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Shared decision making (SDM) plays a vital role in clinical practice guidelines, fostering enduring therapeutic communication and patient-clinician relationships. Previous research indicates that active patient participation in decision-making improves ...
Situational Analysis on Health Services for People with Chronic Diseases and Groups with High Risk: A Case Study at Kohkha Municipality, Lampang, Thailand
ICHSM '18: Proceedings of the International Conference on Healthcare Service Management 2018

The aim of a mixed-method study was to explore the situation of health services for people with chronic disease and the risk group at Kohkha municipality, Lampang, Thailand.The sample for quantitative study was 285 people (171 of chronic disease and 114 ...
Analysis of treatment pathways for three chronic diseases using OMOP CDM
Abstract
The present study examined treatment pathways (the ordered sequence of medications that a patient is prescribed) for three chronic diseases (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and depression), compared the pathways with recommendations from guidelines,...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

October 2023

596 pages

ISBN:9798400701290

DOI:10.1145/3584931

Editors:
Casey Fiesler
University of Colorado Boulder, USA
,
Loren Terveen
University of Minnesota, USA
,
Morgan Ames
University of California, Berkeley, USA
,
Susan Fussell
Cornell University, USA
,
Eric Gilbert
University of Michigan, USA
,
Vera Liao
Microsoft Research Montreal, Canada
,
Xiaojuan Ma
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
,
Xinru Page
Brigham Young University, USA
,
Mark Rouncefield
Lancaster University, UK
,
Vivek Singh
Rutgers University, USA
,
Pamela Wisniewski
Vanderbilt University, USA

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CSCW '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CSCW '23: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

October 14 - 18, 2023

MN, Minneapolis, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

October 18 - 22, 2025

Bergen , Norway

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
283
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)223
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

So JEstrada SJörke MBianchi EWang MHaghighi NFessele KLanday JCuadra A(2024)"They Make Us Old Before We're Old": Designing Ethical Health Technology with and for Older AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870178:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687017
Hao YFarzan RLópez CCardoso Llach DQuercia DMustafa MNiu SWong-Villacrés M(2024)Outcome First or Overview First? Optimizing Patient-Oriented Framework for Evidence-Based Healthcare Treatment Selections with XAI ToolsCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681859(248-254)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678884.3681859
Hao YLiu ZRiter RKalantari S(2024)Advancing Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making with AI Systems for Older Adult Cancer PatientsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642353(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642353

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents