[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3584371.3613019acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbcbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

FinFax: Fast Interpretation of Fax with NLP

Published: 04 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Faxes are commonly utilized in healthcare organizations to facilitate information exchange among healthcare facilities, despite the existence of electronic health record (EHR) systems. Nevertheless, the manual processing of faxes is both time-consuming and prone to errors. Unfortunately, critical medical information conveyed through faxes often leads to delays and potential harm due to the unavailability of vital clinical data when required. This predicament is further exacerbated by the substantial volume of faxes received by healthcare organizations on a daily basis.
While there exist multiple solutions for extracting information from scanned health records, these solutions typically focus on specific segments of the overall workflow. However, in order to effectively drive real-life applications, the entirety of the workflow assumes crucial significance. Hence, this paper presents an all-encompassing system called "FinFax," meticulously developed and rigorously tested in collaboration with a clinic in the gulf coast region. FinFax possesses the capability to proficiently classify documents contained within faxes, extract pertinent information, and seamlessly integrate with Epic to write final output to OnBase database. To the best of our knowledge, FinFax is one of the first end-to-end system originating from an academic environment specifically designed for fax processing, integrating seamlessly with Epic, and successfully evaluated in a real-life hospital setting. A comprehensive analysis is provided, elucidating how the proposed end-to-end system significantly simplifies the existing workflow.

References

[1]
American Health Information Management Association position statement. Issue: Facsimile transmission of health information. J AHIMA 1994 May;65(5):suppl 3 p., following p. 80. 10134089
[2]
Siegler JE, Patel NN, Dine CJ. Prioritizing Paperwork Over Patient Care: Why Can't We Do Both? J Grad Med Educ 2015 Mar;7(1):16--18.
[3]
Richter KP, Faseru B, Shireman TI, Mussulman LM, Nazir N, Bush T, Scheuermann TS, Preacher KJ, Carlini BH, Magnusson B, Ellerbeck EF, Cramer C, Cook DJ, Martell MJ. Warm Handoff Versus Fax Referral for Linking Hospitalized Smokers to Quitlines. Am J Prev Med 2016 Oct;51(4):587--596. 27647059
[4]
Kruse CS, Goswamy R, Raval Y, Marawi S. Challenges and Opportunities of Big Data in Health Care: A Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform 2016 Nov 21;4(4):e38. 27872036
[5]
Anthony Kay. 2007. Tesseract: an open-source optical character recognition engine. Linux J. 2007, 159 (July 2007), 2.
[6]
Johnson, C. M., Johnson, T. R., & Zhang, J. (2005). A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 75--87
[7]
Zhang, J., & Walji, M. (2011). TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44 (6), 1056--1067.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
BCB '23: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
September 2023
626 pages
ISBN:9798400701269
DOI:10.1145/3584371
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 October 2023

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

BCB '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 885 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 32
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media