Genie Breaks the Bottle: Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Adoption: ChatGPT; The Beginning and the End of Human Wisdom
Authors: 
Shuyuan Mary Ho, Yue LiuAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 4
Abstract
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has attracted significant attention from early adopters. While this generative artificial intelligence (AI) system can be somewhat intuitive, such technology can also be disruptive in domains that require creativity (e.g., computer coding, system development and education), information authenticity (e.g., news agencies) and precision (e.g., manufacturing, clinical decision making). This study urges scholars in the fields of human-computer interaction and information system to reexamine technology adoption to better understand the criticality and ethics of AI and ChatGPT with regards to social change and social impact.
References
[1]
Davenport, T.H., From analytics to artificial intelligence. Journal of Business Analytics, 2018. 1(2): pp. 73--80.
[2]
Floridi, L., Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1999. 1: pp. 33--52.
[3]
Floridi, L., J. Cowls, M. Beltrametti, R. Chatila, P. Chazerand, V. Dignum, C. Luetge, R. Madelin, U. Pagallo, F. Rossi, B. Schafer, P. Valcke, and E. Vayena, AI4People--An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 2018. 28: pp. 689--707.
[4]
Floridi, L. and J.W. Sanders, On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 2004. 14: pp. 349--379.
[5]
France-Presse, A. World's best Go player flummoxed by Google's 'godlike' AlphaGo AI, in The Guardian, 2017 May 23, 2017; Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/23/alphago-google-ai-beats-ke-jie-china-go.
[6]
Gabbat, A. IBM computer Watson wins Jeoparty clash, in The Guardian, 2011 February 17, 2011; Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/feb/17/ibm-computer-watson-wins-jeopardy.
[7]
Hassenzahl, M., The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product, in Human-Computer Interaction Series (HCIS): Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, M.A. Blythe, et al., Editors. 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers: the Netherlands. pp. 31--42.
[8]
Hassenzahl, M. User experience (UX): Towards an experiential perspective on product quality. in Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM'08). 2008. Metz, France: ACM Digital Library. pp. 11--15. Retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1512714.1512717.
[9]
Hassenzahl, M., The Thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product, in Human-Computer Interaction Series: Funology 2, M. Blythe and A. Monk, Editors. 2018, Springer Nature. pp. 301--313.
[10]
Hinshaw, S.P. and A. Stier, Stigma as related to mental disordrs. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2008. 4: pp. 367--393.
[11]
Ho, S.M. Veracity AI: Truth disclosure against adversarial deepfake manipulation. 2023, issued from: Florida State University College of Communication and Information. Accessible at https://veracity.cci.fsu.edu/.
[12]
Ho, S.M. and J.T. Hancock, Context in a bottle: Language-action cues in spontaneous computer-mediated decepion. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019. 91: pp. 33--41.
[13]
Ho, S.M., J.T. Hancock, and C. Booth, Ethical dilemma: Deception dynamics in computer-mediated group communication. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017. 68(12): pp. 2729--2742.
[14]
Ho, S.M., J.T. Hancock, C. Booth, and X. Liu, Computer-mediated deception: Strategies revealed by language-action cues in spontaneous communication. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2016. 33(2): pp. 393--420.
[15]
Ho, S.M., J.T. Hancock, C. Booth, X. Liu, S.S. Timmarajus, and M. Burmester. Liar, Liar, IM on Fire: Deceptive language-action cues in spontaneous online communication. in Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics. 2015. Baltimore, MD: IEEE. pp. 157--159.
[16]
Jimenez, L. and U. Boser. Future of testing in education: Artificial intelligence. 2021, published by Center for American Progress. Report pp. 1--8. Accessible from: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/future-testing-education-artificial-intelligence/.
[17]
Klein, E. A.I. is about to get much weirder. Here's what to watch for., in The New York Times, 2023 03/21/2023; Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/21/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-kelsey-piper.html.
[18]
Klein, E. The most amazing--and dangerous--technology in the world, in The New York Times, 2023 04/04/2023; Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/04/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-chris-miller.html.
[19]
Klein, E. This changes everything, in The New York Times, 2023 03/12/2023; Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/12/opinion/chatbots-artificial-intelligence-future-weirdness.html.
[20]
Knijnenburg, B.P., M.C. Willemsen, Z. Gantner, H. Soncu, and C. Newell, Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adopted Interaction, 2012. 22: pp. 441--504.
[21]
Markoff, J. Computer wins on 'Jeopardy!': Trivial, it's not, in The New York Times, 2011 Feb 16, 2011; Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html.
[22]
Mozur, P. Google's AlphaGo defeats Chinese Go Master in win for A.I., in The New York Times, 2017 May 23, 2017; Accessible from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/business/google-deepmind-alphago-go-champion-defeat.html.
[23]
OpenAI. ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. 2023 [cited February 20, 2023; Available from: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/.
[24]
Romero-Brufau, S., K.D. Wyatt, P. Boyum, M. Mickelson, M. Moore, and C. Cognetta-Rieke, A lesson in implementation: A pre-post study of providers' experience with artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2020. 137: pp. 104072: 1--6.
[25]
Sutton, R.T., D. Pincock, D.C. Baumgart, D.C. Sadowski, R.N. Fedorak, and K.I. Kroeker, An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. npj Digital Medicine, 2020. 3: pp. 17: 1--10.
[26]
Taylor, L. Colombian judge says he used ChatGPT in ruling, in The Guardian, 2023 February 2, 2023; Accessible from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/03/colombia-judge-chatgpt-ruling.
[27]
Tegmark, M., Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. 2017: Knopf. 1--384.
[28]
Verma, P. and W. Oremus. ChatGPT invented a sexual harassment scandal and named a real law prof as the accused, in The Washington Post, 2023 04/05/2023; Accessible from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/04/05/chatgpt-lies/.
[29]
Yu, K.-H., A.L. Beam, and I.S. Kohane, Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2018. 2: pp. 719--731.
Index Terms
- Genie Breaks the Bottle: Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Adoption: ChatGPT; The Beginning and the End of Human Wisdom
Recommendations
The problem of machine ethics in artificial intelligence
AbstractThe advent of the intelligent robot has occupied a significant position in society over the past decades and has given rise to new issues in society. As we know, the primary aim of artificial intelligence or robotic research is not only to develop ...
Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence
AbstractA major approach to the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) is to use social choice, in which the AI is designed to act according to the aggregate views of society. This is found in the AI ethics of “coherent extrapolated volition” and “bottom–...
Artificial intelligence (AI) futures: India-UK collaborations emerging from the 4th Royal Society Yusuf Hamied workshop
Abstract“Artificial Intelligence” in all its forms has emerged as a transformative technology that is in the process of reshaping many aspects of industry and wider society at a global level. It has evolved from a concept to a technology that is driving ...
Highlights- Innovation through AI can make a transformative impact on industry and society.
- Trustworthy AI is critical for increasing levels of adoption.
- Evaluating the performance of LLMs to include common sense reasoning.
- Federated ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2023
95 pages
ISBN:9798400700941
DOI:10.1145/3579168
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 29 August 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
SIGMIS-CPR '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 44Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)44
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in