[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3576841.3585923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccpsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Digital-Twin-Based Patient Evaluation during Stroke Rehabilitation

Published: 09 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Individuals who experience motor impairment after stroke are able to partially restore motor control through rehabilitation, which achieves long-term recovery through repeated short-term adaptation. The customization of rehabilitation tasks is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of rehabilitation by promoting the patient's awareness of motor impairments and reducing compensatory behaviors, which is currently dependent on the expertise of physiotherapists. The development of rehabilitation robots aims to alleviate the workload of physiotherapists and has the potential to offer accurate assessments of both short-term adaptation and long-term recovery in stroke patients. In this paper, we propose a framework for automated patient evaluation and task planning during robotic rehabilitation. A motor control model was proposed to capture the patient's motor control process. By adjusting its state and parameters, a digital twin of the patient can be generated and updated, providing insight into the level of adaptation and rehabilitation progress. The digital twin is then utilized to plan customized rehabilitation tasks, which can effectively reduce uncertainty and ambiguities during patient evaluation, and improves patient's adaptation during rehabilitation. The digital twin framework and the task planning algorithms were validated using human subject and simulation experiments.

References

[1]
Bryan L Benson, Joaquin A Anguera, and Rachael D Seidler. 2011. A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation. Journal of neurophysiology 105, 6 (2011), 2843--2851.
[2]
L Brewer, Frances Horgan, Anne Hickey, and David Williams. 2013. Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine 106, 1 (2013), 11--25.
[3]
Etienne Burdet, David W Franklin, and Theodore E Milner. 2013. Human robotics: neuromechanics and motor control. MIT press.
[4]
Ozkan Celik, Marcia K O'Malley, Corwin Boake, Harvey S Levin, Nuray Yozbatiran, and Timothy A Reistetter. 2010. Normalized movement quality measures for therapeutic robots strongly correlate with clinical motor impairment measures. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 18, 4 (2010), 433--444.
[5]
Chia-Ling Chen, Chung-Yao Chen, Hsieh-Ching Chen, Ching-Yi Wu, Keh-Chung Lin, Yu-Wei Hsieh, and I-Hsuan Shen. 2019. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 55, 6 (2019), 754--760.
[6]
ByoungSeon Choi. 2012. ARMA model identification. Springer Science & Business Media.
[7]
Paul A David. 2013. Path-dependent learning, and the evolution of beliefs and behaviors: implications of Bayesian adaptation under computationally bounded rationality. In The evolution of economic diversity. Routledge, 93--140.
[8]
Valery L Feigin, Benjamin A Stark, Catherine Owens Johnson, Gregory A Roth, Catherine Bisignano, Gdiom Gebreheat Abady, Mitra Abbasifard, Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari, Foad Abd-Allah, Vida Abedi, et al. 2021. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990--2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Neurology 20, 10 (2021), 795--820.
[9]
Leonard E Kahn, Michele L Zygman, W Zev Rymer, and David J Reinkensmeyer. 2006. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 3, 1 (2006), 1--13.
[10]
Jeffrey A Kleim and Theresa A Jones. 2008. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. (2008).
[11]
Gert Kwakkel, Janne M Veerbeek, Erwin EH van Wegen, and Steven L Wolf. 2015. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. The Lancet Neurology 14, 2 (2015), 224--234.
[12]
Kristan A Leech, Ryan T Roemmich, James Gordon, Darcy S Reisman, and Kendra M Cherry-Allen. 2022. Updates in motor learning: implications for physical therapist practice and education. Physical therapy 102, 1 (2022), pzab250.
[13]
Elizabeth Leritz, Chris Loftis, Greg Crucian, William Friedman, and Dawn Bowers. 2004. Self-awareness of deficits in Parkinson disease. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 18, 3 (2004), 352--361.
[14]
Joachim Liepert, Cordula Restemeyer, Thomas Kucinski, Simone Zittel, and Cornelius Weiller. 2005. Motor strokes: the lesion location determines motor excitability changes. Stroke 36, 12 (2005), 2648--2648.
[15]
Rui CV Loureiro, William S Harwin, Kiyoshi Nagai, and Michelle Johnson. 2011. Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push. Medical & biological engineering & computing 49, 10 (2011), 1103--1118.
[16]
Peter S Lum, Charles G Burgar, Peggy C Shor, Matra Majmundar, and Machiel Van der Loos. 2002. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 83, 7 (2002), 952--959.
[17]
Matthew Millard, Thomas Uchida, Ajay Seth, and Scott L Delp. 2013. Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. Journal of biomechanical engineering 135, 2 (2013).
[18]
Tobias Nef, Matjaz Mihelj, Gabriela Kiefer, Christina Perndl, Roland Muller, and Robert Riener. 2007. ARMin-Exoskeleton for arm therapy in stroke patients. In 2007 IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics. IEEE, 68--74.
[19]
Erienne V Olesh, Sergiy Yakovenko, and Valeriya Gritsenko. 2014. Automated assessment of upper extremity movement impairment due to stroke. PloS one 9, 8 (2014), e104487.
[20]
Jeong-Ho Park, Yushin Kim, Kwang-Jae Lee, Yong-Soon Yoon, Si Hyun Kang, Heesang Kim, and Hyung-Soon Park. 2019. Artificial neural network learns clinical assessment of spasticity in modified Ashworth scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 100, 10 (2019), 1907--1915.
[21]
Katia Daniele Rech, Ana Paula Salazar, Ritchele Redivo Marchese, Giulia Schifino, Veronica Cimolin, and Aline Souza Pagnussat. 2020. Fugl-Meyer assessment scores are related with kinematic measures in people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 29, 1 (2020), 104463.
[22]
Robert Riener, Lars Lunenburger, Saso Jezernik, Martin Anderschitz, Gery Colombo, and Volker Dietz. 2005. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering 13, 3 (2005), 380--394.
[23]
Ismail Safaz, Bilge Ylmaz, Evren Yasar, and Rdvan Alaca. 2009. Brunnstrom recovery stage and motricity index for the evaluation of upper extremity in stroke: analysis for correlation and responsiveness. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 32, 3 (2009), 228--231.
[24]
Robert Teasell, Nancy M Salbach, Norine Foley, Anita Mountain, Jill I Cameron, Andrea de Jong, Nicole E Acerra, Diana Bastasi, Sherri L Carter, Joyce Fung, et al. 2020. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; update 2019. International Journal of Stroke 15, 7 (2020), 763--788.
[25]
Emanuel Todorov and Michael I Jordan. 2002. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature neuroscience 5, 11 (2002), 1226--1235.
[26]
Chaoqun Wang, Jiyu Cheng, Jiankun Wang, Xintong Li, and Max Q-H Meng. 2018. Efficient object search with belief road map using mobile robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 4 (2018), 3081--3088.
[27]
Dongshu Wang, Dapei Tan, and Lei Liu. 2018. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft computing 22, 2 (2018), 387--408.
[28]
Wenchuan Wei, Carter McElroy, and Sujit Dey. 2019. Towards on-demand virtual physical therapist: Machine learning-based patient action understanding, assessment and task recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 27, 9 (2019), 1824--1835.
[29]
Eric T Wolbrecht, Vicky Chan, David J Reinkensmeyer, and James E Bobrow. 2008. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 16, 3 (2008), 286--297.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICCPS '23: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 14th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (with CPS-IoT Week 2023)
May 2023
291 pages
ISBN:9798400700361
DOI:10.1145/3576841
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 May 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. robotic rehabilitation
  2. digital twin
  3. personalized treatment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICCPS '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 25 of 91 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)515
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)64
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Çığır Açan Uygulamalar: İnsan Dijital İkizi ile Geleceğe YolculukBandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi10.46413/boneyusbad.14409636:3(648-665)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Digital Twins for Healthcare Using WearablesBioengineering10.3390/bioengineering1106060611:6(606)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Digital Twins in NeuroscienceThe Journal of Neuroscience10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0932-24.202444:31(e0932242024)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Proactive Hand Rehabilitation Through a Double Digital Twin Provided by the Virtual Glove2024 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE)10.1109/MetroXRAINE62247.2024.10796497(970-975)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Calibration of the Double Digital Twin for the Hand Rehabilitation by the Virtual Glove2024 IEEE 37th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)10.1109/CBMS61543.2024.00092(521-526)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Human Digital Twins in Rehabilitation: A Case Study on Exoskeleton and Serious-Game-Based Stroke Rehabilitation Using the ETHICA MethodologyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.350802912(180968-180991)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)ETHICA: Designing Human Digital Twins—A Systematic Review and Proposed MethodologyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.341651712(86947-86973)Online publication date: 2024

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media