More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Analysis Model for Decentralized Lending Protocols

Authors:

Viet-Bang Pham,

Tuan-Dat TrinhAuthors Info & Claims

SoICT '22: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology

Pages 405 - 412

https://doi.org/10.1145/3568562.3568650

Published: 01 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – an ecosystem of financial applications built on top of blockchain technology – has kept powering ahead and attracted a large amount of capital in just a few years. As the core part of the DeFi ecosystem, decentralized lending protocols allow users to become lenders or borrowers in a completely decentralized fashion, such that an individual has complete control over their funds at all times. Collecting, analyzing, and visualizing lending data are crucial as these lending protocols are growing steadily. This paper presents an analysis model for decentralized lending protocols. Our main contributions are as follows. (i) We analyze and compare the top lending protocols; (ii) We present a general model to collect and process a large amount of data from multiple lending protocols in an exact and efficient manner; (iii) We design and implement a lending visualization system with various charts divided into three categories, i.e., lending market overview, token analysis, and user analysis.

References

[1]

AAVE. 2020. AAVE Protocol Whitepaper 2.0. https://github.com/aave/protocol-v2/blob/master/aave-v2-whitepaper.pdf

[2]

Andreas M Antonopoulos and Gavin Wood. 2018. Mastering ethereum: building smart contracts and dapps. O’reilly Media.

[3]

Giorgio Camozzi, Felix Härer, and Hans-Georg Fill. 2022. Multidimensional Analysis of Blockchain Data Using an ETL-based Approach. (2022).

[4]

Kristina Chodorow. 2011. Scaling MongoDB: Sharding, Cluster Setup, and Administration. “ O’Reilly Media, Inc.”, 5–18.

[5]

JustLend DAO. 2020. JustLend DAO Money Market Protocol V1.0. https://www.justlend.link/docs/justlend_whitepaper_en.pdf

[6]

Aaron Green, Christopher Cammilleri, John S Erickson, Oshani Seneviratne, and Kristin P Bennett. 2022. DeFi Survival Analysis: Insights into Risks and User Behaviors. (2022).

[7]

Rahela Lokman Hemashrif. 2021. An Analysis of Decentralized Finance and its Applications. Master’s thesis. uis.

[8]

Yoichi Hirai. 2017. Defining the ethereum virtual machine for interactive theorem provers. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 520–535.

[9]

Diana-Elena Ion. 2021. Decentralized Finance Analysis. Master’s thesis. University of Twente.

[10]

Kedar Iyer and Chris Dannen. 2018. The Ethereum Development Environment. Apress, Berkeley, CA, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3492-1_2

[11]

Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes. 2019. Compound: The Money Market Protocol. https://compound.finance/documents/Compound.Whitepaper.pdf

[12]

Evgeny Medvedev and the D5 team. 2018. Ethereum ETL. https://github.com/blockchain-etl/ethereum-etl

[13]

Makiko Mita, Kensuke Ito, Shohei Ohsawa, and Hideyuki Tanaka. 2019. What is stablecoin?: A survey on price stabilization mechanisms for decentralized payment systems. In 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI). IEEE, 60–66.

[14]

Abhijay Paliwal. 2022. Analysis between different Decentralized Lending and Borrowing Protocols. Journal of Business Analytics and Data Visualization (2022), 15–23.

[15]

Daniel Perez, Sam M Werner, Jiahua Xu, and Benjamin Livshits. 2021. Liquidations: DeFi on a Knife-edge. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 457–476.

Digital Library

[16]

Viktorija Stepanova and Ingars Eriņš. 2021. Review of decentralized finance applications and their total value locked. TEM Journal 10, 1 (2021), 327–333.

[17]

WD Wallis. 2013. The Mathematics of Finance. Mathematics in the Real World(2013), 205–214.

[18]

Sam M Werner, Daniel Perez, Lewis Gudgeon, Ariah Klages-Mundt, Dominik Harz, and William J Knottenbelt. 2021. Sok: Decentralized finance (defi). arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.08778(2021).

[19]

Jiahua Xu, Krzysztof Paruch, Simon Cousaert, and Yebo Feng. 2021. Sok: Decentralized exchanges (dex) with automated market maker (AMM) protocols. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12732(2021).

[20]

Teng Andrea Xu and Jiahua Xu. 2022. A Short Survey on Business Models of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Protocols. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07742(2022).

[21]

Gavin Zheng, Longxiang Gao, Liqun Huang, and Jian Guan. 2021. Application Binary Interface (ABI). Springer Singapore, Singapore, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6218-1_5

Cited By

Alamsyah AKusuma GRamadhani D(2024)A Review on Decentralized Finance EcosystemsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1603007616:3(76)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16030076
Singh KK P PBenakatti SSrivatsa V(2023)Revolutionizing Digital Banking: Harnessing Blockchain Smart Contracts for Enhanced Security and Efficiency2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON)10.1109/SMARTGENCON60755.2023.10442642(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTGENCON60755.2023.10442642
Zhang TRen HMao QMa CLiang SHu DLiu X(2023)Unlocking Decentralized Lending Protocols: Semantic Unification and Risk Spillover Assessment2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00095(691-697)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00095

Index Terms

Analysis Model for Decentralized Lending Protocols
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Architectures
    1. Other architectures
      1. Special purpose systems

Recommendations

A default risk model with multi-loan lending operations: a system of integral scale with scope

Recent research on multi-loan lending operations has remained largely silent on the question of what ties together the retail banking functions of scale and scope lending. Our main point is that in a sense, they are just two different manifestations of ...
Contagion in Decentralized Lending Protocols: A Case Study of Compound
DeFi '23: Proceedings of the 2023 Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security

We study financial contagion in Compound V2, a decentralized lending protocol deployed on the Ethereum blockchain. We explain how to construct the balance sheets of Compound's liquidity pools and use our methodology to characterize the financial ...
Systemic Risk and Interbank Lending

We propose a simple model of the banking system incorporating a game feature, where the evolution of monetary reserve is modeled as a system of coupled Feller diffusions. The optimization reflects the desire of each bank to borrow from or lend to a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

SoICT '22: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology

December 2022

474 pages

ISBN:9781450397254

DOI:10.1145/3568562

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

SoICT 2022

SoICT 2022: The 11th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology

December 1 - 3, 2022

Hanoi, Vietnam

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 318 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
114
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)53
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Alamsyah AKusuma GRamadhani D(2024)A Review on Decentralized Finance EcosystemsFuture Internet10.3390/fi1603007616:3(76)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16030076
Singh KK P PBenakatti SSrivatsa V(2023)Revolutionizing Digital Banking: Harnessing Blockchain Smart Contracts for Enhanced Security and Efficiency2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON)10.1109/SMARTGENCON60755.2023.10442642(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTGENCON60755.2023.10442642
Zhang TRen HMao QMa CLiang SHu DLiu X(2023)Unlocking Decentralized Lending Protocols: Semantic Unification and Risk Spillover Assessment2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00095(691-697)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00095

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents