What Not to Wear: Exploring Taboos in Clothing Through Speculative Design
Pages 1 - 14
Abstract
Traditional clothing is commonly worn in India and are visual markers of caste, religion, region, political affiliation, and gender. While family, friends, and communities implicitly monitor what is worn, it causes tensions between personal choices of self-expression and social expectations of conformity. This paper describes a speculative design project that explores clothing taboos and possible futures in private, public, and regional/national contexts. We describe a participatory workshop conducted to facilitate reflection about the clothing choices people make today, and to re-imagine the purpose of clothing in the future. The result was the design of a dystopian speculative world called Oneness exhibited in a series of photographs depicting provocative transformations in private, public, and regional/national life. The exhibition became a catalyst for deeper reflections and insights and we suggest speculative techniques could be used more often to create supportive spaces for discussions around culturally sensitive and taboo topics.
References
[1]
2012. The India behind the ghunghat. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/rasheeda-bhagat/The-India-behind-the-ghunghat/article20509310.ece Last accessed on 10 May 2023.
[2]
2018. Clothing, Identity and the Embodiment of Age Julia Twigg / clothing-identity-and-the-embodiment-of-age-julia-twigg.pdf / PDF4PRO. https://pdf4pro.com/view/clothing-identity-and-the-embodiment-of-age-julia-twigg-4a05af.html
[3]
2019. Textiles and Fabrics of India | INDIAN CULTURE. http://indianculture.gov.in/textiles-and-fabrics-of-india Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[4]
2022. Pussyhat. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pussyhat&oldid=1123550769 Page Version ID: 1123550769 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[5]
2023. Burkini. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burkini&oldid=1153407455 Page Version ID: 1153407455 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[6]
2023. French ban on face covering. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_ban_on_face_covering&oldid=1150204322 Page Version ID: 1150204322 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[7]
2023. Ghoonghat. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ghoonghat&oldid=1149367297 Page Version ID: 1149367297 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[8]
2023. Mahsa Amini protests. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahsa_Amini_protests&oldid=1152910230 Page Version ID: 1152910230 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[9]
2023. Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter - Future of Life Institute. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ Last accessed on 10 May 2023.
[10]
2023. Pride parade. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pride_parade&oldid=1153008133 Page Version ID: 1153008133 Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[11]
Amna Abid and Suleman Shahid. 2017. Helping Pregnant Women in the Rural Areas of Pakistan using a Low-cost Interactive System. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development(ICTD ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136560.3136607
[12]
James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (March 2013), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276.
[13]
James Auger. 2014. Living with robots: a speculative design approach. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, 1 (Feb. 2014), 20–42. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Auger
[14]
Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Erik Stolterman. 2014. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1951–1960. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557137
[15]
Geeta Bhandari. 2011. Dresses of india. https://www.slideshare.net/geeta1967/dresses-of-india Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[16]
Breno Bitarello, Hugo Fuks, and João Queiroz. 2010. New technologies for dynamic tattoo art. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction(TEI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935774
[17]
Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318014
[18]
Stuart Candy. 2018. Gaming Futures Literacy: The Thing From The Future. 233–246.
[19]
Stuart Candy and Kelly Kornet Weber. 2020. Ethnographic Experiential Futures (EXF). 157–170.
[20]
Eric Corbett and Christopher Le Dantec. 2019. Towards a Design Framework for Trust in Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322296
[21]
Jay L. Cunningham, Sydney T. Nguyen, Julie A. Kientz, and Daniela Rosner. 2022. The Cost of Culture: An Analysis of Cash App and the Financial Inclusion of Black American Communities. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533569
[22]
Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, Robb Mitchell, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Design Framework for Social Wearables. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322291
[23]
Fred Davis. 1994. Fashion, Culture, and Identity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3684378.html
[24]
Dazed. 2020. A brief history of sindoor, the divisive Indian tradition of coloured roots. https://www.dazeddigital.com/beauty/article/49915/1/a-brief-history-of-sindoor-the-divisive-indian-tradition-of-coloured-roots
[25]
Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861
[26]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press. Google-Books-ID: 9gQyAgAAQBAJ.
[27]
Grace Eden, Marina Jirotka, and Bernd Stahl. 2013. Responsible research and innovation: Critical reflection into the potential social consequences of ICT. In IEEE 7th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2013.6577706 ISSN: 2151-1357.
[28]
Ilker Etikan, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim, 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics 5, 1 (2016), 1–4.
[29]
Norman L. Farberow. 2017. Taboo Topics. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315130576
[30]
Pedro Gil Farias, Roy Bendor, and Bregje F. van Eekelen. 2022. Social dreaming together: A critical exploration of participatory speculative design. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 2(PDC ’22, Vol. 2). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537826
[31]
Enric Granzotto Llagostera. 2019. Cook Your Way: Political Game Design with Alternative Controllers. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion(DIS ’19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3325148
[32]
Greg Guest, Kathleen M.MacQueen, and Emily E.Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
[33]
Shruti Gupta, Deepali Rastogi, and RITU Mathur. 2017. Khadi: An Iconic Indian Cloth. Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (2017), 267–278.
[34]
Meenakshi Handa and Arpita Khare. 2013. Gender as a moderator of the relationship between materialism and fashion clothing involvement among Indian youth. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37, 1 (2013), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01057.x
[35]
Karen Tranberg Hansen. 2004. The World in Dress: Anthropological Perspectives on Clothing, Fashion, and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 33, 1 (2004), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143805
[36]
Jean Hardy and Stefani Vargas. 2019. Participatory Design and the Future of Rural LGBTQ Communities. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion(DIS ’19 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3323894
[37]
Tyana Hendriksma, Joanne Maartense, Rosanne de Feyter, Rong-Hao Liang, and Loe Feijs. 2020. Designing Interactive Clothing to Raise Awareness of and Comfort the Wearer Suffering from Anxiety. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395884
[38]
Michaela Honauer. 2017. Designing Interactive Costumes: Challenges and Prospects to Integrate Computational Clothing in the Performing Arts. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’17 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 388–390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079166
[39]
Jonna Häkkilä, Ashley Colley, Paula Roinesalo, and Jani Väyrynen. 2017. Clothing integrated augmented reality markers. 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152832.3152850
[40]
Sohail Inayatullah. 2017. Macrohistory and Timing the Future as Practice. World Futures Review 9, 1 (March 2017), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756716686788
[41]
Pradthana Jarusriboonchai and Jonna Häkkilä. 2019. Customisable wearables: exploring the design space of wearable technology. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365635
[42]
Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao, Paul Johns, Asta Roseway, and Mary Czerwinski. 2016. Tattio: Fabrication of Aesthetic and Functional Temporary Tattoos. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3699–3702. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890269
[43]
Mukti Khaire. 2011. The Indian Fashion Industry and Traditional Indian Crafts. The Business History Review 85, 2 (2011), 345–366. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41301395
[44]
Arpita Khare, Ankita Mishra, and Ceeba Parveen. 2012. Influence of collective self esteem on fashion clothing involvement among Indian women. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 16, 1 (Jan. 2012), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211203023
[45]
Lazy Thinkers. 2015. Whose Fault is RAPE | Shocking Reponses Which Will Shake You | India’s Daughters Ep.1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyegZkw9-qM
[46]
Roxanne Leitão. 2019. Anticipating Smart Home Security and Privacy Threats with Survivors of Intimate Partner Abuse. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322366
[47]
Angella Mackey, Ron Wakkary, Stephan Wensveen, Annika Hupfeld, and Oscar Tomico. 2020. Alternative Presents for Dynamic Fabric. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395447
[48]
Cade Metz. 2023. ‘The Godfather of A.I.’ Leaves Google and Warns of Danger Ahead. The New York Times (May 2023). https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/technology/ai-google-chatbot-engineer-quits-hinton.html
[49]
Ivica Mitrovic. 2015. Introduction to speculative design practice–eutropia, a case study. Croatian Designers Association, Arts Academy, University of Split (2015).
[50]
Sachin R. Pendse, Naveena Karusala, Divya Siddarth, Pattie Gonsalves, Seema Mehrotra, John A. Naslund, Mamta Sood, Neha Kumar, and Amit Sharma. 2019. Mental health in the global south: challenges and opportunities in HCI for development. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies(COMPASS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314344.3332483
[51]
Helen Petrie. 2023. Talking ‘bout my Generation … or not? The Digital Technology Life Experiences of Older People. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3582742
[52]
Ramya Rajagopalan and Jeanne Heitmeyer. 2005. Ethnicity and consumer choice: A study of consumer levels of involvement in Indian ethnic apparel and contemporary American clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 9, 1 (Jan. 2005), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020510586424
[53]
Jennifer A. Rode, Rachel Magee, Melinda Sebastian, Alan Black, Rachel Yudell, Aly Gibran, Nora McDonald, and John Zimmerman. 2012. Rethinking the smart closet as an opportunity to enhance the social currency of clothing. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370245
[54]
Lawrence B. Rosenfeld and Timothy G. Plax. 1977. Clothing as Communication. Journal of Communication 27, 2 (June 1977), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01823.x
[55]
Scroll.in. 2018. Decoding Hinduism With Devdutt Pattanaik | Episode 2: Clothes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmzPkxywAO4
[56]
Sejal Kumar. 2017. YOUR CLOTHES MATTER IN INDIA (Girls Only) | Sejal Kumar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-oWHGZjpFM
[57]
Sumita Sharma, Netta Iivari, Marianne Kinnula, Grace Eden, Alipta Ballav, Rocío Fatás, Ritwik Kar, Deepak Ranjan Padhi, Vahid Sadeghie, Pratiti Sarkar, 2021. From Mild to Wild: Reimagining Friendships and Romance in the Time of Pandemic Using Design Fiction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 64–77.
[58]
SheThePeople TV. 2021. What’s wrong with wearing less clothes? | #PointTohHai by Raina Raonta. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEFKk-KMx1U
[59]
Shaleen Singhal, Stanley McGreal, and Jim Berry. 2013. Application of a hierarchical model for city competitiveness in cities of India. Cities 31 (April 2013), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.012
[60]
SpeculativeEdu and Ivica Mitrović. 2019. Reconstrained Futures: SpeculativeEdu Exhibition at BIO 26. https://speculativeedu.eu/reconstrained-futures-speculativeedu-exhibition-at-bio-26/
[61]
Katta Spiel. 2021. ”Why are they all obsessed with Gender?” — (Non)binary Navigations through Technological Infrastructures. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021(DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462033
[62]
Dag Svanæs. 2013. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty’s phenomenology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (April 2013), 8:1–8:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442114
[63]
Emma Tarlo. 1996. Clothing Matters: Dress and Identity in India. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3629913.html
[64]
Alexandra To, Hillary Carey, Riya Shrivastava, Jessica Hammer, and Geoff Kaufman. 2022. Interactive Fiction Provotypes for Coping with Interpersonal Racism. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502044
[65]
Anupriya Tuli, Shruti Dalvi, Neha Kumar, and Pushpendra Singh. 2019. “It’s a girl thing”: Examining Challenges and Opportunities around Menstrual Health Education in India. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26, 5 (July 2019), 29:1–29:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325282
[66]
Laia Turmo Vidal, Hui Zhu, Annika Waern, and Elena Márquez Segura. 2021. The Design Space of Wearables for Sports and Fitness Practices. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445700
[67]
Unsplash. 2018. Photo by Andrej Lišakov on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/3A4XZUopCJA Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[68]
Unsplash. 2019. Photo by Steven HWG on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/9nTFQgFEw4k Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[69]
Unsplash. 2020. Photo by Dmitry Khrustalev-Grigoriev on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/a0X9tAAxzaA Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[70]
Unsplash. 2020. Photo by Manson Yim on Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/qeYJ1RSRV-U Last accessed on 1 February 2023.
[71]
Luke Westaway. 2011. Samsung says 2001: A Space Odyssey invented the tablet, not Apple. https://www.cnet.com/culture/samsung-says-2001-a-space-odyssey-invented-the-tablet-not-apple/
[72]
WhatWouldYouWear. 2021. What Would You Wear Speculative Design: Part 1 (The Problem with Now). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPkUoPLyeyQ
[73]
WhatWouldYouWear. 2021. What Would You Wear Speculative Design Project: Part 2 (The Forecast). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia97fROxSYw
Index Terms
- What Not to Wear: Exploring Taboos in Clothing Through Speculative Design
Recommendations
Design Recommendations for Historical Cemeteries Using Speculative Design
Academic Mindtrek '22: Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceHistorical cemeteries are interesting design spaces within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), due to their cultural and personal significance, and that they also serve multi-purposes within an urban community. However, contemporary usage of such places ...
Designing Speculative Civics
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs human computer interaction design research continues to expand domains, civics is emerging as an important subject through which to explore how computation shapes our public lives. In this paper we present and reflect upon a series of research ...
Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe question of who gets to contribute to design futures and technology innovation has become a topic of conversation across HCI, CSCW, and other computing communities. This conversation has grave implications for communities that often find themselves ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2023
2717 pages
ISBN:9781450398930
DOI:10.1145/3563657
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 July 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
DIS '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 500Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)326
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format