[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3556089.3556130acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Effect of Regression Methods on the Performance of Options Pricing using Machine Learning

Published: 30 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The pricing of financial derivatives is one of the most important issues in financial markets. Due to the huge computational complexity, highly dependence of model and parameter of the traditional pricing model based on Monte Carlo simulation, it has brought huge challenges to complex option pricing and risk management. This paper proposed a data-driven pricing method for non-parameter models based on regression methods. By constructing training sets and test sets, the three most common machine learning methods, namely support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian process regression (GPR) and kernel ridge regression (KRR), were employed to price barrier options and lookback options. Which were compared with pricing with Heston model. It was found that the dependence of the option price on the parameters predicted by the non-parametric model was much lower than that of the Heston model, and the convergence of the pricing accuracy and time cost were very excellent and smaller. A cross-comparison with different machine learning methods shown that the predictive performance of the GPR model was better than the other two models for the pricing of barrier and lookback options. This option pricing, which does not depend on parameter conditions, has important significance for a wider range of option pricing.

References

[1]
Leif BG Andersen. 2007. Efficient simulation of the Heston stochastic volatility model. Available at SSRN 946405(2007).
[2]
David S Bates. 2003. Empirical option pricing: A retrospection. Journal of Econometrics 116, 1-2 (2003), 387–404.
[3]
Fischer Black and Myron Scholes. 2019. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. In World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance: Volume 1: Foundations of CCA and Equity Valuation. World Scientific, 3–21.
[4]
Evgeny Burnaev and Ivan Nazarov. 2016. Conformalized kernel ridge regression. In 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 45–52.
[5]
Longbing Cao. 2022. AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques, and Opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55, 3 (2022), 1–38.
[6]
Jan De Spiegeleer, Dilip B Madan, Sofie Reyners, and Wim Schoutens. 2018. Machine learning for quantitative finance: fast derivative pricing, hedging and fitting. Quantitative Finance 18, 10 (2018), 1635–1643.
[7]
Ryan Ferguson and Andrew Green. 2018. Deeply learning derivatives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02233(2018).
[8]
Lirong Gan, Huamao Wang, and Zhaojun Yang. 2020. Machine learning solutions to challenges in finance: An application to the pricing of financial products. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153 (2020), 119928.
[9]
Steven L Heston. 1993. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. The Review of Financial Studies 6, 2 (1993), 327–343.
[10]
John Hull and Alan White. 1987. The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. The Journal of Finance 42, 2 (1987), 281–300.
[11]
James M Hutchinson, Andrew W Lo, and Tomaso Poggio. 1994. A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks. The Journal of Finance 49, 3 (1994), 851–889.
[12]
You Liang, A Thavaneswaran, Alexander Paseka, and Janakumar Bhanushali. 2021. Fuzzy Option Pricing with Data-Driven Volatility using Novel Monte-Carlo Approach. In 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE, 1–7.
[13]
Robert C Merton. 1976. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 1-2 (1976), 125–144.
[14]
Carl Edward Rasmussen. 2003. Gaussian processes in machine learning. In Summer School on Machine Learning. Springer, 63–71.
[15]
Vladimir Vovk. 2013. Kernel ridge regression. In Empirical Inference. Springer, 105–116.
[16]
Zuoquan Gong, Lin Li, Xi Yu, and Mingsen Deng. 2020. Option Pricing pAckage based on HEterogeneous Machine (Opahem v1.0).

Index Terms

  1. The Effect of Regression Methods on the Performance of Options Pricing using Machine Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '22: Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2022
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450396394
      DOI:10.1145/3556089
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 November 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Gaussian process regression
      2. Heston model
      3. Kernel ridge regression
      4. Option pricing
      5. Support vector regression

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • Natural Science and Technology Foundation of Department of Education of Guizhou Province
      • Natural Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province
      • Plan Project for Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology

      Conference

      ICEME 2022

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 36
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media