[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3549737.3549755acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessetnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Ethics Impact Assessment (EIA) for AI uses in Health & Care: The correlation of ethics and legal aspects when AI systems are used in health & care contexts

Published: 09 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The field of automated-decision making systems using AI technologies has evolved rapidly over the past years. Alongside the technological evolution, the debate surrounding the principles from an ethics point of view that these systems should be based upon, has produced a prolific number of analyses and discussions. In the health & care context, AI systems serve a wide range of activities, from prevention and diagnosis to treatment and monitoring and a variety of users, be it health & care experts or personnel as well as healthy individuals or those requiring medical assistance or treatment. Some of the categories of uses and users, the opportunities and the challenges from a legal and ethics point of view, linked to each category, are discussed in this paper. A transdisciplinary approach is of primordial importance. Such approach should comprise stakeholders and elements from the technology design and development area, the legal and ethics fields and importantly, the users of such AI systems in the health & care context. The paper attempts to demonstrate the various notions that are entangled in the conception, design, development, deployment and use of such systems and introduce the idea of an ‘Ethics Impact Assessment’ (‘EIA’) for a more robust operationalization in a health & care context.

References

[1]
G. Andrade. 2019. Medical ethics and the trolley Problem. Med Ethics Hist Med 12, 3 (2019).
[2]
Edmond Awad, Sydney Levine, Michael Anderson, Susan Leigh Anderson, Vincent Conitzer, M.J. Crockett, Jim A.C. Everett, Theodoros Evgeniou, Alison Gopnik, Julian C. Jamison, Tae Wan Kim, S. Matthew Liao, Michelle N. Meyer, John Mikhail, Kweku Opoku-Agyemang, Jana Schaich Borg, Juliana Schroeder, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Marija Slavkovik, and Josh B. Tenenbaum. 2022. Computational Ethics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences(2022), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.009
[3]
Council of Europe. 2021. History of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/history-of-ai
[4]
E. R. Crigger. 2022. Trustworthy Augmented Intelligence in Health Care. J Med Syst 46(2022).
[5]
B. Dainow and P. Brey. 2021. Ethics By Design and Ethics of Use Approaches for Artificial Intelligence. Brussels: European Commission(2021).
[6]
Ross Don. 2021. Game Theory. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/game-theory/
[7]
B. Duignan. 2022. Philosophy & Religion. https://www.britannica.com/topic/trolley-problem
[8]
European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence
[9]
High Level Expert Group on AI. 2019. A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60651
[10]
High Level Expert Group on AI. 2019. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Technical Report. European Commision. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
[11]
IBM. 2020. Strong AI. IBM Cloud Learn Hub. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/strong-ai#toc-strong-ai--YaLcx8oG
[12]
Aurélie Jean and Grégory Renard. 2022. The Holberton-Turing Oath. https://www.holbertonturingoath.org/
[13]
L. Kalbag and A. Balkan. 2020. Ethical Design Manifesto. https://ind.ie/about/manifesto/
[14]
B. Kocher and Z. Emanuel. 2018. Will robots replace doctors?USC-BROOKINGS SCHAEFFER ON HEALTH POLICY:. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2019/03/05/will-robots-replace-doctors/
[15]
I. Maathuis, M. Niezen, D. Buitenweg, I. L., Bongers, and C. Nieuwenhuizen. 2020. Exploring Human Values in the Design of a Web-Based QoL-Instrument for People with Mental Health Problems: A Value Sensitive Design Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics(2020), 871–898. https://ind.ie/about/manifesto/
[16]
Marvin Minsky. 1984. Jokes and the Logic of the Cognitive Unconscious. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9188-6_10
[17]
P. Phillips, Carina Hahn, Peter Fontana, Amy Yates, Kristen Greene, David Broniatowski, and Mark Przybocki. 2021. Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8312
[18]
JE Riggs. 2004. Medical ethics, logic traps, and game theory: an illustrative tale of brain death.Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2004), 359–361. https://ind.ie/about/manifesto/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical DevicesJournal of Personalized Medicine10.3390/jpm1405044314:5(443)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024

Index Terms

  1. An Ethics Impact Assessment (EIA) for AI uses in Health & Care: The correlation of ethics and legal aspects when AI systems are used in health & care contexts

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SETN '22: Proceedings of the 12th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence
          September 2022
          450 pages
          ISBN:9781450395977
          DOI:10.1145/3549737
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 09 September 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Artificial Intelligence
          2. Ethics Impact Assessment
          3. Ethics-by-Design
          4. Health & Care
          5. Liability

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          SETN 2022

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)84
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
          Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical DevicesJournal of Personalized Medicine10.3390/jpm1405044314:5(443)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media