More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

“What if everyone is able to program?” – Exploring the Role of Software Development in Science Fiction

Authors:

Nora Anna Luise Hille,

Thomas LudwigAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 597, Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581436

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

For decades, research around emerging technologies has been inspired by science fiction and vice versa. While so far almost only the technologies themselves have been considered, we explore the underlying software development and programming approaches. We therefore conduct a detailed media content analysis of twenty-seven movies that examines the role of software development in science fiction by identifying and investigating new approaches to programming and how software development is conceptualized portrayed within science fiction scenes. With the additional analysis of eighteen design fiction stories exploring the scenario “What if everyone is able to program?”, we envision potential impacts of the democratization of software development on business and society. Our study opens new discussions and perspectives, by investigating the current vision of the future of programming and uncovers new approaches to software development which can serve as a starting point for further research in the HCI community.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3581436-video-preview.mp4)

Video Preview

Download
64.21 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581436-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
114.69 MB

References

[1]

Ulrike Abelein, Helen Sharp, and Barbara Paech. 2013. Does Involving Users in Software Development Really Influence System Success? IEEE Software 30, 6: 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2013.124

Digital Library

[2]

Reinhold Achatz. 2006. Optimization of Software Development. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering.

Digital Library

[3]

Vincenzo Ambriola, Paolo Ciancarini, Andrea Corradini, and Nicoletta DeFrancesco. 1991. Towards innovative software engineering environments. Journal of Systems and Software 14, 1: 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(91)90085-K

Digital Library

[4]

Markus Appel, Stefan Krause, Uli Gleich, and Martina Mara. 2016. Meaning through fiction: Science fiction and innovative technologies. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10, 4: 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000052

[5]

Benett Axtell and Cosmin Munteanu. 2021. Tea, Earl Grey, Hot: Designing Speech Interactions from the Imagined Ideal of Star Trek. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445640

Digital Library

[6]

John Backus. 1978. The history of Fortran I, II, and III. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 13, 8: 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/960118.808380

Digital Library

[7]

Gillian Bain and Ian Barnes. 2014. Why is programming so hard to learn? In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education - ITiCSE ’14, 356–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602675

Digital Library

[8]

Titus Barik, Rahul Pandita, Justin Middleton, and Emerson Murphy-Hill. 2016. Designing for dystopia: software engineering research for the post-apocalypse. In Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, 924–927. https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2983986

Digital Library

[9]

Rebecca Bates, Judy Goldsmith, Rosalyn Berne, Valerie Summet, and Nanette Veilleux. 2012. Science fiction in computer science education. In SIGCSE’12 - Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 161–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157184

Digital Library

[10]

Francesco Benzi and Daniela Fogli. 2015. The Role of Gamification in End-User Development. In CoPDA@ IS-EUD, 32–38.

[11]

Alan F. Blackwell. 2017. End-User Developers – What Are They Like? In New Perspectives in End-User Development, Fabio Paternò and Volker Wulf (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_6

[12]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[13]

Robert L. Brennan and Dale J. Prediger. 1981. Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41, 3: 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100307

[14]

Damien Brun, Philipp Jordan, and Jonna Hakkila. 2021. Demonstrating a Memory Orb — Cylindrical Device Inspired by Science Fiction. In 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3497873

Digital Library

[15]

Felix Carros, Isabel Schwaninger, Adrian Preussner, Dave Randall, Rainer Wieching, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Volker Wulf. 2022. Care Workers Making Use of Robots: Results of a Three-Month Study on Human-Robot Interaction within a Care Home. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517435

Digital Library

[16]

Yu-Ting Cheng, Guo-Ling Tsai, Heng-An Lin, Yi-Ching Huang, Rung Huei Liang, and Lin-Lin Chen. 2019. Call Me by My Name. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313074

Digital Library

[17]

Victor Cheung and Alissa N. Antle. 2020. Tangible Interfaces and Interactions in Sci-Fi Movies. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374942

Digital Library

[18]

Yu-Kai Chou. 2014. Actionable gamification. Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards.

[19]

K. R. Chowdhary. 2020. On the Evolution of Programming Languages. ArXiv abs/2007.0. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.02699

[20]

Nicholas S. Dalton, Rebecca Moreau, and Ross K. Adams. 2016. Resistance is Fertile. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892572

Digital Library

[21]

Yvonne Dittrich, Christian Bo Michelsen, Paolo Tell, Pernille Lous, and Allan Ebdrup. 2020. Exploring the evolution of software practices. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409766

Digital Library

[22]

Paul Dourish. 2003. The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 4: 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026149119426

Digital Library

[23]

Phan Minh Dung. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 2: 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

Digital Library

[24]

Tore Dyba and Torgeir Dingsoyr. 2009. What Do We Know about Agile Software Development? IEEE Software 26, 5: 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2009.145

Digital Library

[25]

Hakan Erdogmus, Nenad Medvidovic, and Frances Paulisch. 2018. 50 Years of Software Engineering. IEEE Software 35, 5: 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.3571240

[26]

Katrina Falkner, Claudia Szabo, Rebecca Vivian, and Nickolas Falkner. 2015. Evolution of Software Development Strategies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2015.153

[27]

Ylva Fernaeus and Jakob Tholander. 2006. Finding design qualities in a tangible programming space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124839

Digital Library

[28]

Edgardo Ferretti, Marcelo L. Errecalde, Alejandro J. García, and Guillermo R. Simari. 2014. A possibilistic defeasible logic programming approach to argumentation-based decision-making. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 26, 4: 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.921733

[29]

Corinne Gendron, Silvester Ivanaj, Bernard Girard, and Marie-Luc Arpin. 2017. Science-fiction literature as inspiration for social theorizing within sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production 164: 1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.044

[30]

GitHub. GitHub Copilot. Retrieved from https://github.com/features/copilot/

[31]

Judy Goldsmith and Nicholas Mattei. 2014. Fiction as an Introduction to Computer Science Research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 14, 1: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576873

Digital Library

[32]

Ruthanna Gordon. 2009. Learning From Fiction: Applications in Emerging Technologies. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 29, 6: 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467609349054

[33]

Thomas F. Gordon, Horst Friedrich, and Douglas Walton. 2018. Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR). Argument & Computation 9, 2: 91–119. https://doi.org/10.3233/AAC-180039

[34]

Loretta Rose Guarino. 1978. The Evolution of Abstraction in Programming Languages.

[35]

Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Roosa Piitulainen, and Andrés Lucero. 2021. Forming the Dog Internet. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, ISS: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3488539

Digital Library

[36]

Philipp Jordan. 2018. Science Fiction in HCI-A nuanced view. ACM IX Blogs. Ed. by Gilbert Cockton.

[37]

Philipp Jordan and Brent Auernheimer. 2018. The Fiction in Computer Science: A Qualitative Data Analysis of the ACM Digital Library for Traces of Star Trek. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Verlag, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3_48

[38]

Philipp Jordan, Omar Mubin, Mohammad Obaid, and Paula Alexandra Silva. 2018. Exploring the referral and usage of science fiction in HCI literature. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7_2

Digital Library

[39]

Philipp Jordan, Omar Mubin, and Paula Alexandra Silva. 2016. A Conceptual Research Agenda and Quantification Framework for the Relationship Between Science-Fiction Media and Human-Computer Interaction. In Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Verlag, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40548-3_9

[40]

Philipp Jordan and Paula Alexandra Silva. 2019. Building an Argument for the Use of Science Fiction in HCI Education. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Verlag, 846–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_129

[41]

Philipp Jordan and Paula Alexandra Silva. 2021. Science Fiction—An Untapped Opportunity in HCI Research and Education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_3

Digital Library

[42]

K. Kakas. 1999. Computing argumentation in logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 9, 4: 515–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/9.4.515

[43]

Murata Kiyoshi, A. Adams Andrew, Fukuta Yasunori, Orito Yohko, Arias-Oliva Mario, and Pelegrin-Borondo Jorge. 2017. From a Science Fiction to the Reality. The ORBIT Journal 1, 2: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29297/orbit.v1i2.42

[44]

Amy J. Ko, Brad A. Myers, and Htet Htet Aung. 2004. Six Learning Barriers in End-User Programming Systems. In 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2004.47

Digital Library

[45]

Tadayoshi Kohno and Brian David Johnson. 2011. Science fiction prototyping and security education: Cultivating contextual and societal thinking in computer security education and beyond. In SIGCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953173

Digital Library

[46]

Bowen Kong, Rung-Huei Liang, MengChi Liu, Shu-Hsiang Chang, Hsiu-Chen Tseng, and Chian-Huei Ju. 2021. Neuromancer Workshop: Towards Designing Experiential Entanglement with Science Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445273

Digital Library

[47]

Veronika Krauß, Alexander Boden, Leif Oppermann, and René Reiners. 2021. Current Practices, Challenges, and Design Implications for Collaborative AR/VR Application Development. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445335

Digital Library

[48]

Kevin Krings, Philip Weber, Florian Jasche, and Thomas Ludwig. 2022. FADER: An Authoring Tool for Creating Augmented Reality-Based Avatars from an End-User Perspective. In Mensch und Computer 2022, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3543778

Digital Library

[49]

Michael Laakasuo, Marianna Drosinou, Mika Koverola, Anton Kunnari, Juho Halonen, Noora Lehtonen, and Jussi Palomäki. 2018. What makes people approve or condemn mind upload technology? Untangling the effects of sexual disgust, purity and science fiction familiarity. Palgrave Communications 4, 1: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0124-6

[50]

Shaun Lawson, Ben Kirman, and Conor Linehan. 2016. Power, participation, and the dog internet. Interactions 23, 4: 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2942442

Digital Library

[51]

Lik-Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, Pengyuan Zhou, Lin Wang, Dianlei Xu, Zijun Lin, Abhishek Kumar, Carlos Bermejo, and Pan Hui. 2021. All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05352

[52]

Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò, Markus Klann, and Volker Wulf. 2006. End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm. In End User Development, Henry Lieberman, Fabio Paternò and Volker Wulf (eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_1

[53]

Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2016. Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4032–4043. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858446

Digital Library

[54]

Dapeng Liu, Shaochun Xu, and Wencai Du. 2011. Case Study on Incremental Software Development. In 2011 Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2011.43

Digital Library

[55]

Thomas Ludwig, Julian Dax, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2017. A Practice-Oriented Paradigm for End-User Development. In New Perspectives in End-User Development, Fabio Paternò and Volker Wulf (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_2

[56]

Thomas Ludwig, Volkmar Pipek, and Peter Tolmie. 2018. Designing for Collaborative Infrastructuring: Supporting Resonance Activities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction - CSCW Volume 2, CSCW: 113.

Digital Library

[57]

Thomas Ludwig, Oliver Stickel, Alexander Boden, and Volkmar Pipek. 2014. Towards sociable technologies. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, 835–844. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598528

Digital Library

[58]

Allan MacLean, Kathleen Carter, Lennart Lövstrand, and Thomas Moran. 1990. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI ’90 (Human factors in computing systems), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97271

Digital Library

[59]

Camillia Matuk, Talia Hurwich, and Anna Amato. 2019. How Science Fiction Worldbuilding Supports Students’ Scientific Explanation. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311925

Digital Library

[60]

Philipp Mayring. 2019. Qualitative content analysis: Demarcation, varieties, developments. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 20, 3. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343

[61]

Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174

Digital Library

[62]

Marjan Mernik and Viljem Žumer. 2005. Incremental programming language development. Computer Languages, Systems & Structures 31, 1: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cl.2004.02.001

Digital Library

[63]

Thomas Michaud. 2017. Innovation, Between Science and Science Fiction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119427568

[64]

Colin Milburn. 2010. Modifiable Futures: Science Fiction at the Bench. Isis 101, 3: 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1086/655793

[65]

Clark A Miller and Ira Bennett. 2008. Thinking longer term about technology: is there value in science fiction-inspired approaches to constructing futures? Science and Public Policy 35, 8: 597–606. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X370666

[66]

George R. Milne, Begum Kaplan, Kristen L. Walker, and Larry Zacharias. 2021. Connecting with the future: The role of science fiction movies in helping consumers understand privacy‐technology trade‐offs. Journal of Consumer Affairs 55, 3: 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12366

[67]

Omar Mubin, Kewal Wadibhasme, Philipp Jordan, and Mohammad Obaid. 2019. Reflecting on the Presence of Science Fiction Robots in Computing Literature. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 8, 1: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303706

Digital Library

[68]

Gail C. Murphy. 2019. Beyond Integrated Development Environments: Adding Context to Software Development. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER.2019.00027

Digital Library

[69]

Helen Oliver. 2019. Design Fiction for Real-World Connected Wearables. In The 5th ACM Workshop on Wearable Systems and Applications - WearSys ’19, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325424.3329664

Digital Library

[70]

Harold Ossher, William Harrison, and Peri Tarr. 2000. Software engineering tools and environments. In Proceedings of the conference on The future of Software engineering - ICSE ’00, 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/336512.336569

Digital Library

[71]

Janne Paavilainen, Hannu Korhonen, Kati Alha, Jaakko Stenros, Elina Koskinen, and Frans Mayra. 2017. The Pokémon GO Experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), 2493–2498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025871

Digital Library

[72]

Pritam Panda. 2020. Science Fiction as a Precursor of Advanced Healthcare Technology: An Analysis of Select Science Fiction Narratives. The Criterion Vol. 11, VI.

[73]

Fabio Paternò. 2013. End User Development: Survey of an Emerging Field for Empowering People. ISRN Software Engineering 2013: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/532659

[74]

Nayan B. Ruparelia. 2010. Software development lifecycle models. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 35, 3: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/1764810.1764814

Digital Library

[75]

Daniel M. Russell and Svetlana Yarosh. 2018. Can we look to science fiction for innovation in HCI? Interactions 25, 2: 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178552

Digital Library

[76]

Mahsa Hasani Sadi and Eric Yu. 2014. Analyzing the evolution of software development: From creative chaos to software ecosystems. In 2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2014.6861055

[77]

Theodosios Sapounidis and Stavros Demetriadis. 2017. Educational Robots Driven by Tangible Programming Languages: A Review on the Field. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer Verlag, 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_16

[78]

Michael Schmitz, Christoph Endres, and Andreas Butz. 2008. A Survey of Human-Computer Interaction Design in Science Fiction Movies. https://doi.org/10.5555/1363200.1363210

Digital Library

[79]

Nathan Shedroff and Chris Noessel. 2012. Make it so. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI ’12, 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2254556.2254561

Digital Library

[80]

Yannis Smaragdakis, Shan Shan Huang, and David Zook. 2004. Program generators and the tools to make them. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-Based Program Manipulation, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1014007.1014017

Digital Library

[81]

Gunnar Stevens, Volkmar Pipek, and Volker Wulf. 2009. Appropriation Infrastructure: Supporting the Design of Usages. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00427-8_4

[82]

Lenard George Swamy. 2020. Enhancing Bodily Engagements with Manipulatives for Tangible Programming. In Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50726-8_29

[83]

Donna Teague. A People-First Approach to Programming. https://doi.org/10.5555/1862712.1862737

Digital Library

[84]

Giovanni Maria Troiano, John Tiab, and Youn-Kyung Lim. 2016. SCI-FI. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971489

Digital Library

[85]

Sergi Valverde and Ricard V. Solé. 2015. Punctuated equilibrium in the large-scale evolution of programming languages. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12, 107: 20150249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0249

[86]

A.I. Wasserman. 2000. Software tools: past, present, and future. In Proceedings International Conference on Software Methods and Tools. SMT 2000, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SWMT.2000.890413

[87]

Philip Weber, Kevin Krings, Julia Nießner, Sabrina Brodesser, and Thomas Ludwig. 2021. FoodChattAR: Exploring the Design Space of Edible Virtual Agents for Human-Food Interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3461998

Digital Library

[88]

Mark Weiser. 1999. The computer for the 21st century. ACM SIGMOBILE mobile computing and communications review 3, 3: 3–11.

[89]

H Winschiers and Barbara Paterson. 2004. Sustainable Software Development. In Proceedings of the 2004 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries, 274–278. https://doi.org/10.5555/1035053.1035090

Digital Library

[90]

Richmond Y. Wong, Nick Merrill, and John Chuang. 2018. When BCIs have APIs. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1359–1371. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196746

Digital Library

[91]

Richmond Y Wong, Ellen Van Wyk, and James Pierce. 2017. Real-Fictional Entanglements. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064682

Digital Library

Cited By

Liu JLi S(2024)Toward Artificial Intelligence-Human Paired Programming: A Review of the Educational Applications and Research on Artificial Intelligence Code-Generation ToolsJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633124124046062:5(1385-1415)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240460
Zeqiri AJansen PRixen JRietzler MRukzio E(2024)'Eco Is Just Marketing'Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435588:1(1-27)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643558
Oka HOhnishi ANishida TTerada TTsukamoto M(2024)A Choice-Based Programming Learning Method to Develop Problem-Solving SkillsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344387912(119550-119562)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443879

Index Terms

“What if everyone is able to program?” – Exploring the Role of Software Development in Science Fiction

Recommendations

Vision: Design Fiction for Cybersecurity: Using Science Fiction to Help Software Developers Anticipate Problems
EuroUSEC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 European Symposium on Usable Security

Security and privacy issues are an ever-increasing problem for software systems. To address them, software developers must anticipate the problems that their developed systems may face, using a process we call ‘threat assessment’. Unfortunately, given ...
Neuromancer Workshop: Towards Designing Experiential Entanglement with Science Fiction
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The use of design fiction to speculate an imaginative and critical future has increasingly been recognized in the design research community. Instead of focusing on speculation with a critical position, this paper reports an experiential approach to ...
Chatbots of the gods: imaginary abstracts for techno-spirituality research
NordiCHI '14: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational

This paper reflects on the intersection of human-computer interaction (HCI) with techno-spirituality and science fiction (SF). The paper considers science fiction treatments of spirituality, religion and "the numinous" --- a mysterious presence that ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
562
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)259
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Liu JLi S(2024)Toward Artificial Intelligence-Human Paired Programming: A Review of the Educational Applications and Research on Artificial Intelligence Code-Generation ToolsJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633124124046062:5(1385-1415)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240460
Zeqiri AJansen PRixen JRietzler MRukzio E(2024)'Eco Is Just Marketing'Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435588:1(1-27)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643558
Oka HOhnishi ANishida TTerada TTsukamoto M(2024)A Choice-Based Programming Learning Method to Develop Problem-Solving SkillsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344387912(119550-119562)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443879

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Contents