[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3436369.3436473acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-Target Stance Detection with Multi-Task Learning

Published: 11 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Stance detection plays an important role in the field of online public opinion analysis. The majority of methods of stance detection are for a single target at a once. However, in some situations, multi-target to be analyzed are interrelated, such as several different candidates in an election and different brands of the same product. Detecting the stance of a single target in isolation may lose some information. Some studies have shown that using multi-task learning mechanism for multi-target performs better results than only using a single task. Considering the effectiveness of sentiment features for stance detection in existing researches, we propose a multi-task learning model with sentiment features and at the same time use background lexicon to guide the attention mechanism. We reduce the work of manual labeling and use automatic methods to obtain background knowledge and sentiment information. We use BiLSTM to extract the semantic features and use Multi-Kernel Convolution to get the local features. We use the widely accepted evaluation method and our experiments achieve state-of-the-art results on a benchmark dataset.

References

[1]
AlDayel, A. and Magdy, W. 2020. Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trends. (Jun. 2020), 1--33.
[2]
Bessi, A. et al. 2016. Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation. European Physical Journal: Special Topics. 225, 10 (2016), 2047--2059.
[3]
Campos, R. et al. 2020. YAKE! Keyword extraction from single documents using multiple local features. Information Sciences. 509, (Jan. 2020), 257--289.
[4]
Darwish, K. et al. 2017. Improved Stance Prediction in a User Similarity Feature Space. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017 (New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2017), 145--148.
[5]
Demszky, D. et al. 2019. Analyzing polarization in social media: Method and application to tweets on 21 mass shootings. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference. 1, (2019), 2970--3005.
[6]
Dey, K. et al. 2018. Assessing the Effects of Social Familiarity and Stance Similarity in Interaction Dynamics. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 843--855.
[7]
Dey, K. et al. 2018. Topical stance detection for twitter: A two-phase LSTM model using attention. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2018), 529--536.
[8]
Ebrahimi, J. et al. 2016. A joint sentiment-target-stance model for stance classification in tweets. COLING 2016 - 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2016: Technical Papers. (2016), 2656--2665.
[9]
Fréderic Godin 2019. Improving and Interpreting Neural Networks for Word-Level Prediction Tasks in Natural Language Processing. Ghent University, Belgium.
[10]
Hu, M. and Liu, B. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD '04 (New York, New York, USA, 2004), 168.
[11]
Li, Y. and Caragea, C. 2019. Multi-Task Stance Detection with Sentiment and Stance Lexicons. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019), 6298--6304.
[12]
Mohammad, S. et al. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2016), 31--41.
[13]
Siddiqua, U.A. et al. 2019. Tweet stance detection using an attention based neural ensemble model. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies -Proceedings of the Conference. 1, (2019), 1868--1873.
[14]
Sobhani, P. et al. 2017. A Dataset for Multi-Target Stance Detection. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2017), 551--557.
[15]
Tian, H. et al. 2020. SKEP: Sentiment Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Stroudsburg, PA, USA, May 2020), 4067--4076.
[16]
Wang, P. et al. 2009. Using Wikipedia knowledge to improve text classification. Knowledge and Information Systems. 19, 3 (Jun. 2009), 265--281.
[17]
Wei, P. et al. 2018. Multi-target stance detection via a dynamic memory-augmented network. 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2018. July (2018), 1229--1232.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Incorporate opinion-towards for stance detectionKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108657246:COnline publication date: 23-May-2022
  • (2021)PTMT: Multi-Target Stance Detection with PTM-enhanced Multi-Task Learning2021 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC)10.1109/DSC53577.2021.00038(226-232)Online publication date: Oct-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICCPR '20: Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
October 2020
552 pages
ISBN:9781450387835
DOI:10.1145/3436369
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Beijing University of Technology

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 January 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Multi-task learning
  2. background knowledge
  3. stance detection

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICCPR 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Incorporate opinion-towards for stance detectionKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108657246:COnline publication date: 23-May-2022
  • (2021)PTMT: Multi-Target Stance Detection with PTM-enhanced Multi-Task Learning2021 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC)10.1109/DSC53577.2021.00038(226-232)Online publication date: Oct-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media