[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3424911.3425514acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdlfmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Studying Large Plainchant Corpora Using chant21

Published: 16 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We present chant21, a Python package to support the plainchant formats gabc and Volpiano in music21, and two large corpora of plainchant. The CantusCorpus contains over 60,000 medieval melodies collected from the Cantus database, encoded in the Volpiano typeface. The GregoBaseCorpus contains over 9,000 transcriptions from more recent chant books in the gabc format. Chant21 converts both formats to music21, while retaining the textual structure of the chant: its division in sections, words, syllables and neumes. We present two case studies. First, we report evidence for the melodic arch hypothesis from the GregoBaseCorpus. Second, we analyze connections between differentiæ and antiphon openings in the CantusCorpus, and show that the systematicity of the connection can be quantified using an entropy-based measure.

References

[1]
Olivier Berten and contributors. 2013-2020. GregoBase: A Database of Gregorian Scores. https://gregobase.selapa.net/.
[2]
Dániel Péter Biró, P van Kranenburg, Steven Ness, George Tzanetakis, and Anja Volk. 2012. Stability and Variation in Cadence Formulas in Oral and Semi-Oral Chant Traditions – a Computational Approach. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition and the 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. 98–105.
[3]
Bas Cornelissen, Willem Zuidema, and John Ashley Burgoyne. 2020. Mode Classification and Natural Units in Plainchant. In Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2020). Montréal, Canada.
[4]
Michael Scott Cuthbert and Christopher Ariza. 2010. Music21: A Toolkit for Computer-Aided Musicology and Symbolic Music Data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2010). Utrecht, The Netherlands, 637–642.
[5]
I. Dejanović, G. Milosavljević, and R. Vaderna. 2016. Arpeggio: A Flexible PEG Parser for Python. Knowledge-Based Systems 95 (March 2016), 71–74. https://doi.org/10/f79cb2
[6]
Kyle P. Johnson et al.2014–2019. CLTK: The Classical Language Toolkit. https://github.com/cltk/cltk.
[7]
Bryan Ford. 2004. Parsing Expression Grammars: A Recognition-Based Syntactic Foundation. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages - POPL ’04. ACM Press, Venice, Italy, 111–122. https://doi.org/10/ddkr4k
[8]
Kate Helsen and Debra Lacoste. 2011. A Report on the Encoding of Melodic Incipits in the CANTUS Database with the Music Font ‘Volpiano’. Plainsong and Medieval Music 20, 01 (April 2011), 51–65. https://doi.org/10/bptj5d
[9]
David Huron. 1996. The Melodic Arch in Western Folksongs. Computing in Musicology 10 (1996), 3–23.
[10]
Peter Jeffery. 1992. Re-Envisioning Past Musical Cultures: Ethnomusicology in the Study of Gregorian Chant. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
[11]
Debra Lacoste, Terence Bailey, Ruth Steiner, and Jan Koláček. 1987-2019. Cantus: A Database for Latin Ecclesiastical Chant. http://cantus.uwaterloo.ca/. Directed by Debra Lacoste (2011-), Terence Bailey (1997-2010), and Ruth Steiner (1987-1996). Web developer, Jan Koláček (2011-).
[12]
Samuel A. Mehr, Manvir Singh, Dean Knox, Daniel M. Ketter, Daniel Pickens-Jones, S. Atwood, Christopher Lucas, Nori Jacoby, Alena A. Egner, Erin J. Hopkins, Rhea M. Howard, Joshua K. Hartshorne, Mariela V. Jennings, Jan Simson, Constance M. Bainbridge, Steven Pinker, Timothy J. O’Donnell, Max M. Krasnow, and Luke Glowacki. 2019. Universality and Diversity in Human Song. Science 366, 6468 (2019), eaax0868. https://doi.org/10/ggdvjp
[13]
Maria Panteli and Hendrik Purwins. 2013. A Computational Comparison of Theory and Practice of Scale Intonation in Byzantine Chant. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2013). Curitiba, Brazil, 169–174.
[14]
Harold S. Powers, Frans Wiering, James Porter, James Cowdery, Richard Widdess, Ruth Davis, Marc Perlman, Stephen Jones, and Allan Marett. 2001. Mode. In Grove Music Online. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.43718
[15]
Patrick E. Savage. 2018. An Overview of Cross-Cultural Music Corpus Studies. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nxtbg
[16]
Patrick E. Savage, Adam T. Tierney, and Aniruddh D. Patel. 2017. Global Music Recordings Support the Motor Constraint Hypothesis for Human and Avian Song Contour. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 34, 3 (2017), 327–334. https://doi.org/10/ggmd4f
[17]
Rebecca Shaw. 2018. Differentiae in the Cantus Manuscript Database: Standardization and Musicological Application. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology - DLfM ’18. ACM Press, Paris, France, 38–46. https://doi.org/10/gg572p
[18]
A. T. Tierney, F. A. Russo, and A. D. Patel. 2011. The Motor Origins of Human and Avian Song Structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 37(2011), 15510–15515. https://doi.org/10/b65mxj
[19]
George Tzanetakis, Ajay Kapur, W Andrew Schloss, and Matthew Wright. 2007. Computational Ethnomusicology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 1, 2 (2007), 1–24.
[20]
Peter van Kranenburg and Geert Maessen. 2017. Comparing Offertory Melodies of Five Medieval Christian Chant Traditions. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2017). 204–210.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DLfM '20: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology
October 2020
52 pages
ISBN:9781450387606
DOI:10.1145/3424911
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. datasets
  2. differentia
  3. gabc
  4. melodic arch
  5. plainchant
  6. volpiano

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

DLfM '20

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 27 of 48 submissions, 56%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 104
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media