[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3422337.3447845acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SteemOps: Extracting and Analyzing Key Operations in Steemit Blockchain-based Social Media Platform

Published: 26 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Advancements in distributed ledger technologies are driving the rise of blockchain-based social media platforms such as Steemit, where users interact with each other in similar ways as conventional social networks. These platforms are autonomously managed by users using decentralized consensus protocols in a cryptocurrency ecosystem. The deep integration of social networks and blockchains in these platforms provides potential for numerous cross-domain research studies that are of interest to both the research communities. However, it is challenging to process and analyze large volumes of raw Steemit data as it requires specialized skills in both software engineering and blockchain systems and involves substantial efforts in extracting and filtering various types of operations. To tackle this challenge, we collect over 38 million blocks generated in Steemit during a 45 month time period from 2016/03 to 2019/11 and extract ten key types of operations performed by the users. The results generate SteemOps, a new dataset that organizes more than 900 million operations from Steemit into three sub-datasets namely (i) social-network operation dataset (SOD), (ii) witness-election operation dataset (WOD) and (iii) value-transfer operation dataset (VOD). We describe the dataset schema and its usage in detail and outline possible future research studies using SteemOps. SteemOps is designed to facilitate future research aimed at providing deeper insights on emerging blockchain-based social media platforms.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (codas949d.mp4)
SteemOps is a dataset that organizes over 900 million operations from Steemit into three sub-datasets: 1) social-network operation dataset (SOD); 2) witness-election operation dataset (WOD); 3) value-transfer operation dataset (VOD).

References

[1]
Ashton Anderson et al. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD, pages 850--858. ACM, 2012.
[2]
Alireza Beikverdi and JooSeok Song. Trend of centralization in bitcoin's distributed network. In 2015 IEEE/ACIS 16th SNPD, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2015.
[3]
Steem blockchain [Internet]. Available from. https://developers.steem.io/. Accessed Oct. 2018.
[4]
Vitalik Buterin et al. A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. white paper, 2014.
[5]
Weili Chen, Jun Wu, Zibin Zheng, Chuan Chen, and Yuren Zhou. Market manipulation of bitcoin: evidence from mining the mt. gox transaction network. In IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 964--972. IEEE, 2019.
[6]
Weili Chen, Tuo Zhang, Zhiguang Chen, Zibin Zheng, and Yutong Lu. Traveling the token world: A graph analysis of ethereum erc20 token ecosystem. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020, pages 1411--1421, 2020.
[7]
Kyle Croman et al. On scaling decentralized blockchains. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pages 106--125, 2016.
[8]
Tien Tuan Anh Dinh, Ji Wang, Gang Chen, Rui Liu, Beng Chin Ooi, and Kian-Lee Tan. Blockbench: A framework for analyzing private blockchains. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data, pages 1085--1100, 2017.
[9]
Ittay Eyal. The miner's dilemma. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 89--103. IEEE, 2015.
[10]
Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer. Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In International conference on financial cryptography and data security, pages 436--454. Springer, 2014.
[11]
Emilio Ferrara et al. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7):96--104, 2016.
[12]
Adem Efe Gencer et al. Decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum networks. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pages 439--457. Springer, 2018.
[13]
Maria Glenski, Corey Pennycuff, and Tim Weninger. Consumers and curators: Browsing and voting patterns on reddit. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 4(4):196--206, 2017.
[14]
Jack Hessel et al. Science, askscience, and badscience: On the coexistence of highly related communities. In ICWSM, pages 171--180, 2016.
[15]
Interactive Steem API [Internet]. Available from. https://steem.esteem.ws/. Accessed Oct. 2018.
[16]
Seungwon Eugene Jeong. Centralized decentralization: Does voting matter? simple economics of the dpos blockchain governance. Simple Economics of the DPoS Blockchain Governance (April 21, 2020), 2020.
[17]
Aggelos andothers Kiayias. A puff of steem: Security analysis of decentralized content curation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01719, 2018.
[18]
Moon Soo Kim and Jee Yong Chung. Sustainable growth and token economy design: The case of steemit. Sustainability, 11(1):167, 2019.
[19]
Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias et al. Omniledger: A secure, scale-out, decentralized ledger via sharding. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 583--598. IEEE, 2018.
[20]
Yujin Kwon, Jian Liu, Minjeong Kim, Dawn Song, and Yongdae Kim. Impossibility of full decentralization in permissionless blockchains. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, pages 110--123, 2019.
[21]
Daniel Larimer. Delegated proof-of-stake (dpos). Bitshare whitepaper, 2014.
[22]
Seunghyeon Lee, Changhoon Yoon, Heedo Kang, Yeonkeun Kim, Yongdae Kim, Dongsu Han, Sooel Son, and Seungwon Shin. Cybercriminal minds: an investigative study of cryptocurrency abuses in the dark web. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, pages 1--15. Internet Society, 2019.
[23]
Chao Li and Balaji Palanisamy. Incentivized blockchain-based social media platforms: A case study of steemit. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, pages 145--154, 2019.
[24]
Chao Li and Balaji Palanisamy. Comparison of decentralization in dpos and pow blockchains. In International Conference on Blockchain, pages 18--32. Springer, 2020.
[25]
Qinwei Lin, Chao Li, Xifeng Zhao, and Xianhai Chen. Measuring decentralization in bitcoin and ethereum using multiple metrics and granularities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.10699, 2021.
[26]
Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. 2008.
[27]
Philipp Singer, Emilio Ferrara, Farshad Kooti, Markus Strohmaier, and Kristina Lerman. Evidence of online performance deterioration in user sessions on reddit. PloS one, 11(8):e0161636, 2016.
[28]
Greg Stoddard. Popularity and quality in social news aggregators: A study of reddit and hacker news. In Proceedings of the 24th WWW, pages 815--818. ACM, 2015.
[29]
Chenhao Tan and Lillian Lee. All who wander: On the prevalence and characteristics of multi-community engagement. In Proceedings of the 24th WWW, pages 1056--1066, 2015.
[30]
Mike Thelwall. Can social news websites pay for content and curation? the steemit cryptocurrency model. Journal of Information Science, page 0165551517748290, 2017.
[31]
Gang Wang, Konark Gill, Manish Mohanlal, Haitao Zheng, and Ben Y Zhao. Wisdom in the social crowd: an analysis of quora. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 1341--1352. ACM, 2013.
[32]
Jiaping Wang and Hao Wang. Monoxide: Scale out blockchains with asynchronous consensus zones. In 16th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 19), pages 95--112, 2019.
[33]
Haaroon Yousaf, George Kappos, and Sarah Meiklejohn. Tracing transactions across cryptocurrency ledgers. In 28th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 19), pages 837--850, 2019.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessment of Wealth Distribution in Blockchain Online Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.322892511:1(671-682)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2024)Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of User Collusion Behavior in Blockchain Online Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.321518511:1(522-530)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2024)A wealth-driven analysis of user engagement in Blockchain Online Social Media2024 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops)10.1109/PerComWorkshops59983.2024.10502449(637-642)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. SteemOps: Extracting and Analyzing Key Operations in Steemit Blockchain-based Social Media Platform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CODASPY '21: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy
      April 2021
      348 pages
      ISBN:9781450381437
      DOI:10.1145/3422337
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 April 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. blockchain
      2. dataset
      3. social network
      4. steem

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

      Conference

      CODASPY '21
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 149 of 789 submissions, 19%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Assessment of Wealth Distribution in Blockchain Online Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.322892511:1(671-682)Online publication date: Feb-2024
      • (2024)Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of User Collusion Behavior in Blockchain Online Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2022.321518511:1(522-530)Online publication date: Feb-2024
      • (2024)A wealth-driven analysis of user engagement in Blockchain Online Social Media2024 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops)10.1109/PerComWorkshops59983.2024.10502449(637-642)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Federated Analytics-Empowered Frequent Pattern Mining for Decentralized Web 3.0 ApplicationsIEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM52122.2024.10621294(801-810)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
      • (2024)Influence maximization in blockchain social networks: a heterogeneous LDAG approachWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-024-01308-w27:6Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
      • (2023)The Effect of Monetary Incentives on Health Care Social Media Content: Study Based on Topic Modeling and Sentiment AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4430725(e44307)Online publication date: 11-May-2023
      • (2023)Liquid Democracy in DPoS BlockchainsProceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure10.1145/3594556.3594606(25-33)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Dynamic Influence Maximization with WoM Sensitivity in Blockchain Online Social Network2023 IEEE International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing & Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical & Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics)10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-SmartData-Cybermatics60724.2023.00074(326-333)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2023
      • (2023)Exploring Downvoting in Blockchain-based Online Social Media Platforms2023 IEEE 9th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE Intl Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, (HPSC) and IEEE Intl Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS)10.1109/BigDataSecurity-HPSC-IDS58521.2023.00022(66-71)Online publication date: May-2023
      • (2023)Cross-Consensus Measurement of Individual-level Decentralization in Blockchains2023 IEEE 9th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE Intl Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, (HPSC) and IEEE Intl Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS)10.1109/BigDataSecurity-HPSC-IDS58521.2023.00018(45-50)Online publication date: May-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media